Chapter 36

Concert of World Powers in 2000’s

“Global Clash of Races-Diplomacy of Civilizations” © (2006) Kalki Gaur

36(1) Talk Points

(1) Concert of World to Hold USA in Check

One. The world powers in 2003 formed informal alliance to hold America in check by pooling their diplomatic assets, just as in 1814 European powers had agreed to hold any preeminent European power in check, by creating alliances to maintain the balance of power in Europe. The Concert of Europe established at the 1814 Congress of Vienna maintained peace in Europe from 1814 to 1914. The G-8 Summit meeting at Evian France, indirectly established the Concert of World, when President Chirac invited President Hu Jintao and Prime Minister as guests for formal meetings with the G-8 summit leaders at the side lines of the Summit. The world leaders would pool their diplomatic assets to hold America in check, just as at the Congress of Vienna European powers met to hold France in check and later on Germany in check. The Balance of Power among world civilizations would maintain peace and order in the 3rd Millennium. The Concert of World Civilizations would stabilize the global balance of power in 21st Century, just as the Concert of Europe did for 100 years after 1814 Congress of Vienna. The Six world powers shall manage the world order in the 21st Century, and they shall be United States, Russia, China, India, Japan and France-Germany. The world powers are also Civilization States. Russia represents White Russian Slav Civilization. India represents Brown Hindu Indian Civilization. China represents the yellow Buddhist Chinese Civilization. American represented the white protestant American Civilization. The Concert of World Powers, United States, China, India, Russia and France, can also be called the Concert of World Civilizations.

(2) India China Europe America Russia Japan

Two. The six world powers representing Concert of the World shall be: (a) American Civilization jointly represented by Protestant United States and Britain, (b) Slav Civilization represented by Russia, (c) European Union represented jointly by Catholic France-Germany, (d) Buddhist Civilization represented by China, (e) Hindu Civilization represented by India, and (f) Shinto Civilization represented by Japan. No Islamic nation is big enough either in size of economy or military power to be part of the Concert of World powers. Israel is a nation of 6 million and GNP ($100 billion) not big enough to join the Concert of World. The minimum size of the economy of the members of the concert of the World shall be GNP of $2 trillion. The largest economies in terms of GNP at PPP are United States ($8.4 trillion), China ($4.1 trillion), Japan ($3 trillion), India ($2.2 trillion), Germany ($1.8 trillion), France ($1.3 trillion), Britain ($1.2 trillion), and Russia ($929 billion). The Six civilization power system become eight-world power system, represented by USA, China, Russia, Germany, France, India, Britain and Japan.

 

(3) Demise of NATO

Three. The trans Atlantic alliance, NATO reached a definitive end in the Iraq War in April 2003, due to the determined opposition to Germany, France and Belgium. The Concert of Europe (1814-1914), the Congress System established by 1814 Congress of Vienna got a sudden rebirth in March 2003, when Germany, France, Russia and China joined diplomatic assets to oppose President Bush. One superpower system ended when America failed to buy, coerce, woo, and threaten to gain support of Non Aligned Nations Non Permanent Members of the UN Security Council, namely, Angola, Cameroon, Guinea, Chile and Pakistan, on British-American Resolution on Iraq. United States, Britain, Spain and Italy were thoroughly humiliated in the corridors of United Nations. The Non Aligned Movement and the United Nations became relevant once again. The world became multi-polar once again in April 2003.

 

(4) Civilization’s Right of Preemptive Strikes

Four. The Civilization State principle established the Great Powers’ right to undertake preemptive strikes against terrorist nations, religious intolerance to maintain the integrity of Civilizations. Great Powers would not onwards have a right to establish colonial empires and oil colonies to secure their oil and gas supplies. The predator religious intolerance of Semite Wahhabi terrorism, Semite Zionism, Semite Catholicism emerged as the global nexus of religious intolerance to threaten the world civilizations. The growing Vatican-Mecca Axis of religious intolerance and Semite Tel Aviv-Riyadh Axis of Mecca Caliphate secured the support of American oil colonialism, and emerged as the principle threat to world civilizations.

 

(5) Catholic Cocaine & Sunni Heroin Cartel

Five. The growing nexus of Catholic Cocaine Cartel and Semite Wahhabi Heroin created the global nexus of organized crime that apparently took over Capitalist financial markets by their financial clout of $750 billion annual incomes of drug cartels. The Mecca-Vatican Axis of Intolerance financed by Catholic Cocaine-Sunni heroin nexus. The income of Semite OPEC Oil Cartel, Semite Diamond Cartel, Catholic Cocaine Cartel, joined forces with predator religious Semite Wahhabi cult to destabilize the Civilization states of Russia, India, Iraq and Yugoslavia to gain control over the oil and gas reserves of Arabian Gulf and Caspian Central Asia.

 

(6) Eight-Power Multi Polar World Order

First, the leading eight world powers are United States, China, India, Germany, France, Britain, Russia and Japan. The New Millennium heralded the Multi-Polar World Order that replaced bipolar world order of the Cold War era (1945-1990), and one-superpower system of the post-Cold War age (1990-2000). Decline of the second super power, the Soviet Union did not increase the lead of United States over other great powers, namely, China, Japan and India. The decline of nuclear Russia resulted in multi-polar world order replacing the bipolar world order. United States is the preeminent Super Power of the world, but not the Sole Super Power of the world in 2003. Nuclear China and Economic giant Japan and nuclear India have emerged as world powers in 2003. Germany has eclipsed Britain as the major power in European Union. The largest economic powers of the world in the declining order are, United States, China, Japan, India, Germany, France and Britain. The eight-power Concert of World Powers, consisting of United States, China, India, Japan, Germany, France, Britain and Russia, should preside over the multi-polar new world order in 21st Century. The Concert of the World Powers created when in Feb 2003, replicating the Congress of Vienna of 1814, when Germany and France were joined by Russia and China to oppose America’s declared objective to invade Iraq.

 

(7) 8-Power Concert of World Congress System

Second, America, Russia, China, India, Germany, France, Britain, and Japan would operate and manage the Concert of World and 8-power Congress System. Throughout history the preeminence of any single nation in world order has caused wars. The Raison d’etat and Balance of power principle determine the counter moves of the other major world powers that unite to balance the preeminent power. The preeminence of France in (1618-1814) period caused Napoleonic wars. The preeminence of Germany in early part of 20th century caused First World War and the Second World War. The preeminence of United States after 1945 caused numerous wars, military coups, though it was kept in check by the Soviet Union and the Non-Aligned Movement led by India. The demise of the Soviet Union and the preeminence of United States gave birth to American imperial wars in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Iraq. Only the Concert of Eight World Powers would maintain world peace and stable world order in 21st Century. Foreign-policy alignments have gone mad worldwide. A bizarre diplomatic coalition consisting of Russia, China, France and Germany confronted the United States, Britain, Italy and Poland, in February 2003 at UN Security council Meeting on Iraq Crisis. Who could have imagined such a combination just 10 years ago besides readers of political thrillers? Iraqi President Saddam Hussein provoked the great divide in world politics. The situation is diplomatically tough because if Pentagon goes to war in Iraq over the objections of Moscow, Beijing, Paris and Berlin, the entire Mid East situation may deteriorate, and France and Russia may regain their influence over oil-producing Arab world.

 

(8) Colonial Empires of 21st Century

Third, the 21st Century shall be similar to 18th and 19th Centuries, wherein Colonial Empires competed with one another for colonial expansionism. Neo-Colonial Empires staged a comeback in the 21st Century that seeks to exploit the oil, gas and mineral resources of colonies, but restores religious and political control to the fundamentalist religious clergy or military coup leaders. President George W. Bush ushered in the Age of Neo-Colonial Oil-Colonialism in the 21st Century, by rationally justifying American national interests defined as control over Oil and gas resources of the oil-producing nations. The post 1945 foreign policy of United States consistently promoted the interests of American Oil Colonialism throughout oil-producing nations. The Bush 43 Administration camouflages the Bush Oil Administration, and the interests of American Oil Colonialism determine the foreign policy of the White House. India also accepts the legitimacy of the Neo-imperial Oil-Colonialism and return of the colonial Empires in the 21st Century. President Bush by declaring America’s war on Islamic Terror legitimized the new age of Neo-Colonial Empires in the 21st Century. If President Bush wanted, he has the moral and legal authority to create American oil colonies and herald the new age of colonial empires and other great powers would follow the suit and create the new colonial empires of their own to secure their supplies of oil, gas and other strategic minerals and metals.

 

(9) Supra National Confederations

Fourth, the multinational regional confederations, regional federations, and regional Empires, the likes of European Union would replace the post-Second World war system of multitudes of smaller independent sovereign states in Asia, Africa and South America. In 21st Century more than 100 nation states would lose the independence and sovereignty and would get merged in the regional supra national groupings. Most of the nations that have population less than 50 million, and area of 1,000,000 sq. km. would lose their separate independent sovereign status and would merge in regional confederations. There should not be more than 20 sovereign, independent states in the world in 2050 AD. There should be no more than 3 sovereign states in the continent of Africa. The nation states in the Continent of Asia should be grouped under 5 or 6 regional federations. The continent of South America and Central America should be reorganized into 3 or 4 Regional Confederations. The Eight World Powers should express the relationship between the global balance of power and a shared sense of legitimacy by partitioning the world in eight spheres of influence, where every world power could establish colonies.

 

(10) 9/11 Created Multi-Polar World Order

Fifth, Osama Bin Laden destroyed the one-superpower international system by 9/11 attacks. India supports the Multi-Polar world order. The terrorist attacks of 9/11 by Osama Bin Laden and President Bush declaration of America’s war on Islamic terrorism created Multi-Polar New World Order in September 2001 and ended the Uni-Polar world order that had replaced the end of the Bipolar-world order of the Cold War, after the demise of the Soviet Union in 1990. From 1990 to 2001, the one-superpower system defined the post-Cold War new world order. The vulnerability of the homeland of sole-superpower exposed by the terrorist attacks on financial and military centers, ended the one-superpower system and replaced it by Multi-Polar world order, dominated by 8-world powers, namely, United States, Russia, China, India, France, Germany, Japan and Britain. The myth of the sole-super power status of the Protestant Christian United States exposed as Paper Tiger by the ferocity of the Wahhabi Muslim terrorist attacks that caused more than $5 trillion in economic damages to the United States. Failure of the Pentagon to arrest Osama Bin Laden and any senior Al Qaeda terrorist in Afghanistan exposed the military effectiveness of the American Armed Forces in Asian land warfare. President Bush’s invasions of Iraq, without first finishing the Taliban and Al Qaeda menace in Afghanistan exposed the moral foundations of the Wilsonianism, which had justified America’s War on Islamic terrorism, as a mere camouflage for the American Neo-Colonial war for establishing American Oil colonies in Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan and Iraq. The military effectiveness of Muslim terrorist attacks on Christian American economic infrastructure on 9/11, and the ineffectiveness of American armed forces to capture Osama Bin Laden, coupled with the loss of the moral legitimacy of the America’s war on Islamic terrorism, and the America’s naked Oil colonialism in Iraq, ended the one-superpower system of 1990s and ushered in a new era of Multi-Polar world order of the 21st Century in 2002. President Bush would have failed to invade Afghanistan without the declared support of India, Russia and Pakistan, and it means that United States failed to prove that it is the sole super power of the world. United States continues to be the preeminent world power and the leading world power in the 8-power new Multi-polar world order. There are four independent centers of the power constituting the four major poles of the 8-power world system, namely, United States, Russia, India, and European Union.

 

(11) Civilization Empire Strikes First

Sixth, the 9/11 attacks sounded the death warrant on the legitimacy of smaller nations that misused concept the independence and sovereignty of nation states to harbor terrorists and sponsor religious terrorism and intolerance. The 9/11 attacks eroded the legitimacy of the newly independent states that emerged as a result of the decolonization. President George W. Bush wisely enunciated the new ‘Pre-emptive Empire Strikes First” national security strategy. It justified preemptive strikes against terrorists, because in the age of weapons of mass destruction, the civilizations would be foolish to allow barbarians strike first. The 9/11 terrorist attacks on Twin Towers and Pentagon exposed the Achilles’ heels of the so called sole superpower of the world, and ushered in the new age of multi-polar world order. President Bush’s attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq to establish American Oil colonies in Caspian basin and Iraq ushered in the new Age of Neo-Colonial Empires in the 21st Century. Australia’s Prime Minister John Howard wisely argued that United Nations charter should be changed to allow a country to launch strikes against any threat conventional or terrorist. President Bush’s unilateral invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, and the doctrine of preemptive strikes against terrorist nations, establishes the precedent under customary international law that allows every one of the eight great powers to launch military strikes against terrorist nations, and terrorist-sponsoring nations.

 

(12) Anachronistic Smaller States System

Seventh, just as feudal Papal States became anachronistic after Napoleonic wars, and colonialism became anachronistic after the Second world war, the smaller, weaker fundamentalist theocratic states became anachronistic after the Wahhabi Muslim terrorist attacks of the 9/11, which ushered in the new Age of Neo-Colonial Empires based on Oil, Gas, Diamond and Gold colonialism in the 21st Century. Many of the smaller and weaker nation states of the Third World, shall cease to be the entities constituting the international system and world order in the 21st Century, and may lose their independent and sovereign status. In each transition of the International system, the change of the world order, what had been taken for granted suddenly became anachronistic, as Papal Empire of the 17th and 18th Century, and multinational Empires of the 19th Century and the Colonialism in the 20th Century became anachronistic, though it had been taken for granted for many centuries. In 21st Century the multitude of newly independent states that emerged out of the disintegration of the European Colonial Empires, would also become anachronistic in the 21st Century, though in the post-1945 era emergence of the newly independent states had been taken for granted. Every world order expresses an aspiration to permanence and the very term has a ring of eternity about it. World systems live precariously and the elements and components that comprise International systems are in constant flux. Whenever the entities constituting the international system change their character, a period of turmoil inevitably follows. The legal and political entities constituting the international system shall change in 21st Century. The multitude of the newly independent states of Africa and Asia that emerged after the Second World War would lose their independent and sovereign status and they shall merge into European Union type regional confederations led by major regional powers. The supra nationalism would replace nationalism and supra national regional groupings would replace smaller nation states as the legal entities constituting the new world order and the international system. Neo-colonial empires and regional confederations would become the legal entities constituting the international system of the 21st Century. These are the issues that the author raises in this chapter.

 

36(2) 2003 Concert of Europe

 

(1) Concert of World Civilizations

The Concert of World Civilizations would stabilize the global balance of power in 21st Century, just as the Concert of Europe did for 100 years after 1814 Congress of Vienna. The Six world powers shall manage the world order in the 21st Century, and they shall be United States, Russia, China, India, Japan and France-Germany. First, The six world powers representing Concert of the World shall be American Civilization represented by Protestant United States, Slav Civilization represented by Russia, European Union represented jointly by Catholic France-Germany, Buddhist Civilization represented by China, Hindu Civilization represented by India, and Shinto Civilization represented by Japan. No Islamic nation is big enough either in size of economy or military power to be part of the Concert of World powers.

 

(2) Old Europe Strikes Back

The powers of “Old Europe” namely Germany and France brought back the instruments of “Old Diplomacy” namely “Raison d’etat and Balance of Power to develop a common front of Russia, Germany, France and Belgium to balance the hegemony of the United States and restore the balance of power in Eurasia. The age one-superpower system is over and Great Powers would recreate the Congress System to check and tame the preeminence of the leading world power. The great Power Concert of Europe checked the preeminence of France and Germany in 1814 to 1914 period. In February 2003, President Vladimir Putin of Russia and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and French President Jacques Chirac, met after President Bush’s first war on Afghanistan and before Bush’s Second war on Iraq. Putin, Schroeder, and Chirac will continue to meet for summit meetings during America’s War for Iraqi oil. After the First Napoleonic wars, Austria, Prussia, Russia, England assembled in Vienna in September 1814 to plan the postwar world. The Congress of Vienna continued to meet all during Napoleon’s escape from Elba and Napoleon’s final defeat at Waterloo. In 1806, the vestigal Holy Roman Empire was abolished. By 1818, France was admitted to the Congress System at periodic European congresses, which for a Century (1814-1964) came close to constituting the government of Europe.

 

(3) EU is undoing Richelieu’s Work

European Union of 2000 is anti-thesis of Richelieu’s work of 1600. European Union uniting Europe, while Richelieu worked to keep Central Europe divided. Congress of Vienna united into German Federation 300-pre Napoleonic states. European Union united East European States into European State. However Germany and France adopted the Richelieu’s Raison D’etat to undermine Communism and the Soviet Union, just as Richelieu had undermined the Holy Roman Empire.

 

The architects at the Congress of Vienna recognized that if Central Europe were to have peace and stability, they would have to undo Richelieu’s work of the 1600s. Richelieu had fostered a weak, fragmented Central Europe, providing France with a standing temptation to encroach and to turn it into a virtual playground for the French Army. Thus the statesmen at Vienna set about consolidating, but not unifying, Germany. Austria and Prussia were the leading German states, followed by Bavaria, Wurttemberg and Saxony. The 300-odd pre-Napoleonic German states were combined into some thirty and bound together in a new entity called the German Federation.

 

(4) New Concert of the World of 2003

The Great Power concert of Europe, the Congress System that began on September 1814, took a rebirth after its incarnation as the Concert Of World, in February 2003, when Germany, France denounced by Americans as “Old Europe” aligned with Russia to start a new age of Raison d’etat, Balance of Power and Great Power concert of Europe to check the preeminence of America and to jointly balance the hegemony of United States in world politics, by pooling the economic resources of Germany, diplomatic resources of France and military and nuclear resources of Russia. The Schroeder, Chirac and Putin seek to jointly tame the Yankee shrew. France Preventing American Hegemony after the demise of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War. After the end of the ideological divide in Europe, however, French policy began quickly to reorient itself. As early at 1996, the incoming French foreign minister, Herve de Charette, described the role of French foreign policy as "Preventing American Hegemony."

 

(5) Great Concert of World Powers

Germany, France launched the Great Concert of World Powers in February 2003 by teeming with Russia to balance the hegemony of the United States. The Great Concert of World Powers got a sudden start with Russia, Germany and France putting their foot down on President Bush’s war on Iraq. Russia and German positions are very close, after talks between Mr. Putin and Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder. Forming a strong three-way alliance between Russia, France and Germany would be seen as a diplomatic coup for Paris and Berlin, previously dismissed by US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld as "Old Europe". Germany’s fresh proposals on boosting weapons inspectors, based on the French plan, was presented to the Security Council, and it set up a direct confrontation with the US, which has dismissed it as a diversion. 'German proposal, to send thousands of UN troops to back up the weapons inspectors, was being played down in Paris and Berlin on Monday. Europe remains deeply split over the way forward on Iraq. The UK is leading a bloc of countries, including Spain and Italy, supportive of the US position, while France, Germany and Russia remain powerful "war skeptics". Russia’s president Vladimir Putin pledged to work closely with France and Germany with the aim of achieving a peaceful resolution to the crisis in Iraq, to scuttle America’s war efforts. Russia is convinced that a one-sided use of force would lead to great suffering for the Iraqi population and increase tension in the whole region. Germany wants to make sure jointly with Russia and France that there is a peaceful disarmament of Iraq, so that American does not end up owning most of the Iraqi oil after the war. China, Russia, France and Germany are all Security Council members, share similar view on Iraqi crisis. However, Russia does not want to use its veto at the UN because it could ruin the newfound strategic partnership between Moscow and Washington.

 

Russia and France, two of the most powerful players in the Iraq crisis, held key talks on the way forward. Russian President Vladimir Putin arrived in Paris, and was met by French President Jacques Chirac at the start of three days of Summit-level talks, which was dominated by the Iraqi crisis. Mr. Putin's visit began as Europe's divisions on Iraq also surfaced dramatically in a heated Nato meeting in Brussels. France and Belgium blocked plans to boost Turkish defenses ahead of any war with Iraq. Chirac broke with protocol to go the airport At the Paris talks. France and Russia remained in agreement that weapons inspectors need more time and more manpower. Both France and Russia have the power of veto on the UN Security Council, and are trying to steer the Iraqi crisis away from America’s war on Iraqi Oil. Central to the Paris talks will be French proposals to boost the number of inspectors possibly to 300. Mr. Putin arrived in Paris at a time when France and Russia appeared to be on the same diplomatic wavelength. The divisions within European Union and NATO over whether to back American military action against Iraq became very stark in February 2003. Under influence of Britain, France and Germany were not asked to sign an open letter published by eight European leaders, which urged Europe and the United States to stand together to rid the world of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. Statement signatories are five members of the European Union - Britain, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Denmark, and three countries due to join next year, Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic. On the 40th anniversary of their friendship treaty, France and Germany said they would work together in the Security Council to try to prevent a war on Iraq. The open letter from eight countries close to Washington is a riposte to that, it lays bare the divisions within Europe and draws up the battle lines for the final phase of diplomacy in the Iraq confrontation.

 

Turkey immediately requested emergency consultations under NATO's mutual defense treaty - or Article 4 - the first time a nation has done so in the alliance's 53-year history. But those consultations ended Monday without resolution. They were to continue Tuesday at the North Atlantic Council, NATO's political body. The veto has deepened divisions in the alliance over the Iraq crisis, with American ambassador Nicholas Burns accusing the three of plunging NATO into crisis. The United States lobbied hard in January and February 2003 for NATO to begin preparations to protect Turkey in case it came under attack from Iraq. United States won support from 16 of the 19 NATO allies. Turkey, the only NATO nation bordering Iraq, is a likely staging ground for a U.S.-led war. The NATO plan would include preparations to send Turkey AWACs early warning planes; Patriot missile interceptor batteries and units specialized in counter-germ warfare and anti-poison gas operations. Just an hour before the order to start the NATO military planning was to be given France, Germany and Belgium intervened, saying it risked undermining efforts to end the Iraq crisis peacefully. "Belgium opposed it arguing that it would signify that we have already entered into the logic of war that any chance, any initiative to still resolve the conflict in a peaceful way was gone. America called the France, Germany and Belgium’s move as most unfortunate decision, because of it NATO now faced a crisis of credibility, from which it may never recover.

 

(6) Loss of American Credibility

Napoleon Bonaparte and Adolf Hitler lost the wars because they lost the credibility in the eyes of the world. World leaders simply didn’t believe the words they said. The superpower status is a political status, and the loss of credibility causes the erosion of the super power status. World leaders beginning to suspect that Bush Administration waging war for Oil Colonialism, camouflaged as America’s war on terrorism, after its failure to arrest even a single top leader of the Al Qaeda terrorist network after the war on Afghanistan, where it continues to build up NATO troops deployment disproportionate to its need. The loss of credibility of Bush Administration in the America’s war on terrorism, which suddenly became the War for Oil Colonialism, forced Germany, France and Russia to come out openly against President Bush’s policies on War on Iraq. You can't trust the government; you can't believe what they say, and you can't rely on their judgment. People do things the president wants to do even though it's wrong, and the president can be wrong. These words, uttered in the Oval Office in the early 1970s by then White House chief of staff H.R. Haldeman, paraphrased the thinking of another presidential adviser, Donald Rumsfeld. According to H.R. Haldeman, who was then working in the White House, Donald Rumsfeld understood that the American public had lost faith in government as a result of the publication in 1971 of the Pentagon Papers, which showed the administration was not being entirely truthful with the public about the Vietnam War. But 30 years later, same Donald Rumsfeld, as the defense secretary, tells the American public to trust President Bush's unproven claim that America’s War on Iraq is not for American Oil Colonialism but for Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction. Remember that former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara, in his memoir, “In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam,” acknowledged that he and Nixon misled the nation about the prospects for victory in Vietnam. McNamara apologized for failing to negotiate an early settlement of the war that could have saved thousands of young American lives. In a subsequent book, McNamara admitted the war was prolonged by a lack of communication between the leaders of the United States and Vietnam. McNamara said Nixon made a big mistake by acting without the support of U.S. allies in Europe and elsewhere.

 

36(3) Civilizations’ Colonialism

 

(1) 21st Century alike Colonial 18th Century

President George W. Bush changed history by establishing the legal precedent that Civilization Empires can and should undertake preemptive strikes against terrorists, without waiting to be attacked first. The 18th Century Colonialism has staged a comeback in the 21st Century, in form of Oil-Colonialism. The Oil-colonialism does not want to promote Christianity and is content in exploiting the oil and gas resources of the nation. Under Neo-Colonialism great powers would establish oil-colonies, gold-colonies, diamond-colonies and mineral-colonies throughout the Third World. It shall be the legitimate responsibility of the eight world powers to establish oil-colonies and mineral-colonies in the Third World, as it would promote world peace and balance the preeminence of the United States. Germany, France, Russia, India, China and Japan and Britain have the right inherent in the great power status to establish colonial empires in the 21st century. Colonialism has staged a comeback after the American invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq and the genie cannot be forced back into the battle. Whatever rights President Bush exercised as the leader of the American civilization, against weaker mineral-rich nations, became legitimate rights of the great powers in the 21st Century, as customary international law. President Bush has changed the course of world history, and caused the rebirth of the New Age of Colonial Empires in the 21st Century. American Civilization Empire’s doctrine of pre-emptive strikes against terrorists is just, moral and correct response of the Civilization under the assault of barbarians. American Civilization led by President Bush enunciated the “New Pre-emptive Empire Strikes First” policy underlying the 2002 national security strategy, drafted by Dick Cheney, Scooter Libby, Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle, to justify attacks on Iraq. American Civilization should not hesitate to turn United States into a political laboratory to imposing democracy, freedom and women’s rights in the Arab world. After toppling tyrant Saddam Hussein American Oil Colonialism in Iraq, would create a domino effect to plant democracy throughout oil-producing Wahhabi Muslim world, and orchestrate more freedom throughout the Middle East. The preeminent Civilizations should not be shy in playing hardball with terrorists, and assert their legitimate role as the new sheriff throughout the pro-terrorist world. The Civilization Empires have the right to assert military domination over terrorist nations to tame the breeding ground of the barbarians and terrorists. India should support the American invasions of the pro-terrorism Islamic world to establish American Oil colonies throughout the oil-rich Islamic world. American oil colonialism is the suitable response of the Civilizations to the barbarian invasions. However every one of the eight great powers, that comprise the Concert of the World, enjoys the privilege to establish Oil Colonies over oil-producing and mineral-rich nations, similar to what President Bush asserted United States had over Afghanistan, Iraq, Colombia, Angola, Guinea and Venezuela.

 

(2) How Civilization Empire Responds?

How should the philosophical inquiry into the cause, effect and resolution of the Global Clash of Races, advise the present leaders of Protestant United States, Hindu India, Buddhist China, Buddhist Japan and Orthodox Russia to fine tune their diplomacy and military strategy to check the growing menace of predatory religious sects and drug-financed religious terrorism, which threatens the continued existence of multi-ethnic, multi-religion, multi-linguistic Civilization-Nation states? In a nutshell: How should the Civilization-Nation Empires, United States, India, Russia and China strike back at the militant religious terrorist Cults that are financed by global drug trade?

 

(3) Predator Snakehead Fish & Predator Cults

Predator Asian northern snakehead fish is a nasty-looking fish with a nasty name and a nastier reputation. The voracious snakeheads eats their way through the pond, then walk on their fins on the land, until they chewed their way into another lake, as it can survive more than two days without water. To treat Asian northern snakeheads humanely means the genocide of other peaceful species of fish. Wildlife officials have determined that snakeheads have to die, which can be done, either by explosives, or electricity or by poisoning. Elimination of predator fish Asian northern snakehead, whether by explosives, or by electricity or by poisoning of the lake, would kill many other fish also, even then it would be more humane then allowing predator Asian northern snakehead fish to let live. Like predator Asian northern snakehead fish, the Sunni Wahhabi Cult practices by merely 2% Muslims of the world, about 20 million in Arabian Peninsula, is a ‘Predator Religious Sect,’ which civilized Muslim world’s leaders believe determined to conquer the Islamic world, by forcing its way through the Muslim world by anti-women religious fundamentalism and terrorism Islamism, funded by Heroin drug trade and OPEC oil-incomes. The problem of the philosophy is to advise: Should multi-ethnic Civilization-Nation Empire deploy overwhelming force to eradicate the breeding grounds of predator religious cults to protect the integrity of multi-ethnic plural Civilization nation states?

 

(4) Idolaters Response to Iconoclasts

What should be the just response of brown Indian and yellow Chinese and Japanese civilizations to the wars launched by white Iconoclast Christians and Muslims on brown Hindu and yellow Buddhist Idolaters. Buddhist Chinese and Japanese can visually identify with the pain and suffering of 9 million European women, men and children that were tortured, raped and burnt on stakes as witches during Medieval Catholic Inquisition, by looking at the skulls of some of the 2 million Cambodian Buddhist monks, nuns, educated men and women massacred by Catholic Khmer Rouge, who set up 20th Century’s Catholic Inquisition during terrorist reign of Catholic Pol Pot in Cambodia, who was placed into power by Jewish Henry J. Kissinger and Christian-Communist Mao tse tung, even when yellow Buddhists had militarily defeated the white Christian super power in the Vietnam War.

 

(5) 1994 Moscow Declaration on the Protection of Interests of Pluralists States

The Moscow Declaration on the Protection of Interests of Pluralists States became the bedrock of India-Russia relations. As multi-ethnic, multi-religious and pluralistic societies the declaration focuses on the rise of non-military challenges to India and Russia’s Territorial integrity. These challenges are the rise of ethnic nationalism, religious and political extremism and separatism. Today these negative tendencies have acquired an insidious dimension in form of Islamic international terrorism.

 

(6) Rise of European Neo-Nazism

Rumsfeld’s comment could result in Nazi governments in Berlin and Paris before 2020 AD. Fascism takes birth when some hostile power insults the nation. Hitler came into power, because the Allied victors insulted Germany, German civilization and German people. The 21st clones of Adolf Hitler and Napoleon Bonaparte, could take birth, and acquire political power in Germany and France, within a decade, partly due to the tactless insults hurled by Donald Rumsfeld.

 

(7) Rise of German & French Oil Colonialism

France and Germany powers gathered at Versailles not to humiliate but to toast each other, so that Germany and France could join forces to establish European Oil Colonies in competition with Pentagon, NATO and American Big Oil. The goal of President Jacques Chirac and Chancellor Schroeder is to create French-German Oil Colonial Empire in oil-producing counties, in direct competition with American Big Oil.

 

(8) Rise of Colonial European Powers

Passing from 15 to 25 members in 2002, the European Union is not only in danger of being diluted into a toothless impotent free trade zone, enlarged European Union risks being transformed into a simple protectorate of the United States. Germany and France paying through their nose to subsidize the poor economies of Poland, and other 10 poor east European Cousin, only to realize that Poland’s president, Aleksander Kwasniewski, the most gung-ho new member of NATO, declared, “if it is President Bush’s vision, it is mine.” Why should Western Christian Germany and France pay to feed impoverished Poland, only to find that the Poland declared to be willing hired mercenary of Yankee President, even to attack Germany and France at the bidding of the White House if the situation ever warranted in future. Germany and France realized to their dismay that inclusion of East Europeans at great economic costs to Germany and France, allowed to hire the mercenary troops of demobilized soviet satellites at no economic cost to the Pentagon. How could German and French leaders be so foolish? Expansion of European Union to include East Europeans has weakened France and Germany, threatened the national security of Germany and France. Pentagon-led NATO presents greater threat to the integrity and security of Germany and France, more than the threat posed by Stalin’s Russia at the height of the Cold War.

 

(9) Dynamics of New World Order

From 1814 to 1914 the five-great power multipolar world, managed the European affairs by Congress System, the periodic Summit Meetings called Congresses, by diplomats of Austria, Prussia, Russia, France and Britain. From 1945 to 1990, the two super powers, United States and Soviet Union, managed the bipolar world affairs of First World and Second World. From 1950 to the disintegration of the Soviet Union, Non-Aligned Movement led by India, Egypt, Yugoslavia managed the foreign policies of the Third World, to the great dismay of two super powers. From 1990 to 2002, the world became one-superpower system, the unipolar world, led by United States. The 1998 nuclear weapon tests by India and Pakistan, and the rise of Vladimir Putin as the President and dictator of Russian federation in 2000, and the transfer of power to new generation led by Hu Jintao in China in 2002, made the 21st Century world multi-polar again as it was during the 19th Century, after the Congress of Vienna during the Congress System set up by the Concert of Europe. The eight leading World Powers in 2002, in the descending order with their GNPs at PPP are: United States (1st, $8.4 trillion), China (2nd, $4.1 trillion), Japan (3rd, $3 trillion), India (4th, 2.2 trillion), Germany (5th, 1.8 trillion), France (6th, $1.3 trillion), Britain (7th, $1.2 trillion), Russia (10th, $929 billion). The four-power Quadruple Alliance of Democratic Protestant Germany, Catholic France, Hindu India and Buddhist Japan, would have the combined GNP of ($8.3 trillion), and population of 1.268 billion. Quadruple Alliance of German, French, Japanese and Indian civilizations, would also promote the Deutsch, French, Japanese and Hindi languages and become a major force in Media, and Films.

 

(10) Persian Gulf as Indian Lake

Persian Gulf or Arabian Gulf had been Indian Lake throughout 18th, 19th and early 20th century. Indian Empire controlled the oil-rich Iran and oil-rich Iraq and military bases at Suez Canal and Aden, at two mouths of the Red Sea. India-Iran Defense pact would restore Indian domination of the Arabian Sea. India-Germany-France-Japan defense Pact would make the Quadruple Alliance the Second Super Power of the world, equal to the United States. The 21st Century Concert of the World, led by the leaders of United States, China, Russia, India, Germany, France and Japan would maintain peace in the world and create the just world order, wherein eight great powers would enjoy spheres of influences. The colonial empires would resurface in the 21st Century, in form of neo-colonialism, where great powers would be allowed to establish Oil Colonies in the oil-producing and mineral-rich nations.

 

(11) 9/11 Ended the Sole Super Power Status

The Muslim terrorist attacks of 9/11 exposed the Achilles’ heel of maritime Masterland United States, and United States eased to be the sole super power of the world. Failure of the American troops to capture even a single Al Qaeda terrorist exposed the military weakness of the Pentagon. By invading Iraq, before catching Osama Bin Laden, exposed the moral camouflage of the American Oil Colonialism. The military dominance of the United States rests on its control over Middle East Oil.

