Chapter 14

20^th Century Clash of Civilizations

“Global Clash of Races-Diplomacy of Civilizations” © (2006) Kalki Gaur

14(1) Purport- 14(2) Talk Points

14(3) Clash of Civilizations’ Beast

(1) Protocols of Meetings of Elders of Zion

The Protocols gives a brief outline of the conspiracy Papacy and Jews hatched to bring down and loot the property of the ancient civilizations of Egypt, Greece, Rome, Persia, Byzantine, Russia and Ottomans. The proverbial snake described in the Protocols is the main conspirator that caused the clash of civilization in the 21st Century. The clash of civilization is conspired by very different personages with hidden agenda, than what is imagined by those who are not behind the scene and part of the big conspiracy. The clash of civilization is caused by the joint conspiracy of the Papal Vatican and Wahhabi Mecca to establish the totalitarian theocratic dictatorship of the priests in the Christian and Islamic worlds respectively. The barbarian 1,000 year long European Dark Age was the direct result of Pope’s conspiracy to bring about the end of the Roman Empire the last of the world monarchies, by betraying Roman Empire and conspiring with German invaders, to help create German Christian empire in German lands and North Italy, in exchange for Pope-ruled Papal States in Central Italy, neighboring Rome. Semite Wahhabi clergy have joined forces with Papacy and Israeli Zionists to attempt takeover of Saudi Arabia to establish the direct totalitarian rule of Wahhabi clergy after overthrowing the Al Saud Monarchy of King Fahd. Catholic clergy of Rome betrayed Rome and conspired with German barbarian invaders to loot and destroy the Roman Empire, in exchange of Pope’s ruled Kingdom of God in the Papal States and Rome. Similarly, Wahhabi clergy of Mecca betrayed their rulers Ottoman Empire and conspired with American and British Empire to break up the Ottoman Empire and establish American control over Arabian oil resources in exchange for allowing Wahhabi clergy’s rule over Mecca & Medina and House of Al Saud’s rule over Saudi Arabia and Wahhabi rule over Iraq. Wahhabi clergy led by Osama bin Laden and alike conspiring to overthrow the House of Al Saud and King Fahd to establish the direct rule of the Wahhabi priests in Saudi Arabia, which would allow the Jews, Catholics and Wahhabi clergy, loot hundreds of billions of dollars of the property of Saudi royal family and pro-royalty big business houses. Saudi monarchy will fall the Pahalavi monarchy of Iran and replaced by the Ayatollah type theocratic dictatorship of the Wahhabi priests. Wahhabi King Abdul Aziz was put into power by Americans to secure American control over Saudi oil. Mecca’s Wahhabi clergy would overthrow the House of Al Saud monarchy to control oil riches of Saudi Arabia. Papacy sold the idea of Islamic Papacy and Islamic Kingdom of god to the Wahhabi terrorist clergy of Mecca, arguing that the end of the Al Saud monarchy the last Islamic monarchy would mark the inception of the Wahhabi clergy ruled Islamic kingdom of God in Arabia. Jews looted the property of Russia after the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat in Soviet Union and Communist China. The Jews and Semite Wahhabi clergy would profit by looting the royal family property after the establishment of the rule of totalitarian political dictatorship of Wahhabi priests in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE and Oman.

 

The success of the American oil colony in Iraq, gave new policy options for Pentagon in Saudi Arabia. Protestant United States might find it less expensive to establish direct American colonial rule over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE, as United States needed the continued support of neither Wahhabi clergy nor Al Saud monarchy to control the oil and gas resources of Arabia. Since the purpose of the Semite doctrine of the dictatorship of the priests in Saudi Arabia is to loot the property of the Saudi royal family, it would be no wonder that Protestant American might up the ante and decide to establish the direct American colonial rule over Saudi Arabia and other GCC countries, whenever CIA could report that the Wahhabi clergy takeover of Saudi Arabia became imminent.

 

Clash of Civilization caused by the conspiracy of Islamic and Catholic priests to establish the dictatorship of the priests in the oil-producing Islamic world to allow the Jews, Christians and Wahhabi clergy loot the royal properties in Arabian Peninsula. The Semite doctrine of the totalitarian theocratic dictatorship of the priests is the new philosophical idea conceived by Jews to create new opportunities to loot property of the victim civilizations. Semite doctrine would generate more loot for the Semite looters than the loot generated by the Semite doctrine of dictatorship of the Proletariats. Wahhabi fundamentalism and Semite Wahhabi Mecca’s dream to establish dictatorship of Ulema in the Arab governments is the Semite plot to loot the property of oil-rich Arabian Peninsula’s royal families and Sheikhdoms, conspired by the Hidden Hand of the world rulers described in the Protocols of the Meetings of the Elders of Zion.

 

(2) World of Puppet Rulers

One. The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scene. Let us attempt to understand the strategies and the mindset of the behind-the-screen rulers, governors and manipulators of the world. The writers though not part of the corridors of power, use reasoning to understand the mechanics underlying the big picture. Being an outsider has better view of the big pictures, because even the top diplomats and foreign ministers of the world, lack the intellectual acumen to understand the dynamics of the big picture. Almost 99 percent of the diplomats of the world lack the intellectual capacity to understand the big reality and these diplomats concern primarily with the worldly rewards that being in the corridors of power provides them. Most of the diplomats and presidents and prime ministers in the world are merely puppets playing their designated role to safeguard their fragile place in the corridors of power.

 

(3) USA in Framework of Papal Eschatology

Two. The conservative Protestants of WASP United States take very seriously the threat of Pope John Paul to bring Protestant American Christian Empire into the framework of Catholic apocalyptic teleological eschatology. Protestants especially of Bob Jones University believe that Poland-born Pope John Paul II scheming to bring about the end of the sole Christian super power, the last of the world monarchies, as its end according to Catholic end of time doctrine and Fatima Prophecy would mark the inception of the Pope-ruled Kingdom of God in North America. When Catholic Church became the State church of Roman Empire it included in its liturgy prayers for the Roman Empire and the Roman Emperor, it also brought the Roman Empire into the framework of Catholic Christian apocalyptic eschatology, as the last of the world monarchies whose end would mark the inception of the Pope-ruled Catholic Christian Kingdom of God on earth. Church of Rome started conspiracies to bring about the end the Roman Empire right after it became the state Church in the Roman Empire. Pope John Paul II developed closer ties with President Ronald Reagan and secured institutional ties between the CIA and the Roman Catholic Church to bring about the end of the Soviet Union and the Communism in Poland and Eastern Europe. Pope John Paul II got the consent of President Ronald Reagan and President Bill Clinton to promote Church’s view of American Empire as the vehicle of God’s will, for the Christianization of the world. The election of the Catholic priest as the official priest of Senate and Congress inadvertently made in the view of Catholic eschatology the official church of Protestant United States, which also brought United States into the framework of Catholic apocalyptic eschatology, as the last of the world monarchies whose end would mark the inception of the Pope-led Kingdom of God. Papal apocalyptic eschatology became menace to the secular United States with the constitutional wall that separates the State and the Church. By undermining the wall that separates the State and the Church the Christian United States could be brought into the framework of Catholic eschatology, whose end would be expedited by Pope to realize the goals of Catholic apocalyptic end of time eschatology. Pope John Paul II is a firm believer in Fatima Prophecy and might engineer to bring about the end of the United States just as Papacy brought about the end of Roman Empire in 5th Century. The primary goal of the believers of the Catholic apocalyptic eschatology end of time doctrine in the New Millennium is to bring about the Kingdom of God, which would be a secular government of the world ruled by Pope, Bishops and Priests. The Catholic-Protestant Clash of Civilization would affect the US President Election 2004, when the Protestant religious right conservatives and Republican Neo-conservatives would join forces to foil the attempts to bring United States within the framework of Papal eschatology. Election of a Papal-agent as the new occupant of the Oval Office might bring into play the Apocalyptic Catholic conspiracy to bring about the end of the last of the world monarchies whose end would mark the inception of the Pope-ruled Christian Kingdom of God in New World, just as it brought about the end of the Roman Empire in the Old World. Pope wants to establish the Kingdom of God by establishing the Dictatorship of the Priests in the Christian and Islamic worlds.

 

(4) Dictatorship of the Priests

Three. The clash of civilization is the by-product of the conspiracy of the Vatican-Mecca Axis to engineer the dictatorship of the priests in the Christian and Islamic world. During last 1,400 years the Papacy has consistently tried to destabilize secular empires to weaken them from within to prepare them for the Pope-ruled secular European government. The Catholic Church and Papacy destroyed the great civilizations of ancient Egypt, ancient Rome, ancient Incas, ancient Aztecs, and ancient Mayas. During last 1,400 years the Semite Muslim Arabs destroyed the great civilizations of Egypt, Syria and Persia. The Ottomans destroyed the Byzantine Orthodox civilization. During 20th Century Vatican and Jews promoted the concept of dictatorship of Proletariats to destroy the civilizations of Orthodox Russia, Orthodox Ethiopia, Buddhist China, Buddhist Vietnam and Buddhist Cambodia. Pope John Paul II and Wahhabi King Fahd of Saudi Arabia developed Vatican-Mecca Axis to engineer the revolution in the Islamic world to establish the totalitarian dictatorship of the Wahhabi priests in the Islamic world. Islamic terrorism is a Vatican-Mecca plot to create Semite Islamic Papacy, to create new Islamic Caliphate, where Muslim Ulema would rule the Caliphate instead of Sultan. Dictatorship of the Shiite Ayatollahs is the first dictatorship of the Muslim priests in the world. Those who seek to establish the political dictatorship of the priests must not be allowed to misuse the religious freedom of the civilizations to subvert the civilizations by aiming to establish the dictatorship of the priests. The Islamic doctrine of the dictatorship of the priests is a predatory intolerant revolutionary doctrine as never before Clergy ruled the Islamic Ummah, as Sultan had always controlled and ruled over Ulema and Islamic clergy with iron fist. The menace of the terrorist Islamic dictatorship of the Ulema required decisive overwhelming military and political response of the Civilizations, so that the Arabian breeding ground of this menacing Wahhabi doctrine are brought under the permanent military control of the civilizations. The Clash of civilization is real and presents great danger to the secular civilized civilizations of the world.

 

 

(5) 3-Heads of Beast of the Clash

Five. In the 20th Century the religion influenced the beast of the Clash of Civilizations. Throughout the 20th Century the White House, the CIA and the American Big Oil controlled, nurtured the three heads of the Beast of Clash of Civilizations to control Islamic oil resources and to mobilize Islamic terrorists launch attacks on Hinduism, Buddhism, Paganism and Orthodoxy. Before the terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001 the imperialist Yankee Eagle could keep under tight leash the three-headed Beast of the Islamic Clash of Civilization. The menacing Priest-king, Religious intolerance and Heroin-Cocaine are the three ugly heads of the Beast in the 20th Century. In 21st Century the 4th head of the Beast grew bigger and bigger and the Oil-Beast would eat the heads of the Priest-king Beast and Religious-Intolerance Beast. The 21st Century Clash would be led by the Oil-Beast and Drugs-Beast and the Beast of Priest-King and Beast of Religious Intolerance would become weaker in 21st Century. In the 20th Century, when the Priest-King and Religious intolerance determined international diplomacy, and had functioned as the Lap Dog of the White House. Oil Beast is the Bull Dog not the Lap Dog of the White House in the 21st Century.

 

First. The Occidental Beast of Clash of Civilization has three heads. The first head of the Beast is the head representing the illicit rule of the priest-King or priest-ruler that seeks to criminalize the state-less religious organizations to take over the secular temporal powers. The Papacy is the classical example of the conspiracy hatched by the religious priests to undermine the legitimate powers of the State. The Papacy and the Lawrence of Arabia, British and American Empires conspired with the religious clergy of Mecca to carve out the Wahhabi theocracies, which would empower Wahhabi Muslim clergy with political and social powers, if they agreed to hand over Arab oil resources to Christian Big Oil. Pope betrayed the Roman Empire and helped barbarian conquerors destroy the Roman Empire and Roman Civilization after the conquest of Rome by Alaric the barbarian in 415 AD. Similarly, the Wahhabi Muslim clergy of Mecca agreed to revolt against Ottoman rulers to establish theocracies in Arabian Peninsula and transferred all present and future claims on Arab oil resources to Christian oil companies. American has continued this policy of securing ties of the Muslim clergy in the Islamic world with the CIA to bring the Muslim countries under the control of Christian powers.

 

Second. The second head of the Beast is the illicit intolerance, the barbarian religious and ideological intolerance that advocates policies of ethnic and religious separatism, oppresses women forcing women into servitude to men, and embarks upon the policy of annihilation of the ethnic and religious minorities, political and religious opposition and launches violent terrorist attacks on the civilizations. The Predator Intolerance is the second head of the Beast. Pope John Paul II is the incarnation of the ultra-conservatism and Catholic intolerance. The Vatican-Mecca Axis of Intolerance joined the resources of Papal Conservatism and militant Wahhabi fundamentalism to legitimize the intolerance of the predator religious cults and proselytizing efforts of the monotheist iconoclast Christianity and Islam. The White House and the CIA joined forces the Mujahideen forces of intolerance in Afghanistan to inflict defeat on the Soviet troops in Afghanistan.

 

Third. The third head of the Beast is the illicit drug trade that generates more than $700 billion annually to the organized drug cartels, dominated by white Catholic Colombian Cocaine Cartel and Sunni Muslim Heroin cartel. The militant Wahhabi priest-rulers and the predator intolerant religious fundamentalist terrorists have enriched themselves with the incomes of the Heroin and Opium trade. Muslim organized crime, Muslim religious terrorists and Muslim theocracies created political and religious and economic nexus of Church-Terrorism-Heroin to finance the political aspirations of the priest-rulers and the economic aspirations of the intolerant religious terrorists and social aspirations of the heroin Drug Mafia. Muslim drug Mafia finances the militant Islamic terrorism as well as political takeover of Muslim societies by the Muslim clergy. It is no accident that President Clinton’s “Plan Colombia” and President Bush’s war on Terrorism in Afghanistan, resulted in the unprecedented boom in Coca and Cocaine production in Colombia and unprecedented Opium and Heroin production in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

 

Fourth. Though the Beast of the Clash of Civilizations has three separate heads, it has one stomach. The results of the activities of the priest-rulers, predator intolerance and conservative organized crime work in unison to become instrument of the American policy, so mush so that one can argue that throughout 20th Century the White House and the CIA controlled and guided the activities of the ferocious three heads of the Beast of the Clash of Civilizations to promote the national interests of the United States. The Clash of Civilization is the plot conceived by the Vatican and the White House to establish America’s control over the oil and gas resources of the Islamic oil-producing nations as well as to combine the resources of iconoclast predator proselytizing intolerant monotheist Christianity and Islam, to undermine pagan civilizations of Africa, Hindu Civilization of India and Nepal, and Buddhist civilizations of Asia. Throughout 20th Century, the Christian American oil interests managed and articulated Papal predatory intolerance to undermine Buddhist nations of China, Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Vietnam, Burma, Laos, Cambodia, and Sri Lanka. Throughout 20th Century the Christian American oil interests successfully managed the Wahhabi priest-rulers, Wahhabi intolerant terrorists and Wahhabi heroin drug traffickers to promote the national interests of the United States by engineering the secession of Muslim nations from multi-ethnic Ottoman Empire and Indian Empire.

 

Fifth. The single headed oil-fiery Beast of the Clash of Civilization in 21st Century wages wars for promoting the oil-interests. The Oil-head Beast of 21st Century would promote the American oil interests and even maul and damage the 3-headed Religion’s Beast of the 20th Century and could destroy those protected by the priest-rulers and predator intolerance. The Oil Factor diametrically changed the Clash of Civilization in the 21st Century, thanks to President Bush’s invasion of oil-rich Iraq to establish American’s first colonial empire in the 21st Century.

 

Sixth. The unprecedented Wahhabi Muslim terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, on the Protestant Financial capital of the world the World Trade Center, and on the Protestant military capital of the world the Pentagon, brought to an abrupt halt the growing nexus of the United States with the Wahhabi priest-rulers, Wahhabi predator intolerance and Wahhabi drug cartels. In the 21st Century the Oil God influenced the Beast of the Clash. The omnipotent Oil Beast of the Clash of Civilization has only one head, the Oil Head, and oil interests replaced the religious interests as guiding influence over clash of civilizations in the 21st Century. The 20th Century Clash of Civilization influenced by the Decolonization process and breakup of the colonial empires promoted the interest of the white race by promoting the interests of Christianity. The 21st Century Clash of Civilization is influenced by the return of the age of Colonial empires after the American conquest of Iraq guided only by the oil interests and the Beast has only one head.

 

Seventh. In the 20th Century American Big Oil joined forces with Wahhabi clergy to gain the control of the Arab oil by demanding the breakup of the Ottoman Empire, British Empire and French Empire, so that as the leader of the Free world United States took over the oil and gas resources of the oil-producers, which were formerly part of these empires. In the 21st Century, after the conquest of Iraq, United States worked to reestablish the colonial empires as units of the international system, so that backed by the military power of the Pentagon, the American Big Oil could continue to exploit Arab and Muslim oil-resources without having to cultivate and toe the line of the Wahhabi priest-rulers, Wahhabi intolerant terrorists and Wahhabi Drug Mafia. So long as Pentagon could establish direct American colony over oil-producing Iraqi colony, the Protestant White House might cooperate with Hindu India to bring Wahhabi oil-producers under the direct rule of the Pentagon, so that Wahhabi priest-rulers and Wahhabi intolerant terrorists would lose their strategic and diplomatic value for the American Big Oil in the 21st Century. The Oil Beast would destroy the 2-headed Beast of the 20th Century. The military alliances of the 21st Century Clash of Civilizations would be diametrically opposed to the alliances of the 20th Century Clash of Civilizations. Hindu India and Protestant American would fight the 21st Century Clash of Civilizations on the same side of the battle lines to protect their common oil interests, to secure the supplies of the oil and gas energy resources to the oil-importing Industrialized and industrializing world. In 20th Century Delhi and Washington were adversaries in the religion-focused Clash of Civilization, but in the 21st Century India and the United States are allies in the Oil-centered Clash of Civilizations. The rise of the Oil God in the 21st Century has put the 20th Century’s Clash of Civilizations on its head, and new coalition are built on the basis of coinciding interests of oil importers. Hindu India and Christian United States were adversaries in the 20th Century Religion-Beast led Clash of Civilizations. Hindu India and Protestant United States are allies and Coalition partners in the Oil-Beast led Clash of Civilizations and New Age of colonial Empires in the 21st Century. Throughout the Cold War, the United States undermined Hindu India the successor to the Indian Empire and India-led Non Aligned Nations. Delhi-Washington ties are based on the coinciding oil interests of India and the United States. Pentagon would harness the military assets of Indian Army to take charge of the US-led Oil-Beast of the Clash of civilization of the 21st Century to bring to knees its earlier allies and friends of the 3-headed Beast of the 20th Century Clash of Civilizations. The military, political and economic alliance of Hindu India and Protestant United States would undermine old alliance of the United States with the priest-rulers of Catholic Papacy and Wahhabi Mecca. The White House formulated policies towards China, India, Vietnam, Korea and Laos based on the religious proselytizing interests of the Christian missionaries in the 20th Century, and in the 21st Century these ties would be recast in the light of the oil interests. The oil interests predominate over religious interests, while influencing the Clash of Civilizations in the 21st Century.

 

Eighth, the 21st Century is the Beast with Oil-head and it will maul two heads of the three-headed 20th Century Beast and damage the Priest-ruler head and Intolerance-head of the 3-head Beast. The 21st Century shall have two heads, the Oil head and Drug head. The Clash of Civilization in the 21st Century shall have two heads: the Oil head and Organized Crime head. American Big Oil will control the Oil head of the Beast and white Catholic Cocaine Cartel and Arab Sunni Heroin cartel will control the Drugs head of the Beast. The role of Papacy and Wahhabi Mecca will decline in the 21st Century. American Big Oil will oppose and undermine the Wahhabi intolerance and Papal ultra-conservatism. Hindu India and Protestant United States would join forces to establish American Oil Colonies in the Middle East and United States would no longer require the continued support of either the Wahhabi House of Al Saud or Wahhabi clergy of Mecca to control and dominate the Arab oil and gas resources, if Indian troops could help Pentagon control and administer Iraqi oil colony profitably. Under the influence of Hindu India, the Protestant United States would undermine the white Catholic domination of the Cocaine trade and Sunni domination of the Heroin/ Opium trade.

 

(6) Rise of Oil God in 2003

Six. The geopolitical interests of Oil god would determine the Clash of Civilizations in the 21st Century, just as the missionary interests of Christianity influenced the Clash of Civilizations and clash of races in the 20th Century. Oil is the King in the 21st Century, especially in the oil-producing world and determined the foreign policies of the oil-importing nations. The Clash of Civilizations is not the figment of the imagination. Post-Columbus Colonial expansion of the Christian Europe was the classic case of Clash of Civilizations and it resulted in the conquest of ancient civilizations of Incas, Mayas, Aztecs, India and China. Spain had been under Muslim Moorish rule for 800 years and became free only few decades earlier, when after 1500 it began its imperial conquests in the Americas. United States imposed the colonial policy depopulation of Native Americans the original inhabitants throughout 19th Century. United States colonial policy in 20th Century in the Philippines, Japan, China, South Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and Burma influenced by Christian missionaries and Christianity. President Kennedy invaded Vietnam and President Nixon imposed the rule of Christian Pol Pot over Cambodia to impose Christianity over Buddhist Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and Burma.

 

While Christianity determined the colonial imperial policies of United States in the 20th Century, the oil interests influenced the colonial policies of United States in the 21st Century. The interests of oil god influenced the policies of President George W. Bush. The oil god replaced the Christian god as the principal presiding influence on the foreign policy of Bush Administration. The Oil the black gold became the architect of the Clash of Civilizations in the Bush Administration. The pagan god of Oil came into diplomatic predominance during Bush administration and all of sudden the oil lobby became the strongest influence on American policy making, to the chagrin of the Jewish lobby, Pope’s lobby, Armament lobby. The Protestant Christian Religious Right conservatives and Republican Neo-Conservatives the policy makers of the Bush Oil Administration redefined the national interests of the United States in terms of oil. The diplomats of 21st Century in the new age of Colonial Empires that took birth in 2003, would redefine their national interests in terms of oil and gas interests. The Clash of Civilization and Clash of Races in the post-Iraq War new age of Colonial Empires fueled by the clash of oil rather than clash of religion. The oil interests take precedence over the missionary interests of Catholic and Evangelical Christianity in the formulation of the national foreign policies in Washington, Paris, Bonn, London, Moscow, Beijing, Delhi and Tokyo. United States during the Cold War camouflaged its oil interests in garb of pro-Wahhabi and pro-Saudi Arabian policies of the United States. After the successful colonial occupation of Iraq, Christian United States no longer needed the charade of pro-Wahhabi charade to dominate the Wahhabi oil producing nations.

