Chapter 14

20^th Century Clash of Civilizations

“Global Clash of Races-Diplomacy of Civilizations” © (2006) Kalki Gaur

14(1) Purport- 14(2) Talk Points

14(3) Clash of Civilizations’ Beast

(1) Protocols of Meetings of Elders of Zion

The Protocols gives a brief outline of the conspiracy Papacy and Jews hatched to bring down and loot the property of the ancient civilizations of Egypt, Greece, Rome, Persia, Byzantine, Russia and Ottomans. The proverbial snake described in the Protocols is the main conspirator that caused the clash of civilization in the 21st Century. The clash of civilization is conspired by very different personages with hidden agenda, than what is imagined by those who are not behind the scene and part of the big conspiracy. The clash of civilization is caused by the joint conspiracy of the Papal Vatican and Wahhabi Mecca to establish the totalitarian theocratic dictatorship of the priests in the Christian and Islamic worlds respectively. The barbarian 1,000 year long European Dark Age was the direct result of Pope’s conspiracy to bring about the end of the Roman Empire the last of the world monarchies, by betraying Roman Empire and conspiring with German invaders, to help create German Christian empire in German lands and North Italy, in exchange for Pope-ruled Papal States in Central Italy, neighboring Rome. Semite Wahhabi clergy have joined forces with Papacy and Israeli Zionists to attempt takeover of Saudi Arabia to establish the direct totalitarian rule of Wahhabi clergy after overthrowing the Al Saud Monarchy of King Fahd. Catholic clergy of Rome betrayed Rome and conspired with German barbarian invaders to loot and destroy the Roman Empire, in exchange of Pope’s ruled Kingdom of God in the Papal States and Rome. Similarly, Wahhabi clergy of Mecca betrayed their rulers Ottoman Empire and conspired with American and British Empire to break up the Ottoman Empire and establish American control over Arabian oil resources in exchange for allowing Wahhabi clergy’s rule over Mecca & Medina and House of Al Saud’s rule over Saudi Arabia and Wahhabi rule over Iraq. Wahhabi clergy led by Osama bin Laden and alike conspiring to overthrow the House of Al Saud and King Fahd to establish the direct rule of the Wahhabi priests in Saudi Arabia, which would allow the Jews, Catholics and Wahhabi clergy, loot hundreds of billions of dollars of the property of Saudi royal family and pro-royalty big business houses. Saudi monarchy will fall the Pahalavi monarchy of Iran and replaced by the Ayatollah type theocratic dictatorship of the Wahhabi priests. Wahhabi King Abdul Aziz was put into power by Americans to secure American control over Saudi oil. Mecca’s Wahhabi clergy would overthrow the House of Al Saud monarchy to control oil riches of Saudi Arabia. Papacy sold the idea of Islamic Papacy and Islamic Kingdom of god to the Wahhabi terrorist clergy of Mecca, arguing that the end of the Al Saud monarchy the last Islamic monarchy would mark the inception of the Wahhabi clergy ruled Islamic kingdom of God in Arabia. Jews looted the property of Russia after the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat in Soviet Union and Communist China. The Jews and Semite Wahhabi clergy would profit by looting the royal family property after the establishment of the rule of totalitarian political dictatorship of Wahhabi priests in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE and Oman.

 

The success of the American oil colony in Iraq, gave new policy options for Pentagon in Saudi Arabia. Protestant United States might find it less expensive to establish direct American colonial rule over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE, as United States needed the continued support of neither Wahhabi clergy nor Al Saud monarchy to control the oil and gas resources of Arabia. Since the purpose of the Semite doctrine of the dictatorship of the priests in Saudi Arabia is to loot the property of the Saudi royal family, it would be no wonder that Protestant American might up the ante and decide to establish the direct American colonial rule over Saudi Arabia and other GCC countries, whenever CIA could report that the Wahhabi clergy takeover of Saudi Arabia became imminent.

 

Clash of Civilization caused by the conspiracy of Islamic and Catholic priests to establish the dictatorship of the priests in the oil-producing Islamic world to allow the Jews, Christians and Wahhabi clergy loot the royal properties in Arabian Peninsula. The Semite doctrine of the totalitarian theocratic dictatorship of the priests is the new philosophical idea conceived by Jews to create new opportunities to loot property of the victim civilizations. Semite doctrine would generate more loot for the Semite looters than the loot generated by the Semite doctrine of dictatorship of the Proletariats. Wahhabi fundamentalism and Semite Wahhabi Mecca’s dream to establish dictatorship of Ulema in the Arab governments is the Semite plot to loot the property of oil-rich Arabian Peninsula’s royal families and Sheikhdoms, conspired by the Hidden Hand of the world rulers described in the Protocols of the Meetings of the Elders of Zion.

 

(2) World of Puppet Rulers

One. The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scene. Let us attempt to understand the strategies and the mindset of the behind-the-screen rulers, governors and manipulators of the world. The writers though not part of the corridors of power, use reasoning to understand the mechanics underlying the big picture. Being an outsider has better view of the big pictures, because even the top diplomats and foreign ministers of the world, lack the intellectual acumen to understand the dynamics of the big picture. Almost 99 percent of the diplomats of the world lack the intellectual capacity to understand the big reality and these diplomats concern primarily with the worldly rewards that being in the corridors of power provides them. Most of the diplomats and presidents and prime ministers in the world are merely puppets playing their designated role to safeguard their fragile place in the corridors of power.

 

(3) USA in Framework of Papal Eschatology

Two. The conservative Protestants of WASP United States take very seriously the threat of Pope John Paul to bring Protestant American Christian Empire into the framework of Catholic apocalyptic teleological eschatology. Protestants especially of Bob Jones University believe that Poland-born Pope John Paul II scheming to bring about the end of the sole Christian super power, the last of the world monarchies, as its end according to Catholic end of time doctrine and Fatima Prophecy would mark the inception of the Pope-ruled Kingdom of God in North America. When Catholic Church became the State church of Roman Empire it included in its liturgy prayers for the Roman Empire and the Roman Emperor, it also brought the Roman Empire into the framework of Catholic Christian apocalyptic eschatology, as the last of the world monarchies whose end would mark the inception of the Pope-ruled Catholic Christian Kingdom of God on earth. Church of Rome started conspiracies to bring about the end the Roman Empire right after it became the state Church in the Roman Empire. Pope John Paul II developed closer ties with President Ronald Reagan and secured institutional ties between the CIA and the Roman Catholic Church to bring about the end of the Soviet Union and the Communism in Poland and Eastern Europe. Pope John Paul II got the consent of President Ronald Reagan and President Bill Clinton to promote Church’s view of American Empire as the vehicle of God’s will, for the Christianization of the world. The election of the Catholic priest as the official priest of Senate and Congress inadvertently made in the view of Catholic eschatology the official church of Protestant United States, which also brought United States into the framework of Catholic apocalyptic eschatology, as the last of the world monarchies whose end would mark the inception of the Pope-led Kingdom of God. Papal apocalyptic eschatology became menace to the secular United States with the constitutional wall that separates the State and the Church. By undermining the wall that separates the State and the Church the Christian United States could be brought into the framework of Catholic eschatology, whose end would be expedited by Pope to realize the goals of Catholic apocalyptic end of time eschatology. Pope John Paul II is a firm believer in Fatima Prophecy and might engineer to bring about the end of the United States just as Papacy brought about the end of Roman Empire in 5th Century. The primary goal of the believers of the Catholic apocalyptic eschatology end of time doctrine in the New Millennium is to bring about the Kingdom of God, which would be a secular government of the world ruled by Pope, Bishops and Priests. The Catholic-Protestant Clash of Civilization would affect the US President Election 2004, when the Protestant religious right conservatives and Republican Neo-conservatives would join forces to foil the attempts to bring United States within the framework of Papal eschatology. Election of a Papal-agent as the new occupant of the Oval Office might bring into play the Apocalyptic Catholic conspiracy to bring about the end of the last of the world monarchies whose end would mark the inception of the Pope-ruled Christian Kingdom of God in New World, just as it brought about the end of the Roman Empire in the Old World. Pope wants to establish the Kingdom of God by establishing the Dictatorship of the Priests in the Christian and Islamic worlds.

 

(4) Dictatorship of the Priests

Three. The clash of civilization is the by-product of the conspiracy of the Vatican-Mecca Axis to engineer the dictatorship of the priests in the Christian and Islamic world. During last 1,400 years the Papacy has consistently tried to destabilize secular empires to weaken them from within to prepare them for the Pope-ruled secular European government. The Catholic Church and Papacy destroyed the great civilizations of ancient Egypt, ancient Rome, ancient Incas, ancient Aztecs, and ancient Mayas. During last 1,400 years the Semite Muslim Arabs destroyed the great civilizations of Egypt, Syria and Persia. The Ottomans destroyed the Byzantine Orthodox civilization. During 20th Century Vatican and Jews promoted the concept of dictatorship of Proletariats to destroy the civilizations of Orthodox Russia, Orthodox Ethiopia, Buddhist China, Buddhist Vietnam and Buddhist Cambodia. Pope John Paul II and Wahhabi King Fahd of Saudi Arabia developed Vatican-Mecca Axis to engineer the revolution in the Islamic world to establish the totalitarian dictatorship of the Wahhabi priests in the Islamic world. Islamic terrorism is a Vatican-Mecca plot to create Semite Islamic Papacy, to create new Islamic Caliphate, where Muslim Ulema would rule the Caliphate instead of Sultan. Dictatorship of the Shiite Ayatollahs is the first dictatorship of the Muslim priests in the world. Those who seek to establish the political dictatorship of the priests must not be allowed to misuse the religious freedom of the civilizations to subvert the civilizations by aiming to establish the dictatorship of the priests. The Islamic doctrine of the dictatorship of the priests is a predatory intolerant revolutionary doctrine as never before Clergy ruled the Islamic Ummah, as Sultan had always controlled and ruled over Ulema and Islamic clergy with iron fist. The menace of the terrorist Islamic dictatorship of the Ulema required decisive overwhelming military and political response of the Civilizations, so that the Arabian breeding ground of this menacing Wahhabi doctrine are brought under the permanent military control of the civilizations. The Clash of civilization is real and presents great danger to the secular civilized civilizations of the world.

 

 

(5) 3-Heads of Beast of the Clash

Five. In the 20th Century the religion influenced the beast of the Clash of Civilizations. Throughout the 20th Century the White House, the CIA and the American Big Oil controlled, nurtured the three heads of the Beast of Clash of Civilizations to control Islamic oil resources and to mobilize Islamic terrorists launch attacks on Hinduism, Buddhism, Paganism and Orthodoxy. Before the terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001 the imperialist Yankee Eagle could keep under tight leash the three-headed Beast of the Islamic Clash of Civilization. The menacing Priest-king, Religious intolerance and Heroin-Cocaine are the three ugly heads of the Beast in the 20th Century. In 21st Century the 4th head of the Beast grew bigger and bigger and the Oil-Beast would eat the heads of the Priest-king Beast and Religious-Intolerance Beast. The 21st Century Clash would be led by the Oil-Beast and Drugs-Beast and the Beast of Priest-King and Beast of Religious Intolerance would become weaker in 21st Century. In the 20th Century, when the Priest-King and Religious intolerance determined international diplomacy, and had functioned as the Lap Dog of the White House. Oil Beast is the Bull Dog not the Lap Dog of the White House in the 21st Century.