 

(12) Right of Preemptive Strikes on Terrorists

The multi-ethnic, multi-religious, democratic civilizations have a responsibility to undertake preemptive military strikes against barbarian terrorists, determined to destroy the civilizations and democracies, without waiting to be attacked first by the terrorists. The terrorist attacks of 9/11 caused more economic damage to the United States, estimated at $ 5 trillion, more than that caused to all participants in First World War and the Second World War. President Bush’s doctrine of preemptive strikes against terrorists empowers the world Civilizations to undertake preventive measures, without waiting to be harmed first. India supports President Bush’s doctrine of preemptive strikes against terrorists. India should do the same to deter Saudi Arabia-financed Islamic terrorist attacks in Kashmir.

 

36(4) Concert of Europe 1814-1914

(1) Rumsfeld Spoke the Truth

Just as President Dwight Eisenhower (1953-1961) deflated the great power pretensions of Britain and France during Suez Canal crisis, President George w. Bush decided to dress down France and Germany, as they thought they became important after the expansion of European Union to include east European countries. Donald Rumsfeld pulled the carpet under the feet of France and Germany by bringing East European countries into NATO. Since Poland would follow the lead of United States more than that of Germany and France, the entry of Poland and other East Europeans into the European Union has weakened the power and influence of France and Germany in the Europe. Donald Rumsfeld correctly argued that the center of gravity of power has shifted eastward. The Asia is the dominant continent of 21s Century, as it had been throughout the history. However, Donald Rumsfeld was wrong in arguing that it has shifted to Eastern Europe from Western Europe.

 

(2) Insult could give birth to Neo-Nazism

Pentagon’s Boss Donald Rumsfeld might have given birth to Neo-Hitler in Germany and Neo-Napoleon in France, by insulting Germany and France publicly. Germany and France correctly point out that the unilateral approach of United States harms the stability of the world order. The preeminence of France in caused French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars. The preeminence of Germany caused First and Second World Wars. The preeminence of United States would cause third world war, unless the 7-power Concert of World powers, namely, United States, China, India, Britain, France, Germany and Japan maintain the global balance of power by principles of raison d’etat and balance of power, in the 21st Century.

 

(3) Germany Not Declining Old Europe

Pentagon’s Boss Donald Rumsfeld dismissed Germany and France as “Old Europe.” America in 2003 wants to marginalize Germany and France in 25-member European Union and expanded NATO, just as America marginalized France and Great Britain in Suez Canal conflict in 1955. What options do the diplomats of Germany and France have, to implement the retort of French Finance Minister, Francis Mer, that Old Europe has resilience, and is capable of bouncing back and it will show it in time? Only option that Germany and France have is to have a Defense Pact with India and Japan, to formalize a Quadruple Pact. Without a formal Defense Pact with India and Japan, France and Germany stand to lose leadership of European Union and NATO and cease to be world powers. Even France, Germany, India Triple alliance would be great world power.

 

(4) Quadruple Alliance & Holy Alliance

Germany, France, Japan and India should forge a Quadruple Alliance, designed to check the hegemony of the United States in Eurasian continent. India should sign with President Bush a “Holy Alliance against Terrorism.” Eight Power Concert of World Powers, including, United States, Britain, Russia, Germany, France, Japan, China and India, would maintain the peace the 21st century, just as Concert of Europe kept peace in 19th century. The periodic Summit meetings of the Presidents, Prime Ministers and foreign ministers of 8-Powers to review the world’s state of affairs. World Congress System shall seek to forge consensus on the issues confronting the world and to pave the way for dealing with them on a multilateral basis. Multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multi-linguistic pluralist civilizations states should form “Holy Pluralist Civilization Alliance,” among India, Russia, and European Union. Only after signing the Quadruple Alliance with India and Japan could Germany and France, prove that Old Europe has resilience, and is capable of bouncing back, and which it will show in time. The 4-Power Quadruple Alliance with India and Japan would immediately restore great power status to Germany and France, as the combined GNP at PPP of Japan, India, Germany, and France equaled the GNP of United States in 2002.

 

(5) 21st Century similar 18th & 19th Century

 “Victory in the Cold War has propelled America into a world which bears many similarities to the European state system of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and practices which American statesman and thinkers have consistently questioned. The Absence of both an overriding ideological or strategic threat frees nations to pursue foreign policies based increasingly on their immediate national interest. In an international system characterized by perhaps five or six major powers and a multiplicity of smaller states, order will have to emerge as it did in past centuries from a reconciliation and balancing of national interests.” (Kissinger, Diplomacy, 1994, p.805) However, President Bush cannot build a new world order by applying its domestic values to the world at large. Bush Oil Administration should abandon the temptation to recast the post-Cold War world order in America’s image. President Woodrow Wilson harmed the peace by overshadowing Paris Peace conference, after First World War. President Delano Roosevelt and President Truman, after the Second World War, seemed to be in a position to recast the entire globe in the American model, and it caused numerous wars, including Korean War and Vietnam War. President George H.W. Bush (1989-1993) exploited the demise of the Communist ideological and Soviet geopolitical challenge by establishing American Oil Colony in Kuwait after the 1990 War on Iraq in Kuwait. President Bill Clinton sought to establish America’s predominance by economic globalization, and war on Yugoslavia for Wilsonian humanitarian intervention. President George W. Bush invaded Afghanistan and Iraq to establish American Oil Colonies. The diplomats must reinvent Concert of Europe balance of power in 21st Century as Concert of World, to curb America’s propensity to use military force, by applying the principles of Raison e’etat and Balance of Power.

 

(6) Concert of World like Concert of Europe

The underlying principle of the Concert of Europe was the periodic meetings, or congresses, of the foreign ministers to review the European state of affairs. Congress System sought to forge a consensus on the issues confronting Europe and to pave the way for dealing with them on a multilateral basis. The Great Powers of the world in 2003, should again form the 21st Century Concert of the World, and eight Great Powers, namely, United States, China, Japan, India, Germany, France, Britain and Russia should periodically meet to maintain peace in the world, and to share colonial influence over weaker nations. The privileges of neo-colonial powers should be legalized and eight great powers should be allocated spheres of influence to establish neo-colonial oil colonies and mineral colonies over weaker oil-rich mineral-rich countries.

 

(7) Austria Prussia Russia Britain & France

From 1814 to 1914, the Austria, Prussia, France, Russia and Great Britain, formed the five-Great Power concert of Europe that preserved the peace from 1814 to 1914, from the Napoleonic wars to First World War. While Napoleon was enduring his first exile, at Elba, the victors of the Napoleonic Wars, assembled at Vienna in September 1814 to plan the postwar world. Prince von Metternich of Austria, Prince von Hardenberg of Prussia, Talleyrand of France, and Tsar Alexander I of Russia, and Lord Castlereagh of Great Britain represented their countries. By 1818, France was admitted to the Congress system at periodic European congresses, which for half a century cam close to constituting the government of Europe. No war at all took place among the Great Powers for forty years, from 1814 to 1854. After the Crimean War of 1854, no general war took place for another sixty year, till the First World War of 1914. After the Congress of Vienna, the Quadruple Alliance consisted of Great Britain, Prussia, Austria and Russia. The Holy Alliance was limited to three Eastern Courts-Prussia, Austria and Russia. In the early 19th century, France was regarded with the same fear Germany has been in the 20th century, and United States in the 21st century – as a chronically aggressive, inherently destabilizing power. The statesmen should forge the 21st Century’s Quadruple Alliance, among Germany, France, Japan and India, designed to nip any aggressive American tendencies with countervailing force in Eurasia.

 

(8) Preeminence of Single Nation Causes War

Preeminence’s of any one nation caused world wars, irrespective of the nature of the political leadership. The Congress System, the balance of power and raison d’etat policies would restore peace by curbing on the ambitions of the sole super power United States in the New Millennium. The preeminence of France in 1600’s and 1700’s and caused the Napoleonic wars of early 1800’s in 19th Century. The preeminence of Prussia and Germany in 19th Century caused the First World War and the Second World War. The preeminence of United States in second half of the 20th century caused the Vietnam War, Gulf War, Yugoslavia War, Afghanistan War, and Iraq War. The Concert of World Powers, managed by 8 world powers, namely, United States, China, Russia, India, Britain, Germany, France and Japan, would preserve peace in the 21st century. The Concert of 8 World powers would check the imperial tendencies of the United States in the New Millennium.

 

(9) Prez Bush, Metternich & Tsar Alexander

President George W. Bush in 2003 represents the Russian Tsar Alexander of 1815. In 1804, Russian Tsar Alexander proposed crusades for liberal institutions, which Pitt deflated. In 1815, Alexander’s crusade was the exact opposite of what he had advocated eleven years earlier in 1804. In 1815, Tsar Alexander was in thrall to religion and to conservative values and proposed nothing less than a complete reform of the international system based on the proposition that “the course formerly adopted by the Powers in their mutual relations had to be fundamentally changed and that it was urgent to replace it with an order of things based on the exalted truths of the eternal religion of our Savior (Jesus Christ).” President George Bush in 2000 represented the Tsar Alexander of 1804, and to regain the electoral support of the Catholic Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy, President Bush of 2004, would become like the Tsar Alexander of 1815, the pro-Life, anti-abortion, pro-Pope, pro-segregation, pro-State rights and order to bring down the wall that separates the Church and the State in the United States. President Bush passed the order allowing the use of federal funds for building church buildings, where prayers could be held, provided part of the building is used for social services also. President Bush of 2004 would get afflicted with virus of religious zeal like the Tsar Alexander of 1815.

 

President Bush attempting to formalize an electoral alliance with Christian Religious Right, so that it may not switch sides to the Democratic presidential nominee in 2004 presidential elections. President Bush buying influence over Christian Religious Right by allowing the Church use federal funding for building places of worship, which was considered violation of separation of State and Church wall. Just as Metternich interpreted the religious imperatives of Tsar Alexander to mean as obligations to preserve domestic status quo in Europe, President Bush buying Religious Right by federal funding for building places of worship.

 

The Austrian Emperor in 1815 realized that Austria could neither join the Tsar Alexander’s Crusade nor, in rebuffing it, give Alexander a pretext to go for it alone, leaving Austria to face the liberal and national currents of the period without allies. This is why Metternich transformed the Tsar’s draft into what came to be known as the “Holy Alliance,” which interpreted the religious imperative as an obligation by the signatories to preserve the domestic status quo in Europe. The Holy alliance brought the conservative monarchs together in combating revolution, but it also obligated them to act only in concert, in effect giving Austria a theoretical veto over the adventures of its smothering Russian ally. Metternich saw in Holy alliance, opportunity to commit the tsar to sustain legitimate rule, and to keep him from experimenting with his missionary impulses unilaterally. British statesman Castlereagh called the Holy Alliance a piece of sublime mysticism and nonsense. India should form with United States a “Holy Alliance against Terrorism” to give India a theoretical veto over the adventures of its smothering American ally. The Holy Alliance of the 21st Century would preserve the domestic status quo in the multi-ethnic, multi-religious and multi-racial societies. India Russia and European Union should form the Holy Alliance to preserve the domestic status quo, territorial integrity of multi-ethnic Pluralistic civilization states. India, Russia and European Union could also form ‘Holy Alliance of Pluralist Civilizations’ to preserve the political union of multi-ethnic, multi-linguistic, multi-religious states. India should form the ‘Quadruple Alliance’ with Germany, France and Japan. India should form the Holy Alliance of Pluralist Civilizations with European Union and Russia. India should form the ‘Holy Alliance against Terrorism’ with America.

 

(10) Concert of Europe (1814-1914)

The balance of power reduces the opportunities for using force. A shared sense of justice reduces the desire to use force. An international order, which is not considered just by other major powers, will be challenged sooner or later. Since the idea of national self-determination had not yet been invented, the great powers were not in the least concerned with carving states of ethnic homogeneity out of the territory conquered from Napoleon. The term religious imperative in the Holy alliance meant an obligation by the signatories to preserve the domestic status quo in Europe.

 

36(5) American Oil Colonialism

(1) America Seeks New Oil Colonies

President Bush has the moral authority to herald a new age of colonial empires in the new world order. As the elected leader of the world’s greatest military and economic power, President Bush has the right to create a new world order in the image of America to better promote the national interests of America, provided it gains the concurrence or acquiescence of other great powers, namely, Russia, Germany, France, China and India. Any world order that great world powers accept as legitimate acquires legitimacy. The post-Second World War foreign policy of the United States could be summarized as an attempt to establish American Oil-colonies throughout the oil-producing world. Oil Colonialism is the vehicle that would create the Colonial empires of the 21st Century. Neo-colonialism and Oil Colonialism, does not seek to promote cultural imperialism, and is content to restore the local laws and customs, so long the rulers allows the Big Oil exploit the oil and gas resources of the nation. American want oil-producing Islamic nations to impose Shariah laws over western laws, so long as American Big Oil granted total control over gas and oil resources. The 18th and 19th Century’s colonial empires would stage comeback in the 21st Century in form of Oil Colonial Empires, where colonial rulers do not disturb the local customs and practices. Neo colonial rulers of 21st Century wants oil, gas and mineral riches and content to leave the souls of the colonial inhabitants under the tyrannical rule of the traditional clergy that imposes fundamentalist traditional customs and creeds.

 

(2) Euro Civilization Empire Strikes Back

Can European Civilization Empire, European Union, headed by former colonial powers France and Germany, strike back on the insults hurled by post-Second World War neo-colonial power, determined to establish Yankee Oil Colonies throughout oil-producing world. Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, in January 2003 called spade a spade, when it dismissed France and Germany as ‘Old Europe’ and that ‘the center of gravity is shifting to the east.’ The comment was a part of an effort by White House to marginalize France and Germany, though the two countries dominate Europe’s economic and political affairs. France and Germany erroneously assumed that the expansion of the 15-member EU to 25-member EU would result in the greater influence of European Union in world politics and enhance the great power status of Germany and Japan, who lead the EU. Germany and France paid through their nose to feed the financial needs of impoverished East European economies, by letting them enter European Union. The former slaves of the Soviet Union preferred to join the bandwagon of United States and NATO, even when Germany and France, not the United States paid for their economic modernization. The impoverished new comers of the European Union, the former satellite states of the Soviet Empire, weakened European Union, by joining NATO in stiff opposition to the reservations of Germany and France. At the historic celebration meeting on the expansion of NATO, President Bush refused to have any Summit meeting with German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, during end of 2002. United Germany mistakenly hoped that the East European countries would become part of the Greater Germany economic zone, as they were part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, which Germany inherited. The European Union, Germany and France have become weaker by the unchecked over expansion of the European Union. Had Muslim turkey allowed to join European Union, would have meant the end of European Union. Germany and France should formalize the Defense Pact with India and Japan, to formalize the Four-Civilization Eurasian Pact to restore the legitimate rightful place for civilizations under the sun.

 

(3) Indian Empire Partitioned for Oil in 1947

Indian Empire in 1946, included Yemen, Suez Canal, and controlled oil fields in Iran and Iraq. Britain and United States conspired to partition India so that oil-rich Burma would be separated from India, and Pakistan would become an obstacle for India’s claims over Iranian oil. India had inherited the diplomatic treaties concluded by Indian Empire that was governed from Delhi. If Indian Empire not partitioned in 1947, India would have controlled Iranian oilfields at Abadan, and Iraqi oilfields and Suez Canal. British secret service hired Gujarati lawyer Mohammed Ali Jinnah to espouse the cause of Islam as the basis of state. British secret service agent Lawrence of Arabia had conceptualized the idea of Wahhabi fundamentalism to mobilize Bedouin tribes of Arabia to seek independence from Ottoman Empire in name of Wahhabi sect. To protect British oil interests in Iran and Iraq, British Secret Service M1 launched Operation Akbar to hire Muslims to demand establishment of Islamic state of Pakistan. Jews and Christians developed the concept of Wahhabi fundamentalism to disintegrate multi-ethnic Islamic states, so that America and Britain could conquer and colonize oil-producing nations, and establish American and British Oil colonies throughout Islamic World. Islamic Fundamentalism conceptualized and devised as Jewish and Christian conspiracy to establish American and British Oil colonies in the oil-rich Islamic world. Wahhabi Clergy agreed to hand over the oil-wealth to the Americans in exchange for the political right to beat Muslim women into submission, to impose barbarian Wahhabi Shariah over Muslims.

 

(4) USA Snubbed Britain France in Suez

The America snubbed France and Britain during Suez Canal crisis in 1956, to explain to the world that France and Britain no longer mattered. After India, Egypt represented the most important legacy of Great Britain’s imperial past. In twentieth century, the Suez Canal had become the principal artery for the supply of oil to Western Europe. Even in its weakened state immediately after the Second World War, Great Britain continued to regard itself as the pre-eminent power in the Middle East, its dominance resting on two pillars: Iran, which supplied oil though Anglo-Iranian company; and Egypt, which served as strategic base in Suez Canal. Anthony Eden in 1945 promoted the Arab League as a political framework for resisting outside penetration of the Middle East by new world powers like United States and India. Significant British forces remained in Egypt, Iraq and Iran. A British officer, General John Glubb (Glubb Pasha) commanded Jordan’s Arab Legion.

 

(5) US Undermined Britain in Iran

United States undermined the British influence in Iran and Egypt to sabotage Britain’s great power aspirations. On the twin pillars of control over Iranian Oil and Suez Canal rested the post-Second World War great power status of Great Britain. British military base along the Suez Canal was one of its last significant imperial posts garrisoned by 80,000 troops. Indian Empire had earlier paid for the cost of maintaining British imperial posts worldwide, and without India Britain was in position to maintain a large force in Suez Canal. In 1954, pressed by the United States, Great Britain agreed to withdraw forces from its Suez Base by 1956. Iranian Prime Minister Mosadegh nationalized Iran’s oil industry in 1951, and demanded the withdrawal of British troops protecting the oil complex at Abadan. United States refused to support Great Britain to undertake military action in Iran to protect Abadan base. After the exit of the Britain from Abadan, United States encouraged a military coup to overthrow the government of Iranian Prime Minister Mosadegh two years later in 1953. American did not allow Great Britain to restore its pre-eminence in Iran. United States installed Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi to throne in Iran, and United States replaced Great Britain as the preeminent power in Iran. America supported the military coup against Egypt’s King Farouk, to undermine Britain’s military position in Egypt.

 

United States conspired to marginalize Britain and France in Iran and Egypt in early 1950, and Donald Rumsfeld attempted to marginalize Germany and France, in enlarged 25-member European Union, by recruiting former Soviet Colonial satellites, to gang up against Germany and France. United States plans to destroy the economic foundations of Germany and France, by eliminating their opposition to American Oil Colonial Empire. Had Britain in 1951, invited India to deploy Indian troops in Abadan Iran and Suez Canal Egypt in 1951, after independence, then Great Britain would have maintained its preeminence in Iran, Egypt, Yemen, Kuwait, Oman, Trucial States, Persian Gulf and Red Sea. France and Germany have to decide, whether they want to become a slave colony of the American Oil Colonial Empire, or emerge as world powers by signing Eurasian Defense Pact with India and Japan. The 4-Power Eurasian Defense Pact (EDP) would replace United States and NATO as the dominant military and economic power of the world. Would subjects of the nations that produced Adolf Hitler, Bismarck, Napoleon Bonaparte and Talleyrand agree to become slave colony of the Yankee Oil Empire? It is the moral imperative for France and Germany to retaliate against insults hurled at them by Yankee Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, to explore the 4-Power Eurasian Defense Pact with India and Japan, so that EDP Oil Colonies could be established in the Middle East and Caspian Central Asia in direct competition with Yankee Oil Colonialism.

 

(6) Decline of Europe Is Propaganda

Dr. Henry Kissinger, backed by Jewish media unleashed global propaganda campaign to denigrate European state’s right to claim great power status. “The nineteenth century European nation was based on common language and culture, and, given the technology of the times, provided the optimum framework for security, economic growth, and for influencing international events. In the post-Cold War world, the traditional European nation-states-the countries, which formed the Concert of Europe until the First World War-lack the resources for a global role. The success of their (European) effort to consolidate themselves into the European Union will determine their future influence. United, Europe will continue as a Great Power; divided into national states, it will slide into secondary status.” (Henry Kissinger, Diplomacy, 1994, pp 807, 804-810) Donald Rumsfeld embarking upon the diplomacy to force Western Europe, especially Germany and France slide into secondary status in 2000’s. United States conspired to destroy the unity among European Union members, by forcing the entry of 10 impoverished East European, into European Union, so that Germany and France would be weekend by forking out their scarce capital, to feed and build former slave nations of the Soviet Empire. United States undermined the unity of the European Union, by buying the political influence over Poland’s president Aleksander Kwasniewski, who openly declared: ‘If it is President Bush’s vision, it is mine.’ Germany and France have to take Civilization decision, whether Western Europe, continue to feed, nurture and finance East Europeans, if they continue to respect non-European power, more than France and Germany, the economic engines that feeds and finances impoverished East Europeans, the erstwhile former slaves of the Soviet Empire.

 

36(6) 21 Century World Order

(1) Multi Polar World Order

The new world order in the 21st Century is a multi-polar world, dominated by 8 world powers, namely, United States, China, India, Russia, Britain, Germany, France and Japan. Canada would also become a world power, whenever it decides to do so provided it develops foreign policies independent of the United States. So long as Canada remains dependent on United States, it would not become a world power. United Europe would emerge as world power and replace Germany, France and Britain as independent players in the world politics. The seven world powers would be: United States, United Europe, India, Russia, China, Japan and Canada.

 

(2) No Muslim Country is World Power

No Islamic nation would ever become the world power. No Islamic nation, including Saudi Arabia and Pakistan could ever become a great economic power. The GDP of Saudi Arabia ($129 billion), Kuwait ($30 billion), Pakistan ($237 billion), Bangladesh ($188 billion), Iran ($325 billion), and Indonesia ($505 billion) rules out the possibility of ever playing a great power role. No Muslim power would ever become a great power to join the Concert of World Powers. Indonesia is the sick man of Asia and could disintegrate before 2020. 

 

(3) Issues in 21st Century New World Order

President Bush spoke of the new world order as if it were just around the corner. In fact, the new world order is still in a period of gestation, and its final form will not be visible until 2010. Part extension of the past, part unprecedented, the new world order of the 21st century, like those it succeeds, will emerge as an answer to three questions: (a) What is the justified military response of multi-ethnic, multi-religious pluralist Civilization nation state, against barbarian invasions, international terrorism, ethnic nationalism, religious extremism, ethnic separatism, predator religious cults and religious militant terrorism? (b) What use of military force is justified, to establish control over oil-producing nations with smaller populations, to guarantee the secured supply of oil and gas resources to the heavily populated industrialized nations, in the new Age of Oil Colonialism? (c) How to follow the example of multi-state European Union to establish similar confederation political groupings in Asia, Africa and South America, so that multitude of states are regrouped into regional federations or confederations, led by dominant regional powers?

 

(4) Short Duration of World Orders

International systems and world orders live precariously. Every ‘world order’ expresses an aspiration to permanence, and the very term world order has a ring of eternity around it. Yet the underlying elements and forces that comprise the world order are in constant flux; indeed, with each century, the duration of the international system, the world order has been shrinking. The world order or the international system that grew out of the Peace of Westphalia in 1648 lasted 150 years, till 1800, the outbreak of the Napoleonic wars. The world order or the international system created by the Congress of Vienna (September 1814) maintained itself for a hundred years, from 1814 to First World War 1914. The Cold War world order, the world order or the international system characterized by the Cold War ended after forty years, it existed from 1950 to 1990. The Versailles settlement after the First World War never operated as a system adhered to by the major world powers, and Versailles settlement amounted to little more than an armistice between two world wars. Never before have the components of world order, their capacity to interact, and their goals quite so rapidly, so deeply, or so globally as in the 21st century.

 

(5) Feudalism to Secular Empire

The Thirty Years War (1618-1648) was in large part about the transition from feudal Medieval European societies based on Christianity religion and Church to the claims of universality to the modern secular Empire states based on raison d’etat, national interests and balance of power. The wars of the French Revolution marked the transition to the nation-state defined by common language and culture. The multinational states became anachronistic in the 19th century. The wars of twentieth century, the First World War was caused by the disintegration of Habsburg Catholic Empire, Ottoman Islamic Empire and Orthodox Russian Czar Empire. The Second World War caused by the challenge to European Colonial powers, dominance of Europe, and end of colonialism. In each transition, what had been taken for granted suddenly became anachronistic, with the advent of the new world order. The concept of multinational states Empires became anachronistic after the First World War. The concept of Colonial Empires became anachronistic after the Second World War, even when it had been taken for granted for centuries. The concept of Communist multi-national state became anachronistic after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Since the end of the Second World War, nearly a hundred new countries have come into being. The collapse of Communism in the Soviet Union and the breakup of Yugoslavia have spawned another twenty nations.

 

(6) 25-Member European Union

The coming Federation of 25-member European Union, signals a newer trend for the consolidation of the multitude of newer states into multi-national Federation with single currency, single parliament, single foreign policy and single military. The disintegration of Yugoslavia and the integration of European Union, represent two divergent futures for the mankind. Would world witness consolidation of the states along Civilizations or multi-ethnic, multi-religious Civilization states disintegrate? Would multi-ethnic, multi-linguist and multi-religion states like Yugoslavia disintegrate due to the machinations of predator religions, intolerance of organized religions, religious terrorism, or they would confederate with other larger nations to form Civilization Federations, on the lines of European Union?

 

(7) Germany & France as “Old Europe”

Donald Rumsfeld’s comment about Germany and France as ‘Old Europe’ signals Pentagon’s resolve to force France and Germany abandon its leadership illusions over expanded European Union. The 25-member European Union threatens the security of the United States and the America’s domination of the NATO. The US-led expanded Nato would use military force to tame Germany and France. In the eyes of Pentagon the rise of European Union, means the decline of United States. The European Union was formed to make the union of European nations, become economically and militarily rivals of the United States. The national interests of European Union conflict with those of the United States. United States wants to destroy the economic and political potential of France and Germany, because these two nations led the Europeans in their drive to confederate into European Union. United States joined forces with Papacy and Wahhabi terrorism, to split multi-ethnic democratic Yugoslavia, to secure American control over Caspian oil and gas pipelines that would pass through Georgia, Kosovo to Albanian Adriatic sea oil terminals. United States wants to disintegrate multi-ethnic, multi-linguistic and multi-religion states to control the separated nations and to establish colonies over strategic countries. United States, Papacy and American oil companies conspired to partition India on grounds of religion so that India may not compete with United States for control over oil resources of Iran and Iraq. France and Germany should realize that the national interests of civilizations and great powers, like France, Germany, India and Japan coincide and 4-Power Eurasian Defense pact would restore leadership of France and Germany over European Union and checkmate neo-imperial agenda of American Oil Colonialism.

 

(8) Eurasian Pact of India France Germany

The civilizations of France, Germany, India, and Japan Russia should enter into the Pact of civilizations to restore peace and order in the Eurasian continent. The Big Oil of France, Germany, Japan, and India should form an economic Pact for Oil Colonialism, to compete with American Big Oil in the age of Oil Imperialism. The Eurasian pact would establish Eurasian Oil colonies in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, UAE, Iran, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan and split its profits among France, Germany, India, Japan and Russia. The wars in the 21st Century would be fought for control over Oil and natural gas resources of Eurasia. Eurasian Pact of France, Germany, India, and Japan would control the economic resources of Eurasia and control the destinies of the world. The France-Germany-India-Japan Civilization Pact would emerge as the dominant economic power of the world and replace United States as the dominant Super Power of the world. Donald Rumsfeld’s condemnation of France and Germany as Old Europe, while in new Europe the center of gravity of power shifted eastward, became an eye-opener to the descendants of Napoleon Bonaparte and Adolf Hitler, forced Catholic France and Protestant Lutheran Germany to identify new diplomatic, military and economic partners in Hindu India and Buddhist Japan. Eurasian Pact of France, Germany, India and Japan would be Civilization’s response to the barbarian invasions of the Eurasian Civilizations. The 4-power Eurasian pact of world’s 3rd largest, 4th largest, 5th largest and 6th largest economic powers would equal United States GNP. The 2001 GNPs of world’s largest 6 economic powers are: United States ($8.4 trillion), China ($4.1 trillion), Japan ($3 trillion), India ($2.2 trillion), Germany ($1.8 trillion), France ($1.3 trillion), and United Kingdom ($1.2 trillion). Donald Rumsfeld is correct in saying that the center of gravity has shifted from Germany and France eastward. The center of gravity has shifted eastward from Europe to Asia, as China, Japan and India emerged as the world’s 2nd largest, 3rd largest, and 4th largest economies. Germany, France and United Kingdom are the world’s 5th largest, 6th largest and 7th largest economies of the world in 2002. Russia Federation with GNP ($929 billion) is the world’s 10th largest economy, preceded by Italy ($1.2 trillion) 8th largest economy, and Brazil ($1 trillion) 9th largest economy of the world. No wonder that the second pole of the new world order shall center around the Eurasian Pact of Japan, India, Germany and France, with the combined GNP of $8.4 trillion, equal to that of the United States ($8.4 trillion). The Eurasian Pact of Four-Civilizations would eclipse America as the leading civilization of the world in the first quarter of the 21st Century. The Civilization Empires of France, Germany, Japan and India would strike back and reclaim its rightful place under the sun.

 

36(7) Plural Civilization Respond

(1) Preemptive strikes by Civilizations

The Civilization State principle established the Great Powers’ right to undertake preemptive strikes against terrorist nations, religious intolerance to maintain the integrity of Civilizations. Great Powers would not onwards have a right to establish colonial empires and oil colonies to secure their oil and gas supplies. The predator religious intolerance of Semite Wahhabi terrorism, Semite Zionism, Semite Catholicism emerged as the global nexus of religious intolerance to threaten the world civilizations. The growing Vatican-Mecca Axis of religious intolerance and Semite Tel Aviv-Riyadh Axis of Mecca Caliphate secured the support of American oil colonialism, and emerged as the principle threat to world civilizations.

 

Barbarian Muslim raiders destroyed the Christian Civilizations of Egypt, Libya, Syria in 7th Century and Byzantine Christian Civilization in 13th Century. Civilizations have the Right of Self-defense to launch preemptive strikes against Muslim terrorist nations to bring them under colonial occupation of the civilized nations and to destroy the terrorism breeding grounds of the home base of the Wahhabi terrorists. The moderate pluralist civilizations would undertake military preemptive strikes against predator religious cults, ethnic separatism, religious fundamentalism and political extremism, to safeguard the military, economic, social and political interests of the multi-ethnic, multi-linguistic, multi-religion and multi-racial Civilization empires and civilization nations states.

 

(2) Because You White Men Always Do!

Because, white men always kill, after he has finished, said the Goraimi tribe’s elder in Brazil to filmmaker Roland Joffe, when he was filming ‘Mission.” It in a nutshell explains nuclear Hindu India’s response to the Global Clash of Races. We are all prisoners of our own history. History comes alive in an especially contemporary and touching way in Roland Joffe’s films. Roland Joffe made history of sorts with The Killing Fields, his very first film as a director. Based on the experiences of New York Times reporter Sidney Schanberg in Cambodia, the film picked up three Oscars and earned Joffe a nomination for Best Director in 1984. A veteran of British theatre and television, Joffe won another Best Director nomination and prizes at Cannes for The Mission, a visually spectacular story of the Jesuit priests in 18th century Brazil. There does seem to be an Indian influence in some of Roland Joffe’s films. Film “Mission,” for example, has a strange spiritual quality to it. Roland Joffe admitted that ‘Mission” film was an extraordinary experience for him, from start to finish. When Joffe went to South America for the first time, he looked for the Gorami tribe and he could not find them. Eventually, he found Gorami tribe, but they were so decimated by years of being ignored that they could not look him in the eye. Joffe spent time living with another tribe that he eventually filmed. Joffe cannot forget a conversation that he had with an elderly couple from that tribe. That tribal elder suddenly asked Joffe whether he would kill them after he had finished. When Joffe asked them why they asked that, they replied, simply, "Because you white men always do!" That was when the history of the white man really jumped up and bit Roland Joffe in the neck. Eventually, the tribe developed so much confidence in Joffe that they invited him to be their chieftain. The spiritualism of India affects other dimensions of Indian life, like Indian science, Indian writings, Indian military strategy, and Indian diplomacy. Indian culture certainly gives the Indian mind, including the mind of the Indian scientist and the mind of the diplomat, the ability to think out of the box. Much of Indian science seems intuitive and not bound by the rigid thinking of classical Christian scientists. Much of Indian diplomacy seems philosophic and idealist and not bound by the rigid thinking of classical Christian Raison d’etat and Machiavellian Real Politik.

 

Brazilian Amerindian Goraimi elder asked Joffe, whether he would kill them after he had finished shooting film Mission. Similarly Indian thinkers ask President Bush: Would America again finance and nurture Wahhabi Sunni Muslim terrorists like Osama bin Laden, to cause riots and civilian deaths in Kashmir, Chechnya and Xinjian after Christian America had finished making Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan into new American Oil Colonies, by cunningly exploiting compassion of Hindu India, Orthodox Russia and Buddhist China for 9/11 Wahhabi terrorist attacks on white Protestant United States? The real cause of the looming Global Clash of Races is the perception of the nature of the White Men in the minds of non-white races and non-Christian peoples of the world, who represent more than 75 percent of the world’s population in 2003. The economic and military center of gravity has shifted away from white Christian Western Europe to non-white, Brown and Yellow, Hindu and Buddhist Asia, at the start of the Third Christian Millennium in 2000.

 

(3) Terrorist Cortez, Pizzarro & Robert Clive

Christopher Columbus, Cortez, Pizzaro, and Robert Clive were all barbarian terrorist fortune-seekers that invaded and occupied the lands of the civilizations by deceit and looted the gold and riches of the civilizations. Wahhabi Muslim terrorist Osama Bin Laden sincerely believed that militant Arab terrorists would achieve a military victory against Protestant United States, no different the victory similar Bedouin terrorists scored over rich Christian Egyptian Civilization after 640 AD, under the leadership of Prophet Muhammad. What should be the response of the Civilization-Nation Empires against terrorist attacks of the barbarian religious cults financed by global drug trade in Heroin and Cocaine and supported by covert operations led by foreign secret services, like the CIA and ISI of Pakistan?