 

The success of Indian peacekeeper in Iraqi oil colony could convince White House that the national interests of the United States and the economic interests of American Big Oil better served if Protestant America and Hindu India jointly established American oil colonies in Wahhabi Arabian Gulf. America depopulated the lands of United States of the original inhabitants and it is not impossible that the Clash of Oil in the 21st Century might result in the permanent American occupation of the thinly populated oil-rich lands of Muslim OPEC nations in the Middle East. The post-2003 Clash of Civilizations represents the turning point in history when oil replaced religions as the sole determinant of the future clash of races, clash of Civilizations and clash of nations. A new history began after the President Bush’s conquest of Iraq in 2003. The Oil is the guiding principle of the global clash of races and Clash of Civilizations in the post-Iraq War International system. Hindu India and Protestant United States are allies in the oil-determined world order. Hindu India and Protestant United States would fight the Clash of Civilization on the same side of the battle lines to protect their common oil interests throughout the 21st Century.

 

(7) Beast of Intolerant Priest-King’s Drug Cartel

Seven. The Intolerant, drug-peddling priest emerged as the greatest threat to Civilizations in the 21st Century. The evil priest-king and evil predator intolerance are the two heads of the beast that feeds on the incomes of the global drug trade. The priest-rulers control the incomes of the global drug trade in heroin and cocaine by legitimizing the intolerant religious terrorists who supplement their incomes by organized crime. The Evil Beast of Clash of Civilization has three head.

 

First, the three heads of the Beast of the Clash of the Civilization are: Priest-King, Predator Intolerance, and Drug Cartels. The first head is that of priest-king representing the menace of the religious clergy that conspire to undermine the political power of the secular King-President to install into power the Priest as the ruler. The second head is that of the Predator intolerance of religious fundamentalism that threatened multi-ethnic Civilization states. The third head is that of the organized crime Drug cartels that generates huge tax-free incomes to keep the evil leaders into power.

 

Second, the religious intolerance and predator fundamentalism of priest-kings of Vatican and Mecca made Catholic conservatism and Wahhabi fundamentalism the great menace to the civilized Civilizations. Third, the white Catholic Cocaine Colombian cartel and Wahhabi Heroin Muslim cartel launder $700 billion annual drug incomes through Catholic and Sunni financial institutions.

 

Fourth, the Catholic priest-king of the Vatican, joined forces with Sunni Wahhabi priest king of Mecca to wage Christian-Islamic wars on Hindu, Buddhist and pagan civilizations to proselytize Christianity and Islam. American oil colonialism supported the priest-king aspirations of Muslim clergy of Wahhabi Mecca to engineer the secession of oil-rich Muslim Arab states from the Muslim Ottoman Caliphate in 1920s and for the secession of Muslim Pakistan from Indian Empire in 1947.

 

Fifth, the CIA used the incomes of the Heroin drug incomes of Taiwanese Kuomintang Army in Karen Province of Burma to finance anti-Communist wars in the Golden Crescent of Burma from 1945 to 1990, and would again make Myanmar the world producer of heroin if Christian Suu Kyi ever became the President of Myanmar. To secure the control of oil of Colombia President Bill Clinton launched Plan Colombia in Colombia. President Bush invaded Afghanistan to secure control over Turkmenistan oil and camouflaged it by America’s war on Islamic terrorism.

 

Sixth, the Vatican and Germany helped Vladimir Lenin acquire power in Russia to destroy Russian orthodoxy. United States helped Mao tse Tung acquire power in China hoping communist rule would harm Buddhism China. United States supported priest-ruler aspirations of Mecca Caliphate, to secure American control over Saudi oil. Seventh, the United States supported the Wahhabi religious intolerance to empower Muslim clergy in the moderate liberal Islamic nations, hoping Wahhabi clergy would promote American oil interests. United States supported the Catholic Cocaine cartel to gain control over Colombian oil. United States supported the Muslim drug cartels in Albania, Afghanistan, and Pakistan to secure Muslim support for the disintegration of Yugoslavia, and conquest of Afghanistan and Iraq.

 

(8) Rise of Theocracies as Menace

First, Islamic clergy and ulema enjoyed no special power and privilege in Islamic empires, Ottoman Empire, Mughal Empire of India and Persian Empire. In Islamic jurisprudence the Caliph the ruler controlled the clergy and the Islamic State controlled the Islamic Church. First, since the leaders of the three Islamic nations, Ottomans, Iran and Indian empire were not Arab Muslims, the Lawrence of Arabia and British Empire sold the idea of Wahhabi theocracies to the Ottoman Sharief of Mecca, arguing that based on the legitimacy of Mecca the Wahhabi theocracies could form the Wahhabi Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Islamic Clash of Civilization, is a Vatican Zionist American plot to install Islamic Wahhabi theocracies and rule of the Muslim clergy and Shariah Law over otherwise secular, modern Islamic nations.

 

(9) Secularism Vs Hinduism & Buddhism

Second, United States and Britain deployed the instrument of secularism to undermine Islam in Ottoman Turkey, employed secularism to undermine Hinduism in Indian Empire, and employed secularism to undermine Buddhism in China, Vietnam, and employed Christians-led military dictatorships in south Korea, Taiwan, Burma to under mine Buddhism. Germany’s William Kaiser used secularism and Communism to undermine Orthodoxy in Russia. Germany implanted atheist socialist Marxist Vladimir Lenin in Russia to destroy Orthodoxy in Russia. United States implanted atheist socialist Marxist Mao tse Tung in China to undermine Buddhism in China. Britain implanted atheist socialist Jawaharlal Nehru in India to undermine Hinduism in India. Hindu Civilization and Buddhist Civilizations are part of Oriental civilization and might merge into one another to form a composite Oriental Civilization in the 21st Century. The British Empire promoted the concept of Arab nationalism to engineer the secession of Arab nations from Ottoman Empire. The British Empire promoted the concept of Wahhabi Priest-Ruler to engineer the Clergy-led revolt against Ottoman Empire. The British Empire promoted the concept of secularism to undermine the Ottoman Islamic Empire. British Empire imposed the military rule in secular Turkey and encouraged the genocide of 400,000 Armenians in Turkey to promote ethnic separatism to replace Ottoman supranational by turkey nationalism. British Empire directly encouraged the massacre of Hindus and Muslims in the Communal riots in 1947 to destroy the legacy of the Mughal Empire, the joint Muslim-Hindu Empire in Indian Empire. America supported the secular atheist Mao’s Communist forces in China, hoping that Judeo-Marxist Communists would destroy Buddhism faster than the Christian Chiang Kai sheik. William Kaiser in First World War supported Vladimir Lenin and helped him acquire power in Russia, hoping that atheist Communists would destroy Orthodox Russian Tsar, who was related to the British Royal family. America, Britain and Papacy deployed the instrument of secularism or Marxism to implant leaders in Russia, Ottoman Turkey, India and China to undermine the Orthodoxy in Russia, Islam in Turkey, Hinduism in India, Buddhism in China, Burma, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Laos and Cambodia.

 

(10) Mullah-Ruler Concept Undermined Ottomans

Third. The rise of Asia, especially rise of India and China resulted in the decline of Europe in the 21st Century. The decline of Europe resulted in the Unification of Europe as European Union. The Christian nations sought to united the Islamic and Christian Civilizations under the banner of monotheistic Occidental Civilization. India’s legacy of Mughal Empire allowed India leadership role in the oil-rich Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. Greater India could expand westward to include Islamic nations of Central Asia and Arabian Gulf or India could expand eastward to include Buddhist nations of East Asia and Southeast Asia. While secular Ottoman Islamic Caliphate had been the historic enemy of Christian Europe, the Christian West sought alliance with Muslim clergy in the Arab world, which had been marginalized in the Islamic Caliphate to join forces with the European Christian, who agreed to establish Wahhabi theocracies out of the corpse of dying Ottoman Caliphate. European Christians gave a final deathblow to the Ottoman Caliphate by imposing the rule of secular military dictatorship in Turkey, who ruthlessly abandoned the multi-ethnic Ottoman legacy by engaging in the massacre of 400,000 Armenians. Christians ended the Islamic menace to Europe by imposing the secular regime in Turkey and engineering the secession and installation of Wahhabi theocracies in the former territories of the Ottoman Empire by promoting the concept of ethnic separatism and clergy ruled theocracies. The national interests of Turkey, India, Russia, China and Iran coincide on the issue of the Wahhabi Mullah-Ruler Theocracy. The Christian colonial powers propagated the concept of Muslim Priest-King the Wahhabi theocracies to win over the allegiance of the Muslim clergy in the multi-ethnic secular liberal Ottoman Empire, Soviet Union, Indian Empire and French Empire, to encourage Muslim clergy mobilize militant Muslims against their respective governments to promote the interests of American oil colonialism. America promoted concept of Wahhabi Islamic theocracy to turn Muslim clergy into traitors in multi-ethnic States of Ottoman Empire, Soviet Union and Indian Empire.

 

(11) Ottomans & India Controlled Islamic World

Fourth, the American and British imperialism created the artificial states of Saudi Arabia, Israel, Pakistan to weaken consolidation of the Islamic world under the leadership of Turki Ottomans and Indian Mughals. The Ottomans based in Asia Minor and Mughals based in Indian Subcontinent were two major contenders for the leadership of the Islamic world. Britain created the Islamic Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Kingdom of Iraq based on the Wahhabi religion, created the Jewish state of Israel based on the religion of Judaism, and created the Islamic state of Pakistan based on the religion of Islam. Israel, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are three artificial states that never existed and were artificially created to serve the national interests of American Big Oil. Formal recognition of Jewish state of Israel by Semite Saudi Arabia and Islamic Pakistan would establish the Israel’s leadership over Semite Islamic oil resources of Arabian Gulf.

 

(12) CIA consented for Rule of Muslim Clergy

Fifth, in 1900 the three multi-ethnic empires represented the majority of the Islamic world. The Ottoman Empire, Russian Empire and Indian Empire. The Christian colonial powers, British colonialism and Papacy unleashed the Islamic Clash of Civilization against Ottoman Empire, Russian Empire, Indian Empire and French North African Empire by directly supporting the Muslim clergy. Britain, France and America secured alliance with Wahhabi Muslim clergy to engineer the secession of Arab states in name of creating Wahhabi theocracies governments in the Arabian Peninsula headed by Priest-Kings the Wahhabi clergy. America supported Muslim clergy and Fundamentalist Muslims in Afghanistan to engineer the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Afghanistan and the secession of oil-rich Muslim Central Asian Republics from Soviet Union. America supports the militant Islam in Chechnya to severe the oil-pipeline route that connects the Azerbaijan oil fields to the oil and gas pipelines networks in Russia. Britain supported Islamic fundamentalists and hired Mohammed Ali Jinnah to demand the secession of Muslim provinces from Indian Empire, so that India may not have direct land borders with oil-rich Iran. America supports the Islamic militants in Algeria to severe France’s ties with Algeria so that the Wahhabi Islamic regime of Algeria might bring Algeria under the colonial control of American big oil. America supported Islamic terrorists, Wahhabi fundamentalism and turned the blind eye to the Islamic acts of terrorism. Ottoman Empire, Soviet Empire, Indian Empire and French Empire in 1947 were four principal Empires that controlled the Muslim World. American and British oil colonialism joined forces with the Wahhabi Islamic clergy and sold them the idea of the Islamic Priest-Kings to win their allegiance, and induced them to rebel against their multi-ethnic rulers. American has continued this policy against multi-ethnic India. Osama Bin Laden is the icon of American foreign policy and the most successful instrument of the CIA and the White House. The White House, the CIA, and American Big Oil have nurtured, cultivated and armed the likes of Osama bin Laden to secure alliance of the Muslim Clergy by offering them the dream of the Wahhabi Clergy rulers in the otherwise modern, liberal Islamic nations, where Muslim clergy didn’t enjoy any special political, social and economic power.

 

(13) Richelieu’s Raison D’etat (1624-1642)

Sixth, with the concept of unity under Papacy, the emerging states of Europe needed some principle to justify their foreign policy independent of Papacy. Cardinal de Richelieu, the First Minister of Catholic France found it in the concepts of Raison d’etat and the balance of power. Each depended on the other. Raison d’etat asserted that the well being of the state justified whatever means were employed to further it. The national interest supplanted the medieval papal notion of universal Catholic morality. The state need not formulate the foreign policy to promote the religious interests of Roman Catholicism and Christianity. The purpose of the Diplomats pursuing the raison d’etat is to pursue national interests of the State neither the ideological goals nor the papal religious Christian interests. The Raison d’etat principles made the diplomats free from any obligation to the Pope and Roman Catholic Church. Richelieu came into office in 1624, when the Habsburg Holy Roman Emperor Ferdinand II was attempting to revive Catholic Universality, stamp out Protestantism, and establish Holy Roman Empire’s control over the Protestant princes of Central Europe. Cardinal de Richelieu was the First Minister of Catholic Kingdom of France from 1624 to 1642, during the period of Counter Reformation Thirty years Wars (1618-1648). Richelieu’s 18-year reign as First Minister of France blunted the Pope and Habsburg Holy Roman Empire’s attempts to destroy Protestant Reformation and Lutheran Movement, during 30-year religious war in Europe, in which more than one-third population of Germans died. The Counter Reformation War was one of the most brutal and destructive wars in the history of the mankind. By 1618, the German-speaking territory of Central Europe was divided into two armed camps, namely the Protestant Camp and Catholic Camp. In the crucible of this conflict, Cardinal Richelieu grafted the principle of Raison d’etat on French foreign policy, a principal that the other European states adopted in the century that followed.

 

(14) Counter Reformation War (1974-2004)

Seventh, the ultra-conservative Bolshevik Poland-born Pope John Paul II’s Pontificate could go down inn the history as the Counter Reformation Wars at the turn of the New Millennium. The Vatican-Mecca Axis cemented by Pope John Paul II propagated the concept of the Islamic Unity under Wahhabi Mecca the priest-King papal theocracy legitimized the Wahhabi Ulema Rule under the Shariah Law. Vatican promoted the concept of Islamic theocracy and rule by Muslim clergy in the Muslim societies to formalize the Axis of Monotheist Religions and theocracies to undermine the modern secular Islamic societies and multi-ethnic secular societies to destabilize pagan African societies of Nigeria, Sudan, Hindu India and Buddhist societies in Myanmar, South Korea, China, Taiwan, Laos, Thailand and to destabilize Buddhist communities in Malaysia and Indonesia. Hindu India, and modern Islamic nations would need the 21st Century version of Richelieu’s raison d’etat to undermine the growing acceptance of Wahhabi theocracy advocated by Islamic fundamentalists of Saudi Arabia. Armed by the doctrine of Raison d’etat the modern Muslim nations would feel free to use military power to invade Mecca & Medina and remove Wahhabi clergy and ulema from all positions of power and wealth in Mecca, Medina and Saudi Arabia. The Kemalist leader of Muslim Pakistan would employ the Richelieu’s raison d’etat to use Pakistan’s military force to impose Pakistan’s domination over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE and to impose Sufi Mysticism and Deobandi sect as the official religion of Saudi Arabia, Mecca and Medina. India being a Hindu country would support Pakistan’s expansionist policy in the Middle East to buy peace in the Subcontinent.

 

(15) Philosopher Vs. Prophet

Eighth, the Semite Prophet Joshua gloated over his victory over agricultural cities, similarly Prophet Bush gloated over his victory over Iraq, and proved the morality of his convictions by the proof of victory on the battlefield. The warlike acts of President Bush are as much moral and altruistic as the acts of Prophet Bush. President Bush like Prophet Joshua subjugated the agricultural secular pro-women society of Iraq to bring them under the Semite Wahhabi patriarchy. In some respect President George W. Bush in 2003 acted like the Protestant Prophet when he took the risk and deployed the American arms to redress, what his Christian God told him was wrong and evil in the Middle East. Philosopher declared that the religions that expand and propagate by sword die by the sword. Prophets led their followers to expedite the will of their god by the use of swords. The goal of the philosopher is to explore the query to solve the riddle, to help the leaders of friendly as well as enemy nations make just decisions. The purpose of the prophet is to lead his chosen people to the grandeur path. Philosophy seeks to provide individuals the analytic tools and reasoning for improving their understanding of any issue. Prophecy seeks to declare the future to come or the future to be built, or Kingdom to be conquered, or the description of the golden age of the past or the golden age of the future to be sought. Philosopher, on the contrary, believes that mankind would find its golden age appropriate for every generation and every age. While the Prophet provides the purist solution, the philosopher provides the eclectic solutions of the multifaceted problem. The philosopher believes that only thing constant in the world is change, anything that is stagnant becomes stale and putrid. To an eclectic mind every new generation is advancement over the older generation. To a fundamentalist purist mind, the new generation must adhere to the purist code enacted centuries ago, even if these codes are outdated for the modern age. In general the Oriental mind, Hindu and Buddhist mind and reformed Protestant Christian mind more eclectic than the Occidental mind, Judeo, Islamic, Catholic and Orthodoxy mind.

 

(16) Warrior-Statesman Vs Prophet-Priest

Ninth, President Theodore Roosevelt was the warrior-statesman; President Woodrow Wilson was the prophet-priest. Statesmen and even warriors focus on the world in which they live. To Prophets the real world is the one they want to bring into being. Woodrow Wilson transformed what had started our as a reaffirmation of American neutrality into a set of prepositions laying the foundations of the Wilsonian foreign policy for the global crusade of the United States. In spite of the moral pretensions of Woodrow Wilson, Wilsonian foreign policy was simply a ruse, which camouflaged the Roosevelt’s Realpolitik in the make believe garb of the moralistic idealistic pretensions. President George W. Bush did the similar Wilsonian diplomatic coup, when he exploited the world sympathy for 9/11 Saudi Wahhabi terrorist attacks on America, to bring about the unprecedented expansion of Nato to Eastern Europe, Central Asia and South Asia, without hurting even a single Saudi Wahhabi Taliban terrorist leader. Secretary Colin Powell successfully brought about this ingenious diplomatic coup d'etat during first term of the Bush administration, without losing a beat. President Bush articulated his beliefs like the Prophet-Priest Woodrow Wilson, and used the military force like Theodore Roosevelt to create American colonial empire.

 

(17) World We Create is Product of Our Thinking

Tenth, the world we have created is the product of our thinking and it cannot be changed without changing our thinking. However, when the dominant thinking of the leading power changed, the world and the world order also changed. Without passing moral judgment of President Bush’s actions, the dominant thinking of the Bush Administration has the power to create a new world, a new world order, where Colonial Empires, not the smaller independent sovereign states would be the actors and entities of the international system. President Bush’s America has the moral authority and military power to impose a new order and once it becomes a stable world order, it would acquire a legitimacy of its own.

 

(18) America’s Role in the Clash of Civilizations

Eleventh, the dreaded Beast of the Clash of Civilization, was the Lap Dog of the White House as American colonialism nurtured, financed and legitimized all the three heads of the Beast, namely the head of priest-ruler, the head of Intolerance and the head of Drug trade. America engineered the Clash of Civilization at the start of the 20th Century, as the foundation of the Neo-Colonialism that United States decided would supplant the demise of the European Colonial Empires after the Second World War. United States was a new entrant into the race of the Colonial Empires. American oil colonialism financed, nurtured and propagated the Wahhabi priest-rulers of Mecca, militant Wahhabi fundamentalist Intolerance, and Muslim heroin cartels to cement closer ties with Muslim clergy, militant Muslim fundamentalism and Muslim Heroin/Opium cartels to induce Islamic oil-producing nations come voluntarily under the control and influence of the United States.

 

(19) India is Westernizing Force in Clash

Twelfth, India in the 21st Century represents the Westernizing force in history. United States and Papacy in 21st Century represented Counter-Westernizing force in history. Indian foreign policy promoted tolerance, inclusion, women’s rights, freedom, democracy, Western values, separation of the State and the Church, and social diversity. The United States and Papacy promoted Wahhabi fundamentalism, Shariah Law, ruler of the Clergy and priest-kings, military coups, massacre of 2,000,000 Cambodian Buddhists, military coups in Pakistan, and provided sanctuary to terrorist Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan and Mecca. India headed the mission of Westernization, Modernization, and secular liberalization in the world. United States headed the mission of imposing barbarian, fundamentalist Wahhabi militant Islam over modern Islamic nations to secure control over their oil and mineral resources. United States and the Papacy represented the Axis of Medieval in the world and attempted to push the Third World back into the Dark Age. India in 21st Century represented the force of New Age while United States and Papacy represented the force of Dark Age.

 

(20) Beyond Good and Evil

Every independent world Civilization creates a separate and different version of good and evil to maintain its separate identity, and herein lay the fundamental cause the Clash of Civilization. Civilizations create different concepts of good and evil. What is good and virtuous in one Civilization could be ridiculous and shameful in other Civilization. Civilizations maintain their separate identities by having separate sets of good and evil, different from what rival civilizations call good or evil. What is good in one civilization might be evil in other civilization. What President Bush called the Axis of Evil, many leaders would call Axis of Good. Prophet Zoroaster was the wisest of all Prophets of the world. The religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are the offshoot of Zoroastrian Religion. The idea of Monotheism and the concept of Devil took birth in the lands of Iryan, now called Iran, inhabited by the Airyan people, now known as Aryans. The people of Iran and Punjab gave birth to Oriental as well as Occidental religions. The Clash of Civilizations is the result of the eschatological, apocalyptic and teleological reasoning.

 

14(4) Hindus Vs Christians Clash

(1) Different Conception of God

The cause of Hindu Civilizations’s clash with Christian civilization is the differing conceptions of God. Hindus believe in the concept of Goddess, the Christians reject the concept of God as woman. Christianity has accepted many aspects of the iconoclastic philosophy of the Judaism. Christianity, Judaism and Islam are patriarchal religions and Hinduism as well as Buddhism is matriarchal cum patriarchal religion. Christianity believes in the absolute duality of man and God except in the case of Jesus. Hinduism believes in monism as well as dualism concept of God and man. Hinduis believe that God manifests as part of the living Universe. The concept of Sutratma states that every part of the material universe connected with God through infinitesimal thread, which gave brith to the wave theory of light. Christianity and Hinduism belong to separate systems of religions, Christianity is an Occidental religon and Hinduism is an Oriental Religion. Protestant Christianity and Hegelian Idealism borrowed extensively from Hindusim and Budhist to recreate the rationalistic Christianity that Jesus taught to Apostles. Islam, Judaism and Catholic Christianity have different conception of god than Hindus. The conception of god in Protestant Christianity, Pharisees and Kabbalah Judaism and Sufi Shiite Islam is closer to the conception of god in Hinduism.

 

Rival Instruments of Clash of civilizations

One. In the global Clash of Civilizations Hindu civilization and Buddhist civilization is on the same side of the battle lines. Throughout history Hindu India and Buddhist India waged Wars of Civilizations, by emphasizing Hindu ideal of religious tolerance, social diversity, multiple roads to seek divinity and freedom of religion and thought. It is no accident that Greater Buddhist Indian Civilization expanded to include Japan, Korea, China, Mongolia, Central Asia, Siberia, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Tibet and Bhutan. The Chenghis Khan’s Mongol Empire was a Buddhist Empire and Tibet’s Dalai Lama was the supreme religious leader of the entire Mongol Empire. Great Hindu Indian Civilization expanded to include Cambodia, Laos, South Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines. The Mughal Muslim-Hindu Civilization expanded to include Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. India waged clash of civilization by emphasizing the instruments and policies of tolerance, diversity, total religious freedom, multi-ethnic, multi-linguist, multi-religious and multi-racial civilization of India. Whenever India would decide to expand the reach of Indian Civilization, it would wield the omnipotent weapon of tolerance, diversity, religious freedom, equality of man and woman, equality of racial, ethnic and religious groups and equality before law. India can readily defeat the forces of predator religious cults, predator civilizations, intolerance, ethnic separatism and religious militancy by India’s time tested instruments of tolerance, acceptance of diversity and equal treatment of all races and religious sects. The Christian Civilization joined forces with Islamic Civilization to wage Wars of Intolerance, ethnic separatism and subjugation of women on Hindu, Buddhist and Pagan Civilizations. The Christian and Islamic nations represent the forces of intolerance, religious fundamentalism, and ethnic separatism. The Hindu and Buddhist nations represent the forces of tolerance, inclusion, freedom, justice and equality. Hindu and Buddhist civilizations represent the force of good in the Clash of Civilizations.