 

First. The Occidental Beast of Clash of Civilization has three heads. The first head of the Beast is the head representing the illicit rule of the priest-King or priest-ruler that seeks to criminalize the state-less religious organizations to take over the secular temporal powers. The Papacy is the classical example of the conspiracy hatched by the religious priests to undermine the legitimate powers of the State. The Papacy and the Lawrence of Arabia, British and American Empires conspired with the religious clergy of Mecca to carve out the Wahhabi theocracies, which would empower Wahhabi Muslim clergy with political and social powers, if they agreed to hand over Arab oil resources to Christian Big Oil. Pope betrayed the Roman Empire and helped barbarian conquerors destroy the Roman Empire and Roman Civilization after the conquest of Rome by Alaric the barbarian in 415 AD. Similarly, the Wahhabi Muslim clergy of Mecca agreed to revolt against Ottoman rulers to establish theocracies in Arabian Peninsula and transferred all present and future claims on Arab oil resources to Christian oil companies. American has continued this policy of securing ties of the Muslim clergy in the Islamic world with the CIA to bring the Muslim countries under the control of Christian powers.

 

Second. The second head of the Beast is the illicit intolerance, the barbarian religious and ideological intolerance that advocates policies of ethnic and religious separatism, oppresses women forcing women into servitude to men, and embarks upon the policy of annihilation of the ethnic and religious minorities, political and religious opposition and launches violent terrorist attacks on the civilizations. The Predator Intolerance is the second head of the Beast. Pope John Paul II is the incarnation of the ultra-conservatism and Catholic intolerance. The Vatican-Mecca Axis of Intolerance joined the resources of Papal Conservatism and militant Wahhabi fundamentalism to legitimize the intolerance of the predator religious cults and proselytizing efforts of the monotheist iconoclast Christianity and Islam. The White House and the CIA joined forces the Mujahideen forces of intolerance in Afghanistan to inflict defeat on the Soviet troops in Afghanistan.

 

Third. The third head of the Beast is the illicit drug trade that generates more than $700 billion annually to the organized drug cartels, dominated by white Catholic Colombian Cocaine Cartel and Sunni Muslim Heroin cartel. The militant Wahhabi priest-rulers and the predator intolerant religious fundamentalist terrorists have enriched themselves with the incomes of the Heroin and Opium trade. Muslim organized crime, Muslim religious terrorists and Muslim theocracies created political and religious and economic nexus of Church-Terrorism-Heroin to finance the political aspirations of the priest-rulers and the economic aspirations of the intolerant religious terrorists and social aspirations of the heroin Drug Mafia. Muslim drug Mafia finances the militant Islamic terrorism as well as political takeover of Muslim societies by the Muslim clergy. It is no accident that President Clinton’s “Plan Colombia” and President Bush’s war on Terrorism in Afghanistan, resulted in the unprecedented boom in Coca and Cocaine production in Colombia and unprecedented Opium and Heroin production in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

 

Fourth. Though the Beast of the Clash of Civilizations has three separate heads, it has one stomach. The results of the activities of the priest-rulers, predator intolerance and conservative organized crime work in unison to become instrument of the American policy, so mush so that one can argue that throughout 20th Century the White House and the CIA controlled and guided the activities of the ferocious three heads of the Beast of the Clash of Civilizations to promote the national interests of the United States. The Clash of Civilization is the plot conceived by the Vatican and the White House to establish America’s control over the oil and gas resources of the Islamic oil-producing nations as well as to combine the resources of iconoclast predator proselytizing intolerant monotheist Christianity and Islam, to undermine pagan civilizations of Africa, Hindu Civilization of India and Nepal, and Buddhist civilizations of Asia. Throughout 20th Century, the Christian American oil interests managed and articulated Papal predatory intolerance to undermine Buddhist nations of China, Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Vietnam, Burma, Laos, Cambodia, and Sri Lanka. Throughout 20th Century the Christian American oil interests successfully managed the Wahhabi priest-rulers, Wahhabi intolerant terrorists and Wahhabi heroin drug traffickers to promote the national interests of the United States by engineering the secession of Muslim nations from multi-ethnic Ottoman Empire and Indian Empire.

 

Fifth. The single headed oil-fiery Beast of the Clash of Civilization in 21st Century wages wars for promoting the oil-interests. The Oil-head Beast of 21st Century would promote the American oil interests and even maul and damage the 3-headed Religion’s Beast of the 20th Century and could destroy those protected by the priest-rulers and predator intolerance. The Oil Factor diametrically changed the Clash of Civilization in the 21st Century, thanks to President Bush’s invasion of oil-rich Iraq to establish American’s first colonial empire in the 21st Century.

 

Sixth. The unprecedented Wahhabi Muslim terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, on the Protestant Financial capital of the world the World Trade Center, and on the Protestant military capital of the world the Pentagon, brought to an abrupt halt the growing nexus of the United States with the Wahhabi priest-rulers, Wahhabi predator intolerance and Wahhabi drug cartels. In the 21st Century the Oil God influenced the Beast of the Clash. The omnipotent Oil Beast of the Clash of Civilization has only one head, the Oil Head, and oil interests replaced the religious interests as guiding influence over clash of civilizations in the 21st Century. The 20th Century Clash of Civilization influenced by the Decolonization process and breakup of the colonial empires promoted the interest of the white race by promoting the interests of Christianity. The 21st Century Clash of Civilization is influenced by the return of the age of Colonial empires after the American conquest of Iraq guided only by the oil interests and the Beast has only one head.

 

Seventh. In the 20th Century American Big Oil joined forces with Wahhabi clergy to gain the control of the Arab oil by demanding the breakup of the Ottoman Empire, British Empire and French Empire, so that as the leader of the Free world United States took over the oil and gas resources of the oil-producers, which were formerly part of these empires. In the 21st Century, after the conquest of Iraq, United States worked to reestablish the colonial empires as units of the international system, so that backed by the military power of the Pentagon, the American Big Oil could continue to exploit Arab and Muslim oil-resources without having to cultivate and toe the line of the Wahhabi priest-rulers, Wahhabi intolerant terrorists and Wahhabi Drug Mafia. So long as Pentagon could establish direct American colony over oil-producing Iraqi colony, the Protestant White House might cooperate with Hindu India to bring Wahhabi oil-producers under the direct rule of the Pentagon, so that Wahhabi priest-rulers and Wahhabi intolerant terrorists would lose their strategic and diplomatic value for the American Big Oil in the 21st Century. The Oil Beast would destroy the 2-headed Beast of the 20th Century. The military alliances of the 21st Century Clash of Civilizations would be diametrically opposed to the alliances of the 20th Century Clash of Civilizations. Hindu India and Protestant American would fight the 21st Century Clash of Civilizations on the same side of the battle lines to protect their common oil interests, to secure the supplies of the oil and gas energy resources to the oil-importing Industrialized and industrializing world. In 20th Century Delhi and Washington were adversaries in the religion-focused Clash of Civilization, but in the 21st Century India and the United States are allies in the Oil-centered Clash of Civilizations. The rise of the Oil God in the 21st Century has put the 20th Century’s Clash of Civilizations on its head, and new coalition are built on the basis of coinciding interests of oil importers. Hindu India and Christian United States were adversaries in the 20th Century Religion-Beast led Clash of Civilizations. Hindu India and Protestant United States are allies and Coalition partners in the Oil-Beast led Clash of Civilizations and New Age of colonial Empires in the 21st Century. Throughout the Cold War, the United States undermined Hindu India the successor to the Indian Empire and India-led Non Aligned Nations. Delhi-Washington ties are based on the coinciding oil interests of India and the United States. Pentagon would harness the military assets of Indian Army to take charge of the US-led Oil-Beast of the Clash of civilization of the 21st Century to bring to knees its earlier allies and friends of the 3-headed Beast of the 20th Century Clash of Civilizations. The military, political and economic alliance of Hindu India and Protestant United States would undermine old alliance of the United States with the priest-rulers of Catholic Papacy and Wahhabi Mecca. The White House formulated policies towards China, India, Vietnam, Korea and Laos based on the religious proselytizing interests of the Christian missionaries in the 20th Century, and in the 21st Century these ties would be recast in the light of the oil interests. The oil interests predominate over religious interests, while influencing the Clash of Civilizations in the 21st Century.

 

Eighth, the 21st Century is the Beast with Oil-head and it will maul two heads of the three-headed 20th Century Beast and damage the Priest-ruler head and Intolerance-head of the 3-head Beast. The 21st Century shall have two heads, the Oil head and Drug head. The Clash of Civilization in the 21st Century shall have two heads: the Oil head and Organized Crime head. American Big Oil will control the Oil head of the Beast and white Catholic Cocaine Cartel and Arab Sunni Heroin cartel will control the Drugs head of the Beast. The role of Papacy and Wahhabi Mecca will decline in the 21st Century. American Big Oil will oppose and undermine the Wahhabi intolerance and Papal ultra-conservatism. Hindu India and Protestant United States would join forces to establish American Oil Colonies in the Middle East and United States would no longer require the continued support of either the Wahhabi House of Al Saud or Wahhabi clergy of Mecca to control and dominate the Arab oil and gas resources, if Indian troops could help Pentagon control and administer Iraqi oil colony profitably. Under the influence of Hindu India, the Protestant United States would undermine the white Catholic domination of the Cocaine trade and Sunni domination of the Heroin/ Opium trade.

 

(6) Rise of Oil God in 2003

Six. The geopolitical interests of Oil god would determine the Clash of Civilizations in the 21st Century, just as the missionary interests of Christianity influenced the Clash of Civilizations and clash of races in the 20th Century. Oil is the King in the 21st Century, especially in the oil-producing world and determined the foreign policies of the oil-importing nations. The Clash of Civilizations is not the figment of the imagination. Post-Columbus Colonial expansion of the Christian Europe was the classic case of Clash of Civilizations and it resulted in the conquest of ancient civilizations of Incas, Mayas, Aztecs, India and China. Spain had been under Muslim Moorish rule for 800 years and became free only few decades earlier, when after 1500 it began its imperial conquests in the Americas. United States imposed the colonial policy depopulation of Native Americans the original inhabitants throughout 19th Century. United States colonial policy in 20th Century in the Philippines, Japan, China, South Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and Burma influenced by Christian missionaries and Christianity. President Kennedy invaded Vietnam and President Nixon imposed the rule of Christian Pol Pot over Cambodia to impose Christianity over Buddhist Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and Burma.

 

While Christianity determined the colonial imperial policies of United States in the 20th Century, the oil interests influenced the colonial policies of United States in the 21st Century. The interests of oil god influenced the policies of President George W. Bush. The oil god replaced the Christian god as the principal presiding influence on the foreign policy of Bush Administration. The Oil the black gold became the architect of the Clash of Civilizations in the Bush Administration. The pagan god of Oil came into diplomatic predominance during Bush administration and all of sudden the oil lobby became the strongest influence on American policy making, to the chagrin of the Jewish lobby, Pope’s lobby, Armament lobby. The Protestant Christian Religious Right conservatives and Republican Neo-Conservatives the policy makers of the Bush Oil Administration redefined the national interests of the United States in terms of oil. The diplomats of 21st Century in the new age of Colonial Empires that took birth in 2003, would redefine their national interests in terms of oil and gas interests. The Clash of Civilization and Clash of Races in the post-Iraq War new age of Colonial Empires fueled by the clash of oil rather than clash of religion. The oil interests take precedence over the missionary interests of Catholic and Evangelical Christianity in the formulation of the national foreign policies in Washington, Paris, Bonn, London, Moscow, Beijing, Delhi and Tokyo. United States during the Cold War camouflaged its oil interests in garb of pro-Wahhabi and pro-Saudi Arabian policies of the United States. After the successful colonial occupation of Iraq, Christian United States no longer needed the charade of pro-Wahhabi charade to dominate the Wahhabi oil producing nations.