 

(4) Responses of Pluralist India and Russia

Russia and India are worried by the fact that Asia is developing into one of the planet’s most explosive regions. Islamic Wahhabi extremism, financed by oil-incomes, global drug trade and the CIA and the ethnic separatism financed by Papacy and endorsed by the CIA present major threats to peace and stability in multi-ethnic pluralistic societies in Asia. Pakistan’s nuclear and missile technology is available for sale to Saudi Arabia and Osama bin Laden. Sunni Muslim monopoly over Afghan Heroin trade finances the global Islamic terrorism worldwide, and the CIA blesses Islamic terrorism, when it targets non-western countries. The anti-women and anti-abortion Catholic Christian religious right conservative conspiracy joined forces with anti-women, anti-abortion, and pro-Shariah Wahhabi Sunni Islamic religious right fundamentalism to wage proselytizing religious wars on Orthodoxy, Hinduism, Buddhism and Paganism in Asia and Africa. Roman Catholic had destroyed Roman Empire in 410 AD and destroyed the great Inca, Maya and Aztec civilizations during post-Columbus era. Catholic religious right during 20th Century destroyed Buddhist monarchy in China, Tibet, Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia and Orthodox monarchy in Ethiopia. Christian religious right co-conspired in the assassination of Hindu Monarchy of Nepal of King Mahendra. Papacy co-conspired to engineer the secession of Catholic Ireland from Great Britain, and the secession of Catholic Slovenia and Croatia from multi-ethnic Yugoslavia. The arch-conservative Roman Catholic Church and arch-fundamentalist militant Wahhabi Sunni Islam have joined forces to destabilize the multi-ethnic, multi-linguist, pluralistic states in Eurasia, namely Russia and India. Hindu India, Orthodox Russia and Buddhist China should pool military, economic and diplomatic resources to strike back on the destabilizing conspiracies and predator cult wars waged by Catholic Vatican and Wahhabi Mecca on peace loving multi-ethnic multi-religious Russian, Indian and Chinese Civilizations. Civilization-nation empires must not allow the barbarian, fundamentalist non-state forces to destabilize the pluralistic civilization-nations. Conservative Roman Catholicism and Wahhabi Sunni Islam represent predator religious cults, determined to launch predator attacks on moderate, liberal, pro-women religions in Asia and Africa.

 

(5) Predator Religious Cults

Wahhabi fundamentalism and Islamic terrorism represents barbarian forces that aspire to overhaul the geo-political structure of the world, to the detriment of the world civilizations. Civilization-nation Empires must resolutely retaliate against the terrorist barbarian forces that aspire to overhaul the geo-political balance of power, by destroying the barbarian homelands and breeding grounds of the barbarian terrorism.

 

(6) Good Vs Evil Celestial Wars

In Hindu mythology there has been constant celestial wars going on between the forces of the good and the forces of the evil. Throughout history Empires strike back on the Barbarians, to destroy and conquer barbarians. The Civilization-nations, namely, India, Russia, China and India would strike back to destroy the breeding grounds of Islamic terrorism, which is the 21st Century version of the historic Barbarians invasions of Civilizations. Barbarians have the inherent ability to modify military technology, to use it by mobile lightweight barbarian troops to successfully attack civilian centers of Civilizations, causing great distress, confusion and chaos in the Civilizations. Barbarian terrorists score early victory, because they focus all their energies on destruction of the isolated civilian centers of the Civilization. Barbarian terrorists are destroyers not builders. Barbarian Wahhabi Arab oil-producing nations have misused the military and economic artifacts developed by the Christian Civilization, to launch terrorist attacks on very center of Protestant Christian Civilization, namely, Manhattan and Pentagon. Barbarian Wahhabi terrorists have misused the democratic freedom in Hindu Indian Civilization to wage terrorist attacks on civilian targets in India. Barbarian Wahhabi terrorists have launched terrorist attacks on civilized Slav Russian Orthodox Civilization in Chechnya. Barbarian Muslims have waged terrorist wars on civilized Chinese Buddhist Civilization in Xinxian province. Barbarian Wahhabi Muslims representing less than one percent of the World’s population have waged wars on world’s most populous Civilizations, namely, Chinese Buddhist Civilization, Indian Hindu Civilization, Russian Slav Orthodox Civilization, American Protestant Christian Civilization. Arab Muslim Barbarian Wahhabi Civilization might cease to exist as a race, civilization and religion, whenever American, Russian, Chinese and Indian Civilizations decide to strike back on the Wahhabi barbarian terrorists with full force.

 

(7) Fundamentalist Threat to Pluralist States

Russia like India is huge pluralistic state. Russia and India are the largest federal pluralism states in the world. In 1994, Russia and India signed the Declaration of Protection of Rights in Pluralistic States. (President Putin, Oct. 4, 2000). Russia and India takes into account the complexity of religious and communal problems, which should be resolved through political dialogue. The Moscow Declaration on the Protection of Interests of Pluralists States became the bedrock of India-Russia relations. As multi-ethnic, multi-religious and pluralistic societies the declaration focuses on the rise of non-military challenges to India and Russia’s Territorial integrity. These challenges are the rise of ethnic nationalism, religious and political extremism and separatism. Today these negative tendencies have acquired an insidious dimension in form of Islamic international terrorism. At the same time, Russia and India should manifest commitments to principles and firmness, when conflict on the basis of religious and communal basis grow and jeopardize the lives of the Russian and Indian people, and the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Russia and India. The Russian and Indian position regarding this are identical, they actually coincide. The same individuals, the same terrorist organizations, extremist organizations are organized and very often the same individuals participate in conducting and igniting terrorists from the Philippines to Kosovo including Kashmir, Afghanistan and Russia’s Northern Caucasus. The so-called international terrorists have succeeded. Russia fully supports the initiative of the Indian leaders on the collective front to fight terrorism, said President Putin. During President Putin’s 2000 visit the Declaration of Strategic Partnership was signed. The Declaration is a new world in the Russian-Indian relations and it is a practical document. Russia and India’s geo-political interests coincide.

 

(8) End of the European Age

The European age has ended in 2000. The center of gravity in world affairs has shifted in favor of Asia. Geopoliticians in 2000 saw Western Europe as a Peninsula at one end of the great Eurasian continent. The shift towards Asia accelerated after the defeat of the United States in the Vietnam War. The collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, gave a powerful impetus to this eastward shift in center of gravity in world politics. The striking economic successes of India and China and their ability to overcome the 1997-98 financial crisis with minimum losses predetermined the lightening growth of their importance in world economy and world politics.

 

36(8) Civilization-State Principle

(1) Threat of Predator Exclusive Intolerance

American and British Empire promoted Wahhabi religious intolerance to break-up the multi-state, multi-ethnic and multi-religion civilization states of Ottoman Empire, Soviet Union Empire and Indian Empire to promote ethnic separatism and engineer the secession of Muslim provinces to form separate Wahhabi Arab states of Saudi Arabia and Iraq, Pakistan, and Central Asian Muslim republics respectively. The Civilization state principle came under attacks of Islamic terrorism that threatened the stability of the tolerant, secular civilization state system in Russia and India. Leading Protestant, Orthodox, Buddhist, and Hindu multi-ethnic Civilization nation states would pool their diplomatic and military resources to check the menace of religious intolerance and predator religious cults, namely Catholic Conservative Conspiracy and Wahhabi terrorism, to make the world safe for multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multi-linguistic liberal Civilizations. Roman Catholicism is a predator religion, and Roman Catholic Church has historically specialized in fomenting religious strife and communal riots in multi-ethnic, multi-religion and multi-linguistic Civilization Empires. Catholic Pope played very significant role in the destruction of Roman Empire, Roman Civilization, Roman Religion and British Empire. Vatican conspired to engineer the secession of Catholic Ireland, Catholic Slovenia, Catholic Croatia from Britain and Yugoslavia respectively. Vatican aligned with Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalists to engineer the partition of India in 1947 and partition of Yugoslavia in 1990s. Vatican is a great menace to all multi-ethnic, multi-religious, liberal secular civilization-nation states, namely, India, Russia, China, Canada and United States. Hindu India and Protestant United States would be on the same side of the Third World War and join their forces to defeat the barbarian menace of religious intolerance.

 

(2) Russian Civilization-Nation

India, China, Russia, and United States are multi-ethnic civilized nation states. The Civilization Principle is more important for India than for China and Russia, because the dominant influence of the Han people in China is playing an exceptionally major role in terms of the unification of China. The dominant influence of the Slav Russians is playing an exceptionally major role in terms of the unification of Russia, after the disintegration of the Soviet Union. Boris Yeltsin raised the banner of Russian patriotism to defeat the military takeover of the Russian parliament building. The dominant influence of the White Anglo Saxon Protestants (WASPs) played an exceptionally major role in the unification of United States in 19th Century. In terms of cultural identity and territorial-state structure, Russia is also leaning towards the civilization-nation principle. The quick change of political-ideological and socio-economic paradigms (twice during the 20th century, in 1917 and 1990) forced Russia’s upper classes to doubt on certain key characteristics of Russia as country. In terms of territorial state structure and cultural and economic identity, European Union is also leaning towards the civilization-nation principle.

 

Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru on June 5, 1955 during official visit to Moscow asked: “I would like to understand what this new Soviet Civilization is? What is stable and persistent in Soviet Civilization, and what will disappear as shallow and extraneous?” Russia has departed from socialism. So, what is left and what is standing and persistent in Russia? Not only Russians but Indians also want answers to these questions, about Russian Civilization-State. The settlement of Russian Civilization-states has not yet become a lasting and consistent process, but the vector of movement has been set. Russian national accord is acquiring palpable political forms. Russians are witnessing a gradual ideological recreation of Russia. The Soviet past and the Russia’s past and present are less frequently confronted by Russians, but accepted and evaluated as parts of the whole, which for Russians is the history of Russia as a country.

 

(3) Predator Communism Evil Secularism

Communism vividly demonstrated its inaptitude for sound self-development, dooming Russia. Socialism vividly demonstrated its inaptitude for economic development, dooming India. The road to communism and Socialism were roads to a blind alley, which is far away from the mainstream of civilization. Russia has used up its limit for political and socio-economic upheavals, cataclysms and radical reforms. Only fanatics or political forces, which are absolutely apathetic and indifferent to Russia and its people, can make calls to a new revolution. Hindu India has used up its limit for patronizing Christian and Muslim minorities in the name of secularism, which consistently denigrated Hinduism during the Congress Party governments, when the Congress Party led by pseudo-secularists, traitors and foreign spies. Pseudo-secularist Congress Party of India did no less harm to India, than the Communist Party did to the Soviet Union and Russia. Be it under communist, national-patriotic or radical liberal slogans, Russia as country, and Russian people will not withstand a new radical breakup. Russia’s tolerance and ability both to survive and to continue creative endeavor has reached the limit, and Russian society will simply collapse economically, politically, psychologically and morally, if Russia faces another new radical breakup. Similarly, secularism and socialism has demonstrated its inaptitude for sound national development in India. Hindu India’s tolerance to pseudo-secularism has reached the limit, and any further denigration of Hinduism and Hindu nationalism in India would result in the rise of Hindu Fascist government. Disintegration of Soviet Union is a proof that Karl Marx was a prostitute-philosopher hired by western imperialists to devise a philosophic concoction to justify the looting of the property and riches of the Russian Czars and Russian aristocracy. Similarly, secular socialist governments of Congress Party sought to exploit Hindu India to promote the interests of the Christian nations.

 

(4) Future of Putin’s Russia

Russia is in the midst of one of the most difficult periods in its history. For the first time in the past 200-300 years, Russia facing a real threat of sliding to the second, and possibly even third, echelons of world states. Russia is running of time left for removing this threat. Russia needs co-coordinated creative work. Nobody will do it for Russia, except Russians. Everything regarding future of Russia depends on Russians and on Russians alone, and depends on Russians’ ability to see the size of the threat, to pool forces and to set their minds to hard and lengthy hard work.

 

(5) Population Decline of Russia

Russian population is declining at alarming rate. The number of citizens of Russia reduces every year. For several years, the population of Russia diminished y an average of 750,000 a year. The population of Russia can dwindle by 22 million in next 15 years, by 2015. President Putin declared that if the current trend of the decline of Russian population persisted, it would threaten the Russia’s survival as a nation. Russia is facing a real threat of becoming an aging nation. The demographic situation of Russia is very alarming in 2002. President Putin should open doors for Indian immigration and invite 1,000,000 immigrant Indians per year into Russia for next 20 years. Indian immigrants would make Russia a great economic, political and military power in 21st Century. President Putin should encourage mass marriages among Indian and Russian men and women. Just as United States abandoned its WASP character to invite non-white immigrants, so Russia should also welcome non-white immigrants from India and China.

 

36(9) Crime Corruption Nexus

(1) New Global Dark Age

Presently the CIA profited by controlled use of the global organized crime syndicates to promote the national interests of America, in Yugoslavia, Central Asia and Afghanistan, but after the 9/11 the crime lieutenants of the CIA might acquire independent legitimacy and local fiefdoms to challenge the supervision and diktats. Rather than working as agents of the CIA, the time might come when the global drug cartels might use their financial power to buy political influence over White House and the Capitol. Global drug cartels have the financial power to force the decent of the New Global Dark Age over the world in 21st Century.

 

(2) $750 Billion Global Drug Trade

The global drug trade in Heroin and Cocaine generates for white Catholic Cocaine cartels and Arab heroin cartels more than $750 billion annually, enough to buy political influence in most of the governments of the world. Organized crime and drug cartels buy political influence and buy governments, presidents and prime ministers by political campaign donations and by financing military coups and civil strife. The CIA started the trend by inducting Italian Mafia to compete with Soviet influence over Italian trade unions. President Ronald Reagan disturbed the apple cart by consenting that the CIA could finance its covert operations in Nicaragua out of proceeds of Colombian cocaine shipments to United States. Pakistan’s General Zia Ul Haq followed Ronald Reagan and officially ordered Pakistan’s secret services ISI to finance its covert operations by incomes of Afghan heroin trade. The CIA had allowed Taiwanese Christian Kuomintang Fifth Army to finance its military operations from the proceeds of the Burma’s Opium and heroin trade. Perhaps United States expanded the Vietnam War to Laos and Cambodia to provide safe heaven to Taiwanese Christian drug lords safe place after 1961, when Burmese and Chinese Armies pushed Taiwanese Kuomintang Army out of Burma, into the bordering Jungles of Thailand, Laos and Cambodia. Heroin and Opium can explain the conduct of American foreign policies in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and Burma from 1945 to 1980. Heroin and Opium and Oil interests determined America’s policies towards Afghanistan, Pakistan, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan from 1971 to present day. The nuclear and military stalemate of the Cold war, made foreign Covert Operations financed by heroin and Cocaine trade favored instrument of foreign policy by the CIA, as it did not strain the military assets of the Pentagon, demoralized after the defeat in the Vietnam War. How should India and Russia respond to the American, Pakistani and Wahhabi covert operations launched in the name of militant Islam financed by Heroin trade to promote the oil interests of American Oil Colonialism in the 21st Century?

 

(3) Nexus of Crime-Corruption

The indecision of state power and weakness of the state results in the scramble for local fiefdoms, where center and the territories, the regional and local authorities, the elected officials and Mafia compete among themselves for power. Their mutually destroying fight is watched by those who benefit by disorder and arbitrariness, who exploit the absence of an effective state for their own purpose, namely the organized crime, organized corruption and organized church. The global nexus of crime, corruption and church would like to preserve such a situation for future, as happening in Russia, Italy, Afghanistan and Colombia. The vacuum of power has led to the take-over of state functions by private corporations, clans, Mafia and Church in Russia, Italy, Afghanistan, Colombia and Burma. The global nexus of corrupt politicians and corrupt officials, organized crime and organized drug cartels, and corrupt military coup leaders have acquired their own shadow groups, private militia armies, groups of influence and global crime networks, which use illegal ways to buy political influence and make black money.  But the state functions and state institutions must differ from the entrepreneurial ones by the fact that state institutions must not be bought or sold, privatized or granted for use, let out on lease. State service needs professionals for whom law is the sole criterion of civil activity, otherwise the state opens the door for corruption and a moment may come when it would simply degenerate.

 

(4) Rise of Post-Soviet Russian Mafia

President Putin has pointed out that vacuum of state power in Russia led to the take-over of the Russian state functions by private corporations and clans. These Russian private corporations have acquired their own shadow groups, groups of influence and dubious security services, which use illegal ways to obtain secret government information. Russian state functions and Russian state institutions must not be bought or sold, privatized or granted for use, or let out on lease. Russian professionals for whom the law is the sole criterion of activity are needed in Russian state service. Otherwise the Russian state opens the door to corruption in Russia and a moment may come then Russian state will simply degenerate.

 

(5) Heroin Finances Wahhabi Intolerance

Global trade on heroin and cocaine generates $750 billion annually for the organized crime syndicates, half of which, around $375 billion generated in the United States. White catholic drug syndicates and Sunni Muslim Heroin drug syndicates control the global drug trade. Catholic drug cartels lobbied to cement ties of Vatican and Mecca to develop common iconoclast Monotheist front against Orthodoxy, Hinduism and Paganism. Catholic drug syndicates financed white Catholic death squads to maintain monopoly of drug cartels over Colombian Cocaine and Heroin. Wahhabi Sunni drug syndicates financed Wahhabi Muslim fundamentalist militants to maintain monopoly over Afghan Opium and Heroin production and distribution. Catholic drug syndicates launder illegal drug incomes through Vatican based financial institutions. Sunni drug syndicates launder drug incomes through Arabian Gulf financial institutions in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Riyadh, Jeddah, Dammam, Kuwait, Qatar and Bahrain. American Big Oil lobbied to arrange White House support to Wahhabi Arab terrorists in Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan and Pakistan to empower Wahhabi terrorists takeover of Afghanistan, so that oil-producing nations be brought under control of American Oil Colonialism.

 

(6) Alliance of Predator Religious Cults

Iconoclast Religious Intolerance profited by gas and oil reserves of OAPEC and Caspian Sea Basin, and $750 billion annual incomes of the Drug syndicates, to forge global alliance of iconoclast Monotheist predator religious cults to wage wars of terrorism on Hindu Indian Civilization and Orthodox Russ Slav Civilization, to cause religious and ethnic riots in Kashmir and Chechnya, hoping to recreate Kosovo in Kashmir and Chechnya, serve the interest of American oil colonialism. India and Russia should join forces to retaliate against Vatican and Mecca to protect the multi-religious character of secular India and secular Russia. Vatican led by archconservative Pope John Paul II and Mecca led by Wahhabi Osama bin Laden, financed by Catholic and Sunni drug cartels, aspire to overhaul the geo-political structure of the world. Geo-political ambitions of Papacy and Wahhabi Clergy threatens world peace and cause global clash of races. Boris Yeltsin-led Orthodox Russia found itself face to face with Catholic forces in Yugoslavia that aspired to overhaul the geo-political structure of the Balkans. President Putin’s Russia found itself face to face with Mecca militant Islamism in Chechnya that aspired to overhaul the geo-political structure of the oil-rich Caspian Sea basin, empowered by the global nexus of global drug trade, American oil colonialism, and Papal an Wahhabi religious intolerance. The CIA has replaced Pentagon as the favored instrument of American colonialism, and it finances its covert operations by global drug trade and global oil trade. The global nexus of Intolerance, oil, drugs, corruption and coups legitimized by the CIA’s penchant for covert operations, threatens the civilization nation Empires in the post-Cold War Age. The religious intolerance of conservative Vatican and Mecca, joined forces with White Catholic Cocaine Cartel and Wahhabi Sunni Heroin Cartel, to launch terrorist and proselytizing attacks to help establish American oil colonies in oil-rich Muslim nations. In simplistic terms, the notorious terrorist Osama Bin Laden, and his fellow Muslim Mujahideens continue to enjoy political, financial and military support of the Catholic and Sunni drug cartels, iconoclast Mecca and Vatican, American Oil colonialism and the CIA. During post-Columbus era, after 1500 European colonial powers and Roman Catholic Church, used iconoclast religious intolerance as guiding state policy to massacre the highly advance Aztec, Maya and Inca Civilizations, primarily to secure empty agricultural lands for white European Christian race. Similarly, Pentagon and the CIA employing the assets of the Catholic and Sunni drug cartels, the Vatican and Mecca's intolerance and fundamentalism, to secure political and military control over the oil and gas fields of Arabia and Caspian Sea Basin. The control over oil and gas resources of Arabian Gulf, Caspian Sea basin and African West Coast, determines the nature of the emerging global clash of races.

 

(7) Response of Civilizations

What should be the response of the world civilizations, namely, Hindu Indian, Orthodox Russ Slav and Sinic Buddhist Civilizations to the geo-political threat posed by: (a) Vatican-Mecca nexus of religious intolerance; (b) Catholic Cocaine-Wahhabi Heroin nexus of organized drug syndicates; (c) Wahhabi terrorists-the CIA nexus of religious cum military cum terrorist covert operations; and (d) Wahhabi-Oil colonialism nexus of pro-fundamentalism American Oil Colonialism?

 

36(10) On Religious Intolerance

(1) Religious Intolerance in USA

Christian religious intolerance joined forces with intolerant Wahhabi Muslims, intolerant Zionist cabal to promote the interests of the pro-segregation whites in United States, to oppose the destabilizing effects of the 1964 Bill of Rights signed into law by President Lynden B Johnson. Jews were second-class citizens in United States as late as 1965. Secretary Henry Kissinger secured the political alliance of Zionist Cabal with pro-segregation whites, pro-impeachment of Nixon Democratic caucus, and Christian religious right conservatives to create the global alliance of pro-religious intolerance forces in Israel, Saudi Arabia and United States. Zionist Cabal joined forces with pro-segregation whites, Republican Neo-conservatives, Christian religious right conservative conspiracy, and American Big Oil colonialism to promote Wahhabi religious intolerance as a vehicle to establish American oil colony over Iraq, Syria and Iran, and to establish domination of Wahhabi Mecca Caliphate over Iraq, Syria and Iraq. The role played by Zionist Cabal in misguiding Republican Neo-conservatives and American oil colonialism to wage military invasions of Iraq, Syria and possibly Iran during Bush Administration, foretells the danger the election of a Jewish president of United States would pose to the world.

 

(2) Intolerance Caused World Wars

Religious intolerance emerged as the leading cause of world wars in the 20th Century. Barbarian invasions of predator religious cults and religious intolerance are great menace facing the World Civilizations in 21st Century. Roman Empire and Roman Civilization, British Empire and British Commonwealth may have been well and kicking today, had they banished Roman Catholic Church and Roman Catholicism from the territories of Roman and British empires. Church of Rome misused the religious tolerance of the Roman Empire, by decreeing during Christian Roman Emperor Theodosius I (d. 395) to ban all non-Christian religions throughout Roman Empire by sword. Church of Rome misused the religious tolerance of British Empire by engineering the secession of English-speaking Catholic Ireland from English-speaking Great Britain. Vatican successfully conspired the secession of Catholic Slovenia and Catholic Croatia from Yugoslavia. Multi-ethnic Protestant United States and Hindu India could be the next target of the Papacy for disintegration during 21st Century. Catholic Super Power could be creating by separating Catholic–majority states of United States and merging it with Catholic-majority states of Canada and Mexico.

 

(3) Wall Separates State and Church

The Founding Fathers of the 1787 Constitution prudently created the wall separating State and the Church, to neutralize any future destabilizing conspiracy of the Papacy. Hindu Indians and Buddhist Chinese fear that in future Catholic President occupying the Oval Office could turn out to be as fanatic as Christian Roman Emperor Theodosius I (d. 395), who may misuse the separation of power and executive privileges to deploy military resources of the worlds sole super power to destroy non-Christian religions. World has not as yet compensated Cambodia for the genocide of 2 million Buddhists in Cambodia, caused by the arch-conservative policies of Secretary Henry J. Kissinger during Nixon and Ford Administrations. Unless checked, fundamentalist conservatives may conspire Cambodia-type genocide in Hindu India and Buddhist China. The genocidal potential of religious intolerance and predator religious cults is real and mind boggling. The plural, liberal secular World Civilizations must ever remain vigilant to the threat of religious intolerance posed by predator religious cults and secret religious societies funded by Catholic cocaine cartels and Sunni heroin cartels.

 

(4) Swords of Tolerance Vs Intolerance

World history is the chronicle of the ongoing war between nations and societies that espouse religious tolerance and those that fanatically propagate religious intolerance. The global clash of races can be summed as global war between religious tolerance and religious intolerance. All ancient matriarchal religions and the religions of universal mother goddess in agricultural societies espoused religious tolerance. The ancient Hinduism is the religion of Goddess and Hindu traditions made India the heaven of religious freedom and universal religious tolerance. India is the mother of religious tolerance and total freedom for all religions, sects and creeds, including freedom to atheism and atheistic creeds. India guarantees freedom, to reject the idea of religion itself, and to lead the life of atheism. Hindu scripture Gita, declares that there are innumerable paths to divinity and every one should choose the path suited to his or her temperament. Religious tolerance implies freedom to directly connect with the divine reality, with or without the intermediacy of the priest class. In religious tolerant states, priests do not have an authority to impose their version of religious practices on the believers or non-believers. All Oriental religions espouse total religious tolerance. Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, Jainism, Sikhism, and paganism espouse religious freedom to pursue any multitude paths to connect with the divinity. Brown Hindu Indian Civilization, and yellow Buddhist Japanese and Sinic civilizations abhor religious intolerance and guarantee freedom of religion, freedom of religious sects and freedom to modify religious practices and religious dogmas. Asian civilizations, Hindu and Buddhist civilizations are free from the curse of religious intolerance and Hindus and Buddhists represent more than half of the mankind. Ancient religions of Egypt, Greece and Rome espoused religious tolerance. Ancient India, China, Egypt, Greece, Rome and Persia espoused religious tolerance. Zoroastrian, Maggi, and Mazdaq religions respected the religious beliefs of opponents. Even as late as 4th Century Roman Empire and Persian Empire worshipped the same God Mithra, and sough the blessing of the same god Mithra in the same war.

 

(5) Pro-Oil Global Alliance of Intolerance

The religious intolerance of Jews, Roman Catholics and Wahhabi Sunnis resulted in the global alliance of Iconoclast Monotheist religions, which threatens the stability and territorial integrity of the multi-ethnic civilization states, and established American oil colonies throughout Islamic oil-producing nations. Islamic religious intolerance threatens global clash of races as Christian powers lent their full diplomatic and military support to propagate the cause of Islamic religious intolerance, because it has consistently promoted the economic interests of American Oil Colonialism. In exchange for religious absolutism in Mecca and Medina and political power to Islamic militants in Iran, Kosovo and Afghanistan, the Wahhabi clergy agreed to impose the rule of American Oil Colonial Empire throughout oil-producing Islamic world. American Oil Colonialism arranged the full support of the White House behind Wahhabi religious intolerance, in exchange for total American control over Arab oil and gas resources. Hindu India and Orthodox Russia realizes that Christian powers lent their full diplomatic support to Wahhabi militant Islamic fundamentalism in Iran, Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Chechnya, Kashmir, and Sudan to promote American colonial interests in oil and gas rich Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.

 

(6) Jews attacked Tolerant Societies

The global alliance of monotheistic religious intolerance and iconoclast Wahhabi Islam and Catholic Christianity presents grave threat to the tolerant, multi-religious civilization nations, namely, Russia and India. The religious bedrock of the global alliance of iconoclast religious intolerance provides theological justification of the Militant Islam’s Jihad on tolerant and secular India and Russia. Rise of Judaism in the Jordan and Jerusalem represented the advent of religious intolerance. The religious intolerance is the nomad Jews’ gift to the world. Semite nomad Jews selectively attacked goddess-worshipping agricultural cities in the Jordan. The self-sufficient pastoral economy of Jews shepherds gave Jews the advantage of mobility and employment to female shepherds that gave economic incentive to polygamy. The subjugation of women gave economic justification to polygamy and allowed total control over workforce of female sheepherders. The female sheepherders became as productive as male sheepherders, allowing Jewish men folk concentrate on warfare, which gave them a military edge over men farmers in goddess worshipping agricultural societies. Patriarchy militarily conquered the agricultural communities, killed its men folk and forced women into concubine and polygamy. Jewish religious leaders justified the Jews religious intolerance as it justified the slaughter of the men folk of the conquered matriarchal societies. Iconoclastic theology became a favored imperialist weapons wielded by patriarchal nomad Jews to loot the gold and women of the matriarchal cities.

 

(7) Jews Looted Ancient Civilizations

Hellenic Jews during 4th Century joined forces with fanatic Christian Roman Emperor Theodosius I (d. 395), and used His royal edict that banned pagan religions to loot the thousands of opulent temples of God Zeus, Ossir, Mithra and Goddess Isis, Athena, Hera throughout Greece, Roman Empire, Asia Minor, Egypt and Syria. Religious Iconoclasts looted the gold and riches of the ancient temples and became enriched by the loot. Enriched by the success of the religious bigotry of Emperor Theodosius I, Roman Catholic Church continued its long practice of religious intolerance from 375 AD to the 21st Century, for more than 1600 years. Church of Rome practiced religious intolerance throughout witch burning of Inquisitions and genocide of Incas and Mayas in South America. The 1965 Synod Bishops gave some hope that Roman Catholic Church would undergo reform. However, the ultra-conservative Pontificate of John Paul II did resurrect religious intolerance as the guiding principle of Roman Catholicism.

 

(8) Damascus Jews Financed Muslim Wars

Damascus Jews and urban Arab traders joined forces in the 7th Century, to harness the iconoclastic Islamic theology to finance the Bedouin Muslim raiding parties to loot the riches of Syria, Egypt, and Libya. Islamic religious intolerance justified the enslavement of the men folk, subjugation of women into polygamy and concubinage and looting of the wealth and gold in the Apostolic, Gnostic Christian Egypt, Syria and Libya. Religious intolerance was principally a ruse to subjugate the women of the pagans and to loot the wealth and property of the pagans and to enslave the men folk of the pagans.

 

(9) Britain Created Wahhabi Monster

In the beginning of the 20th century, British Empire and Papacy resurrected the Iconoclast Sunni doctrine of Wahhabi to undermine the liberal Ottoman Sultanate. Militant Wahhabi religious intolerance and fundamentalism became the instrument of foreign policy to promote the political interests of British Empire and Papacy. Just as during 7th Century, the Damascus Jews had financed Bedouin raiding parties to loot the gold of Egypt, Syria and Libya, during 20th Century, the British Empire and American Empire financed Wahhabi Bedouin terrorists to attack Ottomans and to capture control over Mecca and Medina, so that American and British could make establish oil colonies in the oil-producing Arab nations. Wahhabi religious intolerance became convenient tools in the arsenals of American Empire and British Empire to loot the oil-riches of the Arab world. The British secret services financed and supported Wahhabi raiders to undermine Ottoman rule. British Indian Empire created the artificial state of Iraq, to control Iraqi oil riches. British rulers partitioned Indian Empire to create the artificial state of Pakistan to hinder India’s domination of Iranian and Iraqi oil. America and the CIA supported Wahhabi terrorists in Afghanistan, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan to control the oil and gas reserves of Caspian Sea basin countries. 

 

(10) Wars on Civilization-Nations

In 1994, Russia and India signed the “Declaration of Protection of Rights in Pluralistic States,” to manifest commitment to principles and fairness when the foreign-inspired religious and communal terrorism, grows and jeopardize the lives of the people and territorial integrity and sovereignty of the multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multi-linguistic civilization nation states. In the perception of India and Russia, predator religious cults and subversive secret religious societies, propagated and nurtured by militant fundamentalist Wahhabi Mecca and arch-conservative Vatican, exploiting secularism and freedom of the multi-religious pluralist civilization nations, to undertake covert operations. Organized crime, organize predator conservative religious cults, and organized secret services, must not misuse the democratic freedom, religious tolerance and secular society of Russia and India to undertake covert operations, to promote anti-women religious bigotry, militant fundamentalism, and ethnic separatism to cause religious strife and communal riots in Russia and India. Orthodox Russia, Hindu India and Buddhist China, the multi-ethnic Civilization nation states, representing Russ Slav, Sinic and Indian Civilization have an inherent right to undertake military action to destroy the home base of predator religious cults. In the Global Clash of Races the covert operations of the non-state fronts of predator religious cults, necessitates the military response of the civilization nation empires.

 

36(11) Vatican-Mecca Intolerance

 

(1) Predator Monotheism Wars on Pagans

Pope John Paul II cemented the Vatican-Mecca Axis of Religious Intolerance, to pool the religious resources of Monotheist Christianity and Islam to force Iconoclast Monotheist religions on polytheist pagan African tribal civilizations. Zionist Cabal entered into Tel Aviv-Riyadh Axis to promote the domination of Mecca Caliphate over Iraq, Syria and Iran to bring Iraqi and Iranian oil under the control of American oil colonialism. Saudi Arabia’s religious adventures that imposed Shariah over oil-rich Nigeria and Sudan promoted the Christian interests of the Vatican as well as oil interests of American Big Oil colonialism. Vatican-Mecca Axis of Religious Intolerance sought to bring under Catholic controls the Orthodox Christian religious properties in the Holy Land and Church of Nativity in Bethlehem, which necessitated the partition of Jewish Israel to carve out Muslim Palestine State. The Tel Aviv-Jeddah Zionist-Wahhabi Axis of Oil Colonialism sought to promote the expansion of Mecca Caliphate throughout secular, liberal Islamic world, as Wahhabi rulers agreed to American control over Wahhabi oil resources and military policymaking. To Saudi Arabians the interests of the Mecca Caliphate and Oil colonialism overcame the conflicting proselytizing interests of the Monotheist religions. The Vatican recognized Israel only in 1995, while Saudi Wahhabi leaders accepted the reality of newly created artificial State of Jewish Israel, because like Jewish Israel, the artificial Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, based on the concept of Wahhabi religion as the basis of Saudi Kingdom. The oil and Caliphate interests of Tel Aviv-Riyadh Axis of Oil conflicts with the religious interests of Vatican-Mecca Axis.