 

(2) Christianity’s War on Buddhism

Two. Christianity has launched an all out war against Buddhism in Asia. Christians separated Buddhist Sri Lanka and Burma from India in 1935 though it had been a part of Indian Empire. Christian agents infiltrated into Buddhist religious organizations and misled the Buddhist leaders into taking an anti-Hinduism and pro-Christianity line. Christian Army leaders overthrew the democratic elected government of Buddhist Uu Nu in Burma. Europeans and Americans leading international drive to put into power Christian Suu Kyi in Myanmar/Burma, just as they put Catholic Priest Rev. Aristide into power in Haiti. America influenced by Christian missionaries supported Mao-led communists in China, hoping that Buddhists would convert to Christianity more readily under the anti-Buddhist Communist regime than under the nationalist government. The CIA transferred the Chinese Christian KMT Fifth Army into South Burma Karen province that monopolized the Heroin and Opium trade of the Asia’s Golden Triangle. United States conspiring to put Christian Suu Kyi into power in Buddhist Burma/ Myanmar hoping the Christian ruler of Burma would make Burma/Myanmar the world’s leading producer of Heroin once again. President John F. Kennedy invaded Vietnam not to repulse the southward expansion of Communism but to destroy Buddhism in Vietnam and to place Christian Vietnamese into power in Vietnam. Secretary Henry Kissinger put Christian Pol Pot and Khmer Rouge into power in Cambodia to expedite the imposition of Christianity over Cambodia by the massacre of over 2,000,000 Buddhists at the hands of Communist Christians. The West may again plan the massacre of Buddhists in Burma/Myanmar whenever the Christian Suu Kyi and her Heroin Cartel entrenches in power in Burma. India and China control Myanmar as it is on the borders of India. India cannot allow Christian American troops in Burma. America’s unwelcome entry into Myanmar/Burma might result into a Vietnam type war in Burma. United States encouraged Muslim Indonesians to murder 400,000 Chinese Buddhists and rapes thousands of Chinese girls after the downfall of President Sukarno, to force Chinese Buddhists convert to Christianity.

 

(3) Sino-Indian Detente is Civilization’s Alliance

Three. Prime Minister Vajpayee’s June 2003 visit to China resulted in the Sino-Indian détente that created a new pact between Hindu Indian Civilization and Buddhist Chinese Civilization. Sino-Indian détente would combine the resources of giant Elephant India and giant Dragon China to protect the ethnic interests of the Buddhist nations of Asia, namely Burma/Myanmar, North Korea, South Korea, Mongolia, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam. Chinese Civilization even under the Communist Government continues to be the Buddhist Civilization and the national interest of Communist China and Hindu India coincide with Buddhist interests of Buddhist Myanmar/ Burma, Buddhist Mongolia, Buddhist Cambodia, Buddhist Laos and Buddhist Vietnam. It is neither in the national interest of China nor of India, to allow Christians take over the governments of Myanmar/Burma, Mongolia, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam. Hindu India and Communist china would oppose the imposition of the rule of pro-West Christian Suu Kyi in Myanmar/Burma. American military bases in Burma/Myanmar could destabilize the civilization’s balance of power in Southeast Asia and conflagrate the clash of races in Asia. It would not be in the interest of United states to attempt disturb the geopolitical balance of religions and civilizations in Asia by attempting to install a Christian ruler of Buddhist Myanmar/Burma in the geopolitical backyard of India and China. Christian America’s military bases in Buddhist South Korea and Buddhist Japan are not in the geopolitical and civilization interests of India, China, Japan and Koreas.

 

(4) America Launched Clash of Civilizations

Four. British Empire in Egypt developed the concept of Arab League to develop the concept of Arab nationalism to disintegrate Ottoman Empire. British Empire developed the concept of Wahhabi theocracy, the rule by Muslim clergy to disintegrate Ottoman Empire. British Empire developed the concept of Islam as the basis of state to partition Indian Empire. Osama Bin Laden and Wahhabi terrorism is the instrument of American policy to mobilize Muslims in the Clash of Civilization. By propagating the Vatican theocracies as the role model for Islamic world, United States and Britain sought to undermine the three leading Islamic empires of the world, Ottoman Empire, Mughal Indian empire and Iran. Throughout history there were only three important Islamic Empires, Ottoman Caliphate, Iranian Empire, and Mughal Empire of India, and Muslim Ulema clergy never enjoyed any important political role, in any one of these Islamic Empires. Muslim clergy never played any important political role in Islamic Empires. Muslim Rulers, whether in Ottomans and Mughal India called the shots and ulema served him. Muslim clergy didn’t have any important role to play neither in the Ottoman Islamic Caliphate nor in Mughal Indian Empire. Mughal clergy had no voice to oppose the power of the despotic rulers. Neither Ottoman Caliphate nor Mughal Empire was theocracies, as both these two leading Islamic political entities were despotic autocracies, but by no means theocracies. American oil colonialism and British Empire won over the Wahhabi leaders of Mecca arguing that theocracies could be carved out in Arabia based on the Wahhabi fundamentalism, which would give greater power, wealth and influence to Wahhabi Muslim clergy than they had otherwise enjoyed in the Islamic history. United States and Britain sold the idea of Arab theocracies modeled on the concept of the Vatican theocracies, and used the Wahhabi theocracies to undermine the secular, liberal Ottoman Muslim Caliphate, and legacy of Hindu-Muslim Mughal Empire concept in India. 

 

Second, Professor S.P. Huntington led Christian leaders to bring about the Civilization wide alliance of Christianity and Islam so that backed by the might of the Christian nations, Wahhabi Saudi Arabia might take over Islamic religious institutions in the moderate liberal Islamic world so that Islamic militants could bring about the secession of Muslim oil producing regions from multi-ethnic Soviet Union.

 

Third, out of the four largest economies of the world, USA, China, Japan and India, there is only one white Christian nation, the United States. Before 1947 the Indian Empire controlled the 100% of Iranian oil and 49% of Iraqi oil. Before 1947, Indian Empire controlled and dominated Iraq, Kuwait, Trucial States (UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, Muscat) and Yemen. Indian Rupee was the Reserve Currency of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, Iran, Oman, Muscat, UAE, Bahrain, Yemen and Qatar as late as 1965. The oil-rich Caspian nations, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan were part of the Soviet Union before 1990. United States promoted Islamic militancy and Wahhabi fundamentalism to promote ethnic separatism to disintegrate Ottoman Empire, Indian Empire and Soviet Empire. British Empire partitioned India in 1947, to create the artificial state of Pakistan to separate India from the oilfields of Iran and Iraq. America supported Afghan Mujahideens in Afghanistan to engineer the secession of Muslim Central Asian Republics from the Soviet Union.

 

Fourth, the White House puts it might behind Muslim terrorists and fundamentalists to undermine the multi-ethnic Civilization states of Ottoman Empire, Indian Empire and Soviet Empire. American financed Muslim terrorists to mobilize fundamentalist Muslims wage wars on secular Ottomans, secular Indians, secular Russians and secular Chinese. United States promoted the concept of Clash of Civilizations to cement American Big Oil’s strategic ties with oil-rich Wahhabi nations and Wahhabi fundamentalism to mobilize militant Islam wage secessionist movements in Russia, India and China, to undermine their attempts top challenge American domination of the Islamic oil producing nations.

 

Fifth, Orthodox Soviet Union led by Premier Khrushchev deployed nuclear deterrent to end British and French colonial threats to Egypt, Iran and Iraq. The Wahhabi Muslim terrorists have annoyed Russians and in the event of the future conquest of the Arab oil producers, President Putin of Russia might not come to the rescue of Arab Muslim nations. India faced Wahhabi Muslim terrorist attacks in Kashmir, might turn a blind eye, if ever United States invaded Wahhabi Saudi Arabia the known financiers of Wahhabi terrorists in Kashmir. The CIA propagated the Clash of Civilization thesis that Islam is at war against Hindus, Buddhists and Orthodoxy to undermine Islam’s relationship with other civilization, so that no other great nation would come to the rescue of oil-rich Islamic nations under attacks of Christian colonial powers. As a result of terrorist acts of America financed militant Muslims, the civilizations of Hindu India, Buddhist China and Orthodox Russia might support rather than oppose the Christian conquest of Arab Muslim oil-producing nations.

 

The challenge most Muslim people face today is a religious challenge of Wahhabi theocracy, which determined to undermine the Westernization and democratization process. The religious forces of theocracy and Wahhabi militancy trying to challenge the modernization process underway in the Islamic world by violent terrorist actions of the Wahhabi militants that focused on terrorizing the weakest sections of society the Muslim women.

 

With the help direct help of American media and globalization process the Wahhabi fundamentalism touted as the new global idea in the Muslim world, though less than 2% Muslim follow Wahhabi creed. The global Wahhabi militancy became the new hot idea among the Muslims, when oil incomes of Saudi Arabia allowed Wahhabi takeover of more than 80% Muslim mosques in the United States, and militarily and economically imposed Wahhabi fundamentalism in formerly secular Muslim states of Malaysia and Indonesia, which had significant Hindu influence earlier. The Wahhabi demagogic pirouettes aided by American mainstream media hype, presented barbarian Wahhabi fundamentalism as true form of Islam, which Islamic Caliphates had rejected as being too crude and barbarian, during last 1,200 years of Islamic history. While Catholics have rejected the Early Christianity as heresy, they want Muslims to accept the barbarian Islam of desert Bedouin nomad as true form of Islam.

 

(5) Barbarians’ Attacks on Civilizations

Five. The geopolitical terrorist threat that Muslim terrorists presents to United States, Russia and India represents the continuation of the historic barbarian threat to Civilizations and it requires overwhelming military response of the Civilizations against the breeding grounds of the terrorism, if the civilizations intend to defeat rather than succumb to the barbarian terrorism. The Civilizations cannot allow barbarians to exploit the tolerance and freedom of the Civilizations to destroy the Civilizations itself. Civilized Civilizations of India and China repeatedly invaded by the barbarians throughout history. Civilized Civilizations by definition are tolerant, multi-ethnic, multi-cultural, multi-linguistic, nurture diversity and positively interact with other civilizations and encourage the convergence of civilizations. Barbarians historically behaved like terrorists and excel in making improvisations of the current military technologies, making it cheaper, lighter and more lethal. Barbarians throughout history used brutal military force to conquer civilizations and this conquest results in the rise of Barbarian Civilization or the Civilization under the control of Barbarians. Barbarian Civilizations propagate intolerance, eliminates diversity and persecute women, demand and enforce religious uniformity. Throughout history barbarian societies invaded the civilizations and over time succeeded in conquering the civilizations. After the conquest of the Civilization, the barbarian conquerors of the civilizations, developed fortress around the Civilization to protect it from the invasions of other marauding barbarians, while maintaining totalitarian control over the Civilization. The bordering civilization outside the control of the barbarians, continue the process of absorbing barbarian military technology, improvising it and mass-produce the military weapons to launch counter attacks on the barbarian rulers of the civilizations. Civilizations have traditionally enjoyed the advantage of larger populations and larger economic base. Barbarians have traditionally lacked huge populations. Civilizations inevitably succeed in conquering the barbarian rulers of the civilizations and remove barbarian rulers of the civilizations and return the Barbarian Civilization to the fold of Civilized Civilizations. Indian Hindu Civilization is a Civilized Civilization. Saudi Wahhabi is a Barbarian Civilization. The ongoing clash of Civilized tolerant Civilizations and Barbarian intolerant predator Civilizations is the fact of history and fact of life and would continue. The peace would result only when either the barbarians are defeated or barbarians emerge victorious in the barbarians versus civilizations wars.

 

(6) Convergence of Civilizations

Six. According to Indian worldview the Civilized Civilizations do not clash and Civilizations can only collude and converge into one another to create a newer vibrant Civilization. Civilizations learn from one another. In the Milky Way the galaxies collide and billions of stars of the colliding galaxies continue to remain part of their galaxies. The tolerant Civilizations absorb the invasions of barbarians by accepting the diversity and still retaining the original character of the Civilizations. The separate civilizations of barbarians and civilizations can co-exist side by side in mutual harmony for thousands of years. In India Hindu and Muslim Civilizations have co-existed side by side for over a thousand year. Indian Civilization is the only civilization where Hindu, Buddhist Islamic and Christian civilizations coexisted side by side and managed to retain their respective cultural and religious purity. Even if Civilizations collide and move into the space occupied by other Civilizations, the separate pockets of Civilizations can retain their ethnic and cultural independence without any pressure for forced assimilation, while they learnt from one another.

 

(7) Hindu Buddhist Muslim Cultures of India

Seven. It is the manifest destiny of India that Indian Civilization would one day rise to the occasion and unite the Hindu, Buddhist and Islamic civilizations under the leadership of India, just as European Union united the civilizations of Europe. The civilizations of Hindus, Buddhists and Islam can unite into a confederation of Asia and Africa under the leadership of India. India and China are the world’s Civilization heavyweights in terms of its size of populations, size of the economy and the continuity of its civilizations from time immemorial. India and China are two principle centers of the world civilizations that co-existed from time immemorial and represented one-third to one-half of the populations of the world throughout history. In 1750, the China manufactured one-third of the world’s total manufactured goods and India produced one-fourth of the world total manufactured goods. In 1750, India, China and Japan produced 61% of the total manufactured goods. Throughout human history India represented the Eternal Pole of the World Civilizations and all other Civilizations that arose and fell in the history, revolved around India as the center of the world. The Hindu Civilization encompassed the entire ancient world, including the ancient Civilization of Babylon, the ancient Egyptian civilization, ancient Greek Civilization, and ancient Roman Civilization. The Buddhist Civilization of China, Japan, and Korea are sister civilization of Hindu India. Indonesia, Malaysia had been part of South Indian Hindu and Buddhist Civilization. Laos, Cambodia, South Vietnam (Champa) and Burma had historically been part of Indian Hindu Civilization. Whatever is common among Asian nations is the common Indian Civilization.

 

(8) American Colonial Civilization

Eight. The Anglo Saxons the last race from Europe to venture out to establish overseas colonies were the worst genocidal colonizers. First, the Protestant Anglo Saxons acted like predator cannibals in North America, while Spanish and Portuguese Catholics inter-married with original inhabitants of the land and gave birth to the vast populations of Mestizos and Mulattos the people of mixed ancestry in Mexico, Central America, Andean and South America. Like the predator snakehead fish that kills the native fish, the Anglo Saxons massacred the original peoples to empty the lands, far more than what was required for the small number of immigrants in 19th Century. Immigrant Anglo Saxons could have co-existed with the American Indians, as North America is a large continent. Catholic as well as Protestants believed in the extermination of the Native Americans in North America, South America. American Civilization advocated the massacre of the indigenous peoples and subjugation of the non-white peoples.

 

Second, the United States used the Railways to kill millions of bison during two consecutive winters to destroy the food reserves of the Red Indians that solely relied on the bison meat. United States destroyed the ethnic societies of the Pacific Islanders that came under rule of the United States as Mandate territories. United States removed the indigenous people from the Diego Garcia Archipelago when it leased it for establishing US Naval Base. Protestant Anglo Saxons in United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand methodically massacred and eliminated the indigenous peoples to establish the White Christian nations. Unlike Spanish and Portuguese conquerors of South and Central America, the Anglo Saxons refused to inter-marry indigenous peoples and chose to systematically slaughter them. United States did not believe in the coexistence of races and coexistence of civilizations in the 18th and 19th centuries. United States represented the predator intolerant barbarian civilization determined to exterminate the indigenous civilization to depopulate the lands of its original inhabitants to create a new Empty continent for the white immigrants from Europe.

 

Third, the Unionist Republican President Lincoln didn’t fight the pro-slavery Confederate South to liberate blacks and to accept blacks into the folds of American Civilization. President Lincoln feared that the unchecked importation of black slaves would make United States a black-majority country and some day blacks would revolt as they did in Haiti and become the dominant race in the United States. It is very possible that led by black leadership of Haiti, the black slaves of the Unite States might have revolted against white masters and joined forces with American Red Indians and blacks from Haiti to establish black government of the United States of America. During American colonial occupation of the Philippines the US Army massacred 400,000 peoples in the Philippines to establish American rule in the Philippines. United States believed in destroying the indigenous people and to empty the lands of the original inhabitants to establish American Civilization on these empty lands.

 

Fourth, President George W. Bush inadvertently exhibited the genocidal imperialistic predatory spirit lying dormant in the Anglo Saxons, when he ordered the invasions of Iraq, on the fictitious grounds of WMDs, simply because he wanted Iraq emptied of Saddam Hussein and Baathists. It is no wonder that German minister during last general elections compared President Bush to Fuehrer Adolf Hitler. Overnight the diplomats of the world powers gripped with the fear of Anglo Saxons attempts to conquer the world, to empty the world of all opponents to United States.

 

Fifth, the United States historically pursued the policy of Geopolitical dominance over native Indians in USA and over West Europeans after the Second World War. The NATO acted as Chaperon to Western Europe. The US-led NATO established America’s geopolitical dominance over France and Germany. The NATO died in the rubble of Baghdad because suddenly the European nations realized that NATO had been the instrument of enslavement of Western Europe to promote the interests of United States, and not the Western bulwark against menace from the Soviet Union or Russia. No wonder that US-led NATO became as irrelevant as Soviet-led Warsaw Pact, so soon after the end of the Cold War in the aftermath of President Bush’s Iraq War.

 

Sixth, the American invasion of Iraq, in the eyes of historians, represented the invasion by the predator expansionist power against secular, modern multi-ethnic Civilization of Iraq. The armies of Pentagon waged the war under the banner of ethnic separatism, and Wahhabi fundamentalism to impose the will of American predator Civilization on secular Iraq. The burning of Iraqi Museums suggests the American occupying Powers represented the forces of predatory barbarian civilization, waging wars for the loot of the oil wealth of secular Iraq.

 

Seventh, the European colonialists conquered and destroyed the indigenous civilizations in name of the propagation of the Christianity and Western Civilization during colonial era. President Bush in 21st Century conquered and destroyed Iraqi Civilization in the name of Democracy, Freedom and WMDs. Protestant Neo-Conservative Christian religious right President George W. Bush came to represent the force of predatory civilized barbarianism in 2003, which caused great fear and anxiety amongst leaders and diplomats of the world. George W. Bush in April 2003 almost looked like Adolf Hitler or Napoleon Bonaparte in the making. The perception of the looming threat of Pax Americana and Bush Doctrine changed the International system and great powers scrambled to enter into pacts to hold America in check. In the eyes of the world leaders, United States represented the greatest threat to world peace in 2003, simply because of its predominance, which necessitated the counter measures by other world powers to check the hegemony of the United States after the demise of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War.

 

(9) Eternal Greater Hindu Indian Civilization

Nine. India emerged as the principal adversary of Preeminent Protestant American Civilization and white Western Civilization for India’s historic penchant to selflessly fight for the religious, cultural, racial and civilization rights of the weaker, underprivileged and exploited races of the Third World. India and United States violently clash in the clash of civilization, as Hindu India would never remain silent spectator to the attempts of the predatory white Christian Catholic and Evangelical civilizations to impose Christianity on the pagan worlds. India’s defense of pagan nations and Buddhist nations made Hindu India the scourge of predatory expansionist Christian Civilization in the 21st Century.

 

First, in the Clash of Civilizations, Indian Civilization and Hindu religion serves as the primary pole of the world representing the forces of tolerance, diversity, freedom and openness. India is the true Civilized Civilization of the world and had been so throughout history. The strength of India is that India throughout history tolerated and encouraged the diversity, religious tolerance and intermixing of the races. Indian culture is the common denominator the civilizations of Asia and Africa. No nation and no race in the world history could rival India in transnational social and cultural intercourse. Historically Indian Civilization had been diverse and tolerant of diversity in ethnicity, thought and religion. India is the living testimony of the living World Civilization. Eternal civilization of India is a testimony to the fact that populous, tolerant multi-ethnic Civilization would always survive innumerable foreign invasions, barbarian attacks and ethnic disturbances. Eternal Hindu Religion presently practiced by 850 million Indians in India is the same ancient Hindu religion that existed 10 million years ago, and survived the many cycles of the destruction and rebirth of the Human Civilization on this planet earth. No religion can rival Hinduism and no civilization can rival Indian Civilization and the same religion and civilization has survived millions of years. 

 

Second, Indian Civilization and Indian race has maintained historic cultural, social, civilization and religious intercourse in Euro-Asia Africa World Island with more than 42 countries of the world, representing more than two/third of the world population. After Second World War, Indian influence dominated over many Islamic nations, including Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Trucial States (UAE, Bahrain, Qatar), Muscat & Oman, Yemen, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Brunei. After WWII Indian cultural influence dominated in Buddhist lands of Tibet, Burma, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Korea, Southern China, and Japan. Because of Mughal Indian Empire legacy, India had cultural ties with Central Asian Republics of Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Krygyzstan. The Indian Diaspora had substantial presence in Fiji Islands, Mauritius, Guyana, Suriname and Trinidad & Tobago. Indian businessmen dominated the economies of Christian East Africa and Christian Southern Africa, especially Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Zanzibar, Zambia, Zimbabwe/ Rhodesia, Botswana and South Africa. The Greater India extended Indian influence over Islamic, Christian and Buddhist nations of Asia and Africa and included 1 South Africa, 2 Zambia, 3 Zimbabwe, 4 Botswana, 5 Kenya, 6 Tanzania, 7 Uganda, 8 Yemen, 9 Muscat & Oman, 10 UAE, 11 Qatar, 12 Bahrain, 13 Kuwait, 14 Iraq, 15 Iran, 16 Afghanistan, 17 Pakistan, 18 Uzbekistan, 19 Tajikistan, 20 Kyrgyzstan, 21 Tibet, 22 Nepal, 23 Bhutan, 24 Burma, 25 Bangladesh, 26 Myanmar/Burma, 27 Laos, 28 Cambodia, 29 Vietnam, 30 South Korea, 31 North Korea, 32 Maldives island, 33 Mauritius, 34 Fiji Islands, 35 Suriname, 36 Trinidad & Tobago, 37 Malaysia, 38 Indonesia, 39 Brunei, 40 Southern China, 41 Mongolia, and 42 Japan. India has direct cultural civilization ties with more than 42 countries of the Hindu, Buddhist, Muslim and Christian world in Asia, Africa, and the Caribbean.