 

The success of Indian peacekeeper in Iraqi oil colony could convince White House that the national interests of the United States and the economic interests of American Big Oil better served if Protestant America and Hindu India jointly established American oil colonies in Wahhabi Arabian Gulf. America depopulated the lands of United States of the original inhabitants and it is not impossible that the Clash of Oil in the 21st Century might result in the permanent American occupation of the thinly populated oil-rich lands of Muslim OPEC nations in the Middle East. The post-2003 Clash of Civilizations represents the turning point in history when oil replaced religions as the sole determinant of the future clash of races, clash of Civilizations and clash of nations. A new history began after the President Bush’s conquest of Iraq in 2003. The Oil is the guiding principle of the global clash of races and Clash of Civilizations in the post-Iraq War International system. Hindu India and Protestant United States are allies in the oil-determined world order. Hindu India and Protestant United States would fight the Clash of Civilization on the same side of the battle lines to protect their common oil interests throughout the 21st Century.

 

(7) Beast of Intolerant Priest-King’s Drug Cartel

Seven. The Intolerant, drug-peddling priest emerged as the greatest threat to Civilizations in the 21st Century. The evil priest-king and evil predator intolerance are the two heads of the beast that feeds on the incomes of the global drug trade. The priest-rulers control the incomes of the global drug trade in heroin and cocaine by legitimizing the intolerant religious terrorists who supplement their incomes by organized crime. The Evil Beast of Clash of Civilization has three head.

 

First, the three heads of the Beast of the Clash of the Civilization are: Priest-King, Predator Intolerance, and Drug Cartels. The first head is that of priest-king representing the menace of the religious clergy that conspire to undermine the political power of the secular King-President to install into power the Priest as the ruler. The second head is that of the Predator intolerance of religious fundamentalism that threatened multi-ethnic Civilization states. The third head is that of the organized crime Drug cartels that generates huge tax-free incomes to keep the evil leaders into power.

 

Second, the religious intolerance and predator fundamentalism of priest-kings of Vatican and Mecca made Catholic conservatism and Wahhabi fundamentalism the great menace to the civilized Civilizations. Third, the white Catholic Cocaine Colombian cartel and Wahhabi Heroin Muslim cartel launder $700 billion annual drug incomes through Catholic and Sunni financial institutions.

 

Fourth, the Catholic priest-king of the Vatican, joined forces with Sunni Wahhabi priest king of Mecca to wage Christian-Islamic wars on Hindu, Buddhist and pagan civilizations to proselytize Christianity and Islam. American oil colonialism supported the priest-king aspirations of Muslim clergy of Wahhabi Mecca to engineer the secession of oil-rich Muslim Arab states from the Muslim Ottoman Caliphate in 1920s and for the secession of Muslim Pakistan from Indian Empire in 1947.

 

Fifth, the CIA used the incomes of the Heroin drug incomes of Taiwanese Kuomintang Army in Karen Province of Burma to finance anti-Communist wars in the Golden Crescent of Burma from 1945 to 1990, and would again make Myanmar the world producer of heroin if Christian Suu Kyi ever became the President of Myanmar. To secure the control of oil of Colombia President Bill Clinton launched Plan Colombia in Colombia. President Bush invaded Afghanistan to secure control over Turkmenistan oil and camouflaged it by America’s war on Islamic terrorism.

 

Sixth, the Vatican and Germany helped Vladimir Lenin acquire power in Russia to destroy Russian orthodoxy. United States helped Mao tse Tung acquire power in China hoping communist rule would harm Buddhism China. United States supported priest-ruler aspirations of Mecca Caliphate, to secure American control over Saudi oil. Seventh, the United States supported the Wahhabi religious intolerance to empower Muslim clergy in the moderate liberal Islamic nations, hoping Wahhabi clergy would promote American oil interests. United States supported the Catholic Cocaine cartel to gain control over Colombian oil. United States supported the Muslim drug cartels in Albania, Afghanistan, and Pakistan to secure Muslim support for the disintegration of Yugoslavia, and conquest of Afghanistan and Iraq.

 

(8) Rise of Theocracies as Menace

First, Islamic clergy and ulema enjoyed no special power and privilege in Islamic empires, Ottoman Empire, Mughal Empire of India and Persian Empire. In Islamic jurisprudence the Caliph the ruler controlled the clergy and the Islamic State controlled the Islamic Church. First, since the leaders of the three Islamic nations, Ottomans, Iran and Indian empire were not Arab Muslims, the Lawrence of Arabia and British Empire sold the idea of Wahhabi theocracies to the Ottoman Sharief of Mecca, arguing that based on the legitimacy of Mecca the Wahhabi theocracies could form the Wahhabi Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Islamic Clash of Civilization, is a Vatican Zionist American plot to install Islamic Wahhabi theocracies and rule of the Muslim clergy and Shariah Law over otherwise secular, modern Islamic nations.

 

(9) Secularism Vs Hinduism & Buddhism

Second, United States and Britain deployed the instrument of secularism to undermine Islam in Ottoman Turkey, employed secularism to undermine Hinduism in Indian Empire, and employed secularism to undermine Buddhism in China, Vietnam, and employed Christians-led military dictatorships in south Korea, Taiwan, Burma to under mine Buddhism. Germany’s William Kaiser used secularism and Communism to undermine Orthodoxy in Russia. Germany implanted atheist socialist Marxist Vladimir Lenin in Russia to destroy Orthodoxy in Russia. United States implanted atheist socialist Marxist Mao tse Tung in China to undermine Buddhism in China. Britain implanted atheist socialist Jawaharlal Nehru in India to undermine Hinduism in India. Hindu Civilization and Buddhist Civilizations are part of Oriental civilization and might merge into one another to form a composite Oriental Civilization in the 21st Century. The British Empire promoted the concept of Arab nationalism to engineer the secession of Arab nations from Ottoman Empire. The British Empire promoted the concept of Wahhabi Priest-Ruler to engineer the Clergy-led revolt against Ottoman Empire. The British Empire promoted the concept of secularism to undermine the Ottoman Islamic Empire. British Empire imposed the military rule in secular Turkey and encouraged the genocide of 400,000 Armenians in Turkey to promote ethnic separatism to replace Ottoman supranational by turkey nationalism. British Empire directly encouraged the massacre of Hindus and Muslims in the Communal riots in 1947 to destroy the legacy of the Mughal Empire, the joint Muslim-Hindu Empire in Indian Empire. America supported the secular atheist Mao’s Communist forces in China, hoping that Judeo-Marxist Communists would destroy Buddhism faster than the Christian Chiang Kai sheik. William Kaiser in First World War supported Vladimir Lenin and helped him acquire power in Russia, hoping that atheist Communists would destroy Orthodox Russian Tsar, who was related to the British Royal family. America, Britain and Papacy deployed the instrument of secularism or Marxism to implant leaders in Russia, Ottoman Turkey, India and China to undermine the Orthodoxy in Russia, Islam in Turkey, Hinduism in India, Buddhism in China, Burma, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Laos and Cambodia.

 

(10) Mullah-Ruler Concept Undermined Ottomans

Third. The rise of Asia, especially rise of India and China resulted in the decline of Europe in the 21st Century. The decline of Europe resulted in the Unification of Europe as European Union. The Christian nations sought to united the Islamic and Christian Civilizations under the banner of monotheistic Occidental Civilization. India’s legacy of Mughal Empire allowed India leadership role in the oil-rich Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. Greater India could expand westward to include Islamic nations of Central Asia and Arabian Gulf or India could expand eastward to include Buddhist nations of East Asia and Southeast Asia. While secular Ottoman Islamic Caliphate had been the historic enemy of Christian Europe, the Christian West sought alliance with Muslim clergy in the Arab world, which had been marginalized in the Islamic Caliphate to join forces with the European Christian, who agreed to establish Wahhabi theocracies out of the corpse of dying Ottoman Caliphate. European Christians gave a final deathblow to the Ottoman Caliphate by imposing the rule of secular military dictatorship in Turkey, who ruthlessly abandoned the multi-ethnic Ottoman legacy by engaging in the massacre of 400,000 Armenians. Christians ended the Islamic menace to Europe by imposing the secular regime in Turkey and engineering the secession and installation of Wahhabi theocracies in the former territories of the Ottoman Empire by promoting the concept of ethnic separatism and clergy ruled theocracies. The national interests of Turkey, India, Russia, China and Iran coincide on the issue of the Wahhabi Mullah-Ruler Theocracy. The Christian colonial powers propagated the concept of Muslim Priest-King the Wahhabi theocracies to win over the allegiance of the Muslim clergy in the multi-ethnic secular liberal Ottoman Empire, Soviet Union, Indian Empire and French Empire, to encourage Muslim clergy mobilize militant Muslims against their respective governments to promote the interests of American oil colonialism. America promoted concept of Wahhabi Islamic theocracy to turn Muslim clergy into traitors in multi-ethnic States of Ottoman Empire, Soviet Union and Indian Empire.

 

(11) Ottomans & India Controlled Islamic World

Fourth, the American and British imperialism created the artificial states of Saudi Arabia, Israel, Pakistan to weaken consolidation of the Islamic world under the leadership of Turki Ottomans and Indian Mughals. The Ottomans based in Asia Minor and Mughals based in Indian Subcontinent were two major contenders for the leadership of the Islamic world. Britain created the Islamic Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Kingdom of Iraq based on the Wahhabi religion, created the Jewish state of Israel based on the religion of Judaism, and created the Islamic state of Pakistan based on the religion of Islam. Israel, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are three artificial states that never existed and were artificially created to serve the national interests of American Big Oil. Formal recognition of Jewish state of Israel by Semite Saudi Arabia and Islamic Pakistan would establish the Israel’s leadership over Semite Islamic oil resources of Arabian Gulf.

 

(12) CIA consented for Rule of Muslim Clergy

Fifth, in 1900 the three multi-ethnic empires represented the majority of the Islamic world. The Ottoman Empire, Russian Empire and Indian Empire. The Christian colonial powers, British colonialism and Papacy unleashed the Islamic Clash of Civilization against Ottoman Empire, Russian Empire, Indian Empire and French North African Empire by directly supporting the Muslim clergy. Britain, France and America secured alliance with Wahhabi Muslim clergy to engineer the secession of Arab states in name of creating Wahhabi theocracies governments in the Arabian Peninsula headed by Priest-Kings the Wahhabi clergy. America supported Muslim clergy and Fundamentalist Muslims in Afghanistan to engineer the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Afghanistan and the secession of oil-rich Muslim Central Asian Republics from Soviet Union. America supports the militant Islam in Chechnya to severe the oil-pipeline route that connects the Azerbaijan oil fields to the oil and gas pipelines networks in Russia. Britain supported Islamic fundamentalists and hired Mohammed Ali Jinnah to demand the secession of Muslim provinces from Indian Empire, so that India may not have direct land borders with oil-rich Iran. America supports the Islamic militants in Algeria to severe France’s ties with Algeria so that the Wahhabi Islamic regime of Algeria might bring Algeria under the colonial control of American big oil. America supported Islamic terrorists, Wahhabi fundamentalism and turned the blind eye to the Islamic acts of terrorism. Ottoman Empire, Soviet Empire, Indian Empire and French Empire in 1947 were four principal Empires that controlled the Muslim World. American and British oil colonialism joined forces with the Wahhabi Islamic clergy and sold them the idea of the Islamic Priest-Kings to win their allegiance, and induced them to rebel against their multi-ethnic rulers. American has continued this policy against multi-ethnic India. Osama Bin Laden is the icon of American foreign policy and the most successful instrument of the CIA and the White House. The White House, the CIA, and American Big Oil have nurtured, cultivated and armed the likes of Osama bin Laden to secure alliance of the Muslim Clergy by offering them the dream of the Wahhabi Clergy rulers in the otherwise modern, liberal Islamic nations, where Muslim clergy didn’t enjoy any special political, social and economic power.