 

Catholic Church enjoyed historic alliance with fundamentalist Sunni sect and used these ties to settle historic battles with other Christian sects and other religions. Muslim’s Koran declares that Christians lost their original Bible, meaning that original Christian Bible was the Bible of Apostolic Gnostic Arian Christians, while the Roman Catholic Bible and Orthodox Bible are not original Bible. Shariah law of Muslim nations, including Pakistan would hang Catholic priests for blasphemy. Why then Vatican seeks closer political and theological ties with Wahhabi Sunni? Pope John Paul II secured Axis of Intolerance with Mecca, to develop common Catholic-Sunni front to impose Shariah Law over pagan Africans, to militarily force animists and pagans choose either Islam or Christianity. Anti-Women, pro-Life, anti-Abortion, Catholic religious conservatism, during Pontificate of John Paul II, no more liberal than the anti-women, Wahhabi fundamentalism, if one takes into account the Civilization difference of Italy and Saudi Arabia. Just as Wahhabi Mecca aims to turn the clock back to seventh century throughout modern Muslim, Catholic religious conservatism aims to turn the clock back to Medieval Dark ages when Catholic Inquisition reigned. The looming global Medieval Dark Age could descend on the European Union in 21st Century, if archconservative Vatican allowed its way in Europe. The religious intolerance practiced by predator religious sects propagated by Vatican and Mecca aims to derail the modernization process of the 21st Century, to impose End of Time, Apocalyptic teleological conditions on Christian and Islamic world. Vatican and Mecca must be reformed and brought under the control of tolerant Christians and tolerant Muslims, to end the menace of religious intolerance, preached by Vatican and Mecca. Should tolerant pluralist Civilizations use force to end the reign of religious intolerance in the Vatican and Mecca? Propagation of religious intolerance by religious leaders presiding over the principle centers of world religions is legitimate causus belli. Would Civilization wage Third World War to check the menace of Religious Intolerance? Use of military force to wage War on Religious Intolerance and Predator Religions would be a Just War.

 

(2) Vatican-Mecca Axis of Intolerance

Roman Catholic Church during the long Pontificate of Pope John Paul II, perhaps failed to convert or entice even 1,000 Sunni Muslims to Roman Catholicism. Arch conservatism and anti-women and anti-abortion doctrines of the Vatican, makes Vatican as conservative and fundamentalist as Wahhabi Mecca. Muslim nations, including Pakistan have hanged Catholic priests for blasphemy and attempted conversions. Holy Koran declares that Christians lost the original Bible, meaning that the present Roman Catholic Bible is false scripture. Church of Rome has historically co-conspired with the Sunni Muslims for the destruction of non-Catholic Christian churches, to establish ascendancy of the Church of Rome, in its fratricidal wars of Christian religious sects. During Fourth Crusades Catholic Crusaders looted Orthodox Christian Byzantine. Church of Rome supported, aided and abetted the Ottoman Turks in their successful conquest of Byzantine Empire and Constantinople. Church of Rome conspired the secession of Catholic Ireland from Great Britain, laying the foundation of the subsequent demise of British Empire. The Thirty Years Counter Reformation Wars (1618-1648) proved that in the eye of the Papacy, Protestants are the mortal enemy of Church of Rome, next to Orthodox Christianity. Immediately after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Pope John Paul II, opposed President Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism in 2001 and he opposed President Bush’s war on Iraq in 2003. Catholic terrorists suspected to launch anthrax attacks on Protestant political leaders immediately after the 9/11 attacks. Saudi Arabian hijackers planned their terrorist attacks on European soil, in Germany and Spain the Catholic-majority nations. Sunni terrorists did not target any Catholic nation, and they targeted only Protestant nations. Papacy led the diplomatic initiative to demand the creation of sovereign Muslim state of Palestine, out of the Christian Holy Land properties, including the sacred Christian Church of Nativity. Pope John Paul II does not support the idea of creation of the Christian Holy State of Christine, in the Christian Holy Land, where Jesus Christ was born, lived and preached. Why Christian Pope does not support the idea of Christian State of Christine? Why Pope John Paul II did not condemn Palestine Muslim terrorists, who defecated and urinated on the Holy Altar at the Church of Nativity during their siege of the Church? Neither Pope John Paul II nor Vatican officials condemned the destruction of Bamian Buddhist statues in Afghanistan. It appears that anti-women and anti-abortion Catholic ultra-conservatism represents one side of the same coin, and the Wahhabi fundamentalism represents the other side of the same anti-women and anti-liberalism coin. Vatican employed Muslim drug dealers to disintegrate multi-ethnic Yugoslavia. To engineer the secession of Catholic Slovenia and Croatia from Yugoslavia federation, Vatican joined forces with Muslim separatists. Catholics and Wahhabi Muslims joined forces in Nigeria to impose Shariah laws over pagan populations in Nigeria. Vatican cooperates with Mecca to develop joint Catholic-Wahhabi iconoclast religious intolerant front to destroy pagan religions in Africa and Asia. In exchange the Sunni clergy to target Protestant Christians in Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Africa.

 

Taming Islamic Intolerance

India and Russia can tame Wahhabi Sunni intolerance by pouring oil on the Shiite-Sunni conflicts and by supporting Shiite Iran’s dream of Shiite control over Mecca and Medina. Wahhabi fundamentalism would lose its political edge if Arab Wahhabi Sunnis lose control over Mecca and Medina. Iraqi Shiite and Iranian Shiite Muslims outnumber Wahhabi Sunni Muslims. Helped by Russia and India, Shiites from Iran and Iraq could dream takeover of Islamic holy cities. The Shiite Muslims enjoy majority in the oil-rich Saudi Al Hasa Province, bordering the oil-rich Arabian Gulf, and they would join with Iran and Iraq. Further partitioning of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Iraq into two separate states each, to carve out separate states for Sunni and Shiite Arab people would eradicate the menace of Wahhabi religious intolerance. Shiite Saudi Arabia, Shiite UAE, Shiite Kuwait and Shiite Iraq would join forces with India and Russia to check the military threat emanating from their Sunni neighbors. India and Russia can tame Wahhabi intolerance by helping Pakistan or Turkey conquer Saudi Arabia, by recognizing Pakistan as Caliph of Islam. By engineering a military coup in Saudi Arabia, the military coup leaders may impose Kemalist secular laws over Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia could be partitioned into five separate sovereign Islamic states, namely Kingdom of Riyadh, Kingdom of Jeddah, Kingdom of Mecca and Medina, Kingdom of Dammam and Shiite Kingdom of Al Hasa. It is very likely that nuclear Pakistan would invade and occupy Kuwait and Saudi Arabia before the end of the first decade and Pakistani men would marry 10 million Arab women as 2nd, 3rd and 4th wives and 50 million Pakistani nationals would move to permanently settle down in Arabian Peninsula before 2020 AD. Pakistan’s conquest of Kuwait, UAE and Saudi Arabia would not harm India’s national interest. Pakistan should become the custodian of Holy cities of Mecca and Medina. Nuclear Pakistan should establish Islamabad Caliphate and bring all oil-producing Arab nations under the control of civilized Pakistan. As a new Islamic Caliph, Pakistan would receive half of the total oil-incomes of OAPEC nations as tribute to the new Caliph of Islam. India would prefer Saudi Arabia and Kuwait as colonial possession of Muslim Pakistan, than as the colonial possession of Christian colonial powers. The principle Islamic sects of India and Pakistan, namely, Deobandis or Bareilwi sects should replace Wahhabi sect as the dominant sect of Mecca and Medina.

 

36(12) Taming Saudi Intolerance

(1) Colonial Iraq foretells demise of Saudis

After regime change in Iraq, Untied States must militarily enforce regime changes in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Qatar and Bahrain, to create New Middle East. American Oil Colonialism after the conquest of Iraq would need neither the continued support of the Mecca’s Wahhabi clergy nor the support of the corrupt House of Al Saud royal family to secure the supplies of Arab oil, and thereby United States might establish direct colonial rule over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE, by harnessing the military support of pro-American Palestinians, Iraqis, Syrians and Iranians. Those Iraqis, Syrians and Iranians that agreed to subvert their national identity and independence under American oil colonialism, would be willing to lay down their lives to impose American colonial rule over Wahhabi Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Qatar, and Oman, simply to punish them for their support to American invasions of Iraq.

 

(2) Saudi Core of Axis of Evil

Wahhabi Saudi Arabia is the core of the Axis of Evil Intolerance. Wahhabi sect seeks to conquer other Islamic religious sects, even when only 2 percent of the Muslims of the world practice Wahhabi sect. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, United Arab Emirates are artificial political entities and they never existed as nation in the history. Saudi Arabia and Kuwait were either parts of Egypt or Iran or Turkey and they should not exist as independent nations. Wahhabi religious sect was propagated by British secret services to mobilize Arab desert Bedouin to weaken the political control of Ottoman Empires over Arabian desert lands, where oil had been discovered. Civilized Islamic nations, Pakistan, Iran, or Egypt should takeover Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE to impose moderate, civilized Islamic religious doctrines over Mecca and Medina. Unless militarily checked, Wahhabi Religious Intolerance could undermine liberal, civilized Muslim societies. Civilized Muslim nations may wage war on Saudi Arabia and expel Wahhabi Arabs from Arabian Peninsula to bring back Mecca and Medina under the rule of civilized, modern and liberal Muslims. Should tolerant world civilizations militarily help civilized Muslim powers namely Pakistan, or Iran, or Afghanistan, or Bangladesh, or Indonesia, or Egypt, or Turkey to conquer and takeover barbarian Wahhabi Saudi Arabia to impose secular, modern European laws over Saudi Arabia? Should American Big Oil establish direct American colonial rule over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE and impose American Constitution, and American laws over Wahhabi Arabia? The loss of sovereignty of Wahhabi Arab oil-producing nations is a small price to pay to rid the world of the menace of Religious Intolerance.     

 

(3) Condemn Saudi Arabia for Intolerance

The State Department named six nations to its list of particular concern for violating religious freedom- North Korea, Iraq, Iran, Sudan, China and Burma. Naming Saudi Arabia, as the violator of religious freedom is something that we are going to have to consider very seriously, said Ambassador John Hanford, the US ambassador for religious freedom. Senator John McCain urged Powell to declare Saudi Arabian Kingdom a “major violator of religious freedom. The designation of Saudi Arabia would be a strong symbolic statement of America’s larger concern about the denial of basic freedom in Saudi Arabia and Arabian Gulf. It would demonstrate in a responsible, measured, but powerful way that under President Bush, America’s policy towards Arabian Gulf is indeed changing in many ways. Senator John McCain (R-Arizona) wants Saudi Arabia labeled as a major violator of religious freedom. Secretary of State Colin L. Powell will be asked to choose whether Saudi Arabia should be spotlighted for its poor record. Saudi Arabia, a longtime US ally would take a place alongside such countries as North Korea, Burma and China as subjects of official ire. United States should demand a project to refuse Saudi textbooks and encourage Saudi government to furnish unadorned buildings for non-Muslim religions prohibited from practicing their faith in public.

 

The US Commission on International Religious Freedom, a governmental agency, has recommended that Powell name Saudi Arabia a country of particular concern for violating religious freedom, opening the possibility of diplomatic or economic sanction. Rep. Tom Lantos (D-Calif.) contends that 1998 International Religious Freedom Act requires the move to label Saudi Arabia as a major violator of religious freedom. Re. Frank R. Wolf (R-Va.) asks: How can the US State Department not name Saudi Arabia as violator of religious freedom? Saudi Arabia clearly ought to be named as violator.

 

The Saudi monarchy’s record of religious intolerance is well documented. Saudi prohibition on the practice of non-Muslim religion in public, recorded in state department’s October report on Global Religious Practices. Saudi Shiite Muslims, numbering over one million, face political and economic discrimination. Freedom of Religion does not exist in Saudi Arabia. Non-Muslim worshippers risk arrest, imprisonment, lashing, deportation and some time torture for engaging in overt religious activity. Saudi judges very often discount the court testimony of non-Muslim people, and Muslims who do not practice Islam according to Wahhabi interpretation. Christian Bibles and religious videotapes are subject to confiscation. Non-Muslim clergy are not permitted to enter Saudi Arabia to conduct religious services, despite the presence of more than 5 million foreigners of many faiths in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Shiite Muslims have documented hate speech at Sunni mosques and among educators at Saudi public schools. More than 93 Ismailies are in Saudi prison because of their faith.

 

The reluctance of president Bush to name Saudi Arabia as violator of religious freedom undermines president’s stated ambition to spread democracy in the Middle East. Washington’s friendly treatment of Saudi Arabia and Egypt are evidence of US inconsistency. The failure to name Saudi Arabia as violator of religious freedom would be read by Saudis as a sign that their special relationship with the United States protects them from the kind of scrutiny that every other country in the world gets. The only way to overcome the mistrust of American motives among the good guys in the world is to be more consistent, and Saudi Arabia is probably the biggest test of that. Saudi Arabia gets away with numerous violations of American law, because Saudi Embassy has perfected the art of bribing top officials, diplomats and functionaries in the State Department in successive Republican as well as Democratic administrations, who are handsomely rewarded or paid in cash or in kind, either during their service or after their leave the governmental jobs.

 

36(13) Taming Papal Intolerance

(1) Pope Condemned War on Terrorism

Pope John Paul II challenged the might of America and opposed President Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism in Afghanistan as well as Iraq. President Bush should mobilize Protestant forces to undermine the control and role Vatican enjoyed over Roman Catholic Churches in United States, to check the Papal Intolerance, so that the might of the Vatican might never be used to oppose the national interests of Protestant American colonial empires in the future. The interests of the Papacy would no longer coincide with the interests of the White House and the interests of American oil colonialism in the 21st Century. The long-term interests of American oil colonialism necessitated the control over the Vatican’s religious intolerance. American colonial empire can no longer afford to sacrifice risk its oil interests at the altar of Catholic apocalyptic teleological End of Time theology.

 

(2) France Italy Oppose Papacy

France, Germany, Spain and Italy have historically worked to tame the political aspirations of Roman Catholic Church, Vatican and Papacy. Should citizens of Italy reestablish the Monarchy of House of Savoy and install the descendant of King Victor Emmanuel II as King of Italy in 21st Century and abolish the sovereignty of the Vatican? In 1870, the King of Italy, King Victor Emmanuel II, of House of Savoy Monarchy, unified Italy for the first time after the collapse of the Roman Empire, and entered Vatican and divested Pope of all temporal and secular powers, and successive Popes remained prisoners of the Vatican from 1870 to 1929. Should Italy decree the abolition of the Papal Empire? Should directly elected President of Italy preside over Roman Catholic Church? Should the institution of Papacy abolished in the 21st Century? Should Catholic laity worldwide, directly elect Catholic Pope and Catholic Cardinals for a single term of five years? Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Democratization of Papacy and Roman Catholic Church is the moral imperative of the modern age. Papacy is a form of monarchy, which became an outdated system in the 21st Century. Catholic laity should directly control the economic assets of the Roman Catholic Church. Catholic Clergy, Cardinals, and Bishops should serve at the pleasure of Catholic laity. Papacy represents the outdated system of Priest-Kings. Perhaps a woman should be elected as Pope, a head of the Roman Catholic Church. Should Italy-born Catholic Sonia Gandhi become the next Pope and head of the Roman Catholic Church worldwide?

 

(3) Protestants to Tame Vatican’s Intolerance

In the Global clash of races, the tolerant non-Denominational Protestant Christians would be on the same side of the war as tolerant Hindus and tolerant Buddhists. More than 60 percent of the American population, belong to Protestant Non-Denominational Christian sect, and outnumbers Catholic Americans and Protestant Evangelicals and Protestant Southern Baptists. Vast majority of American citizens abhor religious intolerance. WASPs United States leads the world in opposing the curse of religious intolerance. The WASPs drafted US Constitution to become a bull work against religious intolerance. Vast majority of the American public opposes the archconservative agenda propagated during the conservative Pontificate of Pope John Paul II, which overturned the liberal Catholic Agenda announced in 1965 Catholic Synod. US Elections 2000 represented the direct election between anti-women, pro-life, and anti-abortion political forces on one side and pro-women, pro-choice, pro-abortion political forces. Papal conservative agenda had swamped the political agenda in American presidential election. Contrary to the popular belief, President Bush and Bush Administration do not belong to the Christian religious right conservative conspiracy, even when the latter politically endorsed the Bush-Cheney presidential ticket. Just as anti-abortion movement camouflaged Catholic agenda to challenge the dominance of the WASPs in the United States, the present anti-War movement to oppose President Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism and WMDs in Iraq, camouflages the Vatican-Mecca Axis of Intolerance. It is no accident that Wahhabi Sunni terrorists targeted only Protestant USA, and Sunni terrorists avoided targeting Catholic targets in Europe, even when Sunni Arabs enjoyed more freedom and privileges in WASPs United States than in Catholic European Union. Protestant Americans in general favor pro-women, pro-choice and pro-abortion agenda, which is anathema to conservative clergy in Vatican as well as Mecca. During Elections 2004, the Non-Denominational Protestant Christians, numbering 200 million strong would politically articulate their opposition to forces of religious intolerance and voice their support to President Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism. The opposition to the 1964 Bill of Rights became the foundation, on which Pope John Paul II developed his ultra-conservative Catholic religious right agenda, which camouflaged its opposition to 1964 Bill of Rights and 1965 Synod of Bishops, using euphemism of pro-Life and anti-Abortion movements. The pro-Life agenda camouflages the pro-segregation agenda.

 

(4) Pedophile Clergy Issue

American Christians, Protestants as well as Catholics are aghast that the Vatican refused to expel the Catholic Bishops guilty of protecting the pedophile priests. The American court cases against pedophile judges has given rise to demand that world’s most powerful Christian nation must undertake legislative and diplomatic measures to force Vatican’s totalitarian theocracy become modern and democratic to meet the needs of the 21st Century. Should United States force the sovereign state of Vatican, to allow the direct elections of the Pope, Cardinals, and Bishops for a fixed period term, for a 5-year term period by the Catholic laity worldwide? How can United States allow the Vatican to deny its believers the right to elect its leaders by direct elections? White Catholic Cocaine Cartels control the global Cocaine drug trade and Sunni Heroin cartel controls the global Heroin trade. Mafia and Church nexus allowed it to implant Mafiosi Giulio Andreotti as the seven-time prime minister of Italy.

 

(5) King Victor Emmanuel II

Italy has historically been at the forefront of the Christian State asserting its power over the Church. In 1870, the King of Italy, King Victor Emmanuel II, of House of Savoy Monarchy, unified Italy for the first time after the collapse of the Roman Empire, and entered Vatican and divested Pope of all temporal and secular powers, and successive Popes remained prisoners of the Vatican from 1870 to 1929. Just as Chinese abolished the Dalai Lama theocracy in Tibet, it is possible that the secular government of Italy may reform or democratize Papacy, allowing laity greater control and supervision of religion. It is very likely Italian public would rise and demand the direct election of the Head of the State of the Vatican and the direct elections of Bishops and the Cardinals by Catholic laity worldwide, on the principal of one-man one-vote.

 

(6) Is Democratic Party a Party of Unbelief

Democratic President Carter and President Clinton had been agents of Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy. Democratic Party members oppose Christian Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy. Many members of the Republican Party belong to the Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy. However, President Bush does not belong to Religious Right Conservative Conspiracy.

 

Democratic Party is the party of secularist Americans. Democratic presidential nominee Albert Al Gore lost the presidential elections in 2000, primarily because he nominated Orthodox Jew Joseph Liebermann as his vice President running mate, under pressure of Catholic fundamentalists and Evangelical Protestants who had earlier supported the presidential run of Jimmy Carter. Fundamentalist Catholic Christians now support Joseph Libermann’s democratic nomination hoping by supporting Orthodox Jew, would camouflage their anti-black, pro-segregation, and religious right conservative agenda, and make them politically correct. The political rise of Jews in New York State, with the victory of billionaire Michael Bloomberg resulted in the corresponding decline of Black leadership in the Democratic Party. The pro-segregation fundamentalist Christians promoted pro-segregation agenda by helping Jews replace blacks in Democratic Party leadership. The Catholic/Evangelical religious right conspiracy promoted anti-secularism agenda by promoted the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination of Orthodox Jew Joseph Liebermann, as it would undermine the secularist agenda of the Democratic Party.

 

(7) Secularist Democrats

In 2003, Secularist Democrats are about as large a Democratic voting bloc as organized labor. Democratic Secularists represent about 16 percent of the white electorate in the United States. Democratic Fundamentalist Christians represent only 1% of the Democrats in America. The opposition to religious intolerance defines the political culture in Democratic Party. After the 1964 Bill of Rights signed by Democratic President Lynden B. Johnson, Democratic elites abhorred religious intolerance, religious fundamentalism and fundamentalist Christians.

 

Neither Republicans nor Democrats support religious intolerance. The religion gap among white voters, is more important than the gender, education, income, occupation, age, marital status or region in explaining cleavages among voters in the last three presidential elections, in 2000, 1996, 1992, which elected President Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.

 

(8) Republican Religious Conservatism

During President Ronald Reagan Administration, the Republican Party had become the party of religious conservatives, where Catholic and Evangelical Christian religious right conservative conspiracy defined national policies. However, under President George W. Bush, Bush Administration is not Christian Religious Conservative Administration and Republican Party no longer the party of Catholic Evangelical religious conservatives. The political agenda of WASP Protestant religious conservatism diametrically opposed to the agenda of Catholic/Evangelical religious conservatism. If the GOP can be labeled the party of religious conservatives, the Democratic Party, with equal validity, can be called the Secularist Party, because secularism and anti-apartheid, anti-segregation and anti-intolerance defines the political character of the Democratic Party.

 

Just as President Bush sought to reassure moderates without alienating his base by running as the kind of Christian who scares nobody's mama, a lot of straight God talk by Democratic presidential nominee can hold the Party of Unbelief, without alienating the vast middle of a basically religious country.

 

(9) Democratic Party of Unbelief

The problem for Democratic presidential nominee is that if the Republicans are the party of the Christian right, the Democrats, are increasingly the Party of Unbelief. Atheists, agnostics, anti-fundamentalists and determined secularists flock to Democratic banners. The Democrats' dilemma is that just as Republicans need to win the evangelical-fundamentalist vote without scaring off religious moderates, so too must Democrats mobilize secularists and anti-fundamentalists without becoming too identified in public discourse as the party hostile to religion.

 

(10) Conspiracy of Kissinger

Dr. Henry J. Kissinger, during Nixon administration won the affection of conservative Catholics, fundamentalist Christians and Evangelical Protestants by promoting Christian proselytizing agenda in Cambodia, Laos and Burma during and after the Vietnam War, which sought to impose Christianity over Buddhist Cambodia and Laos with the help of anti-Buddhist Mao tse tung. Annoyed by the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Catholic fundamentalist conservatives and conservative Evangelical Protestants, developed warm and fuzzy feelings towards Jews, as reward for the Christian proselytizing role played by Dr. Henry Kissinger in Cambodia, Laos, Burma and Uganda. President Nixon was decidedly anti-Semite and Nixon Administration included many anti-Semite cabinet members, and many of them served long jail term for their involvement in Watergate crisis. President Nixon’s impending impeachment, was the result of the conspiracy of Catholic fundamentalists, Evangelical Protestants and Orthodox Jews, where Dr. Henry J. Kissinger played the role of the hidden hand of the real leader. The nexus of Catholic fundamentalism, Evangelical Protestantism and Ashkenazi Jews installed Gerald Ford as President and Nelsen Rockefeller as the Vice President. The political alliance of Catholic fundamentalism, Evangelical Protestantism and Ashkenazi Orthodox Judaism sealed during Watergate impeachment and Cambodian genocide. Khmer Rouge’s Pol Pot was the direct child born out of the wedlock of the proselytizing Evangelical Protestants, Catholic fundamentalism, Orthodox Judaism, Bolshevik Jews and Maoism. Dr. Henry J. Kissinger as National Security Adviser and Secretary of State during Nixon Administration and Ford Administration was directly responsible for the ouster of Prince Norodom Sihanouk and victory of Pol Pot of Khmer Rouge. Christian and Jewish Media allowed Khmer Rouge to hide the massacre of 2 million Buddhists, even when it was well known secret in the western circles. On the top of it United Nations fed the Khmer Rouge mass killers, after they were ousted from power by benevolent Vietnamese troops. The global clash of races played out its religious coalition during genocide of 2 million Buddhists in Cambodia under Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge and genocide of 2 million pagans in Uganda under Idi Amin. The foreign policy legacy of Dr. Henry Kissinger, succeeded in promoting many Jewish Senators, Congressmen, Mayors and Governors, but also foreclosed the presidential aspirations of Jewish Senator Joseph Lieberman. The historical legacy of two most prominent Jews of the 20th Century, Lavrenti Beria of Joseph Stalin’s regime and Dr. Henry J. Kissinger of Nixon and Ford administrations, rules out any possibility of presidential aspirations of Senator Joseph Lieberman. The failure of Pope John Paul II to prosecute and dismiss all Catholic Bishops that shielded pedophile priests, rules out the possibility that American Protestants that represents 56 percent of the population, would vote for any Catholic to the post of the presidency of the United States, as Catholics represent 28 percent of the population. Jews have no chance to become the president of the United States as they represent only 2 percent of the population. Black president is more likely to occupy White House than a Jew president as Blacks represent 12.9 percent of the population and many Hispanic Catholics could vote for a black presidential candidate. Chinese Christians also have a chance as Asians represent 4.2 percent of the population, and Asian businessmen can bankroll presidential run of the Chinese origin presidential nominee. The United States (280.6 million) has Protestants (157 million), Roman Catholics (78.6 million), Jews (5.6 million), Whites (216 million), Blacks (36.2 million), and Asians (11.8 million). The political coalition of Blacks, Asians and white Hispanics would become a powerful political coalition, and may win the presidency of the United States.

 

Catholic fundamentalists and evangelical Protestants realized that by inducting fundamentalist Jews as equal partner in American corridors of powers, to realize fundamentalist conservative agenda in politically correct manner. The fundamentalist and evangelical Christians have developed warm and fuzzy feelings toward Jews, to a remarkable extent. In 2000, the average white Christian fundamentalist rated Jews a warm 66 degrees, basically the same rating that Catholics and mainline Protestants gave to Jews. With the blessing of fundamentalist Christians Jews have almost reached a nirvana of religious tolerance in United States.

 

(11) Feeling Thermometer

Political scientists have developed a polling tool called a Feeling Thermometer, which asks respondents to rate social groups and political leaders on a scale ranging from 0 degrees to 100 degrees. In Feeling Thermometer anything below 35 degrees, reflects pretty fierce antipathy; scores above 50 degrees suggest varying degrees of warmth. The 35 degree in the Feeling Thermometer is the average score whites express toward illegal aliens, which reflects pretty fierce antipathy.

 

(12) Non-Denominational Christians

American Non-Denominational Protestant Christians representing more than 200 million American citizens hate religious intolerance and do not approve fundamentalist Christians. Fundamentalist Catholic conservatives and Evangelical Protestants joined forces to take over the Southern Baptist convention the largest Protestant denomination in the United States and imposed Papal anti-women agenda on Southern Baptists and promoted the Democratic presidential nomination of Jimmy Carter as well as that of Bill Clinton, who incidentally belonged to Southern Baptist Church and had indirectly consented to the takeover of the Southern Baptist Convention by pro-Pope arch-conservative Protestants.

 

Democratic party leaders hate religious intolerance. More than quarter (25%) of the American citizens, representing more than 70 million citizens, who openly despise Fundamentalist Catholic Christians, while only 2.5 percent openly hated blacks. Protestant Americans openly hate Catholic Fundamentalist Christians, because of their loyalty to the foreign potentate. There is one religion, Fundamentalist Christians that it is still acceptable to openly hate in America. One has to reach back to pre-New Deal America, to find a period when voting behavior was influenced by this degree of antipathy toward a religious group. In 2000, about a quarter of white respondents rated fundamentalists 35 degrees or below, compared to just 1 percent who felt this antagonistic toward Jews and about 2.5 percent who expressed this much hostility toward blacks and Catholics. Among Democratic elites, the hatred towards Fundamentalist Christians is more intense: The majority of delegates to the 1992 Democratic convention gave Christian fundamentalists the absolute minimum score: 0 degrees. The Party of Unbelief believes in tolerating all points of view, unless they you happen to have one they find really irritating, in which case all bets are off.

 

(13) Secession of Quebec from Canada

Canada would witness the secession of predominantly French-speaking Catholic Quebec from Canada. The Canada (31.9 million) has Roman Catholics (46%, 14.7 million), Protestants (36%, 11.5 million), English speaking (59.3%, 18.9 million), French speaking (23.2%, 7.4 million), Anglo-Irish (28%, 8.9 million), French (23%, 7.4 million), European (15%, 4.8 million), Asian (6%, 1.9 million) and Amerindian (2%, 0.64 million). The secession of Catholic French speaking Quebec would make Canada predominantly Protestant-majority nation. The secession of French-speaking Quebec would promote the national interests of France as well as that of Britain and Ireland. In the global clash of races, Indians, Chinese, Hindus and Buddhists should work toward the secession of predominantly Catholic, French speaking Quebec, which may join European Union and federate with France. Predominantly English speaking, Canada minus Quebec would be predominantly Protestant and it shall develop closer economic ties with Britain and Commonwealth of Nations, especially with India and Australia. India, Australia, Britain and Ireland would develop closer economic and political ties with English-speaking Canada minus Quebec. The secession of French speaking Catholic Quebec would make France a world power and develop closer ties with French Africa. English speaking predominantly Protestant Canada minus Quebec would seek confederation with Britain and Australia and preside over Commonwealth Common Market.

 

36(14) $750 Billion Drug Trade

(1) Drug Mafia Controls Wall Street

The growing nexus of Catholic Cocaine Cartel and Semite Wahhabi Heroin created the global nexus of organized crime that apparently took over Capitalist financial markets by their financial clout of $750 billion annual incomes of drug cartels. The Mecca-Vatican Axis of Intolerance financed by Catholic Cocaine-Sunni heroin nexus. The income of Semite OPEC Oil Cartel, Semite Diamond Cartel, Catholic Cocaine Cartel, joined forces with predator religious Semite Wahhabi cult to destabilize the Civilization states of Russia, India, Iraq and Yugoslavia to gain control over the oil and gas reserves of Arabian Gulf and Caspian Central Asia.

 

(2) Plan Colombia & Drug Cartel

President Bush invaded oil-rich Iraq to establish American oil colony over Iraq and camouflaged it as war on Iraqi WMDs. President Clinton ordered military supplies and covert operations in oil-rich Colombia to control Colombia’s oil reserves and to guarantee that pro-America cocaine cartel control the global drug trade and continue to invest their global drug incomes in the United States. American economic prosperity rests on the reinvestment of $750 billion incomes generated by global drug syndicates, in the American economy. Whenever the $750 billion drug incomes would leave United States, it would cause economic crash in the Wall Street. Billions earned by white Catholic Cocaine cartel and Arab Heroin Cartel finances lobbyists that buy political influence and cements the political alliance of Catholic fundamentalism and Wahhabi fundamentalism. The Catholic-Wahhabi and Vatican-Mecca Axis of Religious Intolerance cemented by Cocaine and Heroin trade, which is monopolized by Catholics and Sunnis respectively. The financial institutions located in sovereign Vatican and Saudi Arabia launder many billions of $ 750 billion global drug trade in cocaine and heroin. Global drug trade finances and legitimizes religious intolerance and buys political influence and political power worldwide to legitimize the political rule of religious intolerance. The global nexus of drug money, religious intolerance and corrupt politicians, threatens to derail the modernization process in the 21st Century, threatening the descent of the New Global Dark Age, throughout the Christian and Islamic worlds. The problem for the philosophical inquiry is: How to break the evil nexus of organized crime, religious intolerance and corrupt politicians? How to avert the descent of the looming global New Dark Age on the Civilized world? Would one justify the use of military force to avert the descent of the New Dark Age? Otherwise 22nd Century would look like uncivilized barbarian Medieval Dark Age? Don’t we have a responsibility towards our future generations?

 

(3) Nexus of Catholic & Sunni Drug Cartels

It is true to assert that he who controls the investment decisions on the disposable incomes of the global drug cartels, estimated at $750 billion annually, controls the financial markets of the world, and thereby controls the destiny of the free Christian world. Drug lords make huge tax-free cash income by global drug trade, more than the GNP of Mexico or Spain. At least ten top drug lords make more money annually than the total wealth of Bill Gates, the richest man in the world. Drug lords have acquired the financial clout to buy political influence, by controlling the political campaign contributions, and agents of the drug lords, adorning the corridors of political power as presidents, prime ministers, governors, senators and members of parliament of leading nations of the world. It is truly a scary scenario.

 

(4) Economic Clout of Global Drug Incomes

Just as drug addicts become addicted on Cocaine and Heroin, American and European economies have become dependent on the reinvestment of the $750 billion annually generated by global drug trade as incomes for the organized crime, half of which generated in United States and other half in the European Union. Without the annual injection of $350 billion incomes of the drug lords, the economies of the United States and European Union could suffer catastrophic crash. The disruption of the global trade in cocaine and heroin could disrupt the western economic prosperity. President Clinton launched Plan Colombia to stabilize the white Catholic monopoly over global cocaine trade in Colombia, to undermine the challenges to the cartel monopoly by non-white mestizo traffickers, by arming white Catholic death squads and white paramilitary.