 

Three, white Christianity has subjugated Islamic civilization and secured Civilization-Civilization Alliance with Semite Wahhabi Islam to give monopoly over oil and gas resources of the Islamic nations to the American Big Oil in exchange for the Christian support to the Wahhabi fundamentalism. American Big oil encouraged Wahhabi fundamentalists to erode Hindu, Buddhist and Indian influences over Malaysia, Indonesia, Brunei, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh by replacing Indian cultural influences with Wahhabi fundamentalism. Throughout the 20th Century the principle foreign policy objectives of European and American policy makers had been to undermine and limit Indian Empires historic cultural and civilization ties with the Muslim states of Yemen, Muscat & Oman, Trucial States (UAE, Qatar, Bahrain), Kuwait, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Krygyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia and Indonesia. In the clash of civilizations Hindu India would support and fight for the religious rights of non-Wahhabi liberal, moderate Muslims and for the rights of Muslim women. India would whole heartedly oppose and fight against the Wahhabi fundamentalism while Christian world would support the Wahhabi fundamentalists engaged in wars of religious sects against moderate, tolerant and liberal Islam. On the issue of Wahhabi fundamentalism, the Hindu India clashes violently with Christian West and Protestant United States.

 

Fourth, the white Christianity has subjugated Buddhist Civilizations of China, Mongolia, Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, by imposing Judeo-Semite Communist doctrine over the Buddhist world. The primary purpose of the Judeo Marxism had been to destroy the political base of Buddhism in China, Mongolia, Vietnam, Laos, North Korea and Mongolia. The white Christianity has subjugated Buddhist Japan by imposing pro-US governments in Japan after the defeat of Japan in the WW II. The white Christianity subjugated Buddhism in Burma by engineering the military coup led by Christian Burmese Army. The white Christianity subjugated Buddhism in Sri Lanka by promoting anti-India policies. The white Christians infiltrated in the Buddhist religious organizations to lead Buddhist religious societies become anti-Hindu in their theological formulations. White Christianity worked hard to undermine Hindu Indian influences over Buddhist nations of Asia by empowerment of Christianity and succeeded in converting half of South Koreans to Christianity. The primary purpose of American military bases in Korea and American invasions of Vietnam, Laos and Korea had been to militarily undermine Hindu and Indian civilization and cultural influences over Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia. Korea and Burma. Throughout the 20th Century the principle objective of European and American foreign policy in Asia had been to limit and undermine India’s cultural, social, and civilization influences of Hindu and Buddhist India in Greater India region of Southeast Asia and East Asia. In the clash of civilizations Hindus would support and fight for the religious rights of Buddhists. On the issue of Buddhism, the Hindu India clashes violently with white Christian West and Protestant United States.

 

Fifth, the White Christianity has succeeded in subjugating the pagan civilizations of black Africa by imposing Shariah laws over pagan nations of Nigeria and Sudan so that pagans are forced to convert to either Islam or Christianity. White Christianity realized that Indians in Africa being sympathetic to the pagans, the followers of ancient Nubian religion and indigenous religions. To the Christians and Muslims in Africa India alone challenged their attempts to force monotheistic Islam or Christianity over pagan believers of black Africa south of Sahara. In the clash of civilizations Hindus would support and fight for the religious rights of pagans in Africa. On the issue of the paganism, the Hindu India clashes violently with white Christian West and Protestant United States.

 

Sixth, the White Christianity, Anglo Saxons and Catholic Latinos succeeded in subjugating the indigenous civilizations of Native Canadians, Native Americans, Incas, Mayas, Aztecs and Australian Aborigines. In the clash of civilizations, Hindus would support and fight for the religious rights, racial rights, freedom and independence of Native Americans, Native Canadians, Amerindians, Incas, Mayas, Aztecs and Australian Aborigines. On the issue of the indigenous religions of Incas, Mayas, Aztecs, Native Americans and Australian Aborigines, the Hindu India clashes with white Christian west and Protestant United States.

 

Seventh, Indian Hindu Civilization presents greatest challenge to the white Christian civilizations of Europe and America, in the global clash of civilizations by daring to oppose the white Christian West and Protestant America determined to impose the domination of Christianity over Buddhism in Asia, pagans in Africa, and Native Americans, Incas and Mayas in North and South America. Hindu India supports the cause of Buddhism in Asia. Hindu India supports the cause of liberal Islam against Wahhabi fundamentalism. Hindu India supports the cause of black pagan Africans against the onslaught of Wahhabi Muslims and Catholic and Evangelical Christians. Hindu India supports the cause of Native Canadians, Native Americans, Mayas, Incas, Aztecs and Australian Aborigines. India alone stands as an obstacle for the world conquest of the white Christian world over rest of the world. Without the leadership of India, the Third World would fail to stand up against super power United States, Papacy and white Christian Europe in the 21st Century. It is no wonder that Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru led the Third World and the newly independent nations of Asia and Africa to join the Non Aligned Movement (NAM) so that the Non Aligned Nations could dare to refuse the domination of the United States and the former European colonial powers. It is beholding to see that the legacy of Nehru survived and expressed itself in April 2003, when Non Aligned Nations temporary members of the UN Security Council, namely, Angola, Cameroon, Guinea, Chile and Pakistan refused to vote for the British-American Resolution supporting United States War resolution on Iraq. No wonder the that the spirit of freedom that India introduced in the Non Aligned Nations of the Third World would continue to mobilize and influence the outcome the global clash of Civilizations in the 21st Century. India became the scourge of the West and the United States for its selfless support for the cause of freedom of underprivileged races, religions and cultures of the world in the global clash of civilizations.

 

(10) G10 Economic Security Council

Ten. The nuclear and space powers, China and India the world’s 2nd largest and 4th largest economies should have a place in the Group of Eight, if the G8 is supposed to represent large economies. In the global clash of civilizations, Europe led by France and Germany welcomed India and China to the exclusive club of Group of Eight (G8) to recognize 21st Century is the Century of Asia. The Group of Ten (G10) would consist of USA, China, Japan, India, Germany, France, Britain, Italy, Russia and Canada, the world’s largest 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 10th, and 12th economies in terms of GNP at Purchasing power parity respectively. The Group of Ten could function as the Economic Security Council of the world. The G10 Group should deal with economic issues, and also deal with energy, labor and environment issues. The Group of Eight should be replaced by a forum including a greater number of participants, such as China and India, and dealing with a broader range of issues demanded EU Trade Commissioner Pascal Lamy. "European Union would rather favor a sort of Economic Security Council, where countries like China, India, Brazil or South Africa plus the present G8 members would sit around the table during a visit to the Chinese city of Dalian. European Union would support a revamping, a reshuffling of the G8, which is a bit of an old, dated formula. Group was created 30 years ago and one does not know of any other institution of that kind which was created 30 years ago and is now very relevant. The G-10 forum replacing the G8 should not just deal with narrow economic issues but also include matters such as energy, labor and the environment on its agenda. "Coming together in the 1970s was mostly about economic development. Coming together in 2000s is about much more than that. Even in its present form, the G8 has reflected the gradual broadening of the agenda occupying the leaders of the world's most powerful countries. While economics remains the core issue when the G8 meets, recent G8 Summits have also addressed matters such as terrorism, crime and infectious diseases. In the eyes of the European Union it would not be a problem for China to gain membership, even though the current G8 consists of industrialized democracies. G-8 is a very informal setting, there is no rule about membership and there is no institution and permanent HQ of the G-8. Speculation that China and India might one day join the G8 was fueled earlier this year when Chinese President Hu Jintao and Indian prime minister Atal Behari Vajpayee were invited to attend talks on development running parallel with a Summit of the Group of Eight in Evian, France. China, which is otherwise eager to join international organizations and raise its global profile, has not expressed an interest in formal membership of the Group of Eight. At the time of Hu Jintao's visit to France, Chinese officials said China did not aspire for membership in the exclusive club, arguing that as a developing country it did not qualify. Indian officials have indicated however that India desires to join the G8, largely because of its failed attempts to grab a full seat in an expanded Security Council of the United Nations, which currently has Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States as its current permanent members. The G8 consists of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States. The first meeting of the Group of Six (G6) was in Rambouillet, France, in 1975, when six countries participated in talks on the economic slowdown of that period.

 

14(5) US & India Rivals in Clash

(1) India is the Westernizing Force in Clash

India in the 21st Century represents the Westernizing force in history. United States and Papacy in 21st Century represented Counter-Westernizing force in history. Indian foreign policy promoted tolerance, inclusion, women’s rights, freedom, democracy, Western values, separation of the State and the Church, and social diversity. The United States and Papacy promoted Wahhabi fundamentalism, Shariah Law, ruler of the Clergy and priest-kings, military coups, massacre of 2,000,000 Cambodian Buddhists, military coups in Pakistan, and provided sanctuary to terrorist Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan and Mecca. India headed the mission of Westernization, Modernization, and secular liberalization in the world. United States headed the mission of imposing barbarian, fundamentalist Wahhabi militant Islam over modern Islamic nations to secure control over their oil and mineral resources. United States and the Papacy represented the Axis of Medieval in the world and attempted to push the Third World back into the Dark Age. India in 21st Century represented the force of New Age while United States and Papacy represented the force of Dark Age.

 

(2) Divergent World Views of India and USA

During 20th Century, India and the United States had been adversaries in the Clash of Civilizations. United States formulated its policy towards Hindu India and Buddhist Asia to promote the Proselyte interests of the Christian missionaries. During 21st Century India and United States are allies in the Clash of Civilizations, as national interests of India and United States coincide in President Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism and America’s dream to establish direct rule over oil-producing Arab oil-producing nations. India opposed United States support to the concept of Papal priest-King and Saudi Wahhabi King as the Caliph of Islam. India also opposed the United States support to the Papal religious right conservative conspiracy and Wahhabi religious intolerance. While United States supported the concept of Vatican & Mecca Priest-king, as well as Catholic, Evangelical and Wahhabi Religious Intolerance, India opposed the pretensions of the priest-rulers and predatory intolerance. While United States condoned Sunni Heroin Mafia to secure the support of the militant Islam to promote US interests in Afghanistan, Chechnya and Kosovo, India opposed it.

 

One. India and United States support the ideologically opposite poles in the global clash of civilizations. Democratic Hindu India supports the forces and nations that support tolerance, religious tolerance, multi-ethnic diversity, women’s rights, freedom, democracy and tolerance of diversity. Democratic Protestant United States guided by oil interests, supports the forces of religious intolerance, ethnic separatism, political repression, tyranny, suppression of women, military coups and religious terrorism. On the ideological platforms India and United States would lend their weight to diametrically opposite ideological camps, especially in the Islamic world and oil-producing world. In the oil-producing world France and Germany, Russia and China, might join India and support secular, liberal, pro-women regimes in the oil-producing Islamic world. India, France, Germany, Russia and China might support liberal, secular Algeria and Libya. It is because of the American oil interests that United States continues to support Saudi Wahhabi fundamentalism and intolerance, even in this age of Christian Crusades against Islamic terrorism. White House might jettison its present pro-Wahhabi policies, if Pentagon could work out the colonial governing structure with India, which would allow India-USA peacekeepers efficiently control oil colonies and maintain colonial peace. If Pentagon could rule and govern Saudi Arabia and control the Saudi oil as it does in Iraq, then White House might work towards overthrowing the rule of Saudi royal family and establish the direct rule of American Big Oil in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE. In order to propitiate the God of Oil that White House cultivated Wahhabi royal family in Saudi Arabia. If United States could propitiate god of oil better, by direct rule of the Pentagon over Saudi Arabia, it would not hesitate to do so. India should show that there are better ways to exploit Arabian oil resources than serving Wahhabi fundamentalism in Saudi Arabia.

 

(2) American Goals in Clash of Civilizations

Two. The United States lent its might behind the forces of intolerance, ethnic separatism, religious separatism, Islamic fundamentalism and Wahhabi terrorism to establish American oil colonies in the Islamic oil-producing countries. First, the United States wanted to establish American colonies in the oil-producing world by aggressively promoting Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalism to promote ethnic separatism of the Arab oil-producing states. British colonialism promoted the Arab League and secular Arab nationalism to engineer the secession of Syria, Jordan, and Iraq from Ottoman Caliphate. American oil colonialism in Arab world based on American support to Mecca-based Wahhabi Bedouin tribes and Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalism as the new doctrine of Islam. United States promoted and continues to promote Wahhabi House of Al Saud family as the new Caliph of Islam and Wahhabi clergy of Mecca as the religious leaders of the Islamic world. Protestant United States would continue to support Wahhabi intolerance, Islamic separatism and Islamic militancy to undermine the multi-ethnic states to engineer the secession of the oil-rich Islamic regions and to establish American oil colonies.

 

Second, American colonial doctrine differed from the colonial doctrines of Spain, France and Britain. The purpose of the post-Second World War American colonialism, normally referred to as Neo-Colonialism didn’t believe in exporting American values, democracy, freedom, democratic system and Christianity. Unlike European colonialism, United States would oppose the secular, liberal, democratic Islamic nations and rather impose Islamic Shariah laws over Western laws in the modern Islamic world, so that the westernized Islamic nations became the mirror image of fundamentalist Saudi Arabia. Democratic, liberal modern Christian United States would support fundamentalist, pro-Shariah, Anti-women Islamic leaders throughout the modern, secular, liberal Islamic world, to impose the leadership of pro-Wahhabi fundamentalist Muslim leadership throughout the Islamic world. United States convinced that only the pro-Wahhabi fundamentalist, pro-Shariah, anti-women militant Muslims would support the economic interests of American Big Oil in exchange for America’s support to Wahhabi Islamic fundamentalism. In the global clash of civilizations, because of the American oil interests, the Protestant United States would lend its might for the cause of religious intolerance, ethnic separatism, Islamic militancy, global drug trade, military coups and political repression.

 

Third, President Clinton supported the military coup bid of Gen. Pervez Musharraf, when Pakistan’s elected Prime Minister Nawaj Sharif offered to arrest Osama Bin Laden and extradite him to United States. President Bush invaded Afghanistan not to neutralize terrorist Osama bin Laden but to provide safe heaven and safe passage to him. American occupation of Afghanistan failed to arrest and neutralize even a single top leader of Al Qaeda and Taliban. One could argue from the benefit of the hindsight that in the clash of civilizations the Protestant United States would support the forces likes of Wahhabi fundamentalist Osama bin Laden. It is no accident that because of American control over Afghanistan, the poppy cultivation, Opium and heroin production has zoomed in Afghanistan. Pakistani observers believe that United States invaded Afghanistan to boost the Opium production of Afghanistan and to provide safe passage from Afghanistan and safe heaven in Pakistan to Al Qaeda terrorists. United States historically employed the Diplomacy of Deception by indirectly supporting Islamic militants and Islamic drug cartels, in the name of America’s war on Islamic terrorism.

 

Fourth, the successful occupation of Iraqi oil colony and the removal of Saddam Hussein presented new opportunities to American oil colonialism. United States destroyed the potential of Iran in 1980 by overthrowing the regime of Shah of Iran that threatened to industrialize Iran to enable Iran’s GNP overtake the GNP of France and Britain before 1985. President Ronald Reagan encouraged and supported Iraq in its war against Iran that destroyed the Khorramshahr petroleum refinery complex, and Iran ceased to be an economic power. Iraq was on the verge of joining the ranks of developed nations in early 1980s. United States Ambassador to Iraq encouraged Iraq to attack Iraq. The American invasions of Kuwait in 1991 and invasions Iraq in 2003 destroyed the economic, military and political power of Iraq. Neither Iran nor Iraq would never be able to threaten the dominance of the West nor challenge the leadership of Semite Wahhabi Saudi Arabia in the Islamic world. After the decline of Iran and destruction of Iraq, United States might realize the America to project Saudi Arabia as new Caliph of Islam.

 

Fifth, after United States established long term colonial occupation of Iraq and UN recognized control over Iraqi oil, it would no longer required the continued support of the Wahhabi clergy and House of Al Saud for the domination of Saudi Arabian oil resources. Perhaps Pentagon might decide that Saudi Wahhabi House of Al Saud royal family could be removed by direct military aggression and United States could directly exploit the resources of Saudi Arabia. If United States able to stabilize the colonial administration of Iraq and profitably manage and exploit the oil resources of Iraq, then Pentagon might engineer the downfall of the Wahhabi House of Al Saud in Saudi Arabia, and enthrone Osama Bin Laden as new ruler of Saudi Arabia, as the Saudi business house of Bin Laden Group has the administrative and political resources to administer and govern Saudi Arabia after the downfall of the House of Al Saud. The downfall of House of Al Saud royal family in Saudi Arabia, in the first decade of the 21st Century, would be a logical step to follow after the 2003 downfall of Saddam Hussein in Iraq and 1980 fall of Shah of Iran in Iran. United States might invade Iran after consolidating its grip over Iraq and bring Iranian oil resources under control of the United States. United States would consolidate its stronghold over its superpower status if it could simultaneously control the oil and gas reserves of Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE and Kuwait. American conquest of Iraq would allow Untied States to control the oil and gas resources of the Caspian oil basin, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. While American conquest of Iraq would be against India’s national interest, American conquest of Saudi Arabia would be in India’s national interest. The continued occupation of Iraq would be in the national interest of India. However, America’s designs over the oil-riches of Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan would not be in India’s national interests.

 

(3) Indian Troops for Iraq Peacekeeping

Three. India should send Indian troops to manage and control American oil colony in Iraq, so that White House might jettison its pro-Wahhabi policy in favor of direct military rule over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE in the new age of Christian Crusades against terrorist Islam. The Rambo United States waged war on Iraq and conquered Iraq without loss of many lives. However, Pentagon started to panic when the death tolls started to rise in the peacekeeping operations in Iraq. First, the Pentagon had a rude awakening that it was much easier to conquer Iraq and much more difficult to maintain the colonial occupation of Iraq. The $4 billion /month colonial occupation bill of the Pentagon might make the entire success of the Iraqi colonial occupation a financial drain on the US Exchequer, which might greatly undermine the future military operations of the Pentagon. The Pentagon’s stellar success in Iraqi War might prove to be the last straw that broke the back the Yankee Camel. India should convince that offering India a big pie of the oil loot would lower Pentagon’s cost of administering American oil colony in Iraq.

 

Second, to make profits in the Iraqi oil colony, Pentagon must outsource its colonial occupation and administration to India, so that Iraqi oil colony might make some net profits for the colonial Occupying Powers and the Indian subcontractors. Colonialism is a business and like every business it is the bottom line that determined whether the colonial occupation is a success or failure. The defeat of American colonial occupation in Iraq would not be in the national interests of India. The Wahhabi control over Iraq would not be in the national interest of India. If Indian troops could make the American colonial occupation profitable for the Occupying Powers and its subcontractors then United States would be forced to shift its pro-Wahhabi foreign policy, to direct colonial occupation of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE. Whenever Untied Stated decided to take direct control over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE then it would have no option but to depend on India for the successful implementation of Pentagon’s colonial agenda in the Middle East. Israel lacked the military muscle to substantially contribute towards American colonial agenda in the Middle East. Pentagon would never trust Pakistani soldiers for the conquest of Saudi Arabia. United States would be forced to depend on India for the conquest of Saudi Arabia, UAE and Kuwait. Pentagon’s inability to administer, control and occupy Iraqi oil colony within US budgetary restraints, might force the White House to invite India as Co-Occupying Power in Iraq and other oil colonies that Pentagon might establish time to time, in the new age of colonial empires.

 

Third, India should send Peacekeeping troops to Iraq, even 200,000 soldiers and 200,000 administrators to convince Pentagon that United States should no longer cultivate Saudi Wahhabi House of Al Saud to control the oil and gas resources of the Arabian Gulf, as Saudi Arabia, UAE and Kuwait can be governed profitably as American oil colonies by joint forces of Pentagon and Indian Army. In the new age of Christian Crusades in 2003, United States no longer needed to befriend Wahhabi fundamentalism in Saudi Arabia, when Pentagon and Indian Army can effectively establish long-term colonial administration in Wahhabi Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE to operate and manage Arabian oil fields for USA and India. The Dow Jones would jump to 20,000-benchmark if pentagon were to allow US-Indian Big Oil take over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE. By taking over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE American Big Oil should pay no more than $2 per barrel of oil to the local regimes. India can persuade United States to abandon pro-Wahhabi policy of the White House in favor of the direct colonial rule over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE by USA-India Big Oil and managed and controlled by Pentagon-Indian Army led government of the American oil colonies. American Empire convinced by the success of Indian troops to sanitize Iraqi oil colony, would decide that it no longer needed the continued support of Wahhabi rulers to control the Saudi and Kuwaiti oil, it would bring down the Wahhabi monarchy of Saudi Arabia and impose direct American rule over Wahhabi Kingdom and Sheikhdoms.

 

14(6) Priest-Rulers & Intolerance

The Menace of the Priest-rulers and the priest-kings represented by the Pope as Potentate in the Catholic world and Muslim clergy as the rulers in the Islamic world, became a menace to the Civilizations, with the globalization of the Wahhabi Islamic fundamentalism backed by Saudi oil incomes and the ultra-conservatism of Bolshevik Poland-born Pope John Paul II’s 28-year plus long Pontificate. Vatican and Mecca led Clash of Civilization in the last quarter of the 20th Century to impose Catholicism and Wahhabi fundamentalism on the Christianity and Islam respectively.

 

(1) Priest-Rulers of Vatican-Mecca Axis

One. The foremost cause of the clash is result of the American and Papal support to the idea of the priest-ruler, the priest-king and temporal and secular powers of the religious clergy in the political realm in a society. First, the Papacy represented the embodiment of the concept of priest-ruler that had been at war against the prevailing concept that Ruler is also the head of the Church. The concept of the priest-ruler had been at war against the American concept of strict separation of the State and the Church.

 

Second, the Vatican-Mecca axis of theocracy is an attempt of the Papacy to develop theopolitical alliance between Church of Rome and Mosque of Mecca, so that iconoclast monotheists of Christianity and Islam could jointly invade and force conversions of pagan idolaters of Africa, forcing them to choose either Islam or Christianity. The pagans of Africa represents more than 50% of the population of South of Sahara black Africa. Papacy joined forces with Wahhabi clergy of Mecca to impose Shariah Law over Islamic world as a means to empower the Muslim clergy ulema with political and judicial power.

 

Third, neither papacy nor the Wahhabi clergy of Mecca enjoyed any political and economic power in 17th, 18th, 19th and early 20th Century. King of Italy entered the Vatican in 1870 and made Pope the prisoner of Vatican and divested him of all temporal secular powers, and subsequent Pope’s remained prisoners of the Vatican from 1870 to 1928. The Clash of Civilization has become critical because of the growing priest-ruler nexus of the Vatican’s Papacy and Mecca’s Wahhabi Clergy. American oil and British Empire through spymaster Lawrence of Arabia historically propagated the idea of the Mecca’s Wahhabi Clergy as rulers of the Arab Kingdoms and Sheikhdoms in the Arabian Peninsula to engineer their revolt against the multi-ethnic Ottoman Islamic Caliphate.

 

Fourth, the Washington, Vatican and London supported the likes of Osama Bin Laden, Wahhabi fundamentalism and the imposition of Islamic Shariah Law replacing the Western laws, to disintegrate Ottoman Empire and to secure American control over the oil resources of the Arabian Gulf. Papacy actively promoted the Wahhabi fundamentalism and Shariah Law not because Papacy believed in the supremacy of Koran over Bible, but to secure the alliance with Mecca so that priest-ruler concept may become acceptable in both the Christian and Islamic worlds. United States supported the Muslim clergy-ruler concept, Wahhabi fundamentalism and violent militancy employed by Muslim clergy to impose their rule over moderate Islamic societies, because the White House believed that priest-rulers would hand over the oil resources to American big oil more readily than their nationalist secular counterparts. Christian Church as well as Christian Colonial powers propagated the idea of Muslim clergy-ruler to gain control over the oil resources of Arab world, to undermine the emergence of any powerful supranational Islamic state.