 

(13) Richelieu’s Raison D’etat (1624-1642)

Sixth, with the concept of unity under Papacy, the emerging states of Europe needed some principle to justify their foreign policy independent of Papacy. Cardinal de Richelieu, the First Minister of Catholic France found it in the concepts of Raison d’etat and the balance of power. Each depended on the other. Raison d’etat asserted that the well being of the state justified whatever means were employed to further it. The national interest supplanted the medieval papal notion of universal Catholic morality. The state need not formulate the foreign policy to promote the religious interests of Roman Catholicism and Christianity. The purpose of the Diplomats pursuing the raison d’etat is to pursue national interests of the State neither the ideological goals nor the papal religious Christian interests. The Raison d’etat principles made the diplomats free from any obligation to the Pope and Roman Catholic Church. Richelieu came into office in 1624, when the Habsburg Holy Roman Emperor Ferdinand II was attempting to revive Catholic Universality, stamp out Protestantism, and establish Holy Roman Empire’s control over the Protestant princes of Central Europe. Cardinal de Richelieu was the First Minister of Catholic Kingdom of France from 1624 to 1642, during the period of Counter Reformation Thirty years Wars (1618-1648). Richelieu’s 18-year reign as First Minister of France blunted the Pope and Habsburg Holy Roman Empire’s attempts to destroy Protestant Reformation and Lutheran Movement, during 30-year religious war in Europe, in which more than one-third population of Germans died. The Counter Reformation War was one of the most brutal and destructive wars in the history of the mankind. By 1618, the German-speaking territory of Central Europe was divided into two armed camps, namely the Protestant Camp and Catholic Camp. In the crucible of this conflict, Cardinal Richelieu grafted the principle of Raison d’etat on French foreign policy, a principal that the other European states adopted in the century that followed.

 

(14) Counter Reformation War (1974-2004)

Seventh, the ultra-conservative Bolshevik Poland-born Pope John Paul II’s Pontificate could go down inn the history as the Counter Reformation Wars at the turn of the New Millennium. The Vatican-Mecca Axis cemented by Pope John Paul II propagated the concept of the Islamic Unity under Wahhabi Mecca the priest-King papal theocracy legitimized the Wahhabi Ulema Rule under the Shariah Law. Vatican promoted the concept of Islamic theocracy and rule by Muslim clergy in the Muslim societies to formalize the Axis of Monotheist Religions and theocracies to undermine the modern secular Islamic societies and multi-ethnic secular societies to destabilize pagan African societies of Nigeria, Sudan, Hindu India and Buddhist societies in Myanmar, South Korea, China, Taiwan, Laos, Thailand and to destabilize Buddhist communities in Malaysia and Indonesia. Hindu India, and modern Islamic nations would need the 21st Century version of Richelieu’s raison d’etat to undermine the growing acceptance of Wahhabi theocracy advocated by Islamic fundamentalists of Saudi Arabia. Armed by the doctrine of Raison d’etat the modern Muslim nations would feel free to use military power to invade Mecca & Medina and remove Wahhabi clergy and ulema from all positions of power and wealth in Mecca, Medina and Saudi Arabia. The Kemalist leader of Muslim Pakistan would employ the Richelieu’s raison d’etat to use Pakistan’s military force to impose Pakistan’s domination over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE and to impose Sufi Mysticism and Deobandi sect as the official religion of Saudi Arabia, Mecca and Medina. India being a Hindu country would support Pakistan’s expansionist policy in the Middle East to buy peace in the Subcontinent.

 

(15) Philosopher Vs. Prophet

Eighth, the Semite Prophet Joshua gloated over his victory over agricultural cities, similarly Prophet Bush gloated over his victory over Iraq, and proved the morality of his convictions by the proof of victory on the battlefield. The warlike acts of President Bush are as much moral and altruistic as the acts of Prophet Bush. President Bush like Prophet Joshua subjugated the agricultural secular pro-women society of Iraq to bring them under the Semite Wahhabi patriarchy. In some respect President George W. Bush in 2003 acted like the Protestant Prophet when he took the risk and deployed the American arms to redress, what his Christian God told him was wrong and evil in the Middle East. Philosopher declared that the religions that expand and propagate by sword die by the sword. Prophets led their followers to expedite the will of their god by the use of swords. The goal of the philosopher is to explore the query to solve the riddle, to help the leaders of friendly as well as enemy nations make just decisions. The purpose of the prophet is to lead his chosen people to the grandeur path. Philosophy seeks to provide individuals the analytic tools and reasoning for improving their understanding of any issue. Prophecy seeks to declare the future to come or the future to be built, or Kingdom to be conquered, or the description of the golden age of the past or the golden age of the future to be sought. Philosopher, on the contrary, believes that mankind would find its golden age appropriate for every generation and every age. While the Prophet provides the purist solution, the philosopher provides the eclectic solutions of the multifaceted problem. The philosopher believes that only thing constant in the world is change, anything that is stagnant becomes stale and putrid. To an eclectic mind every new generation is advancement over the older generation. To a fundamentalist purist mind, the new generation must adhere to the purist code enacted centuries ago, even if these codes are outdated for the modern age. In general the Oriental mind, Hindu and Buddhist mind and reformed Protestant Christian mind more eclectic than the Occidental mind, Judeo, Islamic, Catholic and Orthodoxy mind.

 

(16) Warrior-Statesman Vs Prophet-Priest

Ninth, President Theodore Roosevelt was the warrior-statesman; President Woodrow Wilson was the prophet-priest. Statesmen and even warriors focus on the world in which they live. To Prophets the real world is the one they want to bring into being. Woodrow Wilson transformed what had started our as a reaffirmation of American neutrality into a set of prepositions laying the foundations of the Wilsonian foreign policy for the global crusade of the United States. In spite of the moral pretensions of Woodrow Wilson, Wilsonian foreign policy was simply a ruse, which camouflaged the Roosevelt’s Realpolitik in the make believe garb of the moralistic idealistic pretensions. President George W. Bush did the similar Wilsonian diplomatic coup, when he exploited the world sympathy for 9/11 Saudi Wahhabi terrorist attacks on America, to bring about the unprecedented expansion of Nato to Eastern Europe, Central Asia and South Asia, without hurting even a single Saudi Wahhabi Taliban terrorist leader. Secretary Colin Powell successfully brought about this ingenious diplomatic coup d'etat during first term of the Bush administration, without losing a beat. President Bush articulated his beliefs like the Prophet-Priest Woodrow Wilson, and used the military force like Theodore Roosevelt to create American colonial empire.

 

(17) World We Create is Product of Our Thinking

Tenth, the world we have created is the product of our thinking and it cannot be changed without changing our thinking. However, when the dominant thinking of the leading power changed, the world and the world order also changed. Without passing moral judgment of President Bush’s actions, the dominant thinking of the Bush Administration has the power to create a new world, a new world order, where Colonial Empires, not the smaller independent sovereign states would be the actors and entities of the international system. President Bush’s America has the moral authority and military power to impose a new order and once it becomes a stable world order, it would acquire a legitimacy of its own.

 

(18) America’s Role in the Clash of Civilizations

Eleventh, the dreaded Beast of the Clash of Civilization, was the Lap Dog of the White House as American colonialism nurtured, financed and legitimized all the three heads of the Beast, namely the head of priest-ruler, the head of Intolerance and the head of Drug trade. America engineered the Clash of Civilization at the start of the 20th Century, as the foundation of the Neo-Colonialism that United States decided would supplant the demise of the European Colonial Empires after the Second World War. United States was a new entrant into the race of the Colonial Empires. American oil colonialism financed, nurtured and propagated the Wahhabi priest-rulers of Mecca, militant Wahhabi fundamentalist Intolerance, and Muslim heroin cartels to cement closer ties with Muslim clergy, militant Muslim fundamentalism and Muslim Heroin/Opium cartels to induce Islamic oil-producing nations come voluntarily under the control and influence of the United States.

 

(19) India is Westernizing Force in Clash

Twelfth, India in the 21st Century represents the Westernizing force in history. United States and Papacy in 21st Century represented Counter-Westernizing force in history. Indian foreign policy promoted tolerance, inclusion, women’s rights, freedom, democracy, Western values, separation of the State and the Church, and social diversity. The United States and Papacy promoted Wahhabi fundamentalism, Shariah Law, ruler of the Clergy and priest-kings, military coups, massacre of 2,000,000 Cambodian Buddhists, military coups in Pakistan, and provided sanctuary to terrorist Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan and Mecca. India headed the mission of Westernization, Modernization, and secular liberalization in the world. United States headed the mission of imposing barbarian, fundamentalist Wahhabi militant Islam over modern Islamic nations to secure control over their oil and mineral resources. United States and the Papacy represented the Axis of Medieval in the world and attempted to push the Third World back into the Dark Age. India in 21st Century represented the force of New Age while United States and Papacy represented the force of Dark Age.

 

(20) Beyond Good and Evil

Every independent world Civilization creates a separate and different version of good and evil to maintain its separate identity, and herein lay the fundamental cause the Clash of Civilization. Civilizations create different concepts of good and evil. What is good and virtuous in one Civilization could be ridiculous and shameful in other Civilization. Civilizations maintain their separate identities by having separate sets of good and evil, different from what rival civilizations call good or evil. What is good in one civilization might be evil in other civilization. What President Bush called the Axis of Evil, many leaders would call Axis of Good. Prophet Zoroaster was the wisest of all Prophets of the world. The religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are the offshoot of Zoroastrian Religion. The idea of Monotheism and the concept of Devil took birth in the lands of Iryan, now called Iran, inhabited by the Airyan people, now known as Aryans. The people of Iran and Punjab gave birth to Oriental as well as Occidental religions. The Clash of Civilizations is the result of the eschatological, apocalyptic and teleological reasoning.

 

14(4) Hindus Vs Christians Clash

(1) Different Conception of God

The cause of Hindu Civilizations’s clash with Christian civilization is the differing conceptions of God. Hindus believe in the concept of Goddess, the Christians reject the concept of God as woman. Christianity has accepted many aspects of the iconoclastic philosophy of the Judaism. Christianity, Judaism and Islam are patriarchal religions and Hinduism as well as Buddhism is matriarchal cum patriarchal religion. Christianity believes in the absolute duality of man and God except in the case of Jesus. Hinduism believes in monism as well as dualism concept of God and man. Hinduis believe that God manifests as part of the living Universe. The concept of Sutratma states that every part of the material universe connected with God through infinitesimal thread, which gave brith to the wave theory of light. Christianity and Hinduism belong to separate systems of religions, Christianity is an Occidental religon and Hinduism is an Oriental Religion. Protestant Christianity and Hegelian Idealism borrowed extensively from Hindusim and Budhist to recreate the rationalistic Christianity that Jesus taught to Apostles. Islam, Judaism and Catholic Christianity have different conception of god than Hindus. The conception of god in Protestant Christianity, Pharisees and Kabbalah Judaism and Sufi Shiite Islam is closer to the conception of god in Hinduism.