 

(5) Catholics control global Drug Trade

Without the control over global drug trade, the unmixed white Catholics of Colombia would lose the political power to the non-white mestizos who represent much larger percentage of the population. The unmixed white Christians represent only 15 percent population of Bolivia, only 20 percent population of Colombia, only 10 percent population of Ecuador and 15 percent population of Peru. The population ethnic breakup in Andean America is: Bolivia (Quechua 30%, Mestizo 30%, Aymara 25%, white 15% of 8.3M); Colombia (Mestizo 58%, mulatto 14%, blacks 4%, white 20% of 41M); Ecuador (mestizo 55%, Amerindian 25%, black 10%, white 10% of 13.2M) and Peru (Amerindian 45%, Mestizo 37%, white 15% of 28M). Continued monopoly of White Catholics over Colombian cocaine and heroin trade is essential prerequisite for the continued political and military domination of unmixed white Catholics, who represent minority of the Andes population, less than 20 percent in Colombia. India, Russia and China could challenge America’s domination in Andes by challenging the monopoly of the white Catholics over Colombian cocaine and heroin trade. Minority of white Catholics are able to dominate the economy, politics and military of Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia and Venezuela, by virtue of their monopoly over Colombian Cocaine and Heroin trade. Whenever white Colombian cartel would lose its monopoly over Andes Coca, Cocaine, Opium and Heroin, the brown Mestizos and unmixed Inca Indians would take over levers of political, economic and military power.      

 

36(15) Yankee Oil Colonialism

(1) Muslim Women Wants Petro-Imperialism

Civilized world would welcome the imposition of American colonial rule over Wahhabi oil producing intolerant Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Qatar and Brunei, if it gives freedom to Arab women and replaces Shariah laws with American laws. Arab Muslim women would openly welcome American Neo-Imperialism, if it gave Arab women the freedom presently denied to them under Islam, besides women represents half of the eligible voters. By promoting modernization, progress, liberty and freedom, American oil companies, would earn the affection of Arab women and liberal men. Arab women and modern men would welcome American Oil Colonies throughout oil-producing Islamic world, as lesser evil when compared to Wahhabi religious intolerance. Colonial Empires shall stage a comeback in the 21st Century. American Oil Imperialism would modernize Islamic world by imposing American Colonial rule, laws, language and culture throughout oil-rich Islamic world. Hindu India would openly welcome American Oil Colonialism, if it results in direct American colonial rule throughout oil-producing Islamic world, and India gets guaranteed oil supplies at discounted rates. American Oil Colonialism does not harm India’s national interests, if it is accompanied by the imposition of American rule, laws, culture and values in the Islamic world. President Bush’s war on Iraq to make Iraq an American Oil Colony does not harm national interests of Hindu India. Direct occupation and rule by American Oil companies over Saudi Arabia and Kuwait would not harm India’s national interests. Barbarian Wahhabi fundamentalism designed by British Empire, to denigrate Islam, and to lay the foundation of Western Oil colonialism in the oil-rich Arab world. Barbarian Wahhabi fundamentalism would result in the loss of sovereignty of oil-producing Arab nations. Wahhabi fundamentalism is the plot of the Western Oil Neo-Imperialism. Wahhabi fundamentalism would result in the decline of Islam and the rise of American Oil Colonialism throughout oil-producing Islamic world.

 

(2) Achilles’ Heel of American Colonialism

President George W. Bush and Vice President represent the first Oil Presidency of the United States. Bush Administration is Oil Administration and President Bush’s Cabinet is the Oil Cabinet. Oil interests determine the foreign policy of oil-dependent energy-gouging United States. Bush administration defines the national interests of the United States in terms of oil security and oil interests. President Bush seeks to enhance the national power of the United States, defined in terms of oil power.

 

(3) Oil is Achilles’ Heel of US Imperialism

Threats to continued American control over volatile Muslim oil and gas fields in Middle East, Caspian Sea basin, Guinea, Nigeria and Indonesia exposes the Achilles Heel of American Oil Colonialism in 21st Century. Neo-Colonial Empires would stage a comeback, in the form of oil colonialism. British, Spanish and Portuguese colonialism expressed in terms of the emigrant Anglo Saxons that settled in South Africa, Rhodesia, Canada and Australia, and Spanish emigrants that settled in Spanish America and Portuguese emigrants that settled in Brazil. Traditional European colonialism nurtured by the colonial settlements of the White man in the colonies. American neo-colonialism does not envisage permanent settlement of white American colonies, it focuses on the economic control over oil and gas resources of the colonies, to make the target oil and gas producer the American Oil Colony, which does not disturb the local religious and social elite. American oil colonialism does not propagate Christian proselytizing efforts. American neo-imperialism seeks to control gas and oil resources of the nations, to profit by the exploration, extraction and distribution of oil and gas resources to ensure long-term energy supply to the American and European industrial economies. Oil is the key to American neo-imperialism. America is happy with Shariah laws, fundamentalist Wahhabi militant Islam, so long as American Big Oil companies enjoy monopoly over oil and gas reserves of the American Oil Colonies. Pentagon wages wars to protect and safeguard American Oil Colonialism.

 

(4) Hitler’s Forgotten Oil War Option

Adolf Hitler might have won the Second World War had he focused on conquering the Oil fields of Iraq and Iran and Baku, after it had conquered Balkans and Greece. Had Hitler attacked Syria by amphibious landing from Greece and moved on to capture Mosul oil fields in Northern Iraq and then moved southward to control the Iranian oilfields in Khorramshahr and then moved into the southern frontier of Soviet Union to capture Baku oil fields in the Caspian Sea basin. Control over Iraqi, Iranian and Azerbaijan oil fields, would have allowed Hitler to strangulate Allied oil supplies and he might have won the Second World War.

 

(5) Third World War for Islamic Oil Fields

The adversaries of the West, during Third World War, would not repeat the Oil mistake of Adolf Hitler and instead focus on denying United States the control over Saudi Arabian, UAE, Kuwait, Iraqi, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan oil and gas fields. Third World War would be fought over the control over the Arabian Gulf and Caspian Sea oil and gas fields. Arabian Gulf and Caspian Sea regions would be the seat and cause of the Third World War. He who controls the oil and gas supplies of the Arabian Gulf and Caspian controls the destiny of the world. Adversaries of the United States can seriously undermine economic and military security of the sole super power United States by military takeover of any oil-producing OPEC nation in the Arabian Gulf. America’s military might depend upon its continued ability to control Arabian Gulf oil and fields during Third World War. The principle military goal of the adversaries shall be to destabilize Arabian Gulf oil supplies and the principle military goal of the Pentagon shall be to secure Arabian Gulf oil supplies during War. Shifting controls over the Arabian Gulf oil and gas supplies would determine the shifting fortunes of the Third World War. Third World War will be fought over, lost or won over the control over gas and oil supplies of Arabian Gulf and Caspian Sea. India, Pakistan and Iran would determine the outcome of the wars for the control over Arabian Gulf and Caspian Sea oil and gas supplies. Historically Indian Empire dominated the Persian Gulf in the 18th and 19th Century as late as the end of the Second World War. Persian Gulf (now called Arabian Gulf) had been Indian Lake during 19th Century and Indian Empire employed Gun Boat Diplomacy to bring about desired changes in Iran. After the disintegration of Ottoman Empire, Indian Empire created artificial state of Iraq to control the Iraqi Oil. Indian Empire controlled the Iranian Oil. Formerly known as Trucial States, the oil-rich UAE, Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait had been colonies of Indian Empire, and Britain gave independence to UAE, Qatar and Bahrain only in 1968. As late as 1965, Saudi Arabia, Trucial States, Kuwait, Oman, and Yemen kept their national foreign exchange reserves in Indian rupees. As late as 1965, there were only three foreign currency zones in the world: US Dollar zone, British Pound Sterling zone and Indian Rupee zone. It is India’s manifest destiny to exercise diplomatic, political and military control over Arabian Gulf and Caspian Sea region.

 

(6) Benevolent American Oil Colonialism

The European colonialism that ended with the Second World War would get a new birth in form of American Oil Colonialism in 21st Century. America led by Oil-President Bush and Bush Oil Cabinet seeks to establish American Oil colonies throughout oil-producing world, from Venezuela, Indonesia, Angola, Equatorial Guinea, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait and Iraq. Colonial Empires would stage a come back during 21st Century. The post-1500 European Colonial Empires sought to dispossess the original inhabitants of the lands to make way for white European Christian immigration to the colonial lands. The post-2000 Neo-Colonial Empires would not disturb the religion, culture and land ownership of the colonies; rather legitimize the dominant religious sect. The defining principle of the post-2000 Neo-Colonial Empires would be to establish oil colonies, so that colonial powers could steal the oil and gas reserves of the oil-producing nations. India created British Empire and Pax Britannia and nuclear Hindu India would help America make American Oil Colonies in Arabian Gulf, in exchange for guaranteed supply of heavily discounted crude oil prices for India. Rather than allowing Osama Bin Laden become King of Saudi Arabia, it is better that United States establishes direct American rule over Arab oil-producing nations, so that American oil companies control and administer the oil-producing nations, with the help of Indian and Pakistani Army. Neither United States nor India could sit idle and allow Wahhabi terrorists; the likes of Osama Bin Laden and Ayatollah Khomeini take over the monarchies and sheikhdoms in the Arabian Gulf region. Corrupt House of Al Saud in Saudi Arabia, Al Sabah Sheikhdoms in Kuwait are too weak to resist the Wahhabi terrorists and would fall like pack of cards, similar to the fall of Emperor Shah of Iran at the hands of Ayatollah Khomeini. India’s national interests are harmed, whenever United States endorses Wahhabi terrorists and buys regional peace by bribing Wahhabi terrorists to safeguard American oil interests in oil-producing Arab world. India may be forced to take anti-United States measures to protect its national interests, if CIA continues to finance and support Muslim terrorists to curry favor with Wahhabi Arabs to safeguard American Oil colonialism in Arabian Gulf. However, if American Big Oil decides to formally establish American Oil Colonies in the oil-producing Arab world, India would support these neo-colonial imperial ambitions of American Big Oil. American Oil colonies in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Iraq, and Libya would not harm India’s national interest, and it would on the contrary promote India’s national interest and national power. India would support American neo-colonial empire and help in establishing American Oil Colonies throughout oil-producing Islamic world, in exchange for a share of guaranteed discounted crude oil supply to India.

 

(7) Benefits of American Oil Colonial Rule

The oil technology for the extraction of On-Shore and Off-Shore Oil and gas fields commercially available, and many oil-producing nations possess it. The technology for oil-pipeline is also commercially available. American Big Oil leverage their access to capital and marketing and distribution network to persuade the smaller oil-producing nations that their national and financial interests better served as American Oil Colonies. American Oil Colonialism depends upon American Financial Colonialism to successfully establish American Oil Colonies throughout oil-producing nations, without the use of military power. Only as American Oil Colony, could Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and UAE become prosperous and free from civil wars and communal riots. Only as American Oil Colonies, could Arabian Gulf oil-producing OPEC nations safeguard their territorial integrity from hostile invasions of the regional powers. United States would not have extended Pentagon’s defensive umbrella over OPEC nations, had these nations not agreed to become American Oil Colonies voluntarily. American Big Oil seeks to establish American Oil Colonial Empire, without the use of military force, by judiciously using America’s diplomatic power and sole superpower status. American Neo-Colonialism would exercise financial power to establish American Oil Colonies, and the CIA would undertake Covert Operations to maintain America’s hegemony over American Oil Colonies, without the need to deploy Pentagon’s military assets.

 

36(16) The Empire Strikes First

(1) Iraq is the First and Iran is Second

The American Empire decided to strike first on Iraq in March 2003, and asserted the right of the Civilizations and Colonial Empires to invade and establish oil colonies over oil-rich countries. There was no smoking gun in 2003 State of the Nation address by President Bush. The Axis of Evil has shrunk to Saddam Hussein, evil incarnate. Iran and North Korea were put aside with a comment, different threats require different strategies. Osama bin Laden was not even mentioned, only al Qaeda was referred to. President Bush’s rationale for war on Iraq is based on ample metaphysical evidence, the perfect storm of imperial schemes and ideological stratagems driving the desire to establish American Oil colonialism over Iraq, with the second largest reservoir of oil in the world. Bush 43 Administration thinks the best way to galvanize the American public opinion is with fear of terrorist attacks similar to that of 9/11 attacks. Bush 43 Administration started by coupling Saddam Hussein to 9/11 and building Saddam into a Hitler, who could threaten the world with a holocaust. Dick Cheney, Scooter Libby and Paul Wolfowitz think that Saddam Hussein is the perfect lab rat on which to test their new “Pre-emptive Empire Strikes first’ national security strategy, enunciated in the Bush doctrine 2002. This doctrine first drafted in 1992 during Bush 41 Administration, by the Wolfowitz and Libby. The President Bush (1989-93) found the Wolfowitz-Iibby ideas too far out, but present President Bush has put them into play. President George Bush coined the phrase, “We recognize that our best defense is a good offense,” that sums up the new national security strategy of the Bush 43 Administration.

 

Wolfowitz, Libby and Richard Perle want to turn United States into a laboratory for democracy in the oil-rich Arab world. After planting the democracy on Mesopotamian Iraqi soil, United States can orchestrate more freedom, democracies throughout the oil-producing Middle East, so long as the Muslim world continues to accept Yankee president as the new sheriff. White House intends to put pressure on Iran to restore the Pahlevi monarchy of Mohammed Riza Pahlevi. Perhaps America-born Queen Noor installed as reigning monarch of Syria. Perhaps a Queen should rule Saudi Arabia as reigning monarch to restore rights to Saudi women. Whatever may be the cause, president Bush’s imperialistic moves in Iraq, shows that Pre-emptive Empire Strikes First military strategy, represents the classical response of the civilizations, that faced barbarian invasions in the history.

 

(2) President Bush Changed the History

Why did Hindu India, Orthodox Russia and Buddhist China openly support Protestant President Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism in Afghanistan, after the 9/11 attacks, even when it meant the eastward expansion of NATO to Central Asia and South Asia? Because India and Russia hoped that United States would be on their side of the battle lines in the Third World War. The leading military powers of the world, namely, United States, Russia, China and India, are also multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multi-linguistic Civilization-Nations that abhor religious intolerance and espouse religious tolerance and diversity. Protestant United States, Orthodox Russia, Buddhist China and Hindu India would be on the same side of the battle lines, to jointly wage wars on forces representing religious intolerance and predator religious sects. Wahhabi terrorist Osama Bin Laden changed the history on 9/11/2001, as it suddenly enlightened the Protestant Christians that Wahhabi Sunni Islam is the principle enemy of Protestant Christians, and Hindu India would be the real friend of Protestant United States. President Bush changed the direction and flow of the history by declaring the war on Islamic terrorism on the Senate floor. Even if President Bush had waged war on Afghanistan primarily to protect America’s oil interests in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan, it ignited the Crusade mentality in the Protestant Christian world. Saudi Wahhabi terrorist attack of 9/11 made India and United States the allies in the looming Third World War. India supported President Bush’s war on Afghanistan, because Bush defined America’s war on Islamic terrorism, as civilization’s response to the invasions of barbarians. So long as Protestant United States continue to define America’s war on Terror as Civilization’s response to barbarians’ invasions, the Hindu India would support America, without expecting any reward in exchange. Any decisive victory of Civilizations over Barbarians would always promote the national interest of Indian Civilization. Indians of all denominations wholeheartedly support America in President Bush’s war on Islamic terror, whether in Afghanistan or Iraq or elsewhere in any other terrorist Muslim nation.

 

(3) India’s Space Power Ambitions

Info warfare will be lethal. India’s President A P J Abdul Kalam predicted that Information warfare will start dominating the future war with adversaries trying to break into each others computer network to gain control of the vital resources and Info warfare with knowledge products will be more lethal compared to Nuclear-tipped carrier vehicles. Five major technological revolutions in this century would effectively change the shape of sky-warfare. Besides the Info warfare, integration of multiple technologies of supersonic aircraft, missiles and spacecraft will transform into unmanned supersonic long-range and low radar cross section vehicles replacing manned fighter aircraft. India will progress in partnership with other countries in the design of a hyper plane a reusable hypersonic space vehicle as well as a cost effective launch vehicle that is capable of turning out 15 per cent payload factor in place of the existing three. While anti-ballistic missile with its satellite network to protect land and airspace, will become an integral part of the national defense, supersonic cruise missiles will replace the current generation of subsonic cruise missiles and the new ones, with low radar detection, will be difficult to locate and offer very short reaction time for the enemy's defenses. While a re-usable missile configuration and technology has not yet emerged in the world, Indian technologists have started working on reusable hypersonic cruise missile system.

 

(3) China’s Generational Revolution

Russia and China are very lucky that incumbent older generation peacefully handed over the leavers of state power to the newer generation. Similar, generational shift of power to newer generation is required in India also. Hu Jintao the new leader of Communist China would not be anti-Buddhist like Mao Tse tung Zedong and most likely restore Buddhism to its rightful status in China. Russia had a peaceful generational revolution on the eve of New Millennium, when President of the Russian Federation, Mr. Boris Yeltsin, resigned on December 31, 1999 and nominated Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, as the acting President of Russian federation, who continued to be the Prime Minister of Russian Federation. The 16th Chinese Communist Party Congress, held in November 2002, created a similar generational revolution in China, when the entire ageing leadership gave way to the younger generation. In January 2003, five allies of China's Communist Party chief Hu Jintao were appointed to key provincial government and parliamentary posts as the China's new leader, Hu Jintao moved to consolidate his power base in China, in the aftermath of the unprecedented generational revolution in China. Li Keqiang, 47, was named chairman of the People's Congress, or provincial legislature, of Henan in central China. Li Keqiang, one of China's youngest provincial leaders, is a Hu ally, two men's paths crossed during stints at the Communist Youth League. The appointments are a significant step in what analysts say will be a long road to building power. Hu Jintao is slowly showing his strength. Hu is not that simple. Hu will slowly consolidate power. Hu Jintao took over from Jiang Zemin as party chief in a generational leadership change at the 16th party congress in November, the Communists' first orderly succession since 1949. Hu Jintao, 60, is to replace Jiang, 76, as state president at the national legislature's annual session in March 2003. But Jiang Zemin is expected to remain chief of the military, wielding power from behind the curtain as did his predecessor, Deng Xiaoping. Though still in Jiang Zemin's shadow, Hu Jintao has tried to make his mark by promoting a string of allies to key posts and by media exposure. In a highly publicized bid to burnish his and the party's image, Hu Jintao has taken up the cudgel for China's poor, one of the few non-controversial areas where he can make a difference without risk of stepping on his predecessors’ toes. Li Keqiang formerly governor of Henan, China's most populous province with 95.6 million people, has been promoted to provincial party boss even though in his previous post he had to take administrative blame for a disco fire in Luoyang city in December 2000, which killed 309 people. Also under Li's watch, thousands of rural residents were infected with HIV, the virus that can cause AIDS, in a blood-selling scandal in the 1990s when government-backed clinics failed to properly clean needles. Toeing the party line is more important than the fire or the AIDS scandal. A bungled accident or disaster on an official's watch can sometimes lead to him being passed over for promotion. Other Hu allies promoted included Li Chengyu, 56, no relation to Li Keqiang, Henan's new party chief, who was elected that province's governor. Ji Yunshi, 57, was re-elected governor of the northern province of Hebei. Ma Qizhi, 59, was re-elected governor of the northwestern, Moslem-majority region of Ningxia. China's legislatures are mere rubber stamps and vote according to the wishes of the party. The Beijing People's Congress expected to elect Vice Mayor Meng Xuenong, yet another Hu Jintao ally, as mayor of the capital. Meng is 53. Hu's men are also tipped to take over as mayor of Shanghai and as governor of the booming southern province of Guangdong, bringing to six the number of governors and top city mayors tied closely to Hu Jintao. Hu Jintao has a network of supporters from his days in the Youth League, from his alma mater Tsinghua University and from former posts as head of the Central Party School and of the western regions of Guizhou, Gansu and Tibet. Hu Jintao's men have also gained control of two important central party departments, publicity, which oversees propaganda and the media, and united front, responsible for wooing "dangwai", literally those outside the party. The appointments follow a string of promotions in late 2002 that made at least five Hu Jintao’s allies provincial Communist party chiefs in China.

 

36(17) Old Europe Tamed Bush

(1) Rise of Euro-Fascism

United States didn’t support the imperial aspirations of Britain and France over oil-rich Arabia, when they invaded Suez Canal Zone in 1956, in response to the nationalization of the Suez Canal by President Gamal Abdel Nasser. The imperial pretensions of France and Germany were busted by the threat of retaliation by Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev, and Untied States stood on the sideline. Donald Rumsfeld deliberately insulted Germany and France to trumpet their weakness as military and economic power, and the Russian President Putin stood on the sidelines. After the successful conquest of Iraq, Russia remained on the sidelines and Germany humbly joined the American war camp, hoping to profit by the lucrative post-war contracts in Iraq. France would also eat its pride and join the American Camp to profit by the lucrative contracts in Iraq. President Chirac hyped France’s desire and resolve to play great power role in leading the world’s opposition to America’s invasions of Iraq, jointly with Russia and China, primarily to deny his presidential challenger pro-Right Le Pen electoral advantages in the coming elections.

 

Rumsfeld’s comment could result in Nazi governments in Berlin and Paris before 2020 AD. Fascism takes birth when some hostile power insults the nation. Hitler came into power, because the Allied victors insulted Germany, German civilization and German people. The 21st clones of Adolf Hitler and Napoleon Bonaparte, could take birth, and acquire political power in Germany and France, within a decade, partly due to the tactless insults hurled by Donald Rumsfeld.

 

(2) Rise of German & French Oil Colonialism

France and Germany powers gathered at Versailles not to humiliate but to toast each other, so that Germany and France could join forces to establish European Oil Colonies in competition with Pentagon, NATO and American Big Oil. The goal of President Jacques Chirac and Chancellor Schroeder is to create French-German Oil Colonial Empire in oil-producing counties, in direct competition with American Big Oil.

 

(3) Rise of Colonial European Powers

Passing from 15 to 25 members in 2002, the European Union is not only in danger of being diluted into a toothless impotent free trade zone, enlarged European Union risks being transformed into a simple protectorate of the United States. Germany and France paying through their nose to subsidize the poor economies of Poland, and other 10 poor east European Cousin, only to realize that Poland’s president, Aleksander Kwasniewski, the most gung-ho new member of NATO, declared, “if it is President Bush’s vision, it is mine.” Why should Western Christian Germany and France pay to feed impoverished Poland, only to find that the Poland declared to be willing hired mercenary of Yankee President, even to attack Germany and France at the bidding of the White House if the situation ever warranted in future. Germany and France realized to their dismay that inclusion of East Europeans at great economic costs to Germany and France, allowed to hire the mercenary troops of demobilized soviet satellites at no economic cost to the Pentagon. How could German and French leaders be so foolish? Expansion of European Union to include East Europeans has weakened France and Germany, threatened the national security of Germany and France. Pentagon-led NATO presents greater threat to the integrity and security of Germany and France, more than the threat posed by Stalin’s Russia at the height of the Cold War.

 

The day is not far away, when NATO troops led by Pentagon and manned by East Europeans would enter Paris and Berlin as conquerors, if France and Germany continue to annoy the Yankee President. The expanded 25 member European Union is militarily vulnerable, and victim of classical unchecked growth. What options Germany and France have? Germany and France should break military ties with NATO, and ask NATO and American troops to leave German and French soil, and Germany and France should sign a new Defense Pact with India and Japan. Germany, France, Japan and India Defense Pact would replace NATO as the leading military power of the world in the 21st Century.

 

During much of the Cold War, while West Germany served as the motor of European economic growth, Germany bowed to the political leadership of France. With German unification, Germany destined to play greater role in diplomacy and Paris at first harbored concern over possible German domination of European Union. But after German unification, Germany has been struggling to overhaul its inflexible economy, while the French economy has adapted to the challenge of globalization and France has replaced Germany as the engines of European economic growth. The addition of 10 additional members of the European Union and discussions about constitutional amendments for the enlarged union, are putting renewed strains on French-German understanding that Germany is the economic leader of European Union, France is the political leader of European Union, and United States is the military leader of the NATO.

 

With the question of Oil Colonialism and invasions of Iraq to make Iraq the American Oil colony, welded the political and diplomatic ties between Washington and London more closely, the French have begun to fear the British and American domination of Western Europe, as the principal threat to the national interests of France and Germany, which made the fear of possible German domination disappear from the radar. France historically viewed Britain as the Trojan Horse of European Union, an American implant to sabotage the European Union from within. Washington continues to want to govern the oil world alone and more and more without rules, in the perception of France.

 

(4) Germany & France As Old Europe

US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld thinks of Europe as more than just Germany and France, and he said, “I think that’s Old Europe. If you look at the entire NATO Europe today, the center of gravity is shifting to the east and there are a lot of new members.” Rumsfeld’s comment was a part of an effort by Washington to marginalize France and Germany, though the two countries dominate Europe’s political and economic affairs. The bitter exchanges between President Bush and America’s European allies have now gone well beyond an argument about strategy. Donald H. Rumsfeld, dismissed the mounting opposition in France and Germany, calling the two countries “Old Europe,” and all but declaring that in the Bush white House, they no longer mattered. President Bush has redrawn his mental map of America’s alliances, and that Paris and Berlin have been placed in the deep freeze for failing his loyalty test. The central element in the current friction in the US-France relations is an American President who makes up his mind and then will accept no argument.

 

French finance minister, Francis Mer, replied, “This old Europe has resilience and is capable of bouncing back, and it will show it, in time.” French are annoyed by the way President Bush talks, the rhetoric and the religiosity. George Bush reminds French of what drove to crazy about President Ronald Reagan. Bush reminds them about what they miss about Bill Clinton. All the stereotypes, the cowboy imagery, it’s all back. 

 

36(18) Clash of Cultures Reject Bush’s Moral Imperatives

(1) Rejecting America’s Moral Imperative

Influenced by the clash of German and French cultures with that of the Yankee cowboy president, France and Germany turn against Washington, and reject America's 'moral imperative. Germany and France closed ranks against war with Iraq, signaling the beginning of an increasingly public opposition to the culture, aims and values of the Bush Administration. To the leadership in Paris and Berlin the threat posed by President Saddam Hussein seems, to be significantly less than that of a Oil War enthusiastically led by the United States, to impose American Oil Colonial rule over Iraq, fully supported by most of the new East European members of the NATO. Old Europe, Germany, France and Belgium felt threatened by the imperialistic zeal of the new members of the NATO and the East Europeans. Germany and France believes that expanded NATO transforming into a coalition for world conquest, where new east European allies going out their way to prove their loyalty to the new master in the Oval Office. Gerhard Schroeder would not approve a resolution, which would give legitimacy to American Oil war on Iraq. The ending of German ambiguity about its voting intentions at the United Nations, and the readiness of France to act in tandem on Iraq policy, could be a pivotal moment, in Europe’s relationship with America. A rift is opening between Germany and France on one side and America. France and Germany wants to commit legitimate force of the European Union to the Just wars, and Bush Administration that regards the removal of anti-American dictators as part of its morally supportable global responsibilities, to impose the colonial rule of the American Big Oil throughout oil-producing world.

 

The 1963 Elysée Treaty, was an attempt to end war between two historic enemies, and formed the basis of the European idea. The arrival of the Bush Administration was a shock to the continental Europeans that has never fully absorbed the Munich Wehrkunde security conference when Donald Rumsfeld lectured on the; moral imperative; of national missile defense. For the Europeans, an American moral imperative meant only one thing; that American Oil Colonialism would not put up with allies demanding fair share of oil loot.

 

(2) Europe as Counter Weight to USA

Should the future Europe be a counterweight to American hegemony? Those who see an enlarged Europe efficiently managed and financed, as a real check to the growth of American power include Joschka Fischer, the German Foreign Minister. This scenario has become part of the European federalist agenda. On the other hand, East Europeans and Britain see European Union as a junior coalition partner of the United States, where former European colonial powers shall have some influence as vassal states and some privileges to influence the policy making at the White House, by humbly petitioning to the Yankee President. The future shape of decision-making in the European Union, according to Britain has to reflect that vassal status and prudently maximize European Union’s limited bargaining power to influence the White House.

 

(3) Old Europe Vs New Europe

The differences between Britain and East Europeans on one side and its European partners Germany and France on the other side, is the ongoing conflict between Germany and France the larger EU members versus smaller EU members, namely Britain and East Europeans in defining a new European constitution. Britain and East Europeans want the expanded European Union become a simple protectorate of the United States, and its economic union diluted into a free trade zone, where richer nations’ role would be limited to funding the poor members of the European Union.

 

Germany and France feared that maritime Britain was the cunning Trojan horse to the unification of continental Europe, as it had been throughout the history. Realizing the Trojan horse nature of Britain, made Paris determined to revive a strong French-German bond as the basis for a more vigorously assertive European foreign policy, to avoid the Waterloo of the 21st Century.

 

The GNP for 2001 measured at PPP for India ($2.1 trillion), Germany ($1.8 trillion), France ($1.3 trillion), Britain ($1.2 trillion), and Poland ($305 billion), suggests that if President Bush alienates Germany and France, and gains the support of Britain and Poland by its policies, United States would lose more than it gains by establishing American Oil Colony over Iraq.

 

36(19) Old Europe Not Problem

(1) Europe Distrusts USA-led NATO

France and Germany realized in 2003 that the purpose of US led NATO had been to Chaperon Germany, France and Italy, instead of defending these countries against Soviet invasions. United States had rejected the Joseph Stalin’s offer of Unification of Germany in exchange of Unified Germany joining the ranks of Non Aligned Nations. Germany, France and Italy realized that United Stated pursued the policy of Geopolitical dominance in post-War Western Europe, and continued to pursue the geopolitical dominance of European Union.

 

After Second world the purpose of American troops in Germany and Japan had been to tame and control Germany and Japan, and were basically the occupation forces. With the expansion of NATO to include east European countries, United States no longer needs the continued support of Germany and France in NATO. Led by Britain and United States and manned by troops from Poland, and other East European armies, NATO could even attack and occupy France and Germany, whenever Pentagon so orders the NATO. After the expansion of NATO in 2002, the NATO has reverted its post Second World War objective, to preserve peace by acting as the occupation troops over Germany. Expanded NATO led by Pentagon presents greatest security threat to Germany and France. In Third World War the NATO may launch invasions of France and Germany, to eliminate challenges to American Oil Colonialism. Pentagon aims to marginalize France, Germany in European Union and NATO, as Germany and France no longer have any usefulness for Pentagon in NATO.

 

Seeking to marginalize opposition by France and Germany, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said "Vast numbers of other countries in Europe back the United States on a possible war with Iraq. There is a real struggle, taking place in the Muslim faith over extremists trying to hijack Islam to spread hate against the West. It could take months or years for United Nations inspectors to find weapons of mass destruction hidden by Iraqi authorities, adding such a search was not the proper role for the inspectors. European countries often had disagreed with one another and the United States over major issues. But Europe responded positively whenever America was right and if its facts were persuasive. France and Germany, strongly opposed to a war with Iraq, were not representative of a "New Europe," which included countries from the former Soviet bloc. "You're thinking of Europe as Germany and France. I think that's old Europe. If you look at the entire NATO Europe today, the center of gravity is shifting to the east. And there are a lot of new members." Rumsfeld called the German and French position "a problem. "But you look at vast numbers of other countries in Europe they're not with France and Germany on this. They're with the United States." French President Jacques Chirac and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder retorted that they agreed a war would be, “the worst of all solutions."

 

(2) Iraq War is War for American Oil Colony

The Russian Army believed that the main aim of the war would be to secure control of Iraqi oilfields. Russia's armed forces have obtained information that the United States and its allies had decided to launch military action in Iraq from mid-February 2003, even while UN inspectors were conducting their search. Pentagon-led operations would be launched once an attacking force of 150,000 had been assembled in the Gulf. The Iraq operation planned for the second half of February 2003. The military operation against Iraq would be conducted by a combination of means. Military strikes will be from the air, land and sea. The war was planed to be short, lasting about one month. Russia believed that the main aim of the operation was not so much to topple Iraqi President Saddam Hussein but to secure U.S. control over Iraqi oilfields. Hussein was the pretext. The real aim of the military action was control over Iraqi oil.

 

(3) Use of Nukes in Iraq or Iran War

Bush administration made clear that it wants to be better prepared to consider the nuclear option against the threat of Weapons of Mass Destruction in the hands of terrorists and rogue nations. The current planning, offers a concrete example of their determination to follow through on this pledge. The Pentagon has changed the bureaucratic oversight of nuclear weapons so that they are no longer treated as a special category of arms but are grouped with conventional military options. The US reserves the right to defend itself and its allies by whatever means necessary.

 

(4) Old Europe' hits back at Rumsfeld

"We are no longer in prehistoric times when whoever had the biggest club would try to knock the other guy out so he could steal his mammoth skin, said French Defense Minister Michele Alliot-Marie: 'Old Europe' hits back at Rumsfeld’s comment on France and Germany. German and French politicians and media across the political spectrum have hit back angrily at U.S. criticism that the France and Germany belonged to "old Europe" and were isolated in their opposition to war in Iraq. Rumsfeld argued that France and Germany were not representative of a "New Europe" that includes former Soviet bloc countries. "You're thinking of Europe as Germany and France. I don't. I think that's old Europe," "I find this comment on 'old Europe' deeply irritating. Old Europe is resilient and capable of bouncing back," French Finance Minister Francis Mer said. Germany's mass circulation Bild daily, traditionally a vocal supporter of the United States lamented, "Mister Rumsfeld, hundreds of thousands of your GIs fell for 'old Europe' because they freed us from the tyranny of Hitler. You are sinning against your own heroes by disparaging 'old Europe.' Your G.I.s died for the ideals of your place of origin," "Old Europe kicks back." Germany and France have realized that United States no longer needs the continued support of France and Germany to control NATO militarily.

 

Chirac and Schroeder continue to oppose America’s Oil war on Iraq, because American Big Oil do not want to share the loot of planned American Oil Colonialism over Iraq with French and German Oil companies. French and German position is not a problem it is a constructive contribution, said German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer. French Finance Minister Francis Mer was "profoundly vexed" by Donald Rumsfeld's remarks. Former employment minister described the US as arrogant. And German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer said that the word "problem" was inappropriate. We should try to treat each other sensibly.  French position is not a problem, it is a constructive contribution." Rumsfeld is not exactly a diplomat and it is not very wise to say something like that. "Polemics have no place in this debate. Donald Rumsfeld expanded on his remark about "old Europe" by pointing to the planned eastward expansion of Nato as far as the three Baltic republics. Word was too offensive.