 

Fifth, the Papacy and American Empire supported Wahhabi priest-rulers, believing that Muslim clergy would betray the national interests of their Muslim states more readily than their political nationalist counterparts in the Arab world. In nutshell, the advocates of militant Islam are the henchmen of the aspirants of the Mullah-rulers who are willing to mortgage their oil national resources to Christian colonial powers, in exchange of Christian support to their quest for political power as priest-king in the Islamic world. Goaded by the dream of acquiring political power the Muslim ulema and Wahhabi clergy voluntarily became fifth columnists in the Third world. Muslim clergy have fallen for the classical trap of the British colonialism: the Policy of Divide and Rule. Wahhabi priest-rulers, Islamic fundamentalists inadvertently became the instruments of Zionism and American colonialism that led to the subjugation of the oil-rich Islamic world to the Christian oil colonialism.

 

Sixth, just as Alaric the barbarian conqueror of Rome in 415 AD, secured the alliance with Pope of Rome to gain the full support of the Church of Rome for the conquest and destruction of the Roman Empire, by priest-rule of Pope over city of Rome. Pope betrayed Roman Empire for few crumbs of property and political power in the city of Rome. Similarly, Colonel Lawrence of Arabia in 1910s secured alliance with the Wahhabi Sharief of Mecca, offering to make his son the ruler of Iraq in exchange for his support for the rebellion against Ottomans. United States supported Wahhabi priest-ruler concept in the Islamic world, so that the Church should control the state in the Islamic world, and it suited the political goals of Papacy, the premier priest-king of the world. The principal cause of the Clash of Civilization in the Islamic world is the propagation of the concept of the Wahhabi priest-ruler by American oil colonialism and Papacy.

 

(2) Wahhabi Theocracy Vatican Zionist Plot

Two. The Wahhabi clergy ulema joined the bandwagon with the Vatican and Zionists hoping that like the Jewish Rabbi and Catholic Pope, the Wahhabi Ulema would enjoy greater political power and wealth in Islamic theocracies. The Vatican-Mecca took birth when the twin theocracies of Catholic Vatican and Wahhabi Saudi Arabia took birth in the 1920s. The birth of the sovereign Vatican theocracy with Pope as the sovereign ruler in 1929 coincided with the birth of the theocracy of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with King Abdul Aziz as the sovereign ruler and Koran as the law of the land. The theocracy of the Vatican with Pope as the Ruler of the Vatican took birth in 1929 in Italy, and before than from 1870 to 1929 Pope had been the prisoner of the Vatican on the orders of the King of Italy. Pope, and Roman Catholic Church enjoyed great political role in the Western Europe throughout Dark Age and Medieval Age.

 

The Islamic Clash of Civilization is the conspiracy of Christians to introduce the concept of Islamic theocracies in the Islamic world, as the two leading Islamic empires, the Ottoman Empire and Mughal Indian Empire, didn’t believe in the concept of theocracies, and the Muslim clergy ulema had no political role in the Islamic regimes in the Islamic history. The Vatican, United States, Britain and spymaster Colonel Lawrence of Arabia conspired with the underprivileged Wahhabi clergy ulema, to join forces with British and American Empires, who would establish Wahhabi theocracies in the Arabia, exchange Wahhabi clergy should accept American and British monopoly over Arab oil resources. United States has consistently supported the Muslim clergy to challenge the modern, liberal, moderate political leadership to impose Shariah theocracies in Iran, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Egypt, Nigeria and lastly in Iraq. In the Clash of Civilizations the democratic, liberal modern Protestant United States supported the Vatican type theocracies as the role model in the Islamic world. While United States demands the separation of the State and the Church in the United States, the White House demands that the Muslim Church should take over secular Muslim states in the Islamic world converting it into theocracies. United States supported Osama Bin Laden impose the fundamentalist Shariah Law in Afghanistan. The liberal democratic United States is the firm exponent and supporter of Islamic theocracies, because it realized that in exchange of political power in the Islamic nations, the Muslim Clergy and Ulema would accept the American monopoly over Islamic oil resources. India would find out to its dismay, that in spite of all pretensions of America’s War on Islamic terrorism, United States would put into power in some Islamic country in future.

 

The Clash of Civilization is the Christian plot to weaken Islam by encouraging Militant Islam’s Civilization wars on other Civilizations, so that Hindu, Buddhist and Orthodoxy Civilizations might become enemies of oil-rich Wahhabi Islamic Civilization, allowing Christian colonial powers to control, occupy and subjugate oil-rich Islamic world. First, Christian West historically financed, nurtured and supported Militant Islam for waging wars on Hindus, Orthodox Russians, Buddhist Chinese and moderate Muslims that opposed American oil colonialism. Western world hyped the Clash of Civilizations to mobilize supports for the Islamic militants in the West, to engineer the secession of the Muslim majority regions from the multi-ethnic, multi-cultural secular nations, namely, Ottoman Caliphate, Soviet Union, Indian Empire and China, because in the 21st Century of Asia the Christian Europe lagged behind Asian powers, namely, China, Japan and India. The Christian West reasoned that by hyping the Clash of Islam versus Hindu India, Orthodox Russia and Buddhist China, the entire Islamic would inadvertently fall into relationship of dependency and bondage with the Christian West and the United States. The CIA helped Militant Islam dig Islam’s own grave when Muslim terrorists attacked other world civilizations with impunity.

 

(3) Ban Wahhabi Books

Three. Future of Wahhabi-led Islamic Middle East is bleak. Semite Arab oil-producers would come under the colonial occupation of America and Semite Israel during 21st Century. The Thirty Years Counter Reformation Wars (1618-1648) pitted Catholics against Protestants in Europe. The moderate Muslim nations would wage the wars of the Clash of civilizations against barbarian Wahhabi fundamentalist Muslim nations to cleanse Islam of Wahhabi fundamentalism and Islamic terrorism. The Catholic-Protestant Wars cost the lives of one-third Germans living in Germany. The Wars on Wahhabi could also cost one-third or more of the Arab population in the Middle East, sometime in the first quarter of the 21st Century The future of Semite Wahhabi-led Islam is bleak and headed for self-destruction and would subordinate Islamic oil to Zionist Semite colonialism. Semite Wahhabi terrorists could give Judas Kiss to Islam and cause the subjugation of the Islamic world to Christian oil powers. Semite Wahhabi cult is the Semite Zionist plot and American colonialism plot to promote ethnic separatism in the Islamic world so that Arab oil producing nations remain under the subjugation and control of American oil colonialism. Future of Islam is bleak if Wahhabi cult succeeded in controlling the Muslim ulemas and clergy in the liberal, moderate modern Islamic nations. Wahhabi Clergy and Wahhabi fundamentalism declared as the enemy of Islam by moderate liberal Islamic intellectuals. The consensus of the Muslim intellectuals is that Saudi Wahhabi ulema theologians and Wahhabi clergy represented the Womb of Evil in Islam and would destroy Islam as religion itself, unless civilized Muslim nations take precautionary measures by militarily overthrowing the domination of Wahhabi cult in Mecca and Medina. Muslim intellectuals in civilized Muslim nations, India, Malaysia and Indonesia believe that Wahhabi books should be removed from libraries in Mosques, schools, colleges and universities and banned throughout the Muslim world. Malaysian Prime Minister Mahatir introduced a new whipping boy: the Wahhabi ulema (theologians) of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE and Qatar. Moderate Muslims realized that Wahhabi fundamentalist ulema have been morally bankrupt, avaricious and perpetrators of injustices to women, forcing them into bondage and servitude. Wahhabi clergy and ulema had been the primary beneficiaries of despotism in Muslim countries and Muslim theocratic societies. The tragedies that the Muslim world has suffered in the past 150 years were a result the complicity of the Wahhabi clergy and ulema with despotism and American Big oil. Muslim Wahhabi clergy and ulema supported the military dictatorship and the self-styled peddlers of American oil colonialism. Illiterate fundamentalist Muslim clergy replaced the educated sections of the Muslim urban middle classes from the driving seat in the Islamic world. Civilized Islamic nations, like Malaysia, Indonesia and India should take the lead and remove Wahhabi from positions of power and influence from Islamic world.

 

(4) Wahhabi Will Destroy Islam

Four. The Zionists, American oil colonialism and Colonel Lawrence of Arabia designed the Wahhabi fundamentalism as useful tool to enslave oil-producing Islamic world. Wahhabi cult is the product of the globalization, which wants to impose Wahhabi barbarianism globally throughout Islamic world, so that Islamic nations might come under the control and subjugation of American oil colonialism. What is the role of Islam in the era of globalization? The Muslim world, ridden with internecine feuds and conflicts with the West, is in deep crisis. Muslim world is a victim of injustice, misunderstanding and unfair propaganda. "Islamophobia," which is supposedly growing in the West with tacit encouragement from powerful "lobbies" in Washington. Muslims rather than focus on concrete issues, drifted into the uncertain seas of obfuscation, where conspiracy theories make waves and dead souls assume the captaincy of phantom vessels. The central question is both valid and in need of urgent treatment. The so-called "global world" is a Western, mainly American construct, in the shaping of which Muslims have played no part. The "global" idea could become an instrument for providing the economically and militarily weaker societies with the means not only to survive but also to strengthen their identity in a pluralist world. Islam should look into its historic, cultural and intellectual resources to find an alternative model or to become an active participant in developing the one proposed by the West. The choice is not between being an object of globalization or its enemy. Arab Muslims reject globalization but support American oil colonialism. Muslims reject the galaxy of brilliant Islamic thinkers while Europe suffered under barbarian Middle Age and Dark Age. Muslims reject globalization, while accepting all its imperatives in practice, in terms of American monopoly over Arab oil and American military bases in Saudi Arabia, exposed Islamic intellectual laziness. Muslims try to challenge modernization, demand for freedom and equality of women, by violent action, without competing with the civilized world in the field of ideas, amounts to decadent Islamic formalism, which resulted in the attacks against the United States on 9/11. Muslim terrorist action presented as a substitute for Islamic thought in the manner of Voltaire's bug. That Voltaire’s bug, annoyed by the tick tock of the clock, committed suicide by jumping at it, stopping the "infernal machine" for a fraction of a second. Muslim world would be committing a collective suicide if they continued to follow the lead of Wahhabi fundamentalists. If Muslims continue to follow the leadership of barbarian Wahhabi fundamentalist Ulema theologians, then Islam could self-destruct in the 15th Century Hijra (21st Century), as some claim was foretold in the scripture.

 

(5) Failure of the Wahhabi Islamic System

Five. There is no advanced Islamic nation in the world. Islamic societies are the most backward societies of the world. Serious debate on where Islam is today and where it needs to be tomorrow must start with an end to the demagogic blame game. Muslims put the blame on the usual suspects of modern Islamic mythology: the Crusaders, the Orientalists, the Imperialists, the Zionists, the Communists, the liberals, the secularists and so on. Muslims by identifying any of those usual suspects as author of the Islamic predicament they were absolving generations of Muslim intellectual and political leaders of their share of responsibility. Muslims are not prepared even to discuss the tragic failure of such supposedly "Islamic" systems as in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Sudan and Afghanistan under the Taliban, and the oppression of women in corrupt House of al Saud monarchy and the tyranny of the religious police in Saudi Arabia. 

 

(6) Keep Wahhabi Ulema Out of Politics

Six. The Clash of civilizations in the Islamic world would take the form of war between pro-Wahhabi terrorist Islamic fundamentalist forces versus modern civilized moderate Islam. Muslims must accept and acknowledge that politics, economics and ethics are domains distinct from that of theology and Wahhabi ulema clergy must not interfere. What this means is that political, economic and ethical issues cannot be defined, analyzed, understood and answered in Wahhabi theological terms. The Saudi religious police denied these distinct domains for distinct political, economic and ethics domains, free from the repression of the Wahhabi religious police, enabled Muslim despots and fundamentalist demagogues of various ideological shades to invent a theopolitical discourse that prevents any rational discussion of the problems Muslims face today. Once we set aside the theopolitical discourse and end the censorship of the Wahhabi ulema and religious police, then only Muslims could acknowledge the distinction between Militant Islam as Wahhabi terrorism, Islam as a faith, Islam as an existential political reality, and Islam as a civilization. Muslim scholars should subject Islam to rational and systematic criticism aimed at discovering its weaknesses and suggesting ways to correct them. The fundamentalist Wahhabi ulema and Clergy tried to impose the barbarian Islam of Arab Bedouin over civilized Muslims of South Asia and Southeast Asia. Wahhabi ulema trying to justify the exploitation of the Wahhabi royal family attack any sensible critique of the way Muslims live and condemn every progressive measures as a critique of Islam as a faith and thus present as a religious dividing line separating Barbarian Wahhabi Islam and Civilized non-Arab Islam.

 

(7) Reject Wahhabi Follow Deobandi

Seven. The Islamic world should reject Saudi Wahhabi ulema and clergy and follow the lead of Indian Deobandi school of Islamic theology and elect India’s Deobandis and Iran’s Sufism as the reigning theology of Mecca 7 Medina. The Civilized Muslims of North Africa and South Asia unlike the barbarian Bedouin clergy of Arabia did recognize the existence of domains distinct from theology, and it was that recognition that enabled several generations of non-Arab African and South Asian Muslim scholars to dig into the Greek, Persian and Indian philosophical and cultural heritage in order to enrich Islamic thought. The theopolitical discourse that is designed to limit freedom of thought and expression in the Muslim world is a new phenomenon developed by a small number of militant thinkers influenced by Wahhabi totalitarian ideologies, financed by American oil colonialism. The challenge that most Muslim peoples face today is religious and rather than political, one. Wahhabi fundamentalism after taking over Mecca and Medina with the support of American Big Oil poised to take over Muslims theologians and ulema of the Civilized Islamic world in South Asia, Central Asia and Southeast Asia, to force oil-producing Islamic world into the servitude of the Christian American oil colonialism. Semite Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalism is the Zionist plot to destroy Islamic world and to force Islamic oil producing world into the bondage and servitude of the American Oil Colonialism. Once civilized Muslims take the lead and remove Wahhabi ulema and clergy from positions of power and influence in Mecca and Medina and other Islamic nations, then Muslims will develop a modern and democratic society in the era of globalization. But to do that Muslims must understand that Wahhabi fundamentalism is not part of Islam, and Islamic religion is part of life and women have equal rights as man, not the other way round as the Wahhabi theopolitical discourse suggests. The Muslim leaders probably afraid of incurring the wrath of Wahhabi terrorists and fundamentalists refuse to let educated modern Muslim take the social and political leadership role in the Islamic world.

 

(8) Berlusconi On Christianity Vs Islam Clash

Eight. Italy represents the New Christian Europe that believed in the subjugation of Islamic world to Christians. Italy, Britain and Spain supported America’s colonial war on Iraq to establish American oil colony over Iraq. First, the President Bush’s War on Afghanistan and Iraq represented Christian Civilization’s Crusades on Islamic nations in 21st Century. United States supported Wahhabi tyrannies in the OPEC nations not because Christian American accepted the superiority of Islam over Christianity, but because Wahhabi rulers accepted American monopoly over Arab oil and gas resources. Second, the Christian Civilization would conquer Islamic civilization, like it conquered Communism. Western Civilization is superior of Islamic Civilization, because Christian Civilization has at its core, as its greatest value, freedom, which is not the heritage of the Islamic culture. The Christian West will continue to conquer peoples, like it conquered Communism, even if it means a confrontation with another civilization, the Islamic one, as Islamic Civilization is stuck where it was 1,400 years ago. Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi has a history of speaking his mind. On Sept. 26, 2001, Silvio Berlusconi said Western civilization was superior to Islam breaking ranks with the United States and other allies when they were trying to reach out to the Muslim world after Sept. 11. "We must be aware of the superiority of our civilization, a system that has guaranteed well-being, respect for human rights and in contrast with Islamic countries respect for religious and political rights, a system that has as its values understandings of diversity and tolerance." Western civilization is superior because it "has at its core, as its greatest value, freedom, which is not the heritage of the Islamic culture." Berlusconi trusted "the West will continue to conquer peoples, like it conquered communism," even if it means a confrontation with "another civilization, the Islamic one, stuck where it was 1,400 years ago." Brilliant Berlusconi correctly pointed out that Christian Civilization is superior to Islamic civilization, as Islamic civilization is 1,400 years behind time. The Western Christian civilization would continue to conquer Islamic Civilization so that its people may adopt Christian values.

 

(9) On Christianity Vs Wahhabi Islam Clash

Nine. The Christians have right to conquer Islamic world and impose Christianity on Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Turkey as these countries were thriving Christian nations before they were conquered by Islamic sword and forced to become Muslim by sword. Since after the conquest of Muslim Iraq by Christian America, the Christian Sword proved to be mightier than Islamic sword, it means that Christian god mightier than Islamic god, hence Christian nations have very right to impose Christianity on former Christian lands in Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Turkey, in the 21st Century. America also believed in the superiority of the Christian Civilization over Islamic civilization, however, America purposely promoted Wahhabi fundamentalism in the modern Islamic nations, as unlike Wahhabi Arabs the nationalist Arabs opposed exploitation of Arab oil resources by American Big Oil.

 

First, after the consolidation of American colonial rule over Iraq, United States would no longer need the support of the Wahhabi rulers of Saudi Arabia to control Arabian oil, and Pentagon might do to Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE, what it did to Iraq. Christian America has as much right over the oil-rich lands of Arabia and oil and gas resources of Arabia, as it has over the land and resources over the lands of Native Americans in Manhattan, which Dutch bought for trinkets from Red Indians. Wahhabi leaders agreed to transfer all ownership of Arabian oil resources to Americans in Saudi Arabia and to Britain in Iraq, in exchange for British-American support to the Wahhabi rule in Arabian Peninsula. Technically all the oil and gas wealth of Saudi Arabia and Iraq belong to Americans and British Big Oil. Wahhabi Saudi Arabia has rights over Saudi oil and gas no more than Red Indians have over the Island of Manhattan that they sold to Dutch traders for trinkets. Influenced by Colonel Lawrence of Arabia, Wahhabi rulers of Saudi Arabia and Iraq contracted to sell all the future oil and gas resources to America and Britain, and these resources no longer owned by Arab states in the clash of civilizations. Just as the property rights transferred to white colonial powers in USA from Native Americans after the conquest of America, similarly rights to Iraqi oil and gas transferred to America and Britain after the conquest of Iraq. Americans have every right to create a new society in Iraq in the image of Christian America.

 

Second, American colonial policy believed in depopulation of colonial lands of original inhabitants to create new civilization of white Christians, it happened in North America as well as Diego Garcia in 1960s. The oil-producing nations are thinly populated nations it is possible that as the Clash of Races progresses during the 21st Century American oil colonialism might remove Arab inhabitants from the oil-producing lands and carve out empty oil-producing lands as separate independent state that might join the Federation of the United States as the 53rd States. United States might do to the Wahhabi Arabs some time in 21st Century what it did to Red Indians in the North America in 18th and 19th Centuries, and bring into the United States the some of the lands of OPEC nations. The oil-regions of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, Brunei and Iraq could join United States as a State, like Puerto Rica, Guam and Hawaii. It is inconceivable that thinly populated oil-producing nations would survive as independent nations in the new age of colonial empires. The personal interests of the ruling elite in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Qatar, and Brunei demands that these countries explore options to join into Confederation with United States, so that United States continue to protect the property rights of the tyrant Wahhabi rulers and Wahhabi theocracies.

 

(10) Menace of the Priest-Ruler Concept

Ten. The battle lines in the global clash of civilizations are drawn along the twin issues of the strict wall that separates the realm of the State and Church, and issue of the priest-ruler. The US Constitution created a strict wall that separated the State and Church in United States. The foreign policy of the White House and the Vatican consistently adopted policies that broke down the walls in the Third World that separated the State and Church, to encourage the power lust of Muslim Clergy and Catholic Bishops in the Third World. Untied States formulated its policies towards South Korea, Myanmar, China, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia and Taiwan to weaken power of the Buddhist Monks and to increase the political power of Christian priests. United States consistently supported the imposition of Shariah Law over Third World nations to reward pro-US Muslim clergy in Africa and in the Islamic world. Papacy represented the greatest threat of Priest-king to the democratic world. The abolition of Papacy and the dismantling of the global empire of Catholic churches and the direct elections of the Papacy and Bishops by the Catholic laity would end the menace of the Priest-Rulers in the Christian world. United States disturbed the process of modernization of the Third World societies when it encouraged the Islamic nation impose Shariah Law replacing modern European Laws in place from the colonial times. United States and Papacy emerged as the greatest threat to the process of the Westernization of the Third World societies. Pope had been disturbing peace and tranquility in the Third World and the United States by series of political measures designed to enforce Catholic laity’s loyalty to the foreign Potentate and the Vatican. United States disturbed social tranquility in the Third World by encouraging the loyalty of the Muslim clergy and ulema to the foreign potentate based in Mecca.

 

14(7) Political Clash of Religions

(1) Priest’s Power Lust is Cause of Clash of Civilization

One. Clash of Civilizations is not a war of religions, but a war waged by pretenders of priest-rulers and priest-kings, who misused religion to propagate predatory religious intolerance of Wahhabi fundamentalism, Papal and Evangelical Christian religious right conservative conspiracy. Religions do not clash only the predator priest-rulers distort religion to propagate intolerance to propel priests into political power. The evil lie not in the Religion but in the political aspirations of the priests that conspired with drug cartel to undermine the democratic or liberal political leadership. The Clash of Civilization is the instrument of diplomacy of the United States and the instrument of domestic politics of the priests for the political takeover of the civilized religious nations.

 

(2) Pope’s Theocracy is Cause of Clash

Two. The theocracy of Papacy is the principal cause of the Clash of Civilization. First, the concept of secular rulers and States had been in constant clash with the concept of priest-king and theocracies. In the Roman Catholic worldview the Pope, Bishops and Priests have a secular role and exercise political power. The Pope’s influence over Christian Roman Emperor Theodosius (died 395 AD) resulted in the promulgation of the evil Edict that imposed by sword Christianity throughout pagan Roman Empire, which resulted in the destruction of the Roman Empire by 415 AD, when barbarian leader Alaric conquered Rome. Second, Catholic Pope developed alliance with the barbarian German conquerors of Rome to anoint barbarian king as the King of Holy Roman Empire, in exchange for the Pope to subjugate the Rome and Italy. In the first clash of civilizations the foreign invaders made a pact with the priests of Rome to sabotage the Empire so that the priests could loot the wealth of the Empire and enjoy temporal power as the priest-king.

 

Third, the history of the Roman Catholic Church of Rome is the history of Dark Age and Medieval Europe, where Pope the priest-king unleashed unheard of terror, burnt more than 9 million women, men and children as witches. Fourth, the barbarian foreign ruler of Roman Empire were anointed as the Holy Roman Empire by the Pope, who used its alliance with the foreign invaders to keep Rome under the tyranny of the Priest-kings. Fifth, the King of Italy in 1870 entered the Vatican and divested the Pope of all temporal power and the subsequent Popes remained prisoners of the Vatican from 1870 to 1929, when Benito Mussolini gave freedom to the Pope and recognized the sovereignty of the Vatican.