 

Rival Instruments of Clash of civilizations

One. In the global Clash of Civilizations Hindu civilization and Buddhist civilization is on the same side of the battle lines. Throughout history Hindu India and Buddhist India waged Wars of Civilizations, by emphasizing Hindu ideal of religious tolerance, social diversity, multiple roads to seek divinity and freedom of religion and thought. It is no accident that Greater Buddhist Indian Civilization expanded to include Japan, Korea, China, Mongolia, Central Asia, Siberia, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Tibet and Bhutan. The Chenghis Khan’s Mongol Empire was a Buddhist Empire and Tibet’s Dalai Lama was the supreme religious leader of the entire Mongol Empire. Great Hindu Indian Civilization expanded to include Cambodia, Laos, South Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines. The Mughal Muslim-Hindu Civilization expanded to include Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. India waged clash of civilization by emphasizing the instruments and policies of tolerance, diversity, total religious freedom, multi-ethnic, multi-linguist, multi-religious and multi-racial civilization of India. Whenever India would decide to expand the reach of Indian Civilization, it would wield the omnipotent weapon of tolerance, diversity, religious freedom, equality of man and woman, equality of racial, ethnic and religious groups and equality before law. India can readily defeat the forces of predator religious cults, predator civilizations, intolerance, ethnic separatism and religious militancy by India’s time tested instruments of tolerance, acceptance of diversity and equal treatment of all races and religious sects. The Christian Civilization joined forces with Islamic Civilization to wage Wars of Intolerance, ethnic separatism and subjugation of women on Hindu, Buddhist and Pagan Civilizations. The Christian and Islamic nations represent the forces of intolerance, religious fundamentalism, and ethnic separatism. The Hindu and Buddhist nations represent the forces of tolerance, inclusion, freedom, justice and equality. Hindu and Buddhist civilizations represent the force of good in the Clash of Civilizations.

 

(2) Christianity’s War on Buddhism

Two. Christianity has launched an all out war against Buddhism in Asia. Christians separated Buddhist Sri Lanka and Burma from India in 1935 though it had been a part of Indian Empire. Christian agents infiltrated into Buddhist religious organizations and misled the Buddhist leaders into taking an anti-Hinduism and pro-Christianity line. Christian Army leaders overthrew the democratic elected government of Buddhist Uu Nu in Burma. Europeans and Americans leading international drive to put into power Christian Suu Kyi in Myanmar/Burma, just as they put Catholic Priest Rev. Aristide into power in Haiti. America influenced by Christian missionaries supported Mao-led communists in China, hoping that Buddhists would convert to Christianity more readily under the anti-Buddhist Communist regime than under the nationalist government. The CIA transferred the Chinese Christian KMT Fifth Army into South Burma Karen province that monopolized the Heroin and Opium trade of the Asia’s Golden Triangle. United States conspiring to put Christian Suu Kyi into power in Buddhist Burma/ Myanmar hoping the Christian ruler of Burma would make Burma/Myanmar the world’s leading producer of Heroin once again. President John F. Kennedy invaded Vietnam not to repulse the southward expansion of Communism but to destroy Buddhism in Vietnam and to place Christian Vietnamese into power in Vietnam. Secretary Henry Kissinger put Christian Pol Pot and Khmer Rouge into power in Cambodia to expedite the imposition of Christianity over Cambodia by the massacre of over 2,000,000 Buddhists at the hands of Communist Christians. The West may again plan the massacre of Buddhists in Burma/Myanmar whenever the Christian Suu Kyi and her Heroin Cartel entrenches in power in Burma. India and China control Myanmar as it is on the borders of India. India cannot allow Christian American troops in Burma. America’s unwelcome entry into Myanmar/Burma might result into a Vietnam type war in Burma. United States encouraged Muslim Indonesians to murder 400,000 Chinese Buddhists and rapes thousands of Chinese girls after the downfall of President Sukarno, to force Chinese Buddhists convert to Christianity.

 

(3) Sino-Indian Detente is Civilization’s Alliance

Three. Prime Minister Vajpayee’s June 2003 visit to China resulted in the Sino-Indian détente that created a new pact between Hindu Indian Civilization and Buddhist Chinese Civilization. Sino-Indian détente would combine the resources of giant Elephant India and giant Dragon China to protect the ethnic interests of the Buddhist nations of Asia, namely Burma/Myanmar, North Korea, South Korea, Mongolia, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam. Chinese Civilization even under the Communist Government continues to be the Buddhist Civilization and the national interest of Communist China and Hindu India coincide with Buddhist interests of Buddhist Myanmar/ Burma, Buddhist Mongolia, Buddhist Cambodia, Buddhist Laos and Buddhist Vietnam. It is neither in the national interest of China nor of India, to allow Christians take over the governments of Myanmar/Burma, Mongolia, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam. Hindu India and Communist china would oppose the imposition of the rule of pro-West Christian Suu Kyi in Myanmar/Burma. American military bases in Burma/Myanmar could destabilize the civilization’s balance of power in Southeast Asia and conflagrate the clash of races in Asia. It would not be in the interest of United states to attempt disturb the geopolitical balance of religions and civilizations in Asia by attempting to install a Christian ruler of Buddhist Myanmar/Burma in the geopolitical backyard of India and China. Christian America’s military bases in Buddhist South Korea and Buddhist Japan are not in the geopolitical and civilization interests of India, China, Japan and Koreas.

 

(4) America Launched Clash of Civilizations

Four. British Empire in Egypt developed the concept of Arab League to develop the concept of Arab nationalism to disintegrate Ottoman Empire. British Empire developed the concept of Wahhabi theocracy, the rule by Muslim clergy to disintegrate Ottoman Empire. British Empire developed the concept of Islam as the basis of state to partition Indian Empire. Osama Bin Laden and Wahhabi terrorism is the instrument of American policy to mobilize Muslims in the Clash of Civilization. By propagating the Vatican theocracies as the role model for Islamic world, United States and Britain sought to undermine the three leading Islamic empires of the world, Ottoman Empire, Mughal Indian empire and Iran. Throughout history there were only three important Islamic Empires, Ottoman Caliphate, Iranian Empire, and Mughal Empire of India, and Muslim Ulema clergy never enjoyed any important political role, in any one of these Islamic Empires. Muslim clergy never played any important political role in Islamic Empires. Muslim Rulers, whether in Ottomans and Mughal India called the shots and ulema served him. Muslim clergy didn’t have any important role to play neither in the Ottoman Islamic Caliphate nor in Mughal Indian Empire. Mughal clergy had no voice to oppose the power of the despotic rulers. Neither Ottoman Caliphate nor Mughal Empire was theocracies, as both these two leading Islamic political entities were despotic autocracies, but by no means theocracies. American oil colonialism and British Empire won over the Wahhabi leaders of Mecca arguing that theocracies could be carved out in Arabia based on the Wahhabi fundamentalism, which would give greater power, wealth and influence to Wahhabi Muslim clergy than they had otherwise enjoyed in the Islamic history. United States and Britain sold the idea of Arab theocracies modeled on the concept of the Vatican theocracies, and used the Wahhabi theocracies to undermine the secular, liberal Ottoman Muslim Caliphate, and legacy of Hindu-Muslim Mughal Empire concept in India. 

 

Second, Professor S.P. Huntington led Christian leaders to bring about the Civilization wide alliance of Christianity and Islam so that backed by the might of the Christian nations, Wahhabi Saudi Arabia might take over Islamic religious institutions in the moderate liberal Islamic world so that Islamic militants could bring about the secession of Muslim oil producing regions from multi-ethnic Soviet Union.

 

Third, out of the four largest economies of the world, USA, China, Japan and India, there is only one white Christian nation, the United States. Before 1947 the Indian Empire controlled the 100% of Iranian oil and 49% of Iraqi oil. Before 1947, Indian Empire controlled and dominated Iraq, Kuwait, Trucial States (UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, Muscat) and Yemen. Indian Rupee was the Reserve Currency of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, Iran, Oman, Muscat, UAE, Bahrain, Yemen and Qatar as late as 1965. The oil-rich Caspian nations, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan were part of the Soviet Union before 1990. United States promoted Islamic militancy and Wahhabi fundamentalism to promote ethnic separatism to disintegrate Ottoman Empire, Indian Empire and Soviet Empire. British Empire partitioned India in 1947, to create the artificial state of Pakistan to separate India from the oilfields of Iran and Iraq. America supported Afghan Mujahideens in Afghanistan to engineer the secession of Muslim Central Asian Republics from the Soviet Union.

 

Fourth, the White House puts it might behind Muslim terrorists and fundamentalists to undermine the multi-ethnic Civilization states of Ottoman Empire, Indian Empire and Soviet Empire. American financed Muslim terrorists to mobilize fundamentalist Muslims wage wars on secular Ottomans, secular Indians, secular Russians and secular Chinese. United States promoted the concept of Clash of Civilizations to cement American Big Oil’s strategic ties with oil-rich Wahhabi nations and Wahhabi fundamentalism to mobilize militant Islam wage secessionist movements in Russia, India and China, to undermine their attempts top challenge American domination of the Islamic oil producing nations.

 

Fifth, Orthodox Soviet Union led by Premier Khrushchev deployed nuclear deterrent to end British and French colonial threats to Egypt, Iran and Iraq. The Wahhabi Muslim terrorists have annoyed Russians and in the event of the future conquest of the Arab oil producers, President Putin of Russia might not come to the rescue of Arab Muslim nations. India faced Wahhabi Muslim terrorist attacks in Kashmir, might turn a blind eye, if ever United States invaded Wahhabi Saudi Arabia the known financiers of Wahhabi terrorists in Kashmir. The CIA propagated the Clash of Civilization thesis that Islam is at war against Hindus, Buddhists and Orthodoxy to undermine Islam’s relationship with other civilization, so that no other great nation would come to the rescue of oil-rich Islamic nations under attacks of Christian colonial powers. As a result of terrorist acts of America financed militant Muslims, the civilizations of Hindu India, Buddhist China and Orthodox Russia might support rather than oppose the Christian conquest of Arab Muslim oil-producing nations.

 

The challenge most Muslim people face today is a religious challenge of Wahhabi theocracy, which determined to undermine the Westernization and democratization process. The religious forces of theocracy and Wahhabi militancy trying to challenge the modernization process underway in the Islamic world by violent terrorist actions of the Wahhabi militants that focused on terrorizing the weakest sections of society the Muslim women.

 

With the help direct help of American media and globalization process the Wahhabi fundamentalism touted as the new global idea in the Muslim world, though less than 2% Muslim follow Wahhabi creed. The global Wahhabi militancy became the new hot idea among the Muslims, when oil incomes of Saudi Arabia allowed Wahhabi takeover of more than 80% Muslim mosques in the United States, and militarily and economically imposed Wahhabi fundamentalism in formerly secular Muslim states of Malaysia and Indonesia, which had significant Hindu influence earlier. The Wahhabi demagogic pirouettes aided by American mainstream media hype, presented barbarian Wahhabi fundamentalism as true form of Islam, which Islamic Caliphates had rejected as being too crude and barbarian, during last 1,200 years of Islamic history. While Catholics have rejected the Early Christianity as heresy, they want Muslims to accept the barbarian Islam of desert Bedouin nomad as true form of Islam.