 

"Rumsfeld has a problem with age. The U.S. defense minister calls France and Germany 'old', the rest of Europe 'young' and wants a quick war with Iraq. Nuclear powers like China and Russia favor more level-headedness," Tageszeitung Editorial said. "Does Washington want to risk a rift in the North Atlantic alliance over Iraq, which could lead to a division of Europe into countries that follow 'modern' America and an 'old' and 'problematic' faction that no longer wants to?" the conservative Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung newspaper asked. The prudent analysts argue that the answer is yes. United States wants to partition Europe into to parts, to isolate the pro-Germany and pro-France European countries. "The importance of Rumsfeld's foolish comments should not be exaggerated. Rumsfeld has de facto extended the 'Axis of Evil'. With Escalation" as its FrontPage headline a French newspaper noted 76 percent of French people, compared with 66 percent at the start of January 2003, are now against a war in Iraq. The age issue also featured in the Parisien's cartoon, which showed Chirac and Schroeder arriving at a U.S. conscription desk holding a "No to War" banner, to which a stern-faced Rumsfeld, with Bush standing behind him, yells "Too old! Discharged!"

 

(5) Insults Nurtured Nazi Germany & France

Rumsfeld’s comment could result in Nazi governments in Berlin and Paris before 2020 AD. Fascism takes birth when some hostile power insults the nation. Hitler came into power, because the Allied victors insulted Germany, German civilization and German people. The 21st clones of Adolf Hitler and Napoleon Bonaparte, could take birth, and acquire political power in Germany and France, within a decade, partly due to the tactless insults hurled by Donald Rumsfeld at scions of white race Germans and French peoples, by publicly insulting the nation, pride and civilization of Germany and France.

 

France and Germany celebrated the 40th anniversary of their postwar alliance in a historic assembly of the two nations' parliaments at the Palace of Versailles. Before more than 1,000 parliamentarians from the German Bundestag and the French National Assembly, President Jacques Chirac and Chancellor Gerhard Schröder paid homage to the founding fathers of the January 22, 1963 Elysée treaty, Charles de Gaulle and Konrad Adenauer. When love leads to marriage, anniversaries may be quiet events. Diplomatic and political unions of convenience, however, produce the grandest of 40th anniversary celebrations. So it was on when 1,200 French and German lawmakers descended on the Palace of Versailles, in Paris to toast the 40th anniversary of Elysee treaty a treaty of friendship signed by German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer and French President Charles de Gaulle.

 

There has never been romance between France and Germany. But the two states have decided they need each other more than ever and that mutual interests should increasingly define their policies. For the French, the America’s Iraq War for Oil appear to afford French Oil companies to revive a strong French-German diplomatic bond as the basis for a more vigorously assertive European Oil Colonial foreign policy and to create French-German Big Oil cartel to compete with American Big Oil, which seeks to establish American Oil Colonies throughout oil-producing Muslim world with the support of the NATO and Pentagon.

 

The unified French-German stand against war with Iraq, reiterated at the 40th anniversary celebrations, is the latest example of how the odd couple at the center of modern Europe is building a French-German partnership aimed partly at balancing the hostile British-American Alliance. This can appear petty tough and indeed it sometimes is very difficult. But the balancing act can also be salutary, and change the destiny of Europe. With the decline of Russia, it is the moral imperative that Germany and France lead the 2nd pole in the world affairs to challenge the hegemony of the United States. Jacques Chirac, France's president, said, for France, “war is always the proof of failure." Chirac was talking about war that plagued the Franco-German relationship for most of a 19th & 20th century and that led to visions of a European Union, after 1963, Treaty of Elysee.

 

The 1871 proclamation of the German Empire in the Hall of Mirrors in Versailles and its consequences, were to haunt the French body politic for half a century. It was in Versailles again that conditions generating humiliation and resentment beyond the Rhine were imposed on Germany after 1918. As few places in Europe, Versailles makes Germany aware how far Germans have come: from the threats of the past, through the promise and hope of the Elysée treaty to the enormous scope of current Franco- German friendship. The last time so many German lawmakers, diplomats and officials showed up at Versailles was in 1871, when France, crushed by Prussia, watched helplessly as Bismarck declared the German Empire. In 1919 the Allied victors of World War I forced a broken and humiliated Germany back to Versailles to surrender. Therein, of course, lay the seeds of World War II. France and Germany wallowed in moving bout of mutual congratulation yesterday as France and Germany, once the bitterest of Europe's enemies, joined to celebrate 40 years of postwar reconciliation. Versailles was where Germany proclaimed itself an empire after defeating Napoleon III in 1871, but also where it was forced to submit to the crushing terms of the 1919 treaty that ended the first world war.

 

36(20) Euro Oil Colonialism

(1) Europe Seeking Oil Colonies

The policy makers of Germany and France realized that only after establishing French-German oil colony over major oil-producing Arab nation could France and Germany assert their respective great power role and dreams. The European Union should establish a goal to establish European Oil Colony over Algeria, Libya and Iran to effectively compete with American oil colonialism that succeeded in establishing oil colonies in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE. India should join forces with European Oil Colonialism to establish Indo-European Oil colonies in some of the oil-rich OPEC countries. So long as Europeans failed to establish oil colonies of its own, European Union would fail to compete with United States.

 

(2) EU wants Oil pegged to Euro not Dollar

Were world oil prices pegged to Euro instead of US $, the American economy stand to lose more than $500 billion annually. France and Germany can undermine the American economic dominance by promoting Euro as the official currency of global oil trade. So it was stirring to see the entire elected governments of these two powers gathered at Versailles not to humiliate but to toast each other, so that Germany and France could join forces to establish European Oil Colonies in competition with Pentagon, NATO and American Big Oil. The goal of President Jacques Chirac and Chancellor Schroeder is to create French-German Oil Colonial Empire in oil-producing counties, in direct competition with American Big Oil. For President Charles de Gaulle and Chancellor Conrad Adenauer, the goal of the 1963 Elysée treaty was not only to set up regular meetings at the highest levels but also cultural and educational exchanges. The young of Germany and France would visit one another and the Rhine would turn from a moat of conflict to a channel of goodwill and transfer point of French and German culture, language and Civilization. To an impressive degree, this has all became a reality. The successful common European currency, the Euro, is a direct result of French-German cooperation after 1963 Elysee treaty, signed on Jan 22, 1963. The European Union has just agreed to expand to 25 members largely out of a deal struck between Berlin and Paris. France and Germany have agreed on how the future Europe ought to be managed, even if their approach seems a bit muddled. The agreement signed at 40th anniversary of Elysee treaty calls for joint cabinet meetings every six months, the possibility of joint citizenship and closer military cooperation. This is a partnership that deserves encouragement, from India, Russia and China, as it would make European Union independent of United States and NATO. When France and Germany agree on something, they may not necessarily get it. But when they are at odds, Europe can be paralyzed. And a strong Europe, with a sturdy Franco-German alliance at its core, is in everyone's interest, including that of India, Russia and China. United States would lose the War of Oil Colonialism, if Germany and France, German and French oil companies join forces with India and Russia and Indian and Russian oil companies, to directly compete with American Oil colonialism, in the early part of the 21st Century. United States would cease to enjoy any technical and financial advantages in competition for Oil colonies, if Germany and France join forces with India and Russia, and develop a common French-German Oil Colonial Empire during 21st Century Neo-Colonialism.

 

(3) Germany & France Motor of EU

Germany and France reinforced the view that without France and Germany the European Union risked being deadlocked. Not without pride can Germans say that Germany and France provided the essential impulse in the decisive phase of European Union’s enlargement. Adenauer and promised that France and Germany would continue to be the "motor" of the European Union's integration. Chirac and Schroeder dwelt on the history that bound them together and echoed through the halls of the palace. Versailles has twice marked the prelude and the epilogue of French-German fratricidal conflicts.

 

The Elysee Treaty’s 40th anniversary ceremony marked the first joint meeting of two European Union parliaments, the German Bundestag and the French National Assembly. The afternoon session at Versailles was preceded, by a working meeting at the National Assembly in the morning. That was held simultaneously with a joint gathering of the French and German governments at the Elysée Palace, at which a common declaration was adopted.

 

The Common Declaration document committed France and Germany to a common vision of Europe as it enlarges from 15 to 25 members and specifically looked forward to further expansion to include Bulgaria and Romania but avoided any mention of Turkey. Among the measures approved for closer co-ordination were the establishment of a new secretariat to manage the mechanics of intergovernmental relations via a Frenchman attached to the German chancellery in Berlin and a German posted to the prime minister's office in Paris. The German and French governments agreed to allow each other's ministers to attend cabinet meetings where legislation was being discussed that might affect their national policies.

 

Germany and France also agreed to look at how to implement joint citizenship for French and German nationals. The voice of the Franco-German tandem must speak out to suggest and innovate, to clear the way for this new Europe. The presidents of the National Assembly and the Bundestag, Jean-Louis Debré and Wolfgang Thierse, presided over the session as Gerhard Schröder and Jacques Chirac sat facing them on Empire chairs. Chirac and Schroeder listened with earphones to each other's speeches, underlining that, for all the warmth and declarations of good intent, the relationship between France and Germany remained as distanced as ever as far as language is concerned. From now on, January 22 will be celebrated in both countries as "Franco-German" day. The goal of President Jacques Chirac and Chancellor Schroeder is to create French-German Oil Colonial Empire in oil-producing countries, in direct competition with American Big Oil.

 

By launching a sharp challenge of President Bush’s policy over Iraq, President Chirac and chancellor Schroeder made a bold effort to reclaim international prestige and a vital say for Germany and France, the two dominant power of Europe, and world’s fifth and sixth largest economy, over the course of events in a world increasingly dominated by United States, the only superpower that counted, besides world powers Russia, India and China. By firming German and French opposition to military action against Baghdad and jointly announcing it at a lavish ceremony marking 40 years of a Franco-German friendship treaty, French President

 

(4) Possible Germany-France Federation

Expanded 25-member European Union would never become a world power. Union of Germany and France could become a world power in its own right, a joint-world power. Dismayed by the failure of European Union to attain great power status, leaders of Germany and France may agree for the formal merger of Germany and France as a Federal state to lay the foundation of an European Super Power, to compete with United States. India, Japan and Russia would join the alliance headed by Union of Germany and France, if it aimed to tame the United States. Jacques Chirac and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder acknowledged that separately, they cannot hope to wield great power influence in world politics, because the expansion of European Union has resulted in the diplomatic, political and military decline of European Union, as the new members are more loyal to United States than to Germany and France, even when only Germany and France pay to upgrade their poor economies. Why should Germany and France continue to subsidize East European economies, when they are willing to attack Germany and France on orders of the Pentagon, if the need ever so arose.

 

Only German-France diplomatic Union could create the second pole in world politics, where India, Japan and Russia would join to jointly oppose the hegemony of the United States. France and Germany would become world powers, if they fine-tune French-German colonial policies to compete with American oil interests, and they should not mind if that irritates the Americans. The German engine of the European economy is sputtering and with that, much of Germany's traditional influence. France's economy better shape than Germany's and Mr. Chirac is firmly entrenched politically, but French influence on the world scene continues to decline, because world   view France as sissy nation, which lacks balls. France needs German balls and German needs French colonial experience. France and Germany both needs India’s military and economic base to compete with United States. Jacques Chirac reviving old Gaullist idea of a France that made real splash on the international stage, to reassert French colonial influence in former French colonies, by undertaking military adventures now under way in Ivory Coast, that challenges American Big Oil interests in Equatorial Guinea. France and Germany have problem with fellow European, Britain's Tony Blair, who has aligned British foreign policy, strictly as a satellite power of the United States, hoping American Oil Colony over Iraq would restore oil interests of the British Oil Colonialism, which ruled Iraq and controlled Iranian oil during and after the Second World War. Germans and French hate British and denounce Britain an American Trojan horse in European Union. Germany and France can attain world Power status, only when they join forces with India and Japan to jointly compete with United States in the neo-imperialist age of Oil-Colonialism.

 

French president, Jacques Chirac, and the German chancellor, Gerhard Schröder signed a declaration promising more cooperation in areas ranging from crime to foreign policy. France and Germany would seek to "adopt common positions" in international bodies, including the UN security council, hold joint cabinet meetings, harmonize national laws wherever possible, and each appoint a senior official to oversee Franco-German cooperation. Franco-German motor had been the driving force of European integration, and the two countries confirmed that they would push for common European Union policies on immigration and asylum and a union-wide prosecution service, criminal record system and border police force. When France and Germany get on, Europe advances. When they don't, it grinds to a halt. France-Germany motor has a communion of destiny in the service of peace. However, for former German chancellor Helmut Schmidt, the French-German motor doesn't exist any more. Though the two capitals talked about renewing French-German alliance, but it is self-deception, as Germany and France need a new European Union treaty, not a new Franco-German treaty. In light of Geopolitics German-French treaty that creates a political federation of Germany and France, would restore great power status to Western Europe, as expanded 25-member European Union destined to be the simple protectorate of the United States. Germany and France would for the disintegration of the 25-member European Union, just as Boris Yeltsin precipitated the dismantling of the Soviet Union, when Russians realized that Russians would cease to rule Soviet Union and become second-class citizens in the Soviet Union. Why should Germans and French continue to subsidize poor Poland and other East Europeans, when rather than being grateful to Germany and France, they are wooing American to the detriment of Germany and France. Let White House subsidize Polish economy, if Poland’s president Aleksander Kwasniewski continues to declare: “if its is President Bush’s vision, it is mine.” Poland and East European members should learn that it must not spit on the hand that feeds it and pays agricultural subsidies for it’s junk agricultural goods. Germany and France should stop agricultural subsidies for all such new members of the European Union, that fail to respect America more than France and Germany. Germany and France should kick Poland out of the European Union, and stop payment of agricultural subsidies to polish farmers. The former slaves of the Soviet Empire are not fit enough to sit on the same table as the descendants of Hitler and Napoleon.

 

36(21) 4-Power Eurasian Pact or Quadruple Alliance

Maritime America would fail to challenge the Eurasian alliance of Germany, France, Russia, China, Japan and India, if these Eurasian could establish oil-colonies of its own and challenge the American oil colonial Empire’s control over Middle East and Central Asian oil and gas resources. The alliance of India and European powers should control the oil and gas resources of the Arabian Gulf and the Central Asia as Indian Empire had exercised hegemony over these regions throughout history. 

 

The Civilization Empires of France, Germany, Japan and India, would overnight replace United States as the dominant super power of the world, if these four civilization-nation states enter into a military and economic pact to establish Eurasian Pact. Neither Untied States, nor Russia nor China would be in a position to challenge the economic, political, scientific and cultural hegemony of Eurasian Pact that united the resources of Catholic France, Protestant Germany, Buddhist Japan and Hindu India. The civilizations of France, Germany, India, and Japan should enter into the Pact of civilizations to restore peace and order in the Eurasian continent. The Big Oil of France, Germany, Japan, and India should form an economic Pact for Oil Colonialism, to compete with American Big Oil in the age of Oil Imperialism. The Eurasian pact would establish Eurasian Oil colonies in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, UAE, Iran, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan and split its profits among France, Germany, India, and Japan. The wars in the 21st Century would be fought for control over Oil and natural gas resources of Eurasia. Eurasian Pact of France, Germany, India, and Japan would control the economic resources of Eurasia and control the destinies of the world. The France-Germany-India-Japan Civilization Pact would emerge as the dominant economic power of the world and replace United States as the dominant Super Power of the world. Russia and China would seek the support of 4-Civilization Pact to check the hegemony of the United States. France, Germany, Japan and India would rightful place under the sun, by the 4-Power Pact. Four-Power Oil condominium would control the oil and gas resources of Eurasia, including Middle East and Caspian Sea Basin. Four Power Eurasian Pact would replace Nato and Pentagon as the dominant military power overnight. Canada and Australia would join the Four Power Pact. The doctrine of balance of power and Raison d’etat would guide the foreign policy makers in France, Germany, Japan and India to sign a Four-Power Pact to emerge as the dominant economic and military power of the world.

 

GNP of Japan, India, Germany & France

The 2001 GNP at PPP of Japan ($3 trillion), India ($2.2 trillion), Germany ($1.8 trillion), and Japan ($1.3 trillion), totals Four Power Pact GNP at ($8.3 trillion), equals to the United States GNP ($8.4 trillion), as calculated by World Bank in 2002. The size of the economy of the Four Power Japan, India, Germany and France, equals the size of the economy of the United States of America. In simple terms collectively Germany, France, Japan, and India would easily overtake United States and replace it as the dominant power of the planet earth. Russia and China would also take shelter under the wings of Germany, France, Japan and India Four Power Eurasian Pact. Oil-producing Middle East, and Caspian Central Asia would also come under the umbrella of Four Power Pact. France would join the Concert of the World and the Quadruple Alliance with India, Germany and Japan to protect its oil interests, as after the US invasions of Iraq and Iran, with an American spigot, the oil will flow free, except to the French who will pay dearly.

 

Eurasian Aerospace Cartel

Armament trade determines the military effectiveness of the great powers. Today’s armament buyers are interested not only in purchasing state-of-the-art armaments and military equipment, but also in maintaining combat readiness of earlier-bought weapon systems. Aircraft accounts for more than 50 percent of total Russian armament exports, combat materials and armament for ground forces account for about 25 percent of Russian armament exports, naval vessels account for 10 percent of the Russian armament exports, and air defense systems account for 10 percent of Russian armament exports. The worldwide international arms market needs mostly modern aircraft, which account for 50 percent of the total demand for armament and military equipment. The submarines, surface ships and other naval equipment represent 14 percent of global armament market. The helicopters represent 14 percent of the global armament market. Armored vehicles represent 11 percent of global armament market. Missile systems represent 10 percent of the global armament market. Artillery systems represent 2 percent of the global armament market. The communication, control and reconnaissance systems represent 2 percent of the global armament market. The France-Germany-Japan- India military industrial complex can dominate the world armament markets in fighter aircrafts, helicopters, and naval equipments, which represent 78 percent of the global arms market.

 

Tame the Pre-eminence of America

However the preeminence of France in 17th Century resulted in the Napoleonic wars at the start of the 18th Century. The Concert of Europe kept peace in Europe from 1814 to 1914. The Quadruple Alliance and Holy alliance played very important role in preserving peace for 100 years from 1814 to 1914. The pre-eminence of Germany in 20th Century resulted in the First World War and the Second World War. The pre-eminence of United States in the post-Second War age resulted in the Vietnam War, Kuwait War, Yugoslavia War, Afghanistan War and Iraq War. The 4-power Quadruple Alliance among Germany, France, Japan and India would strengthen the efforts of the 8-power Concert of the World managed by United States, Russia, China, India, Britain, Germany, France and Japan. The Holy Alliance among pluralist civilizations, namely India and Russia would wage wars on predatory religious cults, and secessionist ethnic terrorism. The Pluralist civilizations, namely, United States, Russia, India, and Canada should assert the rights of the multi-ethnic, multi-religious civilization nations to undertake military actions against terrorists guided by the Pre-emptive Empire Strikes First, 2002 national security strategy currently developed by Bush 43 Administration.      

 

Colonial Empires Stage Come Back

United States ceased to be the sole super power of the world after the devastating attacks of 9/11, as it exposed the vulnerability of the Home base of the American sea power. Osama bin Laden created multi-polar world order on 9/11/2001 with his attacks on Twin Towers and Pentagon, ending the one-superpower system that prevailed after the collapse of the Soviet Union. In response to the barbarian’s invasions, the Protestant Civilization led by President Bush ushered in the new age of Oil Colonial Empires in the 21st century. British Secret Service M1 and spymaster Lawrence of Arabia conceptualized the Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalism as a political tool to mobilize illiterate barbarian nomad Bedouin tribes of Mecca and Medina to engineer the secession of Oil-rich Arabia from Ottoman Empire. The poor Wahhabi clergy of Mecca agreed to accept the establishment of Jewish state of Israel and American and British control over Arabian oil resources, in exchange for Wahhabi Clergy’s undisputed control over Mecca & Medina and imposition of Shariah law over Arabia. Faced with pro-independence movement in Indian Empire, America and Britain hit upon the brilliant scheme to carve out American and British Neo-Colonial Empires, throughout Islamic world and oil-rich and mineral-rich Third World, by allowing the entrenched religious clergy the political control over Islamic religious institutions and Mosques.

 

Gandhi sabotaged the Indian Naval Mutiny of 1945, which could have resulted in independent united Indian empire, which would have included Yemen, Trucial States and Kuwait as part of the independent, sovereign and free Indian Empire. Britain promoted Gandhi as Hindu religious leader to secure political legitimacy of militant Muslim leadership of Mohammad Ali Brothers of Khilafat Movement and Mohammad Ali Jinnah. British M1 hired Gandhi to support fundamentalist Muslim movements in India after the First World War, to allow Britain avoid its commitment to free India after the victory in the First World War, as had been agreed upon for India’s support to the British war efforts in the First World War. Gandhi legitimized Islamic movement by arranging Hindu support to the Khilafat Movement, which had nothing to do with India’s freedom struggle. British Secret Service M1 hired pro-Muslim lawyer Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi in South Africa to sabotage the political leadership of the hot-blood freedom movement in India, represented by Lala Lajpat Rai, Saheed-e-Azam Bhagat Singh, Chandra Shekher, Sri Aurobindo and Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. British Secret Service projected Gandhi as the Hindu religious leader and lobbied for his acceptance as Mahatma.

 

Jawaharlal Nehru abandoned India’s colonial inheritances in oil-rich Iran, Iraq, UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, and Kuwait, as legal successor to British Indian Empire. Kemal Pasha Ataturk abandoned Turkey’s colonial inheritances and influence over oil-rich Arabia. British secret service M1 had hired Kemal Pasha Ataturk to impose secular military dictatorship in Turkey so that Turkey may not interfere with American and British imperial designs to establish Oil colonies in Saudi Arabia and Iraq. In return Western media projected Ataturk as great leader. British M1 secret hired secular Muslim lawyer Mohd Ali Jinnah and promoted him as the savior of Islam.

 

America and Britain promoted the family of Abdul Aziz as House of Al Saud monarchy of Saudi Arabia. Britain and America thought it wise to enrich a family based in Mecca to acquire ownership rights over oil wealth of Arabia as it had already signed away all these oil rights to American and British Big Oil. Britain imposed the rule of King Faisal in Iraq, while with American blessing King Faisal also ruled in Saudi Arabia. King Faisal of Iraq was a stooge of British Oil Colonialism so the CIA arranged the military coup in Iraq and assassination of King Faisal so that American Oil Colonialism could replace British Oil colonialism in Iraq. Saddam Hussein had been a loyal CIA agent and he served America’s national interests, and the CIA rewarded him with chemical weapons to bolster Iraq’s defenses against Iran, during Iran-Iran wars.

 

The CIA arranged the military coup in Iraq to reinstate the Monarchy of Mohammed Shah Reza Pahlevi to establish American Oil colony in Iran that replaced British oil colonialism. President Jimmy Carter arranged the downfall of the secular, liberal, nationalistic monarchy of Shah of Iran, by supporting Islamic fundamentalism and Ayatollah Khomeini, to use the power of Iranian clergy to bring down the secular monarchy, just as America had used Wahhabi clergy of Mecca to bring down Ottoman rule in Arabian. President Ronald Reagan continued the pro-Islamic fundamentalism policy by militarily supporting Muslim militants wage political war on Soviet troops in Afghanistan. Osama Bin Laden had been a creation of the CIA and with the consent of the West Afghanistan became the world’s premier center for Opium production. 

 

Osama Bin Laden disturbed the apple cart and exploited the hidden bonds of the Western secret Services with Islamic terrorism to unleash unprovoked terrorist attacks of 9/11, which caused more than $ 5 trillion economic damages to the United States, and ended the Unipolar One-superpower world order and exposed the sole-superpower United States as the Paper-tiger superpower.

 

President George W. Bush expertly exploited the world’s sympathy towards America’s miserly on account of 9/11 attacks, in engineering the eastward expansion of Nato to include East European countries, and the deployment of Nato in Afghanistan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. American Wilsonian ideological foreign policies lost its moral luster and got exposed as naked oil colonialism when American war on Afghanistan failed to arrest or neutralize even a single top al Qaeda terrorist. President Bush ushered in the new age of Neo-imperial Oil-Colonialism by undertaking naked aggression on Iraq.

 

India fully supports America’s invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq as it legitimizes the return of the Age of Colonial empires in the 21st Century, as major world powers, acquired the right to carve out their own colonial empires in the 21st Century. Osama bin Laden released the genie of Islamic Terrorism. President Bush released the genie of Neo-Colonial Empires. Neither the genies of Islamic terrorism nor that of Neo-Colonial Oil Empires could again be put back into the bottles. World would have to live with the advent of Oil-colonial Empires as well as predator Islamic terrorism. Since World civilizations cannot allow intolerant predator religious cults and barbarian religious terrorists undertake first strikes against Civilizations in the age of weapons of mass destruction, the World Civilizations are forced to undertake massive preemptive strikes against the home-base, the home-land breeding grounds of the religious terrorists, to impose the ruled of the civilizations over multitude of smaller nation-states that harbor, or nurture or finance terrorism predator religious cults, ethnic separatism and political extremism. As the result of the barbarian Muslim terrorist attacks of 9/11 on Protestant Christian Civilization and the justified responses of the American Civilization to the Islamic terrorist attacks, more than 50 smaller independent sovereign nations, presently members of the United Nations, may lose their independence and sovereignty to new and older Civilization Empires in the first half of the 21st Century. The colonial empires would be the major actors in the new international system of the 21st Century, and consist of 12 or so independent sovereign entities. The very concept of micro-states, weaker smaller states having population less than 50 million and land area less than 1,000,000 sq. km., became anachronistic in the 21st century. The supra national regional groupings like European Union, represents the future of the nation states. Taking the lead of European Union, the nation states of Africa, Asia and South America should regroup under regional confederations and regional federations, like Asian Union, African Union and South American Union, led by dominant regional powers. The very concept of smaller nation states, ethnic separatism, has lost its Raison D’etre in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Civilization-federations should replace multitude of nation states that emerged in the post-colonialism age. Osama Bin Laden signed the death warrant for more than 50 independent, sovereign states, many of them in the oil-producing Islamic world. Like the proverbial gold rush that resulted in the destruction of many indigenous societies, the Neo-Colonial Oil-Empires would establish Oil-Colonies throughout oil-producing world. Neo-Colonial diamond-gold Empires would establish Diamond-Gold Colonies in the mineral-rich Third World. Every one of the eight world powers would have unfettered right to establish Oil-Colonies and Mineral-Colonies throughout the Third World, in the 21st Century.

 

36(22) TNCs’ FDIs Capital Flows to China Not to India

On a level playing ground Indian economy would match Chinese economy in every indicators of productivity and resilience, but the West favored China over India, because it realized that India enjoyed better credentials as the likely challenger to United States for the number one spot. United States awarded Most Favored Trading nations status to China and invested in China to enable China leapfrog over India and to overtake Japan as the world’s 2nd largest economy. After the demise of the Soviet Union, and the End of the Cold War, the United States during Clinton Administration ordered the Economic War against Japan and India and promoted China as the future Super power, so that the menace of Super Power Communist Chinese Dragon could replace menace of Soviet Bear, so that scared nations of South East Asia, Middle East could come under the umbrella of the United States.

 

China & India Equal Rivals

China overtook India only in 1990s after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The 1999 population of China (1.25 billion), India’s population (1 billion), the 2000 GNP measured at PPP for China ($4.112 trillion) and Indian GNP ($2.144 trillion). India’s GNP at PPP in 1999 was 52.14 percent of China’s GNP. The Gross Domestic Product of China in 1990 was $354.6 billion, and India’s GDP in 1990 was $322.7 billion. In 1990 India’s GDP was 91% of China’s GDP. The 1999 GDP of China got way ahead of India’s GDP. In 1999 India’s GDP was 46.38% of China’s GDP. China’s GDP in 1999 was 279.5% of 1990 GDP. India’s GDP in 1999 was only 142.5% of 1990 GDP. India stumbled during 1990s and China took off, but china has only ten years lead ahead of India, which India can easily catch up.

 

Indian rupee artificially devalued by corrupt finance ministers and politicians. India’s Rupee and US dollar exchange parity, declined in 1965 (1$=Rs. 4.7), 1975 (1$=Rs. 8.40), 1985 (1$=Rs. 12.33), 1990 (1$=Rs. 17.49), 2000 (1$=Rs. 45.00). One Indian rupee was worth $0.21 in 1965, $0.12 in 1975, and $0.08 in 1985. One Indian Rupee was worth $0.06 in 1990, $0.03 in 1995, and $0.023 in 1999. The exchange rate of Indian rupee versus US dollar is 485% undervalued, when measured at Purchasing Power Parity (PPP). The World Bank Report 2000/2001 estimated India’s GNP in 2000-2001 in terms of 1999 dollars at $442.2 billion.  The report also estimated the India’s 2000-2001 GNP measured at PPP at $2.144 trillion in 1999 dollars. It means that Indian rupees purchasing power is 485% of the purchasing power of the US dollar determined at present exchange rate of rupee and dollar. The purchasing power parity determines that the exchange rate of 1$ should equal Rs. 9.70 per dollar not Rs. 47.00 per dollar.

 

United States helped China to get ahead of India. China got ahead of India not because of the advantages competitive Chinese economy enjoyed over Indian economy, but because United States went all out to promote investments in China. China got ahead of India because of American policies that granted MFN status to China and that made Communist China the favored destination of transnational corporations foreign direct investments. The share of exports by foreign affiliates in the total exports of India in 1985 was (3%), in 1991 (3%). The shares of exports by foreign affiliates in the total export of Hong Kong in 1985 was (10%) and in 1997 (5%). The Share of exports by foreign affiliates in the total exports of Communist China in 1991 was (17%) and in 2001 was (50%). Communist China in 2001 total exports ($279.6 billion), the share of the foreign affiliates in the total exports was (50%) around $140 billion. The top three TNC exporters in 2000 in China exported Samsung Electronics ($1.5 billion), IBM ($1.5 billion), and Nokia ($1.1 billion). The role of Trans National Corporations (TNCs) in the global exports has increased over time. In Communist China, the share of foreign affiliates in exports rose from 17 percent in 1991 to 50 percent in 2001. In Mexico the affiliates of the five transnational auto manufacturers brought in $27 billion of Mexico’s exports in 2000. The TNCs in 2000 accounted for the 29 percent of exports of Costa Rica, 26 percent exports of Hungary and 13 percent exports of Mexico. The Transnational corporations are playing a pervasive role in the exports, and TNCs export growth is directly or indirectly linked to the expansion of the TNCs’ international production systems. The FDIs high shares in exports are not enough, the exports must also be upgraded and involve local value added if this investment is to yield longer-term developmental gains. The role of TNCs is particularly important for those products that have seen the fastest growth in world trade between 1985 and 2000, particularly in the electronics, automobile and apparel industries.

 

While Capitalist India kicked out IBM from India, by implementing socialist agenda, Communist China cajoled and wooed Capitalist corporations with a frenzy, dumping the Marxist ideals completely. The trade in parts and components is assuming greater significance. The specialization within the international production systems of the TNCs, different activities being performed in locations that offer the best conditions in terms of costs, resources, and logistics and market access. Barriers to international transactions are falling and speedier transportation intensifies competitive pressures on the TNCs to become more competitive and to internationalize their operations. In this process many TNCs are focusing on their core activities and contracting out other functions to independent firms, if not opting out of production altogether. India can easily catch up with China as the favored manufacturing outsourcing center, as India has the world’s second largest reservoir of skilled manpower, more than China.

 

Communist China had 6.1 percent and Taiwan 2.7 percent of the world trade in 2000 and India does not figure in the top 20-exporting nation of the world. The 20 economies with the largest export market share of the world trade in 2000 in percentage are: (i) United States (13.2%), (ii) Germany (8.2%), (iii) Japan (7.7%), (iv) China (6.1%), (v) France (4.8%), (vi) Canada (4.7%), (vii) UK (4.5%), (viii) Italy (3.5%), (ix) Netherlands (3.1%), (x) Taiwan (2.7%), (xi) Mexico (2.6%), and (xii) Korea (2.5%). Communist China increased its share of world trade by gaining extra 4.5% of the world trade and India just 0.2% of world trade in 1985-2000 period. The 20 winner economies based on export market share gains, 1985-2000 in percentage points are: (i) Communist China (4.5%), (ii) United States (1.7%), (iii) Korea (1.1%), (iv) Mexico (1.1%), (v) Malaysia (0.8%), (vi) Ireland (0.7%), (vii) Thailand (0.7%), (viii) Taiwan (0.7%), (ix) Singapore (0.6%), (x) Spain (0.5%), (xi) Philippines (0.3%), (xii) Hungary (0.2%), (xiii) Vietnam (0.2%), (xiv) India (0.2%), (xv) Israel (0.2%). In spite of these handicaps size of the Indian economy was $2.14 trillion in 1999, the world’s fourth largest economy in 2000.

 

In Asia Pacific region the largest recipients of FDIs are China, Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand and India. As recipients of the FDI, India followed by Turkey, South Korea, Kazakhstan and Philippines. The FDIs flow to China reached $47 billion in 2001 a 15 percent rise over 2000. FDI continues to play a prominent role in China’s economy: foreign affiliates now account fro 23 percent of the total industrial value added, 18 percent of tax revenues and 48 percent of total exports. The 2001 FDI inflows to Asia and pacific are: (i) China ($46.8 billion), (ii) Hong Kong ($22.8 billion), (iii) Singapore ($8.6 billion), (iv) Taiwan ($4.1 billion), (v) Thailand ($3.8 billion), (vi) India (3.4 billion), (vii) Turkey ($3.3 billion), Korea ($3.2 billion), Kazakhstan ($2.8 billion), and Philippines ($1.8 billion). The 2000 FDI inflows to China ($40.8 billion), Hong Kong ($61.9 billion), Singapore ($5.4 billion), Taiwan ($4.9 billion), Thailand ($2.8 billion), India ($2.3 billion), Turkey (1.0 billion), Korea ($9.3 billion), Kazakhstan (1.3 billion), and the Philippines ($1.2 billion).