 

(3) Wahhabi Theocracy is Cause of Clash

Three. Just as the foreigner barbarian German invader Alaric secured alliance and cooperation of Pope for the conquest of Rome and confiscation of the wealth of Roman Empire, the foreigner American and British Empire led by Colonel Lawrence of Arabia secured the cooperation of the Ottoman Court of Sharief of Mecca, the leader of the Wahhabi clergy, who agreed to conspire against the Ottoman rulers and in exchange for Wahhabi priest-king in Saudi Arabia would transfer all the oil riches to American and British Big Oil. Just as the German barbarian invaders rewarded Pope by making him the Priest-king of Rome, and in exchange Pope agreed to transfer the ownership of the erstwhile lands and riches of Roman Empire to foreign barbarian invaders. The Pope, United States and British invaders could win the support of the Priests of Mecca, and made the Wahhabi clergy the Priest-King of Saudi Arabia, and in exchange US-British Empires got all rights over oil resources of Arabia.

 

(4) The CIA Courted Muslim Clergy Worldwide

Four. The CIA courted the Muslim clergy worldwide and offered them share of the political power in their countries if they supported American Oil Colonialism. The CIA and the White House supported the imposition of Shariah Law and the empowerment of the Priest-Judges and Priest-rulers in Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sudan, Egypt, besides Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Qatar, Oman-Muscat and Yemen. President Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright imposed the rule of Muslim Ulema in Afghanistan, when USA, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and UAE, imposed the rule of Taleban, Al Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan in 1995. In the clash of civilizations throughout 20th Century, the United States, the Papacy and the CIA has consistently supported the political aspirations of the fundamentalist militant Muslim clergy, overlooked the nexus of the Wahhabi clergy and Heroin drug cartels, and helped impose the Shariah Law over the Western laws in place in the former colonies of Africa and Asia. The white European Christian colonial powers in the Muslim Middle East and Muslim world realized that just as Pope and Church of Rome betrayed the Roman Empire and joined forces with the foreign invaders And barbarians and cooperated with the invaders for the demise of the Roman Empire, similarly the Muslim clergy would work loyally with Christian invaders and betray the secular governments of multi-ethnic Ottoman Islamic Caliphate, and secular Indian Empire in 1947. Many of the Muslim clergy accepted the Faustian bargain with the CIA and American-British oil colonialism to betray their countries and rulers and work as fifth columnists for the CIA, and agreed to hand over all the wealth and resources of the Islamic world to the Christian foreign invaders and colonial rulers. It can be safely argued that most of the Wahhabi clergy, under the influence of the CIA, became traitors and enemies of theirs secular states, after Wahhabi clergy signed this Faustian pact with the American and British oil colonialism.

 

(5) Wahhabi Clergy is Enemy of Islam

Five. In July 2003, international gathering of Muslim scholars in Malaysia identified the real enemy of Islam, the Wahhabi clergy of Saudi Arabia. Most the Muslim scholars introduced as new whipping boy: the Wahhabi Ulema theologians funded and supported by Saudi Arabia and the CIA. The menace of Wahhabi fundamentalism is fast growing in the Muslim world with the tacit encouragement from powerful American media, the CIA and the Pentagon. Many of the Muslim scholars demanded that the Wahhabi books should be pulled from libraries in the mosques, schools, colleges and libraries. The civilized Muslims of Malaysia and Indonesia might lead the invasions of civilized moderate Muslim over Mecca and Medina to expel Wahhabi clergy from Arabian Peninsula, so that civilized Islamic sects, such as Deobandi Sunni sect of Dar ul Uloom of Deoband, Shahranpur UP India could replace Wahhabi sect of Arabian Peninsula as the dominant religious sect of Mecca and Medina. The Clash of Civilizations in the Islamic world would pit the civilized, modern, moderate and liberal Muslim nations against the Wahhabi nations that might result in the change of power in Mecca and Medina, the holiest cities of the Islamic world. In the event the Wahhabi cult loses the control over Mecca and Medina to the rival forces led by moderate liberal Islamic sects, could usher in the Islamic world back into the folds of the Civilized world. The clash of Civilization in the Islamic world would result in the destruction of the Wahhabi Monarchy of Al Saud and replace Wahhabi sect by more modern sect such as Deobandi sect of Dar ul Uloom. The Wahhabi versus anti-Wahhabi wars, the Wahhabi vs. Deobandi wars might result in the loss of lots of lives, as happened in the Counter Reformation Wars of 1618-1648 in Europe. The Wahbabi militant clergy seeks to establish in the Islamic world priest-kings, the concept Pope advocated in the Middle Age and Dark Age. The Wahhabi priest-king rule in the Islamic world would usher in the Dark Age in the Islamic world. It is high time that the non-Wahhabi forces of Reformation would take arms and militarily expel Wahhabi clergy from Mecca, Medina and Arabian Peninsula in the first quarter of the 21st Century. The Wahhabi misrule and tyranny in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE would meet the fate of Saddam Hussein and Baath Party in Iraq of 2003, before the end of the first decade of the New Millennium.

 

14(8) Illusory Clash Civilization

(1) Political Nature of Civilizations

One. Twelfth, there are seven Civilizations in the world in 21st Century, namely, the Civilizations of (1) China, (2) India, (3) Europe, (4) America, (5) Mestizo South America, (6) Arab, and (7) Africa. India and United States are the two sides of the same river that can never meet but destined to remain near to each other and could neither meet nor separate, so long as the river lives. India and United States represent two distinct Civilizations, the Indian Civilization and American Civilization. American Civilization is as much related to the European Civilization as Indian Civilization is related to the Chinese Civilization. The roots of American and European Civilizations are similar, but European Civilization represents the flowering of the Catholic Christianity and American Civilization represents the flowering of the Protestant Christianity and these two similar Civilizations however would go separate ways. Russian Civilization shall merge with the European Civilization, as Imperial Russia finds common synergy with France and Germany. European Union would emerge as the common White European Christian Civilization, where three principal rival sects of Christianity, namely, Catholicism, Protestantism and Orthodoxy would find common grounds and the New Constitution would adopt American innovation of the separation of the State and Church. Russia would no longer promote the interests of the Third World and jettison the Soviet traditions. Just as Mediterranean separates White Christian Civilization of Europe and North African Arab Muslim Civilization, the Rio Grande River separates the English-speaking White Protestant United States and Canada from the Spanish-speaking Brown Mestizo Catholic Latino Civilization. The major Civilizations of the world are: (1) Yellow Buddhist Chinese Civilization that includes Japan and Korea; (2) Brown Hindu-Buddhist-Muslim Greater Indian Civilization that includes India, Iran and nations of South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Central Asia; (3) White Christian European Civilization that includes Western Europe, Eastern Europe and Russia; (4) White Western Christian English-speaking American Civilization that includes United States, Canada, Britain, Ireland and Australia; (5) Brown Mestizo Latino Catholic and native American Civilization that includes Mexico, Central America, Andean America, South America and the Caribbean; (6) Arab Sunni Muslim Civilization that includes Arabian Peninsula, North Africa, the Middle East excluding Shiite Aryan Iran; (7) Black African Civilization that includes Christians, Muslims and Pagans in the entire continent of Africa. Brown Mestizo South American Civilization would gradually merge into the Brown Indian Civilization of Asia, because of common identity of the brown race and it would focus on the common interests of the Brown race. Brown Hindu Indian Civilization would gradually merge into Yellow Buddhist Civilization of China, because of common Hindu-Buddhist-Taoist-Shinto Culture and it would focus on the common interests of Asia and jointly herald the advent of the Asian Century in the 21st Century. English speaking Commonwealth of Nations could emerge as a distinct Civilization of its own because of the common language and similar political and legal system. Pan European Civilization shall emerge out of the synthesis of the Christian Catholic, Protestant and Orthodoxy cultures and Papacy would have very limited role in the Pan European Civilization that would focus on the common interest of the White European race.

 

(2) Alliances of Hindu Civilization

Two. Indian Prime Minister’s visit of China in June 2003 opened the prospects of the alliance of Indian and Chinese Civilizations. Brown Hindu Indian Civilization would be able to develop closer Civilizations level alliances with Yellow Buddhist Chinese Civilization, Brown Mestizo Civilization of South America and Black Pagan Civilization of Africa. Indian Hindu Civilization would compete with White European and White American Christian civilizations. Indian Civilization is in competition with the Christian American civilization for influence over Islamic Civilizations. White American and European Civilizations promoting the Wahhabi Sect of Islam to bring the oil-producing Islamic world in alliance with the American Christian world. India would promote the Sunni Deobandi School of Islam as well as Shiite Sufi Mysticism as rivals to Wahhabi for the leadership of the Islam. Arab Islam would align with Protestant Catholic Christian Civilization. The Non-Wahhabi and Shiite Islam and Sufi Islam would align with Hindu Civilization to recreate Mughal Civilization. In the global clash of civilizations Hindu Civilization would join the side of Buddhist Civilization, brown Mestizo Civilization of South America and black Pagan African Civilization. The Shiite Islam, Sufi Islam and moderate liberal secular Islam would join the clash of Civilizations on the side of Hindus.

 

(3) Menace of Ethnic Religious Separatism

Three. British secret services promoted the concept of Two Nation Theory to propagate that Muslims should form a separate state in India to protect their separate ethnic interests that resulted in the partition of 1947. British American oil colonialism promoted the Arab Bedouin ethnicity and Wahhabi fundamentalism to promote Arab nationalism based on ethnicity and religious sect based divisiveness. British colonialism injected religion and language-based divisiveness to undermine Ottoman Empire and Indian Empire. British colonialism and spy Colonel Lawrence of Arabia hired Mecca-based clergy and terrorists to engineer revolt among barbarian Bedouin of Mecca and Medina to engineer the secession of Arabian Peninsula from Ottoman Empire. American oil colonialism entered into pact with fundamentalist Wahhabi clergy and tribes of Mecca and Medina to transfer religious power over Mecca to Wahhabi clergy and political power to Wahhabi House of Al Saud in exchange for American monopoly over Arabian oil and gas resources in perpetuity. British colonialism established rule of

Indian Empire over oil-rich Iraq. Indian Empire before 1947 enjoyed 100% control over Iranian oil and 50% control over Iraqi oil. British spy agencies hired Mohammed Ali Jinnah to propagate the concept of Islam as the basis of state to engineer the secession of Pakistan from India in 1947. The modern Indian era that opened with the end of the Mughal Monarchy in 1857 was a challenging turning point in India’s history. Perceptive minds in India comprehended that neither civilizations nor religion could be compartmentalized into single homogenous units. Mughal Indian Civilization like Ottoman civilization was a multi-ethnic, multi-religious and multi-linguist Civilization. The main hope for harmony in our country, and indeed in the world, lies in the acknowledgement of our diversities and the plurality of our identities and rejecting the religion or language based divisiveness.

 

(4) Sub-Civilization Identity

Four. Hindus do not identify themselves with the separate sects of Hinduism and every Hindu identifies himself as a Hindu rather than as a Shaivite or Vaishnavite. Christians on the other hand always identify themselves either as protestant or as a Catholic and there is no separate identity as Christians, except when White Catholics and White Protestants want to undertake common assaults on either Muslims or pagans. Muslims identify themselves either as Sunnis or as Shiites. Sunni Muslims are now increasingly identified as either Wahhabi or anti-Wahhabi Muslims. Islamic world divided into three mutually exclusive civilizations, the Shiites, the Arab Wahhabis and Moderate Muslims. People of the world cannot be categorized into exclusive civilizations, mutually exclusive religions, ideologies, commanding systems or classifications. There are so many diverse trends in every civilization as well as in each religion that one cannot speak of one Christian world, one Islamic world, one Hindu world or one Buddhist world since the human affiliations are complex and diverse. People have linkages besides a civilization or a religion, with polities, languages, literatures, vocations and so on. One cannot partition single human civilization to invoke the images of a unified, homogenous White Christian Western world, or a unified Islamic world, or a unified Buddhist world, or a unified Hindu world, or a unified pagan world. It betrays crudeness of analysis and poverty of vision, besides lacking in historical objectivity and contemporary reality. Christian Civilization is a misnomer, either it includes two distinct religious civilizations, Protestant civilization and Catholic civilization, or White Civilization based on white race. Similarly, Shiite Civilization is primarily Persian civilization, and Wahhabi Sunni Civilization is primarily Arab Civilization. Muslim Central Asia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia and Indonesia belong to Mughal Indian Civilization and are part of Greater Indian Civilization.

 

(5) Cultural Cross Fertilization

Five. Cultural cross-fertilization had been the hallmark of Hindu and Buddhist Civilizations. Hindu Civilization and Buddhist Civilization are unique in the sense that they unlike Islamic and Christian civilizations do not crush diversity rather encourage the diversities of their continental size populations. India and China represent one-third population of the world and accept the principle of diversity in civilization. For instance to speak of a ‘Hindu India” does not ignore the reality of the Indian art, literature, music and even food caused by the complex interactions over centuries between Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs, Christians, Jews and several other communities. Indian Civilization is comprehended only after taking into account this prolonged process of cultural cross-fertilization.

 

(6) Divisiveness of Religious Intolerance

Six. The religious intolerance is the common trait of Wahhabi Sunni Islamic Civilization as well as Catholic Civilization. Catholics and Vatican do not consider non-Catholics as true Christians. Wahhabi does not accept as non-Wahhabi Muslims as true Muslims. Wahhabi clergy do not accept Shiite Muslims as Muslims. The concepts of one Christian world or one Islamic world are mythical images that do not conform to either history or geography. There is no single religion called Christianity, it is either Protestant Christianity or Roman Catholicism. Protestant civilization is at war against Catholic Civilization. Protestant Civilization is totally different from Catholic civilization and they are united under one White Civilization on the basis of common race. Protestant Christianity is totally separate religion from Catholic Christianity and Catholics have killed more Protestants in history on religious ground than the Protestants that died at hands of non-Catholics in wars. As we know, the so-called one Christian World or Christian Civilization indulged in numerous inter-se conflicts and the two world wars that killed more men, women and children of their own faith than any struggle between different religions. There is no single Civilization called Islamic civilization, there are three distinct civilizations of Muslim people, Arab Wahhabi Sunni Civilization, Persian Shiite Civilization, Moderate Sunni Muslim civilization of Subcontinent and Indonesia. The Muslims of Central Asia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia and Indonesia have more in common with Indian Civilization than either with Saudi Arabia or Iran. Technically speaking, Central Asian Muslim republics, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia and Indonesia and Christian Philippines and Buddhist Laos, Cambodia, South Vietnam, Sri Lanka, Bhutan and Tibet belong to Indian Civilization historically. China had no influence over the civilizations of South Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Burma, Malaysia and Indonesia. Arab countries hand no influence over the civilizations of Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Afghanistan and Kurdistan. Shiite Civilization is at war against Sunni Wahhabi Civilization. Shiite Civilization is totally different from Sunni Civilization. More Shiites have died at hands of Sunni Muslims for religious reasons than died at hands of non-Muslims on political grounds. Similar are the tales of wars amongst Shiite and Sunni feudal lords of this sub-continent who worshipped the same gods.

 

(7) Clash of Islamic & Christian Civilization

Seven. The ‘Clash of Civilizations’ as it is being called in white world as the Clash of Christian and Islamic civilizations, is a myth fostered to ensure the dominance of a few Whites over the other Non-White. Japan, China and Korea belong to the same Buddhist Civilization, even when Japan evolved its own unique civilizational values and achievements and China and Japan fought against each other in the Second World War and continue to share mutual mistrust, so does Korea against Japan. Korean Civilization and Japanese Civilization have less in common with Confucian China and more in common with Indian legacy of Buddhist Civilization. In a way the entire continent of Asia can be called Hindu-Buddhist Civilization that includes China, India, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Mongolia, Taiwan, Bhutan, Burma, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Malaysia, Indonesia and Philippines. The Greater India and Greater China represented the Asian Buddhist and Hindu Civilizations.

 

(8) Europe as Counterweight to United States

Eight. Europe can counterbalance the hegemony of the United States by developing closer ties with Russia, China and India. The dominant question that preoccupies the brilliant minds of the leaders and diplomats of Europe, France, Germany and Russia is: How to check and control the preeminence of the United States in the International System? European intellectuals own original "hot idea" in the 2003 argues for a counterbalance to American global hegemonic pretensions through a unified European foreign policy led by the pioneering "core" European nations. The principal role Europe would play in the Clash of Races would be to consolidate Europe as counter-weight to United States in the international system. European answer of the “End of the History” is to celebrate the adoption of the Single Constitution of Europe that established the single President and single Foreign Minister of Europe. The real fall of the Berlin Wall shall be the fall of the sovereign nation States of Europe into the Confederation State of Europe governed by a single Constitution of Europe. By launching the Constitution of Europe and selection of the Single President of Europe would emerge as the counter-weight to United States in the 21st Century. United States celebrated the “End of Ideology” by arguing that the American Ideology of Freedom, Capitalism and Democracy caused the demise of “Communist Ideology,” demise of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War and the fall of the Berlin Wall. United States hyped the Clash of Civilizations by undertaking common Western Christian Crusades against Buddhist nations of Asia, namely, Vietnam Laos, Cambodia, Burma, South Korea and Taiwan. United States mobilized the White Christian world against Islamic world in name of America’s War on Islamic terrorism.

 

Europe's old laggards will never balance US power even after adopting the Draft Constitution of Europe and creation of the single President of Europe, because for Europe to be an effective counterweight to preeminent United States would require far-reaching changes European policies and solid defense ties with Russia or India or China. European counterbalance to American global hegemonic aspirations and Pax Americana can be accomplished through a unified European foreign policy led by the pioneering core European nations, namely France or Germany. It is moral imperative for Europe to curb American primacy and unilateralism and most of Europeans support this approach. French scholar Jacques Derrida and German scholar Jürgen Habermas published in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, the European intellectuals’ own original "hot idea". Arguing for a counterbalance to American global hegemonic pretensions, Derrida and Habermas maintained that this could only be accomplished through a unified European foreign policy led by the pioneering "core" European nations. Their call for a European identity more significantly linked to the belief that Europe must act to curb American primacy and unilateralism. This articulates what many in Europe are thinking. American earlier came up with slogans such as "the clash of civilizations" and "the end of history" which allowed president Bush to wage wars of oil colonialism disguised as America’s war on Islamic terrorism and Islamic WMDs. Constitutional decisions, like creating the office of a single foreign minister, would go a long way towards enhancing the role of Europe in world affairs.

 

(9) Race of US Hare and India-China Tortoise

Nine. India and China Tortoise would overtake flamboyant American Hare in not so distant future. With the benchmark interest rates falling below 1% in and the USA heading for deflationary phase of economic cycle, India and China likely to overtake United States in the size of their economies and purchasing power. American Hare might lose its vitality with the downturn of the US Service Sector including Financial Sector that contributed towards 72 percent of US GNP in 2000. If India China détente consolidated into Asian common Market then Japan has no option but to join the India China common market as India alone could pull Japan out of the deflation. Chinese dreams to quadruple China’s GNP in next ten years could become a reality only when the Dragon China and Elephant India opened up economies to each other. Asian Common Market comprising India, China and Japan, and Asian Defense Pact led by India and China poised to overtake NAFTA, European Union and NATO in first quarter of the 21st Century. Sino-Indian Tortoise poised to overtake American Hare in the global clash of civilizations. The United States needs to pay attention and adjust to emerging shifts in Asian alliances, lest it play hare to the Sino-Indian tortoise, said Robert Radtke, “China and India: High stakes for US interests, International herald Tribune, June 23, ’03. Sino-Indian détente that began with prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee’s China’s visit might enable Sino-Indian tortoise overtake American hare. How does the United States fit in this changing landscape of Sino-Indian relations and Asia's future? Neither India nor China wants an Asia dominated by the United States. Both China and India see themselves as great powers fallen on bad times centuries ago, but well on their way back to reclaiming their rightful places as preeminent nations in the world in 21st Century. If China and India settle their differences and deepen economic and cultural cooperation and diplomatic engagement they can establish a multipolar world in first quarter of the 21st Century, in which U.S. power in Asia is moderated and held in check a stated goal of China and India, France and Russia.

 

(10) USA-India-China Triangular Balance

Ten. In 2003, India replaced Japan as the key player in Asia and USA India and China triangular balance determined the Asian balance. India shall play more important role than ASEAN countries and Japan for the stability of Asian Balance of Power. The India-China détente 2003 created new triangular balance of power among, United States, China and India that would determine the Asian balance of power in the 21st Century. Japan would play less important diplomatic and political role than India as well as China. Nixon Administration Triangular Balance of USA, Japan and China determined the Asian balance of Power in 1970s, 80s and 90s. Since Secretary Henry Kissinger and President Richard Nixon's visit to China, a triangular relationship among the United States, Japan and China played an important role in the maintenance of peace and stability in Asia. Perhaps the Vajpayee visit to Beijing foreshadows a new kind of triangular stability with China, the United States and India at the three corners. Given economic and military might of the United States 2003, the challenge India-China may present in future is too long-term to be taken seriously by the White House during Bush Administration, which believes that preeminence of the United States has come to stay for ever and they believe only in short-term diplomatic fixes. But China and India think in terms of generations, not quarterly results. The United States needs to pay attention and adjust to emerging shifts in Asian alliances, lest US play hare to the Sino-Indian tortoise and allow India and China to overtake United States as economic and military powers. It is wisely said that India and China are sleeping giants and the world would tremble when India and China wake up and assert their rightful place under the sun.

 

(11) India China Russia Europe Eurasian Axis

Eleven. Indian Prime Minister’s visit to China in June 2003 brought about Sino-Indian détente, much similar to the Sino-US détente President Nixon’s visit to Communist China in 1970s. The new generation of China, led by President Hu Jintao developed closer ties with India and Russia to develop Russia-China-India Triangular Balance to develop common Asian response to America’s overbearing predominance in the aftermath of the American conquest of Iraq. The consolidation of European Union after the adoption of the Constitution of Europe and evolution of the closer ties of Russia with France, Germany and Russia would consolidate a common White Christian front in Europe and Russia. The Hindu-Buddhist Brown-Yellow Asian Axis of India, China and Japan would find common national interests with Western Christendom-Orthodoxy White European Russia-Europe Axis and fruitful Quadrangular Europe-Russia-China-India Eurasian Axis would develop and become powerful enough to hold United States in check. 