 

(5) Barbarians’ Attacks on Civilizations

Five. The geopolitical terrorist threat that Muslim terrorists presents to United States, Russia and India represents the continuation of the historic barbarian threat to Civilizations and it requires overwhelming military response of the Civilizations against the breeding grounds of the terrorism, if the civilizations intend to defeat rather than succumb to the barbarian terrorism. The Civilizations cannot allow barbarians to exploit the tolerance and freedom of the Civilizations to destroy the Civilizations itself. Civilized Civilizations of India and China repeatedly invaded by the barbarians throughout history. Civilized Civilizations by definition are tolerant, multi-ethnic, multi-cultural, multi-linguistic, nurture diversity and positively interact with other civilizations and encourage the convergence of civilizations. Barbarians historically behaved like terrorists and excel in making improvisations of the current military technologies, making it cheaper, lighter and more lethal. Barbarians throughout history used brutal military force to conquer civilizations and this conquest results in the rise of Barbarian Civilization or the Civilization under the control of Barbarians. Barbarian Civilizations propagate intolerance, eliminates diversity and persecute women, demand and enforce religious uniformity. Throughout history barbarian societies invaded the civilizations and over time succeeded in conquering the civilizations. After the conquest of the Civilization, the barbarian conquerors of the civilizations, developed fortress around the Civilization to protect it from the invasions of other marauding barbarians, while maintaining totalitarian control over the Civilization. The bordering civilization outside the control of the barbarians, continue the process of absorbing barbarian military technology, improvising it and mass-produce the military weapons to launch counter attacks on the barbarian rulers of the civilizations. Civilizations have traditionally enjoyed the advantage of larger populations and larger economic base. Barbarians have traditionally lacked huge populations. Civilizations inevitably succeed in conquering the barbarian rulers of the civilizations and remove barbarian rulers of the civilizations and return the Barbarian Civilization to the fold of Civilized Civilizations. Indian Hindu Civilization is a Civilized Civilization. Saudi Wahhabi is a Barbarian Civilization. The ongoing clash of Civilized tolerant Civilizations and Barbarian intolerant predator Civilizations is the fact of history and fact of life and would continue. The peace would result only when either the barbarians are defeated or barbarians emerge victorious in the barbarians versus civilizations wars.

 

(6) Convergence of Civilizations

Six. According to Indian worldview the Civilized Civilizations do not clash and Civilizations can only collude and converge into one another to create a newer vibrant Civilization. Civilizations learn from one another. In the Milky Way the galaxies collide and billions of stars of the colliding galaxies continue to remain part of their galaxies. The tolerant Civilizations absorb the invasions of barbarians by accepting the diversity and still retaining the original character of the Civilizations. The separate civilizations of barbarians and civilizations can co-exist side by side in mutual harmony for thousands of years. In India Hindu and Muslim Civilizations have co-existed side by side for over a thousand year. Indian Civilization is the only civilization where Hindu, Buddhist Islamic and Christian civilizations coexisted side by side and managed to retain their respective cultural and religious purity. Even if Civilizations collide and move into the space occupied by other Civilizations, the separate pockets of Civilizations can retain their ethnic and cultural independence without any pressure for forced assimilation, while they learnt from one another.

 

(7) Hindu Buddhist Muslim Cultures of India

Seven. It is the manifest destiny of India that Indian Civilization would one day rise to the occasion and unite the Hindu, Buddhist and Islamic civilizations under the leadership of India, just as European Union united the civilizations of Europe. The civilizations of Hindus, Buddhists and Islam can unite into a confederation of Asia and Africa under the leadership of India. India and China are the world’s Civilization heavyweights in terms of its size of populations, size of the economy and the continuity of its civilizations from time immemorial. India and China are two principle centers of the world civilizations that co-existed from time immemorial and represented one-third to one-half of the populations of the world throughout history. In 1750, the China manufactured one-third of the world’s total manufactured goods and India produced one-fourth of the world total manufactured goods. In 1750, India, China and Japan produced 61% of the total manufactured goods. Throughout human history India represented the Eternal Pole of the World Civilizations and all other Civilizations that arose and fell in the history, revolved around India as the center of the world. The Hindu Civilization encompassed the entire ancient world, including the ancient Civilization of Babylon, the ancient Egyptian civilization, ancient Greek Civilization, and ancient Roman Civilization. The Buddhist Civilization of China, Japan, and Korea are sister civilization of Hindu India. Indonesia, Malaysia had been part of South Indian Hindu and Buddhist Civilization. Laos, Cambodia, South Vietnam (Champa) and Burma had historically been part of Indian Hindu Civilization. Whatever is common among Asian nations is the common Indian Civilization.

 

(8) American Colonial Civilization

Eight. The Anglo Saxons the last race from Europe to venture out to establish overseas colonies were the worst genocidal colonizers. First, the Protestant Anglo Saxons acted like predator cannibals in North America, while Spanish and Portuguese Catholics inter-married with original inhabitants of the land and gave birth to the vast populations of Mestizos and Mulattos the people of mixed ancestry in Mexico, Central America, Andean and South America. Like the predator snakehead fish that kills the native fish, the Anglo Saxons massacred the original peoples to empty the lands, far more than what was required for the small number of immigrants in 19th Century. Immigrant Anglo Saxons could have co-existed with the American Indians, as North America is a large continent. Catholic as well as Protestants believed in the extermination of the Native Americans in North America, South America. American Civilization advocated the massacre of the indigenous peoples and subjugation of the non-white peoples.

 

Second, the United States used the Railways to kill millions of bison during two consecutive winters to destroy the food reserves of the Red Indians that solely relied on the bison meat. United States destroyed the ethnic societies of the Pacific Islanders that came under rule of the United States as Mandate territories. United States removed the indigenous people from the Diego Garcia Archipelago when it leased it for establishing US Naval Base. Protestant Anglo Saxons in United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand methodically massacred and eliminated the indigenous peoples to establish the White Christian nations. Unlike Spanish and Portuguese conquerors of South and Central America, the Anglo Saxons refused to inter-marry indigenous peoples and chose to systematically slaughter them. United States did not believe in the coexistence of races and coexistence of civilizations in the 18th and 19th centuries. United States represented the predator intolerant barbarian civilization determined to exterminate the indigenous civilization to depopulate the lands of its original inhabitants to create a new Empty continent for the white immigrants from Europe.

 

Third, the Unionist Republican President Lincoln didn’t fight the pro-slavery Confederate South to liberate blacks and to accept blacks into the folds of American Civilization. President Lincoln feared that the unchecked importation of black slaves would make United States a black-majority country and some day blacks would revolt as they did in Haiti and become the dominant race in the United States. It is very possible that led by black leadership of Haiti, the black slaves of the Unite States might have revolted against white masters and joined forces with American Red Indians and blacks from Haiti to establish black government of the United States of America. During American colonial occupation of the Philippines the US Army massacred 400,000 peoples in the Philippines to establish American rule in the Philippines. United States believed in destroying the indigenous people and to empty the lands of the original inhabitants to establish American Civilization on these empty lands.

 

Fourth, President George W. Bush inadvertently exhibited the genocidal imperialistic predatory spirit lying dormant in the Anglo Saxons, when he ordered the invasions of Iraq, on the fictitious grounds of WMDs, simply because he wanted Iraq emptied of Saddam Hussein and Baathists. It is no wonder that German minister during last general elections compared President Bush to Fuehrer Adolf Hitler. Overnight the diplomats of the world powers gripped with the fear of Anglo Saxons attempts to conquer the world, to empty the world of all opponents to United States.

 

Fifth, the United States historically pursued the policy of Geopolitical dominance over native Indians in USA and over West Europeans after the Second World War. The NATO acted as Chaperon to Western Europe. The US-led NATO established America’s geopolitical dominance over France and Germany. The NATO died in the rubble of Baghdad because suddenly the European nations realized that NATO had been the instrument of enslavement of Western Europe to promote the interests of United States, and not the Western bulwark against menace from the Soviet Union or Russia. No wonder that US-led NATO became as irrelevant as Soviet-led Warsaw Pact, so soon after the end of the Cold War in the aftermath of President Bush’s Iraq War.

 

Sixth, the American invasion of Iraq, in the eyes of historians, represented the invasion by the predator expansionist power against secular, modern multi-ethnic Civilization of Iraq. The armies of Pentagon waged the war under the banner of ethnic separatism, and Wahhabi fundamentalism to impose the will of American predator Civilization on secular Iraq. The burning of Iraqi Museums suggests the American occupying Powers represented the forces of predatory barbarian civilization, waging wars for the loot of the oil wealth of secular Iraq.

 

Seventh, the European colonialists conquered and destroyed the indigenous civilizations in name of the propagation of the Christianity and Western Civilization during colonial era. President Bush in 21st Century conquered and destroyed Iraqi Civilization in the name of Democracy, Freedom and WMDs. Protestant Neo-Conservative Christian religious right President George W. Bush came to represent the force of predatory civilized barbarianism in 2003, which caused great fear and anxiety amongst leaders and diplomats of the world. George W. Bush in April 2003 almost looked like Adolf Hitler or Napoleon Bonaparte in the making. The perception of the looming threat of Pax Americana and Bush Doctrine changed the International system and great powers scrambled to enter into pacts to hold America in check. In the eyes of the world leaders, United States represented the greatest threat to world peace in 2003, simply because of its predominance, which necessitated the counter measures by other world powers to check the hegemony of the United States after the demise of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War.

 

(9) Eternal Greater Hindu Indian Civilization

Nine. India emerged as the principal adversary of Preeminent Protestant American Civilization and white Western Civilization for India’s historic penchant to selflessly fight for the religious, cultural, racial and civilization rights of the weaker, underprivileged and exploited races of the Third World. India and United States violently clash in the clash of civilization, as Hindu India would never remain silent spectator to the attempts of the predatory white Christian Catholic and Evangelical civilizations to impose Christianity on the pagan worlds. India’s defense of pagan nations and Buddhist nations made Hindu India the scourge of predatory expansionist Christian Civilization in the 21st Century.

 

First, in the Clash of Civilizations, Indian Civilization and Hindu religion serves as the primary pole of the world representing the forces of tolerance, diversity, freedom and openness. India is the true Civilized Civilization of the world and had been so throughout history. The strength of India is that India throughout history tolerated and encouraged the diversity, religious tolerance and intermixing of the races. Indian culture is the common denominator the civilizations of Asia and Africa. No nation and no race in the world history could rival India in transnational social and cultural intercourse. Historically Indian Civilization had been diverse and tolerant of diversity in ethnicity, thought and religion. India is the living testimony of the living World Civilization. Eternal civilization of India is a testimony to the fact that populous, tolerant multi-ethnic Civilization would always survive innumerable foreign invasions, barbarian attacks and ethnic disturbances. Eternal Hindu Religion presently practiced by 850 million Indians in India is the same ancient Hindu religion that existed 10 million years ago, and survived the many cycles of the destruction and rebirth of the Human Civilization on this planet earth. No religion can rival Hinduism and no civilization can rival Indian Civilization and the same religion and civilization has survived millions of years. 

 

Second, Indian Civilization and Indian race has maintained historic cultural, social, civilization and religious intercourse in Euro-Asia Africa World Island with more than 42 countries of the world, representing more than two/third of the world population. After Second World War, Indian influence dominated over many Islamic nations, including Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Trucial States (UAE, Bahrain, Qatar), Muscat & Oman, Yemen, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Brunei. After WWII Indian cultural influence dominated in Buddhist lands of Tibet, Burma, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Korea, Southern China, and Japan. Because of Mughal Indian Empire legacy, India had cultural ties with Central Asian Republics of Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Krygyzstan. The Indian Diaspora had substantial presence in Fiji Islands, Mauritius, Guyana, Suriname and Trinidad & Tobago. Indian businessmen dominated the economies of Christian East Africa and Christian Southern Africa, especially Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Zanzibar, Zambia, Zimbabwe/ Rhodesia, Botswana and South Africa. The Greater India extended Indian influence over Islamic, Christian and Buddhist nations of Asia and Africa and included 1 South Africa, 2 Zambia, 3 Zimbabwe, 4 Botswana, 5 Kenya, 6 Tanzania, 7 Uganda, 8 Yemen, 9 Muscat & Oman, 10 UAE, 11 Qatar, 12 Bahrain, 13 Kuwait, 14 Iraq, 15 Iran, 16 Afghanistan, 17 Pakistan, 18 Uzbekistan, 19 Tajikistan, 20 Kyrgyzstan, 21 Tibet, 22 Nepal, 23 Bhutan, 24 Burma, 25 Bangladesh, 26 Myanmar/Burma, 27 Laos, 28 Cambodia, 29 Vietnam, 30 South Korea, 31 North Korea, 32 Maldives island, 33 Mauritius, 34 Fiji Islands, 35 Suriname, 36 Trinidad & Tobago, 37 Malaysia, 38 Indonesia, 39 Brunei, 40 Southern China, 41 Mongolia, and 42 Japan. India has direct cultural civilization ties with more than 42 countries of the Hindu, Buddhist, Muslim and Christian world in Asia, Africa, and the Caribbean.