 

INDIA AND CHINA’S SHARE OF WORLD MANUFACTURING OUTPUT (1750-1980): In 1750 India accounted for 24.5%, China for 32.8%, West for 18.2%, Orthodoxy for 5.0% and Japan for 3.8% of the worlds manufacturing output. In 1800, India accounted for 19.7%, China for 33.3%, West for 23.3%, Russia for 5.6% and Japan for 3.5%. In 1830, India accounted for 17.6%, China for 19.7%, West for 31.1% and Japan 2.8%. In 1860, India accounted for 8.6%, China for 19.7%, West for 53.7%, Russia 7.0% and Japan for 2.6%. In 1880, India accounted for 2.8%, China for 12.5%, West for 68.8%, Russia for 7.6% and Japan for 2.4%. In 1900, India accounted for 1.7%, China for 6.2%, West for 77.4%, Russia for 8.8% and Japan for 2.4%. In 1913, India accounted for 1.4%, China for 3.6%, West for 81.6%, Russia for 8.2% and Japan for 2.7%. In 1928, India accounted for 1.9%, China for 3.4%, West 84.2%, Russia for 5.3% and Japan 3.3%. In 1938, India accounted for 2.4%, China 3.1%, West 78.6%, Russia for 9.0% and Japan 5.2%. In 1953, India accounted for 1.7%, China 2.3%, West 74.6%, Russia for 16.0% and Japan for 2.9%. In 1963, India accounted for 1.8%, China 3.5%, West 65.5%, Russia 20.9% and Japan 5.1%. In 1973, India accounted for 2.1%, China 3.9%, West 61.2%, Russia 20.1% and Japan 8.8%. In 1980, India accounted for 2.3%, China 5.0%, West 57.8%, Russia 21.1% and Japan 9.1%. Indian share of world manufacturing output was 24.5% (1750), 19.7% (1800), 17.6% (1830), 8.6% (1860), 2.8% (1880), 1.7% (1900), 1.4% (1913), 1.9% (1928), 2.4% (1938), 1.7% (1953), 1.8% (1963), 2.1% (1973) and 2.3% (1980). Similarly Chinese share declines from 1750 (32.8%), 1800 (33.3%), 29.8%, 1830 (19.7%), 1880 (12.5%), 1900 (6.2%), 1913 (3.6%), 1928 (3.4%), 1938 (3.1%), 1953 (2.3%), 1963 (3.5%), 1973 (3.9%) and 1980 (5.0%). (Paul Bairoch, International Industrialization Levels from 1750 to 1980, Journal of European Economic History, (Fall 1982), pp. 269-334). 

 

The size of Indian economy equaled the size of Chinese economy throughout history and it would again become true in the 21st Century. India is world’s fourth largest economy with the $2.2 trillion GDP even when transnational corporations foreign direct investment avoided India and India did not get the Most Favored Nation (MFN) status with United States. India has the potential to overtake China in 10 years and become the second largest economy of the world. Indian rupees purchasing power is 485% of the purchasing power of the US dollar determined at present exchange rate of rupee and dollar. The purchasing power parity determines that the exchange rate of 1$ should equal Rs. 9.70 per dollar not Rs. 47.00 per dollar.

 

Rise of Indian Diamond Cartel

India is the world’s largest polisher of diamonds and has the economic resources to polish rough diamonds and market them as loose polished stones or as diamond jewelry. India should join forces with Canadian diamond mines, Russian diamond mines and Australian diamond mines to break the monopoly of De Beers diamond cartel. Indians would one day control the diamond industry of the world. India would become the Diamond Power of the world.

 

Rise of Indian Gold Cartel

India has been the market for one-fourth of the world’s gold produced annually for more than 50 years and gold consumption in India is going to rise higher and higher. It makes sense for India’s Bullion dealers to buy one-fourth gold mines of the world and directly ship the gold produced by these mines to India. Indians should invest in gold mines and silver mines and process gold ores and supply to Bombay Bullion dealers in competition with London Metal exchange. American diamond Club would like to make large direct investment in Canadian gold mines. Indian gold bullion dealers are able to buy gold at preferential prices.

 

36(23) Yankee Oil-Colonialism Fuels Concert of World Powers

The control over Arabian Gulf Oil and gas resources determined the predominance of United States as Hyper power. Challengers to the American hegemony, should better organize the concert of World Powers and rival oil colonialism to acquire control over oil and gas resources, not under the control of American oil colonialism. World’s 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 10th largest economies, namely, China, Japan, India, Germany, France and Russia, respectively, would pool their diplomatic, military and economic assets to establish rival oil colonialism and the Concert of World Powers to challenge the American Oil Colonialism supported by America, Britain, Spain and Italy, representing the world’s 1st, 7th, 8th and 14th largest economies. 

 

Old Europe Scrambles for Oil Colonialism

The European diplomacy in 2003 presents uncanny similarities to the European diplomacy of 1814, which created the Congress System and Concert of Europe. The great rush for Black Gold in the new age of Oil Colonialism, Germany, France and Belgium would join forces with Russia to tame the Yankee Oil colonialism, and in the process launch the Concert of World Powers to create stable world order. The economic gains of the possible French Oil Colonialism, German Oil-Colonialism, Belgium Oil-Colonialism and Russian Oil-Colonialism created the Concert of World Powers in February 2003, to tame the schemes of the United States establish the Oil Colony over Iraq, the nation sitting on the world’s second largest reservoir of gas and oil resources. The lure of the access to the huge markets of the United States as most favored trading nation (MFN) status lured Communist China away from Soviet Union into the lap of the Capitalist America and caused the demise of the Soviet Union, just 15-years after the defeat of the United States in the Vietnam War. President George W. Bush gave birth to the new age of Neo-colonialism and Oil Colonial empires would replace major powers as the principal players in world diplomacy. French BigOil aligned with German BigOil, Belgium BigOil and Russian BigOil would compete headlong with American BigOil in the race to create Oil Colonies throughout oil-producing world in the first quarter of the 21st Century.

 

Germany France Russia Detente

What Nixon and Kissinger did to Brezhnev’s Doctrine in 1970s, Russian President Putin did to Bush’s Doctrine 2002 by cementing diplomatic, political, economic and military détente and entente with France, Germany and Belgium in early part of 2003. Mao tse-tung feared Soviet preemptive nuclear attack on China as replay of the Brezhnev’s Doctrine, and aligned with United States to develop Sino-US détente and entente. President Chirac and Chairman Schroeder fear American Oil Colonialism as expression of American dream for the world conquest of the world’s oil and gas resources to force economic slowdown in Western Europe. President Richard Nixon and Secretary Dr. Henry J. Kissinger exploited the Sino-Soviet rifts to secure Sino-US détente and gradually developed the US-China ties from that of an adversary during the Vietnam War to Sino-US strategic ties. President Vladimir Putin exploiting the US-Germany, US-France and US-Belgium oil-conflicts to cement the Germany-Russia and France-Russia strategic ties. The oil-interests of France, Germany, Belgium and Russia coincide, and expressed as total opposition to the American Oil-Colonies in Iraq, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan. Germany and France have asserted the right of Germany and France to exercise rights, responsibilities as world powers in direct opposition to the Untied States. Germany, France and Belgium have come to realize that maritime Britain proved to be the Trojan horse of the European Union that joined the EU to make it a colony of the maritime United States as the continental unification had been against the national interests of Britain. If Germany and France fails to assert Europe’s role in the world politics in 21st Century, the expansion of Europe could result in the decline of Europe and make European Union a satellite of America. If leading West European powers fail to accept the leadership of Germany the dominant economic power of European Union and France the political and diplomatic leader European Union, then why should Germany and France subsidize the poor members of the expanded European Union. If Poland continued to toe American diplomacy, while profiting by the huge EU agricultural subsidies bankrolled by Germany and France, then the very purpose of the expansion of European Union would be lost. Britain, Portugal, Denmark, Italy and Spain broadly backed Washington's hard line stance on Iraq. France, Germany, Belgium, Austria, Sweden and Luxembourg, however, want U.N. weapons inspectors to finish their work. At NATO, France, Germany and Belgium have blocked plans supported by the United States and the NATO Alliance's 15 other members to prepare to protect Turkey against the threat of Iraqi attacks. On another front, France and Germany, backed by Russia and China have proposed that the U.N. Security Council beef up inspections in Iraq as a way to avoid military action, which Washington says is necessary to disarm the regime of Saddam Hussein. The Iraqi crisis is just the litmus test of the fundamental realignment of the European powers in 2003.

 

Europe Asserts Independent Role

The growing anti-Americanism is the social expression of the patriotic need of the German and French race to assert the national image and political role of Germany and France in the world arena. Germany and France no longer want to continue being the humble satellite of the United States. Anti-Americanism West European-style, is widespread, rising and migrating from its traditional home among left-wing intellectuals, academics and café society to the political mainstream. Countries such as France, Germany and Britain, which for more than five decades have been the closest allies of the United States, are beginning to drift away, propelled by a popular wave of concern, alarm and resentment. The reason for the anti-Americanism wave is not related to Iraq but the larger emerging theme is an abiding sense of fear and loathing of American power, policies and motives. The arguments sometimes are beyond logic, beyond reason. Even in Britain, the most cherished American ally, Prime Minister Tony Blair felt compelled to defend his support for the United States before a hostile TV audience this past week. Participants derided him as “Vice President” and “the member of Parliament from north Texas. The Pew Research Center has reported that while most Europeans say they admire American movies, music and television programs, Europeans dislike the spread of American ideas and customs. The rancor directed across the Atlantic came as Europeans struggled to agree on common economic and foreign policies in February 2003. Europeans are divided over the very size and definition of the European Union, and over how far Europe should go in developing a defense capability. Into this vacuum comes a Bush administration whose self-assured policies and rhetorical style smack to many Europeans of Unilateral arrogance. Germans and French are more critical of the United States than in the developing nations of Africa and Asia. Perhaps most telling were European’s suspicions about President Bush’s intentions. The poll indicated that 75 percent of the French surveyed, 54 percent of Germans and 44 percent of Britons believed a U.S. desire to control Iraqi oil was the United States’ principle reason for considering a war on Iraq camouflaged as war on weapons of mass destruction and terrorism. How did Iraq become part of "an axis of evil"? The phrase in the 2002 State of the Union address, linking Iraq, Iran and North Korea, was a sure applause-getter, but it has done nothing but muddle policy lines.

 

EU Expansion Harmed Germany France

Germany and France agreed to invite East European countries into European Union, hoping it would result in Germany economic hegemony over Eastern Europe the area otherwise known as Great Germany, the former territories of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. France, Germany, Belgium, Austria, Sweden and Luxembourg have joined under the France-Germany Umbrella to assert Europe’s greater role in world politics. Britain, Portugal, Denmark, Italy and Spain have joined forces with United States to make United states the preponderant power of the Europe to humble Germany and France. Many of the East European countries, especially Poland is likely to join forces with Untied States, Britain, Portugal, Denmark, Italy and Spain, the distant-neighbors of East Europe, to balance the growing domination of Germany and France the near neighbors of the East Europe. President Eisenhower humbled Britain and France on Suez Canal Crisis in 1956. Donald Rumsfeld humbled Germany and France in the Iraq Crisis, arguing that the expansion of Poland and other east European countries in the NATO made Germany and France “Old Europe” the power of no great significance and international role. Germany and France would lose their great power status if they fail to oppose President Bush in 2003.

 

Western Europe, Germany and France will have to take decisions to preserve Europe’s unity and to assert Western Europe’s role on the world stage. If Western Europe fails to pull together and jointly present a common front to the United States, it will be impossible to continue working closely with the United States on a long-standing basis while retaining European dignity and self-esteem. What is at stake is Europe’s determination to be heeded and to play a leading role on the world stage. It seems hard to believe that this disunity; among Europeans and between Europe and America can reach a lower point, than the current level of animosity between United States and France, between United States and Germany. Diplomats warn of a "deep crisis if Western Europe cannot speak with one voice on Iraq and feared the bitter dispute that has split NATO could disrupt a European Union summit next week. The February 2003 European Union’s Summit Meeting focused on trying to find unity among the 15 European Union nations, which were sharply divided over whether to give U.N. inspectors in Iraq more time or to press toward military action as Washington seeks. The split had caused the worst crisis in decades in NATO, where France, Germany and Belgium rejected a U.S.-backed plan on preparations in case of an Iraq war. At a European Parliament session, diplomats blasted the disunity, but also found European Union’s 626-member body deeply divided. Unless the EU Summit brings unity, the European Union will enter a deep crisis.

 

Closure of American Bases in Germany

Germany would use the Iraqi crisis to demand the closure of American bases in Germany and the removal of medium-range nuclear missiles under the control of the United States from the German soil. Germany appeared to have asked Americans to move out of the military bases on German soil. Germans distrust the motives of American troops deployed in Germany. Germany feared that the American troops could be occupation troops in Germany and the national security of Germany demands that they leave Germany. The Pentagon is considering a major redeployment of U.S. troops out of South Korea and Germany, two Cold War hot spots, as it tries to adjust to the anti-Americanism mood of the Germans and as it realign the American military structure around the world. Pentagon may expedite the movement out of Germany as Germany may object to using German bases for war on Iraq. Pentagon would vacate the bases because of Germany’s opposition to a U.S.-led attack on Iraq. Closure of American military bases in Germany could lead to further strains with Germany.

 

NATO as Chaperon of Europe & Germany

Rumsfeld’s comment about “Old Europe” signaled Bush Administration’s determination to assert expanded NATO’s real strategic function to serve as the ‘Chaperon of Western Europe,’ albeit as the Chaperon of Germany, France and Japan. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld correctly chastised Germany and France as insignificant Old Europe, because the very purpose of the NATO had been from the day of its inception, to keep France and Germany under check. Since the former Soviet colonies in the Eastern Europe, now members of the expanded NATO would provide the necessary manpower, United States no longer needed the support of Germany and France to project America’s power in the world. The Pentagon-led NATO alliance's "real function was to serve as the chaperon of Europe." It is, the means to prevent Western Europe from establishing itself as an independent fortress and perhaps one day, a rival to the United States. Those who argued that Pentagon’s budget is too high, given the end of the Cold War, failed to appreciate the task White House assigned to America in the 21st Century, i.e., to create American Colonial Empire. The adult supervision of Western Europe and Japan is an enormously expensive and complex undertaking, which perforce meant that the Pentagon must spend on its military more than do the next seven countries together, including Russia, Japan, China, France, Britain, Germany and India. Faced with the crash of the Wall Street and Dow Jones Industrial Index White House could finance the bulging Pentagon budgets and large tax cuts only by establishing oil colonies in Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE so that Pentagon could loot the Arabian Gulf oil and pay its puppet rulers of America’s oil colonies no more than $2 per barrel and keep the profits to finance Pentagon’s budget and America’s deficit. America’s conquest of Iraq and establishment of direct military colony over Iraq would allow America finance its assertive military dreams and to serve as Chaperon of France, Germany, and Japan. No wonder that Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, Japan and South Korea realized that America’s colonial occupation of Iraq would make Western Europe and Japan again the political and economic satellites of the United States. No wonder that Britain, Japan and South Korea surrendered their national pride and agreed to serve as the Lap Dog of the White House, because their economies depended on the oil crumbs that their new master in the Oval Office would throw at them to nibble. No wonder that France and Germany would be forced to develop oil pact with Russia and China to challenge America’s occupation of Iraq, unless they agreed to be Chaperoned by the Yankees.

 

Diplomacy of Offshore Balancing Strategy

President Bush’s dreams of hegemonic American Oil Empire, would automatically elicit universal resistance, led by Germany, France, Russia, China and India, and sooner or later American Empire would exhaust itself. Despite its esoteric logic, America's strategy of preponderance is seductive and it made sense that the United States should seek to amass as much power as possible. The rationale behind America’s Oil Colonialism strategy is analogous to that of an Oligopoly firm in an oligopoly market that drove its rivals and competitors out of business to avoid the specter of losing its profits in a competitive environment. Theoretically, if America could establish and maintain itself as the sole super power in the international system, it would enjoy something very close to absolute security and absolute monopoly over the vital economic resources of the world, namely, oil, gas, and foreign capital. However, history is the witness that whenever one state acquired too much power, others invariably feared that it will aggrandize itself at their expense, and make an attempt at world domination. "Hegemonic empires, almost automatically elicit universal resistance, which is why all such claimants have sooner or later exhausted themselves."

 

Offshore Balancing is Concert of Powers

The Offshore balancing policy would check the hegemony of the United States, and hold America in check so that America deluded by its military successes might not embark upon the conquest of the world’s oil or the conquest of the world. The Diplomacy of Offshore Balancing is a modern version of the Congress System that 1814 Congress of Vienna developed to check the hegemony of Napoleonic France and to integrate France into a new world order. The Strategy of Offshore Balancing Diplomacy accepts the geopolitical fact of the rise and fall of great powers, rivalries among great powers and violent regional conflicts. The rise and fall of great powers, civilizations and weapons platforms is an ongoing process and no power can put a stop to it. Super powers should not hinder the attempts of other great powers develop regional alliances. American strategy of preponderance in oil-rich Arabian Gulf to establish American oil colonies throughout OPEC nations is burdensome, Sisyphean, and profoundly risky. American invasions to establish American oil colony would backfire had Iraq succeeded in thwarting the American invasions with the tacit help of Russia.

 

Great powers including White House policymakers could adopt a new grand strategy, the diplomacy of Offshore Balancing. Rather than fear multipolar world the advocates of the Offshore Balancing strategy embraced the multipolar world as the fact of life, and recognized that instability caused by the rise and fall of great powers, great-power rivalries, and messy regional conflicts was a geopolitical fact of life. Offshore Balancing Strategy accepts that the United States cannot prevent the rise of new great powers, either within the present American sphere of influence, namely, the European Union, Germany, and Japan, or outside American sphere of influence, namely, China, Russia, India. Instead of exhausting Americans resources to keep European Union, Germany, France, Japan, Russia, China and India weak, the United States should allow world powers develop their militaries to provide for their own national and regional security. World powers would form a Concert of World Powers and these Great powers would maintain power balances, check the rise of overly ambitious global and regional powers, and stabilize global balance of power. It would create stable Balance of Power in Europe, East Asia, and the Persian Gulf and the stable world order would be in the interest of the super power as well as great powers and medium and smaller powers.

 

President Bush’s dreams of World Empire would accelerate the process of the rise of rival super power. The rise of new great powers is inevitable, and America's very primacy accelerates this process and America would not be able to military stop these new world powers from overtaking America, short of the nuclear war. If White House continued to follow an adult-supervision strategy, which treated America’s Allies, namely, Germany, France, Belgium and Japan as irresponsible adolescents that required American control over their military, and foreign policy affairs, these allies of America would gang up against United States. If America continued to follow an Adult Supervision Strategy towards China, Russia and India as future enemies to be suppressed, America’s relations with these emerging great powers will be increasingly dangerous, as they would coalesce against what they perceive as an American dreams at world conquest. If President Bush decided to undertake preemptive strikes against the world power that Pentagon believed might overtake or equal United States as military or economic power, that act of aggression would accelerate the process of the rise of the rival super power and rest of the world powers would lend their support to the new center of world power. Partners form military alliances neither because they are friends, nor because they have common values, but because they fear someone else more than they fear each other.

 

Great Powers and diplomats must always be more concerned with a predominant power's capabilities than with its intentions. Irrespective of the intentions of the occupant of the Oval Office the very fact of the military preeminence of the United States force major powers to work out new alliances to counter the hegemony of the United States. Throughout 1990s great powers and diplomats have been profoundly anxious about the imbalance of power in America's favor. This simmering mistrust of American predominance intensified during the Clinton Administration, after Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright launched wars of Humanitarian Interventions. Leading great powers, Russia and China responded to American hegemony by concerting their efforts against America. Russia and China, although long estranged, found common ground in a nascent alliance that opposed American hegemonism" and expressly aimed at re-establishing "a multipolar world." Arguing that the term "superpower" is inadequate to convey the true extent of America's economic and military pre-eminence, the French Foreign Minister Hubert Vedrine called the United States a "hyper power." Even the Dutch Prime Minister declared that the European Union should make itself "a counterweight to the United States."

The founding principle of the Offshore Balancing Strategy is that other great powers have at least as much interest in securing freedom of navigation of sea-lanes and uninterrupted access to the strategic minerals and oil and gas resources and stable regional balance of power. An offshore balancing strategy holds that America's strategic interest in Europe does not demand that Washington insure against every untoward event there. Disorder in the Balkans, Cyprus, Georgia, Basque and other places on Europe's fringes should be a matter for Western Europeans, who have the wherewithal to combat it, quarantine it, or, if they choose, ignore it. The United States would follow a similar policy with respect to Japan in the East Asia. Washington would announce to Tokyo its intention to terminate the Mutual Cooperation and Security Treaty within a specified time period say, five years. Then Japan, which for more than fifty years has been a politically stable state, would developed whatever military means it believed necessary to function as an independent great power. An offshore balancing strategy would turn on a simple truth: other states have at least as much interest as the United States does in secure sea-lanes, access to resources, and regional stability. The less America does, and the less other great powers expect America to do, the more other great powers will do to help themselves.

 

36(24) Multipolar World

Multi-Polar Word is the Norm

The media hype of the one-superpower system is OK but the fact of one-superpower system existed did not mean that International system became Unipolar from the Tripolar world order that defined the International system from 1950 to 1980. The demise of the Soviet Union didn’t halt the rise of the Asia and the rise of nuclear China and nuclear India as the world’s 2nd and 3rd military powers respectively. American primacy is not divinely ordained. Unipolarity is an aberration. Multipolarity is the recurring historical pattern. India led Non Aligned Movement created the Tri-polar world from 1950 to 1980. It is wrong to suggest that international system after the Second World War was a bipolar world order. The writ of the United States ran supreme in the White Western Christian First World. The writ of the Soviet Union ran supreme in the White Orthodox European Second World. The writs of neither United States nor of the Soviet Union ran supreme in the Non aligned Third World. The world cannot remain unipolar. The history of the modern state system of the past five centuries shows that primacy by any one power provokes others to challenge it. The failure of the United States, Britain and Spain to bribe, cajole, threaten and buy votes of Non Aligned non-permanent members of the UN Security Council, namely, Cameroon, Angola, Guinea, Chile and Pakistan to support American Resolution in March 2003, demonstrated that the Third Pole of the International system the Non-Aligned Pole had continued to exist in 2003 unabated though diminished after the 1980 demise of the Soviet Union and end of the Cold War. The defeat of France and Germany in the 1956 Suez Canal War demonstrated that France and Germany were no longer Great Powers. The failure of Russia, France and Germany to stop the American invasions of Iraq and Russia’s failure to undertake suitable military response to the American aggression, demonstrated the decline of Russia as World Power and Russia fell to the status of the 4th power of the world, behind China and India in 2003.

 

India & China As Preeminent Powers

China and India were the preeminent powers of the world for more than 5,000 years, from 3000 BC to 1750 AD. As late as 1750, China produced 32.8%, India 24.5% and Japan 3.8% of the world’s manufactured goods. In 1750, China, India and Japan produced 61.1% of world’s total manufactured goods. Indian economy was destroyed by England after the victory in 1757 Battle of Plassey.

 

Russia No Longer Pro Non Aligned World

India should develop closer ties with United States as well as France and Germany because India could no longer depend on Russia’s support to the Non aligned World as the national interests of Russia radically differed with those of the Soviet Union and remarkably similar to the national interests of the Russian Czars, who competed with Indian Empire in the Great Game in Central Asia and Amu River. Putin’s Russia would not value ties with the Non Aligned Third World, as Russia is no longer a Super Power it used to be. Soviet Union as a super power valued its ties with the Non Aligned World to hold in check the preeminent power United States. President Putin’s Russia would revert back to traditional foreign policies of Russia’s Czars that competed with fellow great powers to expand Russia’s territories at the cost of lesser powerful nations in Eurasia. Putin’s Russia would attempt recreating Russia’s lost Empire in alliance with preeminent Super power United States. Russia is more likely to reluctantly accept the onward march of American colonialism, except to demand concessions from United States that Russia should be allowed to do the same in the former Soviet oil-producing countries in the Caspian Central Asia. Russia’s Czars rather than Brezhnev or Khrushchev would influence the future foreign policy of Russia, especially towards the Non Aligned World.  

 

Challenges to Preeminent Powers

The Hapsburg Holy Roman Empire was the predominant power of its time. Richelieu pursued the diplomacy of Raison d’etat and Catholic King of France supported the Protestant princes in Germany to keep Germany disunited and provided military and financial aid to the Protestant Princes in the Counter Reformation Thirty Years Wars (1618-1648). Napoleon Bonaparte was the preeminent power of Europe and the European Powers in the 1814 Congress Of Vienna established the Congress System, the Summit or Congress of the leaders of the European Powers that maintained the Concert of Europe and peace in Europe from 1814 to 1914. Victorian England was the preeminent power of the 19th Century and sun never set in the British Empire, but the power of England based on the power and resources of Indian Empire that paid for the salaries of the English officers and soldiers worldwide. Indian soldiers made the Empire of Victorian England. Papacy conspired to bring down the Protestant Anglican Empire by engineering the secession of Catholic-majority Ireland that destroyed the manpower base of United Kingdom. Failure of England to share imperial revenues with India caused the final demise of British Colonial Empire. Bismarckian Germany was the predominant power of late 19th Century and early 20th Century and it saw its predominance tested by British Empire, Indian Empire, Russia and America. India provided 3,500,000 soldiers during WW II and 1,500,000 soldiers during WW I for Allied Forces. India soldiers contributed more towards Allied Victories in last Two World Wars other than soldiers of Britain, Russia and America. The Hapsburgs, Napoleonic France, Victorian England, Bismarckian Germany were all dominant powers for a short time and they all saw their dominance contested.

 

2003 Concert of World Powers

The Concert of World Powers, represented by Russia, France, India, China and Germany would conduct diplomacy to hold America in check and to maintain global balance of power, in 21st Century just as Concert of Europe after the 1814 Congress of Vienna, held Summit of the leading European powers to maintain European Balance of Power. President Jacques Chirac’s decision to invite China, India, Brazil and Mexico the world’s 2nd, 4th, 9th and 11th largest economies for one day informal meeting with the leaders of the G-4 nations inadvertently laid the foundation for the Concert of World Powers and the system might be called 2003 Congress of Evian, which would coordinate the diplomacy of the top-12 economic powers of the world to hold America in check.

 

Can United States Maintain its Hegemony?

America would fail to maintain control and peace throughout the fast expanding American Empire and American sphere of influence. United States became a super power after the Second World War by accident as Britain lost the urge to retain British Empire. The theft of American Atom Bomb secrets allowed the Soviet Union to emerge as the Second Super Power. The German scientists built Atom Bombs and missiles both for United States and the Soviet Union. United States lacks the diplomatic finesse to maintain the Colonial administration in the American Empire. American primacy is not divinely ordained. Unipolarity is an aberration. Multipolarity is the recurring historical pattern. United States suffered from the same handicap that undermined the imperial Roman Empire, the shortage of expandable military manpower. The shrinking population of Roman homeland and expanding Roman Empire required the induction of the barbarian troops into Roman Legions that transferred the Roman military technology to barbarian tribes that improvised upon it to conquer Rome itself in 410 AD. The defeat of American troops in the Vietnam War obliged the Pentagon to hire Mujahideen mercenaries to wage wars on Soviet occupation troops in Afghanistan, which created vast reservoir of Islamic militants that turned around to wage terrorist attacks on United States and Israel.

 

Could Iraq Victory Be Nemesis For Bush?

It would be very difficult for President Bush to preserve the imperial foreign policy of America as it could get bogged down in Iraq peacekeeping efforts. Whether America can preserve or lose its primacy would depend on how America used its primacy in the post-Iraq War era. At the end of the second world war, the US had power no country possessed in history: 50 per cent of the world’s GDP, nuclear monopoly, unmatched military power and the towering status of President F.D. Roosevelt. It used this power to build a liberal international order. Institutions to serve this order were created—the Bretton Woods system, the GATT, the Marshall Plan and NATO. Maintenance of the Atlantic alliance was seen as vital to US interests. America’s Unipolar world order depended upon NATO and Atlantic Alliance both for legitimacy and diplomatic coalition. The US-Europe Atlantic partnership and NATO died in the rubble of Baghdad in 2003. The expansion of NATO to include Poland and 10 former members of the Soviet Bloc weakened NATO rather than strengthen it, as Old Europe led by Germany and France got alienated while the New Europe led by Poland lacked the manpower and economic muscle to contribute significantly to the American imperial operations or peacekeeping operations. President George W Bush lacks the towering status of President Franklin D Roosevelt. It is safe to argue that no president of the United States lacked respect in Europe more than President George W Bush. United States lacked the economic muscle to reward its allies with economic rewards and investments to keep them in line for future military operations envisaged by Pentagon, bent on creating American Oil Colonial Empire. The Asian economic meltdown of 2000 and the collapse of Argentina’s economy exposed the charade of America’s crusade for the free transfer of capital. America’s leadership of the World Bank caused economic disasters in the ASEAN and South America, especially Malaysia, Indonesia, Argentina, Ecuador, Venezuela, Peru and Colombia. The Sept 11 attacks unhinged the economy of the United States and precipitated the steep decline of the Dow Jones. The military occupation of the oil-rich Iraq gave great boost to American economy, but Iraq oil incomes would never be able to pull American economy out of its morass.

 

Bush Like Freemason Theodore Roosevelt

President Bush pursued the policies of realpolitik President Theodore Roosevelt, who happened to be a declared Freemason like President Ford and President George Washington. Bush Administration jettisoned the diplomacy of President Woodrow Wilson and President Franklin D Roosevelt and adopted the imperial foreign policy of President Theodore Roosevelt. All US presidents, from Truman to Clinton, were basically committed to the Franklin Roosevelt’s liberal interdependent order. President Truman, President Eisenhower, President Kennedy, President Carter, President Reagan, President Bill Clinton pursued the Wilsonian diplomacy and liberal interdependent order. President George W Bush fundamentally departed from it diplomatic traditions of President Woodrow Wilson during First World War and President Franklin d Roosevelt during the Second World War. Crass realpolitik of Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld combined with Evangelical Born Again Christian messianic zeal and Freemasonry type Neo-conservatism produced the potent oil colonial imperialist agenda of the Bush administration’s foreign policy. Brotherhood of neo-conservatives smells like the secret society brotherhood of Freemasonry apparently ran Bush Administration’s America, and they sincerely believe that with its enormous military power America could and should reshape the world to suit American colonial interests in the soon to emerge American oil colonial empire.

 

Bush Doctrine Vs Brezhnev Doctrine

Soviet Union enunciated the Brezhnev Doctrine immediately after the America’s defeat in the Vietnam War and embarked upon the imperial policies in Angola and Afghanistan. The Soviet arrogance as imperial power lasted only 15 years after the America’s defeat in the Vietnam in 1975 and by 1991 the Soviet Union disintegrated, the Berlin Wall came down, Warsaw Pact became history, and truncated Russia became a second rate power. President Putin enhanced the power to Russia, but Russia would never be Able to climb higher than the 4th world power slot in the world, and Russia destined to remain behind United States, China and India in the Top-4 Club. Would United States face catastrophic decline 15 years after the end of the Cold War in 1991 before 2010. Iraq may turn out to be the nemesis of American power. For the first time since its emergence as a preeminent power, the US has taken on a truly imperial role. Iraq Colonization project is far greater in scope then the one in Vietnam and Vietnam War experiment ended in total failure and defeat for America and Vietnam took 54,000 American lives and nothing suggested that America would succeed in Iraq. Iraq is multi-ethnic society unlike Germany and Japan and minority Arab Sunni representing less than 16 percent of the population ruled over Iraq after the First World War, due to the American and British penchant for Arab Wahhabi Sunni Muslims. US success in implanting democracy on the ruins of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan cannot be replicated elsewhere. Few believe that the US wants to build democracy in Iraq. America would readily settle for a pro-American dictatorship in Iraq, as it has done elsewhere. President Bush enunciated the Bush Doctrine 2002 and declared the preeminence of the United States and its readiness to use military power to undertake preemptive strikes against any nation or group of nations that aimed to equal or surpass United States in military capability.

 

36(25) Conclusion

(1) Six Power Concert of World

The leading six powers are United States, Russia, China, India, Japan and united France-Germany. The balance of power among world civilizations would maintain peace and order in the 3rd Millennium. The Concert of World Civilizations would stabilize the global balance of power in 21st Century, just as the Concert of Europe did for 100 years after 1814 Congress of Vienna. The Six world powers shall manage the world order in the 21st Century, and they shall be United States, Russia, China, India, Japan and France-Germany. The six world powers representing Concert of the World shall be: first, United States representing Protestant American Civilization; second, Russia representing Orthodox Christian Slav Civilization; third, United France-Germany representing Catholic European Civilization; fourth, China representing Buddhist Civilization; fifth, India representing Hindu Civilization; and Sixth, Japan representing Shinto Buddhist Civilization. No Islamic nation is big enough either in size of economy or military power to be part of the Concert of World powers.

 

(2) Eight-Power Multi Polar World Order

The New Millennium heralded the Multi-Polar World Order that replaced bipolar world order of the Cold War era (1945-1990), and one-superpower system of the post-Cold War age (1990-2000). Decline of the second super power, the Soviet Union did not increase the lead of United States over other great powers, namely, China, Japan and India. The decline of nuclear Russia resulted in multi-polar world order replacing the bipolar world order. United States is the preeminent Super Power of the world, but not the Sole Super Power of the world in 2003. Nuclear China and Economic giant Japan and nuclear India have emerged as world powers in 2003. Germany has eclipsed Britain as the major power in European Union. The largest economic powers of the world in the declining order are, United States, China, Japan, India, Germany, France and Britain. The eight-power Concert of World Powers, consisting of United States, China, India, Japan, Germany, France, Britain and Russia, should preside over the multi-polar new world order in 21st Century. The Concert of the World Powers created when in Feb 2003, replicating the Congress of Vienna of 1814, when Germany and France were joined by Russia and China to oppose America’s declared objective to invade Iraq.

 

(3) Colonial Empires of 21st Century

The 21st Century shall be similar to 18th and 19th Centuries, wherein Colonial Empires competed with one another for colonial expansionism. Neo-Colonial Empires staged a comeback in the 21st Century that seeks to exploit the oil, gas and mineral resources of colonies, but restores religious and political control to the fundamentalist religious clergy or military coup leaders.