 

(12) Mullah Military Mafia CIA Nexus

Twelve. United States entered the clash of Civilization against the women’s rights and freedom, democratic governments on the side Wahhabi fundamentalist clergy, military coup leaders for securing America’s control over Islamic oil and gas resources. The CIA found it convenient to overthrow democratically elected regimes in Pakistan, and turned blind eye to the military leaders involvement in global drug trade and supported suppression of Muslim women by Wahhabi Muslim clergy. The CIA has roped in the top Muslim Clergy in the Muslim world, and engineered the military coups in the Third world and nurtured the mafia bosses of organized crime and drug cartels to consolidate America’s control over the oil and gas resources of the Islamic oil producing nations. The foundation of American power rely less on the military prowess of the Pentagon than the covert operations capability of the CIA because of its long-standing ties with Muslim clergy Mullahs, Muslim military coup leaders and Muslim and Catholic Mafia and Drug Cartels. The American oil colonialism cemented ties with Wahhabi Sunni Clergy that agreed to hand over the entire oil and gas reserves to Americans in exchange for Wahhabi religious monopoly over Mecca & Medina. The CIA engineered the military coups in Pakistan to install its spies into power, namely, Gen. Zia Ul Haq and Gen. Pervez Musharraf who removed patriotic Prime Ministers Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and Nawaj Sharif for power so that Pakistan could become a colony of the United States. The end result of President Bill Clinton’s “Plan Colombia” had been that Colombian Cartels consolidated their stronghold over global Cocaine and Heroin trade and increased their share of the raw coca and opium production. Because of NAFTA and Plan Colombia Mexico emerged as the top conduit of Heroin and Cocaine exports to United States because of porous southern borders. The end result of the President Bush’s war on Afghanistan in the name of War on Islamic terrorism had been that Opium and Heroin production of Afghanistan zoomed and Pakistan became the top conduit for Heroin exports to Europe. It is no accident that President Bush’s war on Afghanistan failed to neutralize or arrest even a single Wahhabi Al Qaeda terrorist. President Jimmy Carter overthrew the Monarchy of Shah Reza Pahlevi and imposed the rule of Ayatollah Khomeini. United States has consistently supported the fundamentalist Wahhabi measures that brutalized women and denied rights of women in the Islamic world. United States has consistently supported the brutal repressive military regimes that overthrew the democratically elected governments in Chile, Indonesia, Congo, Nicaragua, Brazil, Argentina, Peru, Colombia, and Venezuela because Pentagon realized that only the CIA installed military cup leaders would promote US national interests. The global drug trade generated for the global organized crime $700 billion dollars in 1997 and half of it i.e. $350 billion was generated in the United States. To a large extent the economic prosperity of the United States depended upon continued investment of this $350 billion annually into US Stock markets and other financial instruments. The CIA has arranged the political alliance of the fundamentalist Muslim clergy and military could leaders in Pakistan so that the democracy and women of Pakistan could be crushed to establish American colonies in the Islamic world. American occupation of Iraq resulted in lowering of the status of Iraqi women and Pakistani women. In the America-dominated Islamic world the America is on the side of fundamentalist Wahhabi clergy and tyrant military coup leaders against women’s rights and democracy and freedom. America is against the women and democratic freedom in the clash of Civilizations in the Islamic world. America is on the side of the global drug cartels, military coup leaders, and against women, democracy and freedom in the clash of civilization in the Third World especially oil-producing Islamic world. India should take the cause of freedom, democracy and women to wage wars on America supported Wahhabi regimes and military regimes that overthrew the democratically elected governments in the Third World. America emerged as the greatest menace to the women’s freedom and democracies in the Third world in general and oil producing world or Islamic world in particular.

 

(13) Menace of American Deflation

Thirteen. King Humty Dumpty sat on a Wall, Humpty dumpty had a great fall, and all the Kings men and all the King’s horses couldn’t put Humty Dumpty together again. Moral of the story is that if United States economy entered into deflationary stage the world would have a rude awakening. American would irrevocably enter into deflationary cycle if benchmark interest rates fell below 0.75%. If United States entered into deflationary cycle than the world would depend upon India and China for leading the world in economic growth. The benchmark interest rates fell to 1 percent in June end 2003 because US economy continue to productively invest capital to make more profits to reward the investors of the capital. Money by itself doesn’t procreate to produce more offspring. American doomed for deflationary cycle. The US Federal Reserve has brought the benchmark interest rate down to 1 per cent, the lowest in 45 years. The quarter percent cut in interest rate betrays increasing anxiety among US policy-makers that the biggest economy in the world could be slipping into deflationary mode. The US Federal Reserve has cut interest rate 13 times since January 2001 in an attempt to put more and cheaper money in the hands of the American people to increase consumer spending, consumer confidence and more money for industrial modernization and economic development. But with every cut in the Fed interest rate the American consumer confidence and consumer spending graph seem to be plunging rather than picking up. An US survey in the US consumer sentiment found it at an 11-year low. The lowered consumer confidence further depressed when unemployment figures has also reached a 10-year high. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, who was in control of the US Economy only a few years ago, is literally helpless now and he praying hard for a miracle. Alan Greenspan will soon be unable to leverage the one monetary instrument that kept his hopes up, i.e. Interest Rate cut. Greenspan can’t cut interest rates below zero. There is growing fears that the US economy may be going the Japan way in the deflationary cycle. The interest rate in Japan is near zero, and yet people prefer to keep their money in the bank rather than spend. Japan has been in a deflationary cycle since the late ’90s.

 

United States is destined to enter the deflation cycle because 72 percent of the American GNP contributed by the Service Sector in United States. The Financial services contributed a significant part of the 72% of the Service sector’s contribution towards US GNP. In the deflationary economy the financial wizardry fails to generate financial profits. Money fails to make money in a deflationary economy. It would result in the precipitous decline in the US GNP valuation. What is worrying US policy-makers more is that the data coming out on inflation, interest rate and stock prices is quite similar to the trend in Japan over a decade ago in 1990s that brought Japan into the deflationary cycle. It is very likely that the economic data indicate that US destined to follow in Japan’s footsteps, albeit after a lag of 10 years in the deflationary cycle in the 2005 or sometime in the first decade of the 21st Century.

 

However, the US economy has qualitatively better and more flexible market structures, financial institutions and banks than Japan. American banks are banking superpowers far stronger than German and Japanese banks. American insurance companies are profitable unlike European insurance companies, thanks to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. The White House is acutely aware of the inherent risks of a deflationary economy. History tells us that deflation does far more damage than inflation and is more difficult to counter. Some amount of inflation is always considered healthy for growth in any economy. The IMF recently said the risk of interest rates hitting zero and deflation setting in rises markedly once the inflation target goes below 2 per cent. Thus anything below 2 per cent starts eating into the output. This happened in the US. The Bush administration is trying to counter the specter of American deflation through monetary and fiscal stimulus by cut in the interest rates. Whether this Keynesian therapy succeeds or not, the rest of the world economy is bound to feel its impact. The lower interest rates would cause the decline of the US Dollar vis-à-vis Euro and Yen and cause the recession in European economy by making European goods more expensive in America in dollars.

 

(14) Bush Betting on Terrorist General

Fourteen. United States represents the Axis of Medieval and White House frequently used the might of the United States: to undermine the freedom of women, to undermine democracy by encouraging military coups, to promote terrorism by refusing to arrest Wahhabi terrorists, to legitimize global drug trade by refusing to prosecute Wahhabi Muslim drug cartels, and to legitimize Islamic Organized crime by cementing the CIA’s ties with Pakistan’s ISI and Islamic drug cartels to enhance the covert operations capability of the CIA. Gen. Pervez. Musharraf's willingness to cooperate with the Pentagon and CIA, The Washington Post (June 30, ’03) in its editorial comment, may be enough to convince many in the Bush administration that the general is their best chance in an unstable and dangerous country with its own nuclear arsenal. President Bush has placed another huge stack of chips on Gen. Pervez Musharraf, the self-appointed president of Pakistan, which since 9/11 has become the world's single largest haven of Islamic terrorists, including most likely the fugitive Osama bin Laden. Mr. Bush in June 2003 invited Mr. Musharraf to Camp David and offered him $3 billion in military and economic aid over the next five years, as well as what a White House briefer called "a long-term commitment to build a relationship." That is a huge boost for a man who overthrew Pakistan's last elected civilian government in a military coup, presided over his country's delivery of nuclear weapons technology to North Korea, directed its last military offensive against India and broke his promises to restore democracy and crack down on extremist Islamic groups.  By inviting Gen. Pervez to Camp David he gave south Asia its due. The official alliance of the Pakistani secret services ISI with the CIA that brought under the CIA banner ISI’s terrorist links with Muslim Organized Crime and Drug Syndicates notably Dawood Ibrahim, presents the great danger to India. The CIA might be acquiring the covert operations capability to manipulate India’s next general elections by recruiting Indian Mafia don Dawood Ibrahim’s Indian criminal network to further the covert operations capability of the CIA in India. It is high time that India should lay its eggs in the basket of the democratic forces in Pakistan and work towards overthrowing the military regime of Pervez Musharraf. 

 

(15) Underlying Clash

Fifteen. The Great Clash Game in the Clash of Civilizations is as follows. First, the Great Game is the clash between nations that on one side advocate that women have the rights equal to the men in society, politics, culture, religion and the Church, at war against nations and religions that condemn women into bondage and servitude. Hindu India, Buddhist Japan and Communist China are on the side of equality of women with men. United States and the Vatican joined the side of the nations that led by Wahhabi clergy forced women into bondage and servitude to men. The Vatican and Protestant Southern Baptist Church declared that American Christian women should work as servants to their men. Second, the Great Game is the clash between nations that on one side support democratically elected governments and those that support the tyrannical military regimes, tyrannical monarchies and Sheikhdoms and priest kings. Hindu India is on the side of democracy, freedom and rule of law. The United States and the Vatican historically supported the military regimes, organized military coups against democratically elected governments, subverted rule of law in the Third Word and supported tyrannical terrorist regimes to secure American control over oil and gas resources of the oil producing nations. Third, the Great Game is the clash between nations that on one side opposed the organized crime mafia, drug cartels and those that harnessed the power of the Mafia to control governments. India opposed the drug cartels and US CIA worked hand and glove with the Mafia in Sicily to undermine Fascist Benito Mussolini, controlled the Asia’s Golden Triangle in Burma and Laos finance the covert operations against Communist China. The end result of the President Bill Clinton’s “Plan Colombia” had been the emergence of Colombia as the world’s top producer and exporter of Cocaine and Heroin and raw coca and opium. The direct result of president Bush’s War on Afghanistan had been the upsurge of Opium cultivation and heroin exports of Afghanistan and Pakistan. Fourth, the Great Game is the clash between nations and religions that one side believed that there are infinite paths to reach divinity and individuals can directly approach the Divine without the intermediacy of the Priest and the strict wall should separate the State and the Church. Hindu India, Buddhist Japan and Protestant America are on the side of the freedom of religion. The Vatican and the Islamic nations on the other side of the battle lines support the tyrannical rule of the priests and the overbearing role of the Church as the intermediate between individuals and the Divine. Fifth, the Great Game is the clash of religions where on one side of the battle lines are forces representing Hinduism, Buddhism, Protestant Christianity, Islamic Sufism Mysticism, Jainism, Sikhism, Zoroastrianism, Confucianism, Paganism and moderate Islam. The other side of battle lines is the forces representing Roman Catholicism, Papacy, Wahhabi Sunni fundamentalism, Shiite fundamentalism, iconoclast Judaism, iconoclast monotheist religions and tyrannical clergy. Sixth, the Great Game is the clash of religions where on one side tolerant nations believing in religious diversity accept Almighty may be a woman as well as a man and there could be more than one god. On one other side of the battle lines are arrayed the forces of religious intolerance, predator religious cults, that vow annihilation of religious diversity and any challenge to the dominance of the religious Clergy and Church. Hindu India and Protestant United States on the same side of the battle lines support religious diversity and separation of the State and the Church and freedom of religion and freedom of theological diversity.

 

(16) America is Not All that Powerful

Sixteen. United States lost the Vietnam War and exited from Lebanon and Somalia. United States and NATO won Yugoslavia War, Afghanistan War and Iraq War simply because it didn’t face any military opposition in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Iraq. Even a medium size power could have easily conquered Iraq a small nation having population of only 20 million. United States would fail to control, occupy and rule over Iraq if any other power decided to support anti-American forces in Iraq, to do to United States in Iraq, what the CIA did to Soviet occupation troops in Afghanistan. Pentagon and the CIA troops are not powerful enough to maintain American colonies and Pax Americana without the support of allies, which exposed the myth of American invincibility and hyper power America. The Brezhnev Doctrine promulgated by the Soviet Union after the American defeat in the Vietnam War, resulted in the 1991 demise of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, just 15 years after the fall of the Saigon in 1975. The 2002 Bush Doctrine promulgated to create Pax Americana might also have disastrous consequences for the United States 15 years after the end of the Cold War before 2007 AD.

 

(17) Lessons of Roman Emperor Theodosius I

Seventeen. Fundamentalist Christian Theodosius I (d. 395) became Roman Emperor and issued the Royal edict before his death in 395 AD to ban all ancient religions and made Christianity the sole religion throughout the Roman Empire, and as a result Roman Empire disintegrated and in 410 AD barbarian German Prince Alaric conquered Rome in 410 AD just 15 years after the promulgation of the infamous Royal Edict of 395 AD. The election of any conservative fundamentalist Christian or fundamentalist Jew as the president of the United States might create an Emperor Theodosius I type predicament for the American Empire the 21st Century replica of the universal Roman Empire. 

 

(18) Delhi-Hanoi Asia-Rail Link

Eighteen. In the global clash of civilizations the transnational railways enhances the competitiveness of over populated land powers engaged in historic competition with the less populated maritime sea powers. Railways compete with Shipping lines and Airlines for the business of transportation of goods and passengers. The railways are in direct competition with airlines and ships for the transportation of goods and passengers worldwide. The transnational Asian railways would enhance the collective bargaining power of the Asian land powers in competition with the maritime Western powers by reducing the cost of transportation of goods and people in intra-Asia trade and commerce. The Precision Guided Munitions equipped anti-ship cruise missiles might destroy many of the ocean-going ships to undermine the oceanic trade. The high cost of the airplanes made air travel expensive and airlines capital intensive. Only transnational railways allows the massive transportation of passengers and goods required for the overpopulated Asia. The ancient name of Burma is Brahma-Desa the land of God Brahma the Creator in Hindu mythology. Asian railway would promote India’s cultural and economic ties with Burma, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam Thailand and Malaysia. Burma, Laos, Cambodia and South Vietnam had historically been part of Indian Civilization not Chinese Civilization and these countries borrowed South Indian and Bengali culture and script. India must climb aboard a concept of New Delhi-Hanoi Asia rail whose time has come. Indian diplomats should start thinking out of the box to go places. For years Indians imagined that the only way to link up to Southeast Asia was through Air or by sea. As late as the Second World War marvelous resin-sealed boats that connected the Kalinga coastline with Sumatra, Java and Borneo centuries ago. Now comes a brilliant idea of Asian rail that emerged in the recent ministerial meeting of the Mekong-Ganga Cooperation Group. Myanmarese Foreign Minister Win Awng proposed the idea of a rail link between New Delhi and Hanoi to his counterparts at the meeting. Indian Union foreign minister, Yashwant Sinha promptly welcomed it and urged feasibility studies to be carried out at the earliest. Delhi-Hanoi Rail link is not one of those harebrained concepts straight out of sci-fi. Delhi-Hanoi Rail link is eminently feasible and a good part of it entails augmenting existing links, some of which were laid by the British Raj in its single-minded pursuit of Asia’s natural resources. Delhi-Hanoi rail link could also fit neatly into the Trans-Asian Railway Network work for which is currently going on apace connecting the ASEAN markets with the Mekong delta and Southern China. The potential benefits are mind-boggling. Not only Delhi-Hanoi Rail Link will connect India with the rapidly expanding markets of Southeast Asia, it would go a long way in ending the land-locked isolation of the Indian Northeastern states, helping them to escape from the slough of despair, drug-running and tribal militancy into which some of them have fallen. The logistics of Delhi-Hanoi rail link are mind-boggling, and the terrain in some parts of this region is decidedly tricky. A rail-link between Great Britain and mainland Europe was only a fantasy a few decades ago. Britain-Europe rail link was just an idea, a wish in 1802, became a reality in 1994. The Channel Tunnel 23 of its 31 miles running under the sea changed all that. The multiplier effects of that transcontinental conjoining are felt every time the EuroStar glides out of London and heads for Paris. Europeans came up with EuroStar and the EuroRail. Asians must match Europe with Delhi-Hanoi and Delhi-Beijing Rail link. Asia rail would connect nations of Asia with Railways.

 

14(9) Patriotism in Civilizations

(1) Patriotism in Civilization States

Multiethnic nations owed their patriotic allegiances to Ottoman Empire for centuries. The Islamic Ummah not the ethnic separatism provided the basis of Islamic patriotism. Christian empires worked to undermine the Islam as the basis of nationalism of the Ottoman Empire. After 1929, Papacy worked towards creating the Christian version of the Ottoman Caliphate and Wahhabi Caliph, and argued that Pope should also head a similar political organization of the Catholic nations. American and British colonialism propagated the concept of patriotism based on religion as the basis of patriotism and nationalism that caused the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire after the First World War. Britain promoted Two-nation theory to engineer the secession of Pakistan from Indian Empire in 1947. The CIA promoted the concept of militant Islam as basis of Islamic patriotism to recruit fifth columnists in multi-ethnic Civilization states, namely, Russia, China and India. India believes in the multi-ethnic race and civilization as the basis of patriotism. India does not accept the claims of the ethnic separatism and religious separatism, which run counter to the concept of Civilization states.

 

Demise of Small States System by 2050

One. In 2050 AD, there would be no more than 8 or 10 sovereign units of the International system. The New age of colonial empires took birth after President Bush’s invasion of Iraq in April 2003. The Constitution of Europe heralded a new age of Supranational Federations. Descendants of the European people who invented nation-state have invented a new multilingual political entity and signed into law a New Draft Constitution of Europe for 25-member States of Europe.

 

The British “Economist” weekly magazine, did a survey of the “New Geopolitics, the Road to 2050,” in July 31,1999 issue. The future world shall comprise solely of seven or eight lumbering- cultural monsters. People are moved to action in the world by connections of blood, faith, instinct, color and race. In the coming century, big powers will compete, clash and coalesce with each other in various permutations and combinations. The post-modern system, will takeover, and the descendants of the European people who invented nation-state will themselves have invented a new multilingual political entity that covers most of non-Orthodox Europe. In which case that global state-hood tally will come down again, with a bump. India, China, Europe and America would definitely among the seven or eight lumbering-cultural monster civilizations that would survive the road to 2050.

 

What other four or six countries that would survive as independent sovereign nations in the new age of colonial empires in 2050 AD in the world? People of the world shall be moved to action in the world by connections of blood, faith, instinct, color and race. In the coming century, big powers will compete, clash and coalesce with each other in various permutations and combinations. The Clash of Civilizations is real and would determine which of the 8 or 10 entities would remain the basic units of the International system in 2050. Rest of the smaller countries or the world would have to merge in to one of these 8 or 10 monster supra national confederations before 2050. The top three super powers of the world in 2003 are: United States, China and India, and these three countries would also be super powers in 2050 and beyond.

 

(2) Patriotism For State or Civilization

Two. Patriotism in the 21st Century shall mean loyalty and devotion and willingness to die for Civilizations rather than smaller nation states. The term patriotism has meant different things to different peoples at different times in history. The meaning of patriotism has always been a moving target. In the 21st Century patriotism means the loyalty and devotion towards the Civilization State. The patriots would become more loyal to the Civilizations rather than nation states. Religion is not the sole basis of the Civilization and Race played an important role in the definition of the Civilization. The major civilizations of the world are: Brown Indian Civilization, yellow Chinese Civilization, White European civilization, White American Civilization, Semite Arab Civilization and Black African Civilization. The world patriot began as a neutral term meaning fellow countrymen. During 17th Century England, the term Patriotism came to imply adherence to certain principles- the rights of the citizens and opposition to tyranny. The rebels in America in 18th century called themselves patriots. During 18th century the patriotism represented the support for citizens against the overweening and inappropriate powers of the state. Only in the late 19th century the term patriotism cam to symbolize the support-for-the-state, which is a time of the expanding role of the United States in the world. The Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 broadened the concept of patriotism from simply a willingness to die for one’s country, to encompass the idea that the government must live up to the principles of the Declaration of Independence. There are three separate traditions of patriotism. One principle implies unquestioning loyalty towards the state. Second principle entails democratic principles and an insistence upon upholding the ideals that the country represents. Third principle means love and devotion to one’s country, and if one is truly devoted to something, you stick with it even when you don’t like it and you try to do what is good and right. The fourth principle means love and devotion towards the Civilization and it is incorporated in the Draft Constitution of Europe.

 

The 1861 American Civil War was a Clash of Races and sought to perpetuate the dominance of white Christian Civilization in USA by abolishing slavery and by ending the new immigration from Africa. Who was the patriot during American Civil War of 1861: Confederate Robert E. Lee or Unionist Ulysses S. Grant? If patriotism is simply a kind of filial piety, my country right or wrong, then the case can be made that secessionist confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee was a patriot. If patriotism meant devotion to a particular political idea, then clearly Gen. Grant was a patriot and Gen. Lee was not. Abraham Lincoln invaded the Confederates in South not so much to liberate blacks as to keep the Union united. Unionist thought that continuation of Slavery would make United States a predominantly a black nation and blacks could then rise in revolt like the blacks in Haiti and join forces with native Americans to expel whites from the North America. Unionists realized that whites would lose United States if they continued with the practice of slavery in the United States. The Confederates thought that they could maintain the domination of the Whites in the South better with the practice of Slavery, as they argued that the US Constitution had not created a democracy but a system of Aristocracy, where white would temper with the US election process to maintain its power ad infinitum. Unionists after the victory in the Civil War stopped the immigration of Blacks and restricted the immigration to Whites from Europe. The Unionists argued that with the development of the Railways they would be able to massacre the Native Americans and stop the immigration of blacks so that the New World would become the favored lands of the Whites from Europe. Had Confederates won the war and the Southern states seceded from the Union and had the importation of Black slaves continued unabated, the Southern United States would have become by 1961, predominantly black nation ruled by the black president, much like the many independent nations of Africa. The Black State of Haiti was the first independent state in the New World that overthrew the colonialism and became independent, even before United States became independent. The president of Haiti had greater power and wealth than the first few Presidents of the United States.

 

Should American public support the American Oil Imperialism outlined by President Bush by allowing Wahhabi fundamentalism control Islamic oil-producing nations? Or should American public demand that pentagon should establish democracy in Saudi Arabia and grant equal rights to Saudi Arabian women and ban Wahhabi cult from Arabian Peninsula? Many times the political leadership defines how much inclusiveness, tolerance and diversity multi-ethnic nations can afford. In good times the patriotic reflex weakens and in times of crisis, patriotism thrives. In the period of chronic anxiety, like the present age of terrorism, produce patriotism of quite a cranky sort. In the 19th and early 20th centuries the anxiety about immigration spawned the American protective League, an anti-Catholic, anti-Semitic, anti-immigration groups and Ku Klux Klan in the United States. The unquestioning form of patriotism in the 20th Century found its expression in the turn of the century in the Nativism, the Red Scare, and the internment of the Japanese during World War II, anti-Communist McCarthyism, and destruction of Buddhism in Burma, Laos, Cambodia and South Vietnam during Vietnam War. United States. In the 21st century the anxiety about Wahhabi Islamic terrorism, the specter of Islamic Atom Bombs, and the specter of America’s loss of control over Arabian Oil producers, namely Iraq, produced Neo-Conservatism, Catholic Religious right conservatism and doctrine of preemptive strikes. President Abraham Lincoln waged war on the Southern Confederate States to keep the Union of the USA and to root out the secession as it realized that the long-term interests of the whites are imperiled by the continued importation of the black slaves and United States was fast becoming the black-majority state. President Bush enunciated the Doctrine of Preemptive Strikes and Bush doctrine 2002 to mobilize the White Americans to allow an incumbent American president use the power of Pentagon to establish American oil colonies in Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. America exploited the Arab-Israeli conflict to establish Pax-Americana in the Arabian Gulf as well as promote security of Israel. America exploited the Taliban rule in Afghanistan to establish American oil colony over Afghanistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. India and United States should jointly use military force to impose the practice of tolerance, freedom, diversity and inclusiveness over countries that practice religious and political intolerance, denial of freedom and rights of women.

 

14(10) Role of Intolerance

(1) Predatory Religious Intolerance

One. The predatory intolerance is the principal cause of the Clash of Civilizations. The religious intolerance, predatory intolerance and militant fundamentalism represent the second-head of the Beast of the Clash of Civilization. Intolerance is the guiding principle of the barbarians. Civilized Civilization by its very definition does not believe in principle of intolerance. Barbarians and barbarian Civilizations deploy predatory intolerance to destroy the Civilized Civilizations. Civilizations should use overwhelming force to eradicate the menace of the barbarian religious intolerance and predatory intolerance.

 

Wahhabi Intolerance

The Sunni fundamentalist Wahhabi Cult is the principle cause of the Clash of Civilizations. The Clash of Civilization in the Islamic world taking the form of military, cultural, religious and economic clash between civilized, liberal, modern Islamic nations on one side and the barbarian, uncivilized Wahhabi nations on the other side, for the control over the religious leadership of the Islamic world and for the custody of the Islam’s holiest cities of Mecca & Medina. Lebanon’s Sheikh Husam Qaraqirah declared that Saudi Wahhabi extremists that hide under the slogan of Islam in deceit and propagate Wahhabi fundamentalist ideas have no relation whatsoever to Islam. Saudi Wahhabi sect’s religious books must be banned and lifted of the shelves of Libraries of the mosques, schools, and universities. Civilized Muslims would invade Saudi Arabia and ban Wahhabi cult, and make Mecca & Medina international Islamic cities, governed by international body of Muslims.

 

(2) Clash of Civilization is Real

Two. Professor Huntington’s “The Clash of Civilization” systematically explained that the foreign policies of the major Western powers in the post-Second War age were influenced by the ideals of the clash of civilizations and clash of religions even when they were not articulated as such. Dr. Huntington sought to bring about the alliance of Christian Evangelicalism, Catholic Conservatism and Islamic Fundamentalism to justify the Axis of Iconoclast Monotheism that sought to bring the oil-rich Islamic world under the domination of the West in exchange for the political rule of the Wahhabi fundamentalists in the Islamic world in general and the Arab world in particular. The Dialogue Among Civilizations took on a political dimension in December 1993 when Samuel Huntington proposed his thesis on the Clash of Civilizations. Despite the weakness of Dr. Huntington’s historical argument, the thesis has continued to gain ground even, up to the present time. The Clash of Civilization thesis has, in particular, lent more force than ever to ideological attitudes that insidiously endorse exclusion by emphasizing so-called radical and/or insurmountable differences between the different cultures and religions of the modern world. It is clear that diplomats, on the one hand, strive constantly to shed new light on the interactions among civilizations in the past, which is becoming our common heritage and, on the other, diplomats must identify ways to meet the challenges of our own times in 21st Century. By proclaiming 2001 as the Year of Dialogue Among Civilizations, the United Nations General Assembly took a great step forward which not only repudiated the Dr. S. P. Huntington’s thesis on the Clash of Civilizations but also, prepared new ground for Universal Dialogue Among Civilizations at the highest political level.

 

(3) Westernization Vs Counter Westernization

Three. India in the 21st Century represents the Westernizing force in history. United States and Papacy in 21st Century represented Counter-Westernizing force in history. Indian foreign policy promoted tolerance, inclusion, women’s rights, freedom, democracy, Western values, separation of the State and the Church, and social diversity. The United States and Papacy promoted Wahhabi fundamentalism, Shariah Law, ruler of the Clergy and priest-kings, military coups, massacre of 2,000,000 Cambodian Buddhists, military coups in Pakistan, and provided sanctuary to terrorist Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan and Mecca. India headed the mission of Westernization, Modernization, and secular liberalization in the world. United States headed the mission of imposing barbarian, fundamentalist Wahhabi militant Islam over modern Islamic nations to secure control over their oil and mineral resources. United States and the Papacy represented the Axis of Medieval in the world and attempted to push the Third World back into the Dark Age. India in 21st Century represented the force of New Age while United States and Papacy represented the force of Dark Age.

 

India believes that Christianity is superior to Islam. United States and Papal policies towards Saudi Arabia and support to Wahhabi fundamentalism suggested that they implicitly accepted that Christianity was inferior to Wahhabi Islam. In the global clash of civilizations India stood for what the Framers of the US Constitution stood for, while US and Papal policies towards Wahhabi Islamic nations suggested that United Stated employed the policy of deception and Newspeak when it asserts that it continues to support the policies the framers of the US Constitution had in mind, even in formulation of its policies towards oil-rich Islamic world.

 

(4) Menace of Dominant Western Civilization

Four. India believes like France, China and Russia that the imposition of the American Culture and American power over the Third World would be morally wrong and in the 21st Century the role of Indian Hindu civilization and Chinese Buddhist civilization would become as important as that of the dominant Western Christian civilization in the end of the 20th Century. Western civilization would fail to become the role model for the world if the Third World felt that the Western Christendom is too aggressive and hobnobbing with barbarian Wahhabi fundamentalism to establish American Oil Colonialism throughout oil-rich Third World. France does not believe that the Western Civilizations kept faith with its own cultures and underlying values. The West cannot impose military dictatorship of Gen. Pervez and anti-women Wahhabi monarchy in Saudi Arabia and still claim that the West supports the principles of democracy, freedom and rights of women. France feels that the Papacy’s aggressive propagation of Christian values and President Bush’s unilateralist approach has given the impression of imposing a dominant, especially materialist Western Christian culture that the greater part of the humanity in the Third World feels to be aggressive and as a form of the conquest of the Third World in the new colonial age of the post-Iraq war world. France feels that Western worldview became ethnocentric and gave too much prominence for the White Christian European civilization and culture that during Middle Age was no better than the barbarian culture that destroyed the Roman Civilization. President Chirac on the occasion of the opening of our 31st General Conference, and he emphasized the point that dialogue between cultures needs to be conducted with open eyes and with humility, for arrogance is its worst enemy. He raised some relevant questions: Have we kept faith with our own cultures and their underlying values? Has the West given the impression of imposing a dominant, essentially materialistic culture, a culture that the greater part of humanity feels to be aggressive, as all it can do is observe and rub shoulders with it without gaining access? Have some of our great cultural debates seemed ethnocentric, ignorant of social and spiritual realities elsewhere than in the West? How far can a Civilization go in exporting its values? President Chirac argued that although each culture and civilization can be proud of its achievements it should also engage in self-criticism.

 

(5) History of Civilizations Not History of Wars

Five. The history of the Civilizations rather then the history of the wars and kings would represent better and truer history. World History has been an inventory of antagonisms and wars, and this aspect has been given most prominence in history writing in world history books. In order to look at world history from a more constructive vantage point the new historical research should undertake following new approaches. Firstly a methodological change is needed to shift from conflict to dialogue, while analyzing the historical facts and data. Secondly, we should search in world history for those records that encouraged dialogue among Civilizations. Thirdly, we should attempt to rewrite world history taking them into account interaction, merger, and collusion among civilizations than the conflicts and wars among civilizations. Fourthly, How we see others, how others see us’, brings to mind two interpretations of dialogue among cultures and civilizations. One is the ‘historical or descriptive’ interpretation of history, and the other is the ‘imperative or prescriptive’ interpretation of history. Fifthly, according to the historical interpretation, dialogue among civilizations is nothing totally new but rather an ever-present process. Civilizations have always engaged in dialogue with each other and even the bloodiest wars and hostilities have never completely prevented this. If we look at the problem from this point of view in order to examine the question of ‘how we see others and how others see us’, we have to conduct a survey of the means and methods of dialogue among civilizations throughout history. Sixthly, after the events of 11 September 2001, diplomats came to the realization that dialogue among cultures and civilizations is not merely an intellectual dream, but a real necessity. It is unavoidable; indeed, perhaps it represents the only choice. The 31st General Conference got the approval of the UNESCO for “Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity,” which provided a useful platform to discuss how diplomats can preserve this aspect of our world’s beauty, as we enjoy diversity in nature, so we should enjoy diversity in our cultures and diversity of world civilizations.

 

(6) Wahhabi is Zionist Plot to Destroy Islam

Six. Zionists, British and American oil colonialism joined forces to promote barbarian Wahhabi fundamentalism as leading doctrine of Islam to weaken and enslave on-billion strong Muslim world so that Muslim nations become the colonies American imperialism. The Sunni Wahhabi fundamentalism is the Christian and Jewish weapon to enslave and weaken Islamic world. In the Clash of Civilizations the moderate, liberal developed Muslim nations, Egypt, Libya, Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iran and Afghanistan should mobilize invasions of Saudi Arabia to establish the government led by moderate, liberal moderate Muslim men and women to eradicate the evil of Wahhabi fundamentalism from Arabian Peninsula.

 

Just as Jews developed the doctrine of Marxism to destroy and loot the property of Russian Tsars. Saudi Arabian doctrine of Wahhabi Sunni sect is a Zionist, British and American plot to enslave and colonize Islamic world, because Wahhabi clergy of Mecca and Medina agreed to hand over the entire oil and gas resources of Arabia to American oil companies in exchange for Western support for Wahhabi control over Mecca & Medina. Muslims in 21st Century are easily oppressed and defeated in war because false religious teachings have made them backward, said Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad in July 2003, who has been in power in Malaysia, the rapidly developing Southeast Asian nation for 22 years. Muslims "all over the world prayed for Allah to save the Iraqi Muslims and their country. But their prayers have not been answered." This was not because Allah had abandoned the Muslims, but because they had not caught up with the developed world "in knowledge and the capacity to produce arms, to have disciplined and well-trained forces for their defense. Palestinian suicide bombers regarded by many Muslims as martyrs, but "no merit is accorded to the people who study science, mathematics, engineering etc which are essential for building the defense capabilities of Muslim countries. Muslim’s salvation will not be achieved by blindly killing innocent people. Rather Muslims should plan and execute a long-term development plan to excel in all fields. Some Wahhabi Muslim religious leaders had made today's Muslims "very confused and divided" and it made Muslims unable to cope with changes in the world. Wahhabi Muslim leaders apparently believe that only by recreating the way of life 1,400 years ago (the time of the Prophet) can they become true Muslims. The past glories of Islamic civilization in which there was major progress in the sciences had been lost because Saudi Arabian Wahhabi Muslim leaders began to preach against this liberal attitude towards the study of non-religious subjects. "Wahhabi leaders demanded that the only subjects that should be studied were those related to the religion of Islam. Now, far from being a world power, the one billion Muslims, are easily oppressed by the non-Muslims, easily defeated in war and are forced to accept foreign Christian rule and foreign Christian hegemony. The only conclusion that Muslims can make for the sad fate of the Muslims is that Saudi Arabian Wahhabi Clergy and leaders are not practicing the true teachings of Islam, that the Islam that Saudi Wahhabi leaders now practice is wrongly interpreted, said Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir. The educated moderate liberal and civilized Muslin nations and leaders should set up a permanent Islamic secretariat as a think tank for Muslim scholars to directly challenge the religious leadership of uncivilized barbarian fundamentalist Wahhabi clergy and leaders of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia and Wahhabi Clergy had no right to represent Islamic world and it is high time that civilized Muslim nations and liberal Muslim leaders should militarily remove Wahhabi fundamentalists from political and religious power in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Oman, Qatar and Bahrain. The Clash of Civilization in the Islamic world would take the form of the joint invasions led by civilized moderate Islamic nations to eradicate the menace of Wahhabi fundamentalism in the Arabian Peninsula so that the liberal, moderate civilized Muslims lead the religion of Islam and control the holiest Muslim cities of Mecca and Medina. In the Islamic clash of Civilizations the civilized non-Wahhabi Islamic world would invade and destroy Wahhabi fundamentalism in Arabian Peninsula.

 

(7) Christian Mediterranean Middle East

Seven. The American conquest of Iraq and dismal military performance of Iraqi army exposed the military weakness of the Islamic world. If President of United States agreed Pope and Vatican could establish Catholic Inquisition in North Africa, Mediterranean Arabia and Asia Minor to use force and persuasion of Catholic Inquisition of Medieval fame to impose Christianity throughout Arab world. The successful mass conversions of Muslims that took place in 1492 can be repeated in the Arab Middle East after the American conquest of Iraq. Within a few years, the Catholic Inquisition succeeded in converting almost every Muslim that remained in Spain. When Christian could militarily convert every Spanish Muslim to Catholic Christian faith almost overnight, even when Ottoman Islamic empire ruled in Arabia and Asia Minor, it is possible that if Catholic Inquisition established by American oil Colonialism throughout American oil colonies in the Arab world, the vast majority of Arab Muslims would convert to Christianity within weeks if not months. Should Catholics use Christian sword to militarily convert North African and Arab Muslims to Christianity to permanently reclaim from the control of Muslim the Christian lands of Egypt, Syria, Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan, Libya, Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco. Spain ruled by Muslims as late as 1492. After the Muslim rule ended in Spain Catholic Inquisition overnight converted the entire Muslim nation to entirely Catholic nation. Within few years after the end of the Muslim rule, Spain became devout Catholic. The lesson Roman Catholic Church learnt in en-masse conversion of Muslims to Catholic Christianity over night in Spain could be put into practical use in the en masse conversion of Muslims to Christianity in Egypt, Syria, Libya, Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco. The Sword of Christianity more powerful than the Islamic sword in 2003. Arab Bedouin Muslim invaders financed by Damascus Jews put to sword or enslaved Hindu and Christian Men in Egypt, forcibly married and enslaved all women in North Africa. Drawing upon the mass conversion of Muslims to Catholic Christianity, almost overnight by use of Christian sword and Catholic Inquisition could be repeated over North Africa and Arabia to enforce massive en-masse conversion of Arab Muslims to Catholic Christianity, Protestant Christianity, or Apostolic Gnostic Christianity, or Nubian Pharaoh’s religion. The religions that expand by sword fall by the sword. Spain got its first new mosque in July 11, 2003, in Granada, Spain since Muslim rule ended in 1492. The cry of a muezzin echoed from a hilltop overlooking the Alhambra as Spain got its first new mosque since Muslim rule ended in 1492. Dignitaries from Arab and Muslim countries worldwide gathered at the former seat of Moorish government for the opening yesterday of the Great Mosque of Granada, crowning a fitful and emotionally charged US$4.5 million project that began in 1981. With repeated shouts of "Allahu Akhbar" (God is great), Sheik Sultan bin Mohammed al-Qassimi of the United Arab Emirates, which paid half the cost of construction, drew back a blood-red curtain to display a stone plaque inaugurating the building.

 

The new Spanish mosque is tucked between a Roman Catholic nunnery and church in Granada's old Moorish quarter, the Albaicin, and commands a sweeping vista of one of history's prime pieces of real estate, the Alhambra, the reddish 14th-century palace and citadel. These days, Granada has a Muslim population of about 15,000, one of Spain's largest, but until now its half-dozen mosques were makeshift affairs in apartments or storefronts. In the worldview of Catholic Europe, Protestant United States, Orthodox Russia, Buddhist China and Hindu India, the mass conversion of Wahhabi Muslim Middle East into Catholic Christianity by imposition of Catholic Inquisition that en masse converted Muslims to Christianity after 1492 in Spain, could be a better solution of Islamic terrorism and Wahhabi fundamentalism. En masse forcible conversion of Muslims and Moors in Spain after 1492, presents a viable alternative to the resolution of the problem and menace Islamic terrorism and Wahhabi fundamentalism presents to the civilized world in the 21st Century. In the global Clash of Civilizations, the Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox Christian world would unite to impose civilized Christianity over North Africa and Mediterranean Arabia that were Christian lands before Arab Bedouin Muslims imposed Islam by sword over these lands. It is high time that North Africa, Mediterranean Arabia and Asia Minor became Christian lands again.

 

(8) Ban Wahhabi Books & Wahhabi Clergy

Eight. The Clash of Civilization in the Islamic world meant the clash between the barbarian forces representing Saudi Arabian Wahhabi fundamentalism and civilized Muslims of Egypt, Lebanon, Malaysia and Indonesia. Civilized Muslims from Egypt, Lebanon and Malaysia demanded in the International Islamic conference in Putrajaya, Malaysia that Wahhabi books should be banned from libraries, mosques, schools, colleges and universities and Saudi Wahhabi clergy should be prohibited from channels that are meant to spread Islam. Egypt's top Muslim cleric, Grand Sheik of Al-Azhar Mohammed Sayed Tantawi, considered by many to be the Sunni Muslim world's highest religious authority, said Islamic nations should "wholeheartedly open our arms to the people who want peace with us" and reject violence against the innocent. "I (Egyptian Muslims) do not subscribe to the idea of a Clash among Civilizations. People of different beliefs should cooperate and not get into senseless conflicts and animosity. Wahhabi Muslims who commit terrorist acts in the name of the Islamic cause were wrong. Extremism is the enemy of Islam." The Islamic religion's reputation was being marred by Wahhabi "extremists that hide under the slogans of Islam in deceit and propagate Wahhabi fundamentalist ideas that have no relation whatsoever to Islam," said Lebanon’s Sheik Husam Qaraqirah. The Civilized Muslims have to block Saudi Wahhabi clergy and Wahhabi books from channels that are meant to spread Islam. Wahhabi sect’s religious books must be banned and lifted off the shelves of libraries of mosques, schools, universities and public libraries. Worried that Islam is being linked to terrorism, Muslim scholars at an international conference Friday proposed encouraging greater dialogue with the West and banning books that promote extremism. Delegates at the three-day conference in Putrajaya, Malaysia, were discussing issues facing Muslim nations, such as disunity, terrorism and misconceptions about their religion. Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, painted Europeans as rivals of Muslims, who were being singled out and humiliated by the international fight against terrorism. Muslims "have not tried to catch up and surpass their European Christian detractors in knowledge and the capacity to produce arms, to have disciplined and well-trained forces for their defense. "The Muslims will never be able to bring back the honor and the respect for Islam, unless they become capable again of defending themselves. But violence should not be used to achieve these aims. Muslim salvation will not be achieved by blindly killing innocent people. The Clash of races would mean the clash between barbarian Wahhabi Arabs and civilized non-Wahhabi Malaysians, Indonesians, and Afghans. Egyptian Muslims do not subscribe to the idea of a Clash among Civilizations. People of different beliefs should cooperate and not get into senseless conflicts and animosity. Wahhabi clergy and Wahhabi books should be removed from channels that promote Islam and removed from positions of leadership in the Islamic world. Wahhabi should be removed from Mecca and Medina and Wahhabi must not claim any leadership of Islam.

 

14(11) European Clash of Races

(1) Berlusconi On European Clash of Races

One. Western civilization is superior because it has at its core, as its greatest value, freedom, which is not the heritage of the Islamic culture. The West will continue to conquer peoples, like it conquered Communism, even if it means a confrontation with another civilization, the Islamic one, as Islamic Civilization is stuck where it was 1,400 years ago. Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi has a history of speaking his mind. On Sept. 26, 2001, at a news conference in Berlin, Silvio Berlusconi said Western civilization was superior to Islam breaking ranks with the United States and other allies when they were trying to reach out to the Muslim world after Sept. 11. "We must be aware of the superiority of our civilization, a system that has guaranteed well-being, respect for human rights and in contrast with Islamic countries respect for religious and political rights, a system that has as its values understandings of diversity and tolerance." Western civilization is superior because it "has at its core, as its greatest value, freedom, which is not the heritage of the Islamic culture." He said he trusted "the West will continue to conquer peoples, like it conquered communism," even if it means a confrontation with "another civilization, the Islamic one, stuck where it was 1,400 years ago." Western leaders distanced themselves from the remarks, and the Muslim world demanded an apology. Berlusconi insisted he was misquoted, and he eventually apologized. Brilliant Berlusconi correctly pointed out that Christian Civilization is superior to Islamic civilization, as Islamic civilization is 1,400 years behind time. The Western Christian civilization would continue to conquer Islamic Civilization so that its people may adopt Christian values. Christians have right to conquer Islamic world and impose Christianity on Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Turkey as these countries were thriving Christian nations before they were conquered by Islamic sword and forced to become Muslim by sword. Since after the conquest of Muslim Iraq by Christian America, the Christian Sword proved to be mightier than Islamic sword, it means that Christian god mightier than Islamic god, hence Christian nations have very right to impose Christianity on former Christian lands in Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Turkey, in the 21st Century. 

 

(2) Italian Cuisine superior to Finland’s

Two. Parma is synonymous with good cuisine. The Finns don't even know what prosciutto is. On December 2001, during a European Union summit in Belgium, Silvio Berlusconi tried to lobby for the Italian city of Parma to house a new EU food safety agency amid competition from Finland, which wanted the agency's headquarters to be in Helsinki. "Parma is synonymous with good cuisine. The Finns don't even know what prosciutto is. I cannot accept this." Italy and Finland ultimately agreed the agency would have two units, a headquarters in Helsinki and a smaller unit in Parma. Silvio Berlusconi like every Citizen of Rome is proud of classical pre-Christian Civilization of Rome, and desired to create new European Union in the image of pre-Christian Roman Empire. While Rome was civilized the Finland became civilized thousands of years later.

 

(3) Rome of Romulus and Remus

Three. On May 28, 2002, at a NATO-Russia summit near Rome, Silvio Berlusconi noted the Summit site was the place where the ancestors of the city's mythological founders, Romulus and Remus, settled more than 3,000 years ago. Berlusconi referred to the Mr. Putin and Berlusconi as "Romulus and Remulus" and thought that's how Putin and Berlusconi should be known in future since it sounded better. Brilliant diplomat billionaire Berlusconi rightly pointed out to President Putin of Russia that Italy was great in per-Christian era, at the time of Romulus and Remus, to indicate that Catholic Christianity had been a Curse on Eternal Rome and Eternal Roman Civilization. Mr. Berlusconi also hinted that Rome was great even 3,000 years ago, while Russia's Muscovy was the colony of Buddhist Mongol Empire in the 13th Century. Mr. Berlusconi is right in claiming that the Civilization of Eternal Rome is superior to any other Christian European Nations and Civilization.

 

(4) Barbarian Germans

Four. On July 2, 2003, Berlusconi told a German lawmaker in the European Parliament he should appear in a movie as a Nazi concentration camp guard. The comments, to German socialist Martin Schulz, came a day after Berlusconi took over the rotating EU presidency and led to a diplomatic spat with Germany. "Mr. Schulz, I know there is a producer in Italy who is making a film on the Nazi concentration camps. I will suggest you for the role of `kapo.' You'd be perfect.” "Kapo" is a German word that was used in Nazi concentration camps for privileged prisoners who guarded other inmates. Berlusconi would not apologize for the remark. Italy's Berlusconi asserted the greatness of the Eternal Rome, Pagan Roman Civilization by