 

Three, white Christianity has subjugated Islamic civilization and secured Civilization-Civilization Alliance with Semite Wahhabi Islam to give monopoly over oil and gas resources of the Islamic nations to the American Big Oil in exchange for the Christian support to the Wahhabi fundamentalism. American Big oil encouraged Wahhabi fundamentalists to erode Hindu, Buddhist and Indian influences over Malaysia, Indonesia, Brunei, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh by replacing Indian cultural influences with Wahhabi fundamentalism. Throughout the 20th Century the principle foreign policy objectives of European and American policy makers had been to undermine and limit Indian Empires historic cultural and civilization ties with the Muslim states of Yemen, Muscat & Oman, Trucial States (UAE, Qatar, Bahrain), Kuwait, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Krygyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia and Indonesia. In the clash of civilizations Hindu India would support and fight for the religious rights of non-Wahhabi liberal, moderate Muslims and for the rights of Muslim women. India would whole heartedly oppose and fight against the Wahhabi fundamentalism while Christian world would support the Wahhabi fundamentalists engaged in wars of religious sects against moderate, tolerant and liberal Islam. On the issue of Wahhabi fundamentalism, the Hindu India clashes violently with Christian West and Protestant United States.

 

Fourth, the white Christianity has subjugated Buddhist Civilizations of China, Mongolia, Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, by imposing Judeo-Semite Communist doctrine over the Buddhist world. The primary purpose of the Judeo Marxism had been to destroy the political base of Buddhism in China, Mongolia, Vietnam, Laos, North Korea and Mongolia. The white Christianity has subjugated Buddhist Japan by imposing pro-US governments in Japan after the defeat of Japan in the WW II. The white Christianity subjugated Buddhism in Burma by engineering the military coup led by Christian Burmese Army. The white Christianity subjugated Buddhism in Sri Lanka by promoting anti-India policies. The white Christians infiltrated in the Buddhist religious organizations to lead Buddhist religious societies become anti-Hindu in their theological formulations. White Christianity worked hard to undermine Hindu Indian influences over Buddhist nations of Asia by empowerment of Christianity and succeeded in converting half of South Koreans to Christianity. The primary purpose of American military bases in Korea and American invasions of Vietnam, Laos and Korea had been to militarily undermine Hindu and Indian civilization and cultural influences over Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia. Korea and Burma. Throughout the 20th Century the principle objective of European and American foreign policy in Asia had been to limit and undermine India’s cultural, social, and civilization influences of Hindu and Buddhist India in Greater India region of Southeast Asia and East Asia. In the clash of civilizations Hindus would support and fight for the religious rights of Buddhists. On the issue of Buddhism, the Hindu India clashes violently with white Christian West and Protestant United States.

 

Fifth, the White Christianity has succeeded in subjugating the pagan civilizations of black Africa by imposing Shariah laws over pagan nations of Nigeria and Sudan so that pagans are forced to convert to either Islam or Christianity. White Christianity realized that Indians in Africa being sympathetic to the pagans, the followers of ancient Nubian religion and indigenous religions. To the Christians and Muslims in Africa India alone challenged their attempts to force monotheistic Islam or Christianity over pagan believers of black Africa south of Sahara. In the clash of civilizations Hindus would support and fight for the religious rights of pagans in Africa. On the issue of the paganism, the Hindu India clashes violently with white Christian West and Protestant United States.

 

Sixth, the White Christianity, Anglo Saxons and Catholic Latinos succeeded in subjugating the indigenous civilizations of Native Canadians, Native Americans, Incas, Mayas, Aztecs and Australian Aborigines. In the clash of civilizations, Hindus would support and fight for the religious rights, racial rights, freedom and independence of Native Americans, Native Canadians, Amerindians, Incas, Mayas, Aztecs and Australian Aborigines. On the issue of the indigenous religions of Incas, Mayas, Aztecs, Native Americans and Australian Aborigines, the Hindu India clashes with white Christian west and Protestant United States.

 

Seventh, Indian Hindu Civilization presents greatest challenge to the white Christian civilizations of Europe and America, in the global clash of civilizations by daring to oppose the white Christian West and Protestant America determined to impose the domination of Christianity over Buddhism in Asia, pagans in Africa, and Native Americans, Incas and Mayas in North and South America. Hindu India supports the cause of Buddhism in Asia. Hindu India supports the cause of liberal Islam against Wahhabi fundamentalism. Hindu India supports the cause of black pagan Africans against the onslaught of Wahhabi Muslims and Catholic and Evangelical Christians. Hindu India supports the cause of Native Canadians, Native Americans, Mayas, Incas, Aztecs and Australian Aborigines. India alone stands as an obstacle for the world conquest of the white Christian world over rest of the world. Without the leadership of India, the Third World would fail to stand up against super power United States, Papacy and white Christian Europe in the 21st Century. It is no wonder that Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru led the Third World and the newly independent nations of Asia and Africa to join the Non Aligned Movement (NAM) so that the Non Aligned Nations could dare to refuse the domination of the United States and the former European colonial powers. It is beholding to see that the legacy of Nehru survived and expressed itself in April 2003, when Non Aligned Nations temporary members of the UN Security Council, namely, Angola, Cameroon, Guinea, Chile and Pakistan refused to vote for the British-American Resolution supporting United States War resolution on Iraq. No wonder the that the spirit of freedom that India introduced in the Non Aligned Nations of the Third World would continue to mobilize and influence the outcome the global clash of Civilizations in the 21st Century. India became the scourge of the West and the United States for its selfless support for the cause of freedom of underprivileged races, religions and cultures of the world in the global clash of civilizations.

 

(10) G10 Economic Security Council

Ten. The nuclear and space powers, China and India the world’s 2nd largest and 4th largest economies should have a place in the Group of Eight, if the G8 is supposed to represent large economies. In the global clash of civilizations, Europe led by France and Germany welcomed India and China to the exclusive club of Group of Eight (G8) to recognize 21st Century is the Century of Asia. The Group of Ten (G10) would consist of USA, China, Japan, India, Germany, France, Britain, Italy, Russia and Canada, the world’s largest 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 10th, and 12th economies in terms of GNP at Purchasing power parity respectively. The Group of Ten could function as the Economic Security Council of the world. The G10 Group should deal with economic issues, and also deal with energy, labor and environment issues. The Group of Eight should be replaced by a forum including a greater number of participants, such as China and India, and dealing with a broader range of issues demanded EU Trade Commissioner Pascal Lamy. "European Union would rather favor a sort of Economic Security Council, where countries like China, India, Brazil or South Africa plus the present G8 members would sit around the table during a visit to the Chinese city of Dalian. European Union would support a revamping, a reshuffling of the G8, which is a bit of an old, dated formula. Group was created 30 years ago and one does not know of any other institution of that kind which was created 30 years ago and is now very relevant. The G-10 forum replacing the G8 should not just deal with narrow economic issues but also include matters such as energy, labor and the environment on its agenda. "Coming together in the 1970s was mostly about economic development. Coming together in 2000s is about much more than that. Even in its present form, the G8 has reflected the gradual broadening of the agenda occupying the leaders of the world's most powerful countries. While economics remains the core issue when the G8 meets, recent G8 Summits have also addressed matters such as terrorism, crime and infectious diseases. In the eyes of the European Union it would not be a problem for China to gain membership, even though the current G8 consists of industrialized democracies. G-8 is a very informal setting, there is no rule about membership and there is no institution and permanent HQ of the G-8. Speculation that China and India might one day join the G8 was fueled earlier this year when Chinese President Hu Jintao and Indian prime minister Atal Behari Vajpayee were invited to attend talks on development running parallel with a Summit of the Group of Eight in Evian, France. China, which is otherwise eager to join international organizations and raise its global profile, has not expressed an interest in formal membership of the Group of Eight. At the time of Hu Jintao's visit to France, Chinese officials said China did not aspire for membership in the exclusive club, arguing that as a developing country it did not qualify. Indian officials have indicated however that India desires to join the G8, largely because of its failed attempts to grab a full seat in an expanded Security Council of the United Nations, which currently has Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States as its current permanent members. The G8 consists of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States. The first meeting of the Group of Six (G6) was in Rambouillet, France, in 1975, when six countries participated in talks on the economic slowdown of that period.

 

14(5) US & India Rivals in Clash

(1) India is the Westernizing Force in Clash

India in the 21st Century represents the Westernizing force in history. United States and Papacy in 21st Century represented Counter-Westernizing force in history. Indian foreign policy promoted tolerance, inclusion, women’s rights, freedom, democracy, Western values, separation of the State and the Church, and social diversity. The United States and Papacy promoted Wahhabi fundamentalism, Shariah Law, ruler of the Clergy and priest-kings, military coups, massacre of 2,000,000 Cambodian Buddhists, military coups in Pakistan, and provided sanctuary to terrorist Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan and Mecca. India headed the mission of Westernization, Modernization, and secular liberalization in the world. United States headed the mission of imposing barbarian, fundamentalist Wahhabi militant Islam over modern Islamic nations to secure control over their oil and mineral resources. United States and the Papacy represented the Axis of Medieval in the world and attempted to push the Third World back into the Dark Age. India in 21st Century represented the force of New Age while United States and Papacy represented the force of Dark Age.

 

(2) Divergent World Views of India and USA

During 20th Century, India and the United States had been adversaries in the Clash of Civilizations. United States formulated its policy towards Hindu India and Buddhist Asia to promote the Proselyte interests of the Christian missionaries. During 21st Century India and United States are allies in the Clash of Civilizations, as national interests of India and United States coincide in President Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism and America’s dream to establish direct rule over oil-producing Arab oil-producing nations. India opposed United States support to the concept of Papal priest-King and Saudi Wahhabi King as the Caliph of Islam. India also opposed the United States support to the Papal religious right conservative conspiracy and Wahhabi religious intolerance. While United States supported the concept of Vatican & Mecca Priest-king, as well as Catholic, Evangelical and Wahhabi Religious Intolerance, India opposed the pretensions of the priest-rulers and predatory intolerance. While United States condoned Sunni Heroin Mafia to secure the support of the militant Islam to promote US interests in Afghanistan, Chechnya and Kosovo, India opposed it.

 

One. India and United States support the ideologically opposite poles in the global clash of civilizations. Democratic Hindu India supports the forces and nations that support tolerance, religious tolerance, multi-ethnic diversity, women’s rights, freedom, democracy and tolerance of diversity. Democratic Protestant United States guided by oil interests, supports the forces of religious intolerance, ethnic separatism, political repression, tyranny, suppression of women, military coups and religious terrorism. On the ideological platforms India and United States would lend their weight to diametrically opposite ideological camps, especially in the Islamic world and oil-producing world. In the oil-producing world France and Germany, Russia and China, might join India and support secular, liberal, pro-women regimes in the oil-producing Islamic world. India, France, Germany, Russia and China might support liberal, secular Algeria and Libya. It is because of the American oil interests that United States continues to support Saudi Wahhabi fundamentalism and intolerance, even in this age of Christian Crusades against Islamic terrorism. White House might jettison its present pro-Wahhabi policies, if Pentagon could work out the colonial governing structure with India, which would allow India-USA peacekeepers efficiently control oil colonies and maintain colonial peace. If Pentagon could rule and govern Saudi Arabia and control the Saudi oil as it does in Iraq, then White House might work towards overthrowing the rule of Saudi royal family and establish the direct rule of American Big Oil in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE. In order to propitiate the God of Oil that White House cultivated Wahhabi royal family in Saudi Arabia. If United States could propitiate god of oil better, by direct rule of the Pentagon over Saudi Arabia, it would not hesitate to do so. India should show that there are better ways to exploit Arabian oil resources than serving Wahhabi fundamentalism in Saudi Arabia.

 

(2) American Goals in Clash of Civilizations

Two. The United States lent its might behind the forces of intolerance, ethnic separatism, religious separatism, Islamic fundamentalism and Wahhabi terrorism to establish American oil colonies in the Islamic oil-producing countries. First, the United States wanted to establish American colonies in the oil-producing world by aggressively promoting Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalism to promote ethnic separatism of the Arab oil-producing states. British colonialism promoted the Arab League and secular Arab nationalism to engineer the secession of Syria, Jordan, and Iraq from Ottoman Caliphate. American oil colonialism in Arab world based on American support to Mecca-based Wahhabi Bedouin tribes and Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalism as the new doctrine of Islam. United States promoted and continues to promote Wahhabi House of Al Saud family as the new Caliph of Islam and Wahhabi clergy of Mecca as the religious leaders of the Islamic world. Protestant United States would continue to support Wahhabi intolerance, Islamic separatism and Islamic militancy to undermine the multi-ethnic states to engineer the secession of the oil-rich Islamic regions and to establish American oil colonies.

 

Second, American colonial doctrine differed from the colonial doctrines of Spain, France and Britain. The purpose of the post-Second World War American colonialism, normally referred to as Neo-Colonialism didn’t believe in exporting American values, democracy, freedom, democratic system and Christianity. Unlike European colonialism, United States would oppose the secular, liberal, democratic Islamic nations and rather impose Islamic Shariah laws over Western laws in the modern Islamic world, so that the westernized Islamic nations became the mirror image of fundamentalist Saudi Arabia. Democratic, liberal modern Christian United States would support fundamentalist, pro-Shariah, Anti-women Islamic leaders throughout the modern, secular, liberal Islamic world, to impose the leadership of pro-Wahhabi fundamentalist Muslim leadership throughout the Islamic world. United States convinced that only the pro-Wahhabi fundamentalist, pro-Shariah, anti-women militant Muslims would support the economic interests of American Big Oil in exchange for America’s support to Wahhabi Islamic fundamentalism. In the global clash of civilizations, because of the American oil interests, the Protestant United States would lend its might for the cause of religious intolerance, ethnic separatism, Islamic militancy, global drug trade, military coups and political repression.

 

Third, President Clinton supported the military coup bid of Gen. Pervez Musharraf, when Pakistan’s elected Prime Minister Nawaj Sharif offered to arrest Osama Bin Laden and extradite him to United States. President Bush invaded Afghanistan not to neutralize terrorist Osama bin Laden but to provide safe heaven and safe passage to him. American occupation of Afghanistan failed to arrest and neutralize even a single top leader of Al Qaeda and Taliban. One could argue from the benefit of the hindsight that in the clash of civilizations the Protestant United States would support the forces likes of Wahhabi fundamentalist Osama bin Laden. It is no accident that because of American control over Afghanistan, the poppy cultivation, Opium and heroin production has zoomed in Afghanistan. Pakistani observers believe that United States invaded Afghanistan to boost the Opium production of Afghanistan and to provide safe passage from Afghanistan and safe heaven in Pakistan to Al Qaeda terrorists. United States historically employed the Diplomacy of Deception by indirectly supporting Islamic militants and Islamic drug cartels, in the name of America’s war on Islamic terrorism.

 

Fourth, the successful occupation of Iraqi oil colony and the removal of Saddam Hussein presented new opportunities to American oil colonialism. United States destroyed the potential of Iran in 1980 by overthrowing the regime of Shah of Iran that threatened to industrialize Iran to enable Iran’s GNP overtake the GNP of France and Britain before 1985. President Ronald Reagan encouraged and supported Iraq in its war against Iran that destroyed the Khorramshahr petroleum refinery complex, and Iran ceased to be an economic power. Iraq was on the verge of joining the ranks of developed nations in early 1980s. United States Ambassador to Iraq encouraged Iraq to attack Iraq. The American invasions of Kuwait in 1991 and invasions Iraq in 2003 destroyed the economic, military and political power of Iraq. Neither Iran nor Iraq would never be able to threaten the dominance of the West nor challenge the leadership of Semite Wahhabi Saudi Arabia in the Islamic world. After the decline of Iran and destruction of Iraq, United States might realize the America to project Saudi Arabia as new Caliph of Islam.

 

Fifth, after United States established long term colonial occupation of Iraq and UN recognized control over Iraqi oil, it would no longer required the continued support of the Wahhabi clergy and House of Al Saud for the domination of Saudi Arabian oil resources. Perhaps Pentagon might decide that Saudi Wahhabi House of Al Saud royal family could be removed by direct military aggression and United States could directly exploit the resources of Saudi Arabia. If United States able to stabilize the colonial administration of Iraq and profitably manage and exploit the oil resources of Iraq, then Pentagon might engineer the downfall of the Wahhabi House of Al Saud in Saudi Arabia, and enthrone Osama Bin Laden as new ruler of Saudi Arabia, as the Saudi business house of Bin Laden Group has the administrative and political resources to administer and govern Saudi Arabia after the downfall of the House of Al Saud. The downfall of House of Al Saud royal family in Saudi Arabia, in the first decade of the 21st Century, would be a logical step to follow after the 2003 downfall of Saddam Hussein in Iraq and 1980 fall of Shah of Iran in Iran. United States might invade Iran after consolidating its grip over Iraq and bring Iranian oil resources under control of the United States. United States would consolidate its stronghold over its superpower status if it could simultaneously control the oil and gas reserves of Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE and Kuwait. American conquest of Iraq would allow Untied States to control the oil and gas resources of the Caspian oil basin, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. While American conquest of Iraq would be against India’s national interest, American conquest of Saudi Arabia would be in India’s national interest. The continued occupation of Iraq would be in the national interest of India. However, America’s designs over the oil-riches of Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan would not be in India’s national interests.

 

(3) Indian Troops for Iraq Peacekeeping

Three. India should send Indian troops to manage and control American oil colony in Iraq, so that White House might jettison its pro-Wahhabi policy in favor of direct military rule over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE in the new age of Christian Crusades against terrorist Islam. The Rambo United States waged war on Iraq and conquered Iraq without loss of many lives. However, Pentagon started to panic when the death tolls started to rise in the peacekeeping operations in Iraq. First, the Pentagon had a rude awakening that it was much easier to conquer Iraq and much more difficult to maintain the colonial occupation of Iraq. The $4 billion /month colonial occupation bill of the Pentagon might make the entire success of the Iraqi colonial occupation a financial drain on the US Exchequer, which might greatly undermine the future military operations of the Pentagon. The Pentagon’s stellar success in Iraqi War might prove to be the last straw that broke the back the Yankee Camel. India should convince that offering India a big pie of the oil loot would lower Pentagon’s cost of administering American oil colony in Iraq.

 

Second, to make profits in the Iraqi oil colony, Pentagon must outsource its colonial occupation and administration to India, so that Iraqi oil colony might make some net profits for the colonial Occupying Powers and the Indian subcontractors. Colonialism is a business and like every business it is the bottom line that determined whether the colonial occupation is a success or failure. The defeat of American colonial occupation in Iraq would not be in the national interests of India. The Wahhabi control over Iraq would not be in the national interest of India. If Indian troops could make the American colonial occupation profitable for the Occupying Powers and its subcontractors then United States would be forced to shift its pro-Wahhabi foreign policy, to direct colonial occupation of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE. Whenever Untied Stated decided to take direct control over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE then it would have no option but to depend on India for the successful implementation of Pentagon’s colonial agenda in the Middle East. Israel lacked the military muscle to substantially contribute towards American colonial agenda in the Middle East. Pentagon would never trust Pakistani soldiers for the conquest of Saudi Arabia. United States would be forced to depend on India for the conquest of Saudi Arabia, UAE and Kuwait. Pentagon’s inability to administer, control and occupy Iraqi oil colony within US budgetary restraints, might force the White House to invite India as Co-Occupying Power in Iraq and other oil colonies that Pentagon might establish time to time, in the new age of colonial empires.

 

Third, India should send Peacekeeping troops to Iraq, even 200,000 soldiers and 200,000 administrators to convince Pentagon that United States should no longer cultivate Saudi Wahhabi House of Al Saud to control the oil and gas resources of the Arabian Gulf, as Saudi Arabia, UAE and Kuwait can be governed profitably as American oil colonies by joint forces of Pentagon and Indian Army. In the new age of Christian Crusades in 2003, United States no longer needed to befriend Wahhabi fundamentalism in Saudi Arabia, when Pentagon and Indian Army can effectively establish long-term colonial administration in Wahhabi Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE to operate and manage Arabian oil fields for USA and India. The Dow Jones would jump to 20,000-benchmark if pentagon were to allow US-Indian Big Oil take over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE. By taking over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE American Big Oil should pay no more than $2 per barrel of oil to the local regimes. India can persuade United States to abandon pro-Wahhabi policy of the White House in favor of the direct colonial rule over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE by USA-India Big Oil and managed and controlled by Pentagon-Indian Army led government of the American oil colonies. American Empire convinced by the success of Indian troops to sanitize Iraqi oil colony, would decide that it no longer needed the continued support of Wahhabi rulers to control the Saudi and Kuwaiti oil, it would bring down the Wahhabi monarchy of Saudi Arabia and impose direct American rule over Wahhabi Kingdom and Sheikhdoms.

 

14(6) Priest-Rulers & Intolerance

The Menace of the Priest-rulers and the priest-kings represented by the Pope as Potentate in the Catholic world and Muslim clergy as the rulers in the Islamic world, became a menace to the Civilizations, with the globalization of the Wahhabi Islamic fundamentalism backed by Saudi oil incomes and the ultra-conservatism of Bolshevik Poland-born Pope John Paul II’s 28-year plus long Pontificate. Vatican and Mecca led Clash of Civilization in the last quarter of the 20th Century to impose Catholicism and Wahhabi fundamentalism on the Christianity and Islam respectively.

 

(1) Priest-Rulers of Vatican-Mecca Axis

One. The foremost cause of the clash is result of the American and Papal support to the idea of the priest-ruler, the priest-king and temporal and secular powers of the religious clergy in the political realm in a society. First, the Papacy represented the embodiment of the concept of priest-ruler that had been at war against the prevailing concept that Ruler is also the head of the Church. The concept of the priest-ruler had been at war against the American concept of strict separation of the State and the Church.

 

Second, the Vatican-Mecca axis of theocracy is an attempt of the Papacy to develop theopolitical alliance between Church of Rome and Mosque of Mecca, so that iconoclast monotheists of Christianity and Islam could jointly invade and force conversions of pagan idolaters of Africa, forcing them to choose either Islam or Christianity. The pagans of Africa represents more than 50% of the population of South of Sahara black Africa. Papacy joined forces with Wahhabi clergy of Mecca to impose Shariah Law over Islamic world as a means to empower the Muslim clergy ulema with political and judicial power.

 

Third, neither papacy nor the Wahhabi clergy of Mecca enjoyed any political and economic power in 17th, 18th, 19th and early 20th Century. King of Italy