 

(4) 8-Power Concert World Congress System

Throughout history the preeminence of any single nation in world order has caused wars. The Raison d’etat and Balance of power principle determine the counter moves of the other major world powers that unite to balance the preeminent power. The preeminence of France in (1618-1814) period caused Napoleonic wars. The preeminence of Germany in early part of 20th century caused First World War and the Second World War. The preeminence of United States after 1945 caused numerous wars, military coups, though it was kept in check by the Soviet Union and the Non-Aligned Movement led by India. The demise of the Soviet Union and the preeminence of United States gave birth to American imperial wars in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Iraq. Only the Concert of Eight World Powers would maintain world peace and stable world order in 21st Century. Foreign-policy alignments have gone mad worldwide.

 

(5) 9/11 Created Multi-Polar World Order

Osama Bin Laden destroyed the one-superpower international system by 9/11 attacks. India supports the Multi-Polar world order. The terrorist attacks of 9/11 by Osama Bin Laden and President Bush declaration of America’s war on Islamic terrorism created Multi-Polar New World Order in September 2001 and ended the Uni-Polar world order that had replaced the end of the Bipolar-world order of the Cold War, after the demise of the Soviet Union in 1990.

 

(6) Civilization Empire Strikes First

The 9/11 attacks sounded the death warrant on the legitimacy of smaller nations that misused concept the independence and sovereignty of nation states to harbor terrorists and sponsor religious terrorism and intolerance. The 9/11 attacks eroded the legitimacy of the newly independent states that emerged as a result of the decolonization. President George W. Bush wisely enunciated the new ‘Pre-emptive Empire Strikes First” national security strategy.

 

(7) Anachronistic Smaller New States System

Just as feudal Papal States became anachronistic after Napoleonic wars, and colonialism became anachronistic after the Second world war, the smaller, weaker fundamentalist theocratic states became anachronistic after the Wahhabi Muslim terrorist attacks of the 9/11, which ushered in the new Age of Neo-Colonial Empires based on Oil, Gas, Diamond and Gold colonialism in the 21st Century. Many of the smaller and weaker nation states of the Third World, shall cease to be the entities constituting the international system and world order in the 21st Century, and may lose their independent and sovereign status. In each transition of the International system, the change of the world order, what had been taken for granted suddenly became anachronistic, as Papal Empire of the 17th and 18th Century, and multinational Empires of the 19th Century and the Colonialism in the 20th Century became anachronistic, though it had been taken for granted for many centuries. In 21st Century the multitude of newly independent states that emerged out of the disintegration of the European Colonial Empires, would also become anachronistic in the 21st Century, though in the post-1945 era emergence of the newly independent states had been taken for granted.

 

(8) New Concert of Europe

The powers of “Old Europe” namely Germany and France brought back the instruments of “Old Diplomacy” namely “Raison d’etat and Balance of Power to develop a common front of Russia, Germany, France and Belgium to balance the hegemony of the United States and restore the balance of power in Eurasia. The age one-superpower system is over and Great Powers would recreate the Congress System to check and tame the preeminence of the leading world power. The great Power Concert of Europe checked the preeminence of France and Germany in 1814 to 1914 period. In February 2003, President Vladimir Putin of Russia and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and French President Jacques Chirac, met after President Bush’s first war on Afghanistan and before Bush’s Second war on Iraq. Putin, Schroeder, and Chirac will continue to meet for summit meetings during America’s War for Iraqi oil. After the First Napoleonic wars, Austria, Prussia, Russia, England assembled in Vienna in September 1814 to plan the postwar world. The Congress of Vienna continued to meet all during napoleon’s escape from Elba and his final defeat at Waterloo. The Great Power concert of Europe, the Congress System that began on September 1814, took a rebirth after its incarnation as the Concert Of World, in February 2003, when Germany, France denounced by Americans as “Old Europe” aligned with Russia to start a new age of Raison d’etat, Balance of Power and Great Power concert of Europe to check the preeminence of America and to jointly balance the hegemony of United States in world politics, by pooling the economic resources of Germany, diplomatic resources of France and military and nuclear resources of Russia. The Schroeder, Chirac and Putin seek to jointly tame the Yankee Shrew in the post-Iraq War era.

 

(9) America Seeks New Oil Colonies

President Bush has the moral authority to herald a new age of colonial empires in the new world order. As the elected leader of the world’s greatest military and economic power, President Bush has the right to create a new world order in the image of America to better promote the national interests of America, provided it gains the concurrence or acquiescence of other great powers, namely, Russia, Germany, France, China and India. Any world order that great world powers accept as legitimate acquires legitimacy. The post-Second World War foreign policy of the United States could be summarized as an attempt to establish American Oil-colonies throughout the oil-producing world.

 

(10) 21st Century New World Order

The new world order in the 21st Century is a multi-polar world, dominated by 8 world powers, namely, United States, China, India, Russia, Britain, Germany, France and Japan. Canada would also become a world power, whenever it decides to do so provided it develops foreign policies independent of the United States. So long as Canada remains dependent on United States, it would not become a world power. United Europe would emerge as world power and replace Germany, France and Britain as independent players in the world politics. The seven world powers would be: United States, United Europe, India, Russia, China, Japan and Canada.

 

(11) No Muslim Country is World Power

No Islamic nation would ever become the world power. No Islamic nation, including Saudi Arabia and Pakistan could ever become a great economic power. The GDP of Saudi Arabia ($129 billion), Kuwait ($30 billion), Pakistan ($237 billion), Bangladesh ($188 billion), Iran ($325 billion), and Indonesia ($505 billion) rules out the possibility of ever playing a great power role. No Muslim power would ever become a great power to join the Concert of World Powers.

 

(12) Decline of Europe Is Propaganda

Dr. Henry Kissinger, backed by Jewish media unleashed global propaganda campaign to denigrate European state’s right to claim great power status. “The nineteenth century European nation was based on common language and culture, and, given the technology of the times, provided the optimum framework for security, economic growth, and for influencing international events. In the post-Cold War world, the traditional European nation-states-the countries, which formed the Concert of Europe until the First World War-lack the resources for a global role. The success of their (European) effort to consolidate themselves into the European Union will determine their future influence. United, Europe will continue as a Great Power; divided into national states, it will slide into secondary status.” (Henry Kissinger, Diplomacy, 1994, pp 807, 804-810) Donald Rumsfeld embarking upon the diplomacy to force Western Europe, especially Germany and France slide into secondary status in 2000’s. United States conspired to destroy the unity among European Union members, by forcing the entry of 10 impoverished East European, into European Union, so that Germany and France would be weekend by forking out their scarce capital, to feed and build former slave nations of the Soviet Empire. United States undermined the unity of the European Union, by buying the political influence over Poland’s president Aleksander Kwasniewski, who openly declared: ‘If it is President Bush’s vision, it is mine.’ Germany and France have to take Civilization decision, whether Western Europe, continue to feed, nurture and finance East Europeans, if they continue to respect non-European power, more than France and Germany, the economic engines that feeds and finances impoverished East Europeans, the erstwhile former slaves of the Soviet Empire.

 

(13) Responses of Pluralist India and Russia

Russia and India are worried by the fact that Asia is developing into one of the planet’s most explosive regions. Islamic Wahhabi extremism, financed by oil-incomes, global drug trade and the CIA and the ethnic separatism financed by Papacy and endorsed by the CIA present major threats to peace and stability in multi-ethnic pluralistic societies in Asia.

 

(14) Civilization Right of Preemptive Strikes

The Civilization State principle established the Great Powers’ right to undertake preemptive strikes against terrorist nations, religious intolerance to maintain the integrity of Civilizations. Great Powers would not onwards have a right to establish colonial empires and oil colonies to secure their oil and gas supplies. The predator religious intolerance of Semite Wahhabi terrorism, Semite Zionism, Semite Catholicism emerged as the global nexus of religious intolerance to threaten the world civilizations. The growing Vatican-Mecca Axis of religious intolerance and Semite Tel Aviv-Riyadh Axis of Mecca Caliphate secured the support of American oil colonialism, and emerged as the principle threat to world civilizations.

 

(15) Terrorist Cortez, Pizzarro & Robert Clive

Christopher Columbus, Cortez, Pizzaro, and Robert Clive were all barbarian terrorist fortune-seekers that invaded and occupied the lands of the civilizations by deceit and looted the gold and riches of the civilizations. Wahhabi Muslim terrorist Osama Bin Laden sincerely believed that militant Arab terrorists would achieve a military victory against Protestant United States, no different the victory similar Bedouin terrorists scored over rich Christian Egyptian Civilization after 640 AD, under the leadership of Prophet Muhammad. What should be the response of the Civilization-Nation Empires against terrorist attacks of the barbarian religious cults financed by global drug trade in Heroin and Cocaine and supported by covert operations led by foreign secret services, like the CIA and ISI of Pakistan?

 

(16) Predator Religious Cults

Wahhabi fundamentalism and Islamic terrorism represents barbarian forces that aspire to overhaul the geo-political structure of the world, to the detriment of the world civilizations. Civilization-nation Empires must resolutely retaliate against the terrorist barbarian forces that aspire to overhaul the geo-political balance of power, by destroying the barbarian homelands and breeding grounds of the barbarian terrorism.

 

(17) Civilization State Principle Under Attack

European Union united all white Christians of European continent but engineered the partition of Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, and the Soviet Union. European Union promoted the idea of Single European Christian Civilization while promoting unity among white Europeans. The EU promoted disunity and ethnic separatism in Non Aligned Nations in the Third World and directly attacked the multi-ethnic Civilization states of Russia, India and Ottomans by promoting the barbarian, evil doctrine of Semite Wahhabism.

 

(18) Russia India China Civilization-Nations

India, China, Russia, and United States are multi-ethnic civilized nation states. The Civilization Principle is more important for India than for China and Russia, because the dominant influence of the Han people in China is playing an exceptionally major role in terms of the unification of China. The dominant influence of the Slav Russians is playing an exceptionally major role in terms of the unification of Russia, after the disintegration of the Soviet Union.

 

(19) Population Decline of Russia

Russian population is declining at alarming rate. The number of citizens of Russia reduces every year. For several years, the population of Russia diminished y an average of 750,000 a year. The population of Russia can dwindle by 22 million in next 15 years, by 2015. President Putin declared that if the current trend of the decline of Russian population persisted, it would threaten the Russia’s survival as a nation. Russia is facing a real threat of becoming an aging nation. The demographic situation of Russia is very alarming in 2002. President Putin should open doors for Indian immigration and invite 1,000,000 immigrant Indians per year into Russia for next 20 years. Indian immigrants would make Russia a great economic, political and military power in 21st Century. President Putin should encourage mass marriages among Indian and Russian men and women. Just as United States abandoned its WASP character to invite non-white immigrants, so Russia should also welcome non-white immigrants from India and China.

 

(20) The CIA’s Links with Drug Trade

The global drug trade in Heroin and Cocaine generates for white Catholic Cocaine cartels and Arab heroin cartels more than $750 billion annually, enough to buy political influence in most of the governments of the world. Organized crime and drug cartels buy political influence and buy governments, presidents and prime ministers by political campaign donations and by financing military coups and civil strife. The CIA started the trend by inducting Italian Mafia to compete with Soviet influence over Italian trade unions. President Ronald Reagan disturbed the apple cart by consenting that the CIA could finance its covert operations in Nicaragua out of proceeds of Colombian cocaine shipments to United States. Pakistan’s General Zia Ul Haq followed Ronald Reagan and officially ordered Pakistan’s secret services ISI to finance its covert operations by incomes of Afghan heroin trade. The CIA had allowed Taiwanese Christian Kuomintang Fifth Army to finance its military operations from the proceeds of the Burma’s Opium and heroin trade. Perhaps United States expanded the Vietnam War to Laos and Cambodia to provide safe heaven to Taiwanese Christian drug lords safe place after 1961, when Burmese and Chinese Armies pushed Taiwanese Kuomintang Army out of Burma, into the bordering Jungles of Thailand, Laos and Cambodia. Heroin and Opium can explain the conduct of American foreign policies in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and Burma from 1945 to 1980. Heroin and Opium and Oil interests determined America’s policies towards Afghanistan, Pakistan, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan from 1971 to present day. The nuclear and military stalemate of the Cold war, made foreign Covert Operations financed by heroin and Cocaine trade favored instrument of foreign policy by the CIA, as it did not strain the military assets of the Pentagon, demoralized after the defeat in the Vietnam War. How should India and Russia respond to the American, Pakistani and Wahhabi covert operations launched in the name of militant Islam financed by Heroin trade to promote the oil interests of American Oil Colonialism in the 21st Century? Presently the CIA profited by controlled use of the global organized crime syndicates to promote the national interests of America, in Yugoslavia, Central Asia and Afghanistan, but after the 9/11 the crime lieutenants of the CIA might acquire independent legitimacy and local fiefdoms to challenge the supervision and diktats.

 

(21) Predator Religious Intolerance

Christian religious intolerance joined forces with intolerant Wahhabi Muslims, intolerant Zionist cabal to promote the interests of the pro-segregation whites in United States, to oppose the destabilizing effects of the 1964 Bill of Rights signed into law by President Lynden B Johnson. Jews were second-class citizens in United States as late as 1965. Secretary Henry Kissinger secured the political alliance of Zionist Cabal with pro-segregation whites, pro-impeachment of Nixon Democratic caucus, and Christian religious right conservatives to create the global alliance of pro-religious intolerance forces in Israel, Saudi Arabia and United States. Zionist Cabal joined forces with pro-segregation whites, Republican Neo-conservatives, Christian religious right conservative conspiracy, and American Big Oil colonialism to promote Wahhabi religious intolerance as a vehicle to establish American oil colony over Iraq, Syria and Iran, and to establish domination of Wahhabi Mecca Caliphate over Iraq, Syria and Iraq. The role played by Zionist Cabal in misguiding Republican Neo-conservatives and American oil colonialism to wage military invasions of Iraq, Syria and possibly Iran during Bush Administration, foretells the danger the election of a Jewish president of United States would pose to the world.

 

Pope John Paul II cemented the Vatican-Mecca Axis of Religious Intolerance, to pool the religious resources of Monotheist Christianity and Islam to force Iconoclast Monotheist religions on polytheist pagan African tribal civilizations. Zionist Cabal entered into Tel Aviv-Riyadh Axis to promote the domination of Mecca Caliphate over Iraq, Syria and Iran to bring Iraqi and Iranian oil under the control of American oil colonialism.

 

Wahhabi Saudi Arabia is the core of the Axis of Evil Intolerance. Wahhabi sect seeks to conquer other Islamic religious sects, even when only 2 percent of the Muslims of the world practice Wahhabi sect. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, United Arab Emirates are artificial political entities and they never existed as nation in the history. Saudi Arabia and Kuwait were either parts of Egypt or Iran or Turkey and they should not exist as independent nations. Wahhabi religious sect was propagated by British secret services to mobilize Arab desert Bedouin to weaken the political control of Ottoman Empires over Arabian desert lands, where oil had been discovered.

 

(22) King Victor Emmanuel II

Italy has historically been at the forefront of the Christian State asserting its power over the Church. In 1870, the King of Italy, King Victor Emmanuel II, of House of Savoy Monarchy, unified Italy for the first time after the collapse of the Roman Empire, and entered Vatican and divested Pope of all temporal and secular powers, and successive Popes remained prisoners of the Vatican from 1870 to 1929. Just as Chinese abolished the Dalai Lama theocracy in Tibet, it is possible that the secular government of Italy may reform or democratize Papacy, allowing laity greater control and supervision of religion. It is very likely Italian public would rise and demand the direct election of the Head of the State of the Vatican and the direct elections of Bishops and the Cardinals by Catholic laity worldwide, on the principal of one-man one-vote.

 

(23) Heroin’s Axis of Religious Intolerance

President Bush invaded oil-rich Iraq to establish American oil colony over Iraq and camouflaged it as war on Iraqi WMDs. President Clinton ordered military supplies and covert operations in oil-rich Colombia to control Colombia’s oil reserves and to guarantee that pro-America cocaine cartel control the global drug trade and continue to invest their global drug incomes in the United States. American economic prosperity rests on the reinvestment of $750 billion incomes generated by global drug syndicates, in the American economy. Whenever the $750 billion drug incomes would leave United States, it would cause economic crash in the Wall Street. Billions earned by white Catholic Cocaine cartel and Arab Heroin Cartel finances lobbyists that buy political influence and cements the political alliance of Catholic fundamentalism and Wahhabi fundamentalism. The Catholic-Wahhabi and Vatican-Mecca Axis of Religious Intolerance cemented by Cocaine and Heroin trade, which is monopolized by Catholics and Sunnis respectively. The financial institutions located in sovereign Vatican and Saudi Arabia launder many billions of $ 750 billion global drug trade in cocaine and heroin. Global drug trade finances and legitimizes religious intolerance and buys political influence and political power worldwide to legitimize the political rule of religious intolerance. The global nexus of drug money, religious intolerance and corrupt politicians, threatens to derail the modernization process in the 21st Century, threatening the descent of the New Global Dark Age, throughout the Christian and Islamic worlds.

 

(24) Looming Global Dark Age

The unholy nexus of organized crime, organized intolerant religions and corrupt politicians threaten to descend the New Global Age on the world in the 21st Century. The growing nexus of Catholic Cocaine Cartel and Semite Wahhabi Heroin created the global nexus of organized crime that apparently took over Capitalist financial markets by their financial clout of $750 billion annual incomes of drug cartels. The Mecca-Vatican Axis of Intolerance financed by Catholic Cocaine-Sunni heroin nexus. The income of Semite OPEC Oil Cartel, Semite Diamond Cartel, Catholic Cocaine Cartel, joined forces with predator religious Semite Wahhabi cult to destabilize the Civilization states of Russia, India, Iraq and Yugoslavia to gain control over the oil and gas reserves of Arabian Gulf and Caspian Central Asia.

 

(25) Modernization Under Oil Colonial Rule

Civilized world would welcome the imposition of American colonial rule over Wahhabi oil producing intolerant Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Qatar and Brunei, if it gives freedom to Arab women and replaces Shariah laws with American laws. Arab Muslim women would openly welcome American Neo-Imperialism, if it gave Arab women the freedom presently denied to them under Islam, besides women represents half of the eligible voters. By promoting modernization, progress, liberty and freedom, American oil companies, would earn the affection of Arab women and liberal men. Arab women and modern men would welcome American Oil Colonies throughout oil-producing Islamic world, as lesser evil when compared to Wahhabi religious intolerance. Colonial Empires shall stage a comeback in the 21st Century. American Oil Imperialism would modernize Islamic world by imposing American Colonial rule, laws, language and culture throughout oil-rich Islamic world. Hindu India would openly welcome American Oil Colonialism, if it results in direct American colonial rule throughout oil-producing Islamic world, and India gets guaranteed oil supplies at discounted rates.

 

(26) Oil is Achilles’ Heel of US Colonialism

President George W. Bush and Vice President represent the first Oil Presidency of the United States. Bush Administration is Oil Administration and President Bush’s Cabinet is the Oil Cabinet. Oil interests determine the foreign policy of oil-dependent energy-gouging United States. Bush administration defines the national interests of the United States in terms of oil security and oil interests. President Bush seeks to enhance the national power of the United States, defined in terms of oil power. Threats to continued American control over volatile Muslim oil and gas fields in Middle East, Caspian Sea basin, Guinea, Nigeria and Indonesia exposes the Achilles Heel of American Oil Colonialism in 21st Century. Neo-Colonial Empires would stage a comeback, in the form of oil colonialism. British, Spanish and Portuguese colonialism expressed in terms of the emigrant Anglo Saxons that settled in South Africa, Rhodesia, Canada and Australia, and Spanish emigrants that settled in Spanish America and Portuguese emigrants that settled in Brazil. Traditional European colonialism nurtured by the colonial settlements of the White man in the colonies. American neo-colonialism does not envisage permanent settlement of white American colonies, it focuses on the economic control over oil and gas resources of the colonies, to make the target oil and gas producer the American Oil Colony, which does not disturb the local religious and social elite. American oil colonialism does not propagate Christian proselytizing efforts. American neo-imperialism seeks to control gas and oil resources of the nations, to profit by the exploration, extraction and distribution of oil and gas resources to ensure long-term energy supply to the American and European industrial economies. Oil is the key to American neo-imperialism. America is happy with Shariah laws, fundamentalist Wahhabi militant Islam, so long as American Big Oil companies enjoy monopoly over oil and gas reserves of the American Oil Colonies. Pentagon wages wars to protect and safeguard American Oil Colonialism.

 

(27) Hitler’s Forgotten Oil War Option

Adolf Hitler might have won the Second World War had he focused on conquering the Oil fields of Iraq and Iran and Baku, after it had conquered Balkans and Greece. Had Hitler attacked Syria by amphibious landing from Greece and moved on to capture Mosul oil fields in Northern Iraq and then moved southward to control the Iranian oilfields in Khorramshahr and then moved into the southern frontier of Soviet Union to capture Baku oil fields in the Caspian Sea basin. Control over Iraqi, Iranian and Azerbaijan oil fields, would have allowed Hitler to strangulate Allied oil supplies and he might have won the Second World War.

 

(28) Rise of Euro-Fascism

United States didn’t support the imperial aspirations of Britain and France over oil-rich Arabia, when they invaded Suez Canal Zone in 1956, in response to the nationalization of the Suez Canal by President Gamal Abdel Nasser. The imperial pretensions of France and Germany were busted by the threat of retaliation by Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev, and Untied States stood on the sideline. Donald Rumsfeld deliberately insulted Germany and France to trumpet their weakness as military and economic power, and the Russian President Putin stood on the sidelines. After the successful conquest of Iraq, Russia remained on the sidelines and Germany humbly joined the American war camp, hoping to profit by the lucrative post-war contracts in Iraq. France would also eat its pride and join the American Camp to profit by the lucrative contracts in Iraq. President Chirac hyped France’s desire and resolve to play great power role in leading the world’s opposition to America’s invasions of Iraq, jointly with Russia and China, primarily to deny his presidential challenger pro-Right Le Pen electoral advantages in the coming elections.

 

(29) Rise of German-French Oil Colonialism

France and Germany powers gathered at Versailles not to humiliate but to toast each other, so that Germany and France could join forces to establish European Oil Colonies in competition with Pentagon, NATO and American Big Oil. The goal of President Jacques Chirac and Chancellor Schroeder is to create French-German Oil Colonial Empire in oil-producing counties, in direct competition with American Big Oil.

 

(30) Chirac Waged Clash of Cultures War

Influenced by the clash of German and French cultures with that of the Yankee cowboy president, France and Germany turn against Washington, and reject America's 'moral imperative. Germany and France closed ranks against war with Iraq, signaling the beginning of an increasingly public opposition to the culture, aims and values of the Bush Administration. To the leadership in Paris and Berlin the threat posed by President Saddam Hussein seems, to be significantly less than that of a Oil War enthusiastically led by the United States, to impose American Oil Colonial rule over Iraq, fully supported by most of the new East European members of the NATO. Old Europe felt threatened by the imperialistic zeal of the new members of the NATO and the East Europeans. Germany and France believes that expanded NATO transforming into a coalition for world conquest, where new east European allies going out their way to prove their loyalty to the new master in the Oval Office.

 

Germany and France feared that maritime Britain was the cunning Trojan horse to the unification of continental Europe, as it had been throughout the history. Realizing the Trojan horse nature of Britain, made Paris determined to revive a strong French-German bond as the basis for a more vigorously assertive European foreign policy, to avoid the Waterloo of the 21st Century.

 

There has never been romance between France and Germany. But the two states have decided they need each other more than ever and that mutual interests should increasingly define their policies. For the French, the America’s Iraq War for Oil appear to afford French Oil companies to revive a strong French-German diplomatic bond as the basis for a more vigorously assertive European Oil Colonial foreign policy and to create French-German Big Oil cartel to compete with American Big Oil, which seeks to establish American Oil Colonies throughout oil-producing Muslim world with the support of the NATO and Pentagon.

 

The policy makers of Germany and France realized that only after establishing French-German oil colony over major oil-producing Arab nation could France and Germany assert their respective great power role and dreams. The European Union should establish a goal to establish European Oil Colony over Algeria, Libya and Iran to effectively compete with American oil colonialism that succeeded in establishing oil colonies in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE. India should join forces with European Oil Colonialism to establish Indo-European Oil colonies in some of the oil-rich OPEC countries. So long as Europeans failed to establish oil colonies of its own, European Union would fail to compete with United States.

 

Expanded 25-member European Union would never become a world power. Union of Germany and France could become a world power in its own right, a joint-world power. Dismayed by the failure of European Union to attain great power status, leaders of Germany and France may agree for the formal merger of Germany and France as a Federal state to lay the foundation of an European Super Power, to compete with United States. India, Japan and Russia would join the alliance headed by Union of Germany and France, if it aimed to tame the United States. Only German-France diplomatic Union could create the second pole in world politics, where India, Japan and Russia would join to jointly oppose the hegemony of the United States. France and Germany would become world powers, if they fine-tune French-German colonial policies to compete with American oil interests, and they should not mind if that irritates the Americans.

 

Maritime America would fail to challenge the Eurasian alliance of Germany, France, Russia, China, Japan and India, if these Eurasian could establish oil-colonies of its own and challenge the American oil colonial Empire’s control over Middle East and Central Asian oil and gas resources. The alliance of India and European powers should control the oil and gas resources of the Arabian Gulf and the Central Asia as Indian Empire had exercised hegemony over these regions throughout history. 

 

The Civilization Empires of France, Germany, Japan and India, would overnight replace United States as the dominant super power of the world, if these four civilization-nation states enter into a military and economic pact to establish Eurasian Pact. Neither Untied States, nor Russia nor China would be in a position to challenge the economic, political, scientific and cultural hegemony of Eurasian Pact that united the resources of Catholic France, Protestant Germany, Buddhist Japan and Hindu India. The civilizations of France, Germany, India, and Japan should enter into the Pact of civilizations to restore peace and order in the Eurasian continent.

 

(31) FDIs Capital Flow Into China Not India

United States helped China to get ahead of India. China got ahead of India not because of the advantages competitive Chinese economy enjoyed over Indian economy, but because United States went all out to promote investments in China. China got ahead of India because of American policies that granted MFN status to China and that made Communist China the favored destination of transnational corporations foreign direct investments. The share of exports by foreign affiliates in the total exports of India in 1985 was (3%), in 1991 (3%). The shares of exports by foreign affiliates in the total export of Hong Kong in 1985 was (10%) and in 1997 (5%). The Share of exports by foreign affiliates in the total exports of Communist China in 1991 was (17%) and in 2001 was (50%). Communist China in 2001 total exports ($279.6 billion), the share of the foreign affiliates in the total exports was (50%) around $140 billion.

 

(32) China & India Equal Rivals

China overtook India only in 1990s after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The 1999 population of China (1.25 billion), India’s population (1 billion), the 2000 GNP measured at PPP for China ($4.112 trillion) and Indian GNP ($2.144 trillion). India’s GNP at PPP in 1999 was 52.14 percent of China’s GNP. The Gross Domestic Product of China in 1990 was $354.6 billion, and India’s GDP in 1990 was $322.7 billion. In 1990 India’s GDP was 91% of China’s GDP. The 1999 GDP of China got way ahead of India’s GDP. In 1999 India’s GDP was 46.38% of China’s GDP. China’s GDP in 1999 was 279.5% of 1990 GDP. India’s GDP in 1999 was only 142.5% of 1990 GDP. India stumbled during 1990s and China took off, but china has only ten years lead ahead of India, which India can easily catch up.

 

Indian rupee artificially devalued by corrupt finance ministers and politicians. India’s Rupee and US dollar exchange parity, declined in 1965 (1$=Rs. 4.7), 1975 (1$=Rs. 8.40), 1985 (1$=Rs. 12.33), 1990 (1$=Rs. 17.49), 2000 (1$=Rs. 45.00). One Indian rupee was worth $0.21 in 1965, $0.12 in 1975, and $0.08 in 1985. One Indian Rupee was worth $0.06 in 1990, $0.03 in 1995, and $0.023 in 1999. The exchange rate of Indian rupee versus US dollar is 485% undervalued, when measured at Purchasing Power Parity (PPP). The World Bank Report 2000/2001 estimated India’s GNP in 2000-2001 in terms of 1999 dollars at $442.2 billion.  The report also estimated the India’s 2000-2001 GNP measured at PPP at $2.144 trillion in 1999 dollars. It means that Indian rupees purchasing power is 485% of the purchasing power of the US dollar determined at present exchange rate of rupee and dollar. The purchasing power parity determines that the exchange rate of 1$ should equal Rs. 9.70 per dollar not Rs. 47.00 per dollar.

 

(33) NATO Chaperon of Europe Germany

Rumsfeld’s comment about “Old Europe” signaled Bush Administration’s determination to assert expanded NATO’s real strategic function to serve as the ‘Chaperon of Western Europe,’ albeit as the Chaperon of Germany, France and Japan. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld correctly chastised Germany and France as insignificant Old Europe, because the very purpose of the NATO had been from the day of its inception, to keep France and Germany under check. Since the former Soviet colonies in the Eastern Europe, now members of the expanded NATO would provide the necessary manpower, United States no longer needed the support of Germany and France to project America’s power in the world. The Pentagon-led NATO alliance's "real function was to serve as the chaperon of Europe." It is, the means to prevent Western Europe from establishing itself as an independent fortress and perhaps one day, a rival to the United States.

 

(34) Offshore Balancing is Concert of Powers

The Offshore balancing policy would check the hegemony of the United States, and hold America in check so that America deluded by its military successes might not embark upon the conquest of the world’s oil or the conquest of the world. The Diplomacy of Offshore Balancing is a modern version of the Congress System that 1814 Congress of Vienna developed to check the hegemony of Napoleonic France and to integrate France into a new world order. The Strategy of Offshore Balancing Diplomacy accepts the geopolitical fact of the rise and fall of great powers, rivalries among great powers and violent regional conflicts. The rise and fall of great powers, civilizations and weapons platforms is an ongoing process and no power can put a stop to it. Super powers should not hinder the attempts of other great powers develop regional alliances. American strategy of preponderance in oil-rich Arabian Gulf to establish American oil colonies throughout OPEC nations is burdensome, Sisyphean, and profoundly risky. American invasions to establish American oil colony would backfire had Iraq succeeded in thwarting the American invasions with the tacit help of Russia.

 

Great powers including White House policymakers could adopt a new grand strategy, the diplomacy of Offshore Balancing. Rather than fear multipolar world the advocates of the Offshore Balancing strategy embraced the multipolar world as the fact of life, and recognized that instability caused by the rise and fall of great powers, great-power rivalries, and messy regional conflicts was a geopolitical fact of life. Offshore Balancing Strategy accepts that the United States cannot prevent the rise of new great powers, either within the present American sphere of influence, namely, the European Union, Germany, and Japan, or outside American sphere of influence, namely, China, Russia, India. Instead of exhausting Americans resources to keep European Union, Germany, France, Japan, Russia, China and India weak, the United States should allow world powers develop their militaries to provide for their own national and regional security. World powers would form a Concert of World Powers and these Great powers would maintain power balances, check the rise of overly ambitious global and regional powers, and stabilize global balance of power. It would create stable Balance of Power in Europe, East Asia, and the Persian Gulf and the stable world order would be in the interest of the super power as well as great powers and medium and smaller powers.

 

(35) Relevance of Non Alignment & UNO

One President Bush learnt the limits of America’s when it failed to win the UN Security Council votes of the powerless African nations, namely, Guinea, Angola and Cameroon. Unlike League of Nations the United Nations could summon courage and tamed President Bush on Iraq issue.

 

Two. The Non Aligned Lilliputians showed they could easily chain Gulliver Yankee Bull. United Nations as well as Non Aligned Movement could have lost their respective moral foundations, had they buckled under threats, entreaties, bribery and insults hurled by President Bush. The 114-country Non-Alignment Movement led by India showed its true strength and proved its relevance in world politics, when the 5 Non Permanent Members of the UN Security Council forced President Bush, Secretary Powell and Prime Minister Blair eat a humble pie in the United Nations. United Nations proved its role and strength when it cut to size the Bully America.

 

Three. The trans Atlantic alliance, NATO reached a definitive end in the Iraq War in April 2003, due to the determined opposition to Germany, France and Belgium. The Concert of Europe (1814-1914), the Congress System established by 1814 Congress of Vienna got a sudden rebirth in March 2003, when Germany, France, Russia and China joined diplomatic assets to oppose President Bush.

 

Four. One superpower system proved to be a paper tiger when America failed to buy, coerce, woo, and threaten to gain support of Non Aligned Nations Non Permanent Members of the UN Security Council, namely, Angola, Cameroon, Guinea, Chile and Pakistan, on British-American Resolution on Iraq. United States, Britain, Spain and Italy were thoroughly humiliated in the corridors of United Nations. The Non Aligned Movement and the United Nations became relevant once again. The world became multi-polar once again in April 2003.

 

 

 

© 2006 Copyrights All Rights Reserved Author: KALKI GAUR

Kalki Gaur Books are as follows:

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RACES” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DIPLOMACY OF CIVILIZATIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “MANIFESTO OF NEOCONSERVATISM” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “HINDU HOLY GITA – MOKSA VIA RELIGIOUS WARS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DA VINCI CODE AS CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GNOSTIC BIBLE” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “POPULIST MANIFESTO” (2006)

The complete text of 5,000 pages of Books by Kalki Gaur available for free download at following Kalki Blogs for academic and non-commercial usage.

http://360.yahoo.com/gaurkalki   ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/clashofreligions  ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/diplomacyofcivilizations  ; 

http://clearblogs.com/kalkigaur/  ; 

http://kalkigaur.blogstream.com/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkigaur/blog/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkitv/blog/  ;

http://indiatalking.com/blog/kalkigaur/  ;

http://diplomacyofcivilizations.blog.com/  ; 

http://kalki.newsvine.com/

http://kalkimail.googlepages.com/

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/

© 2006 Kalki Gaur Copyrights All Rights Reserved, Email: kalkimail@gmail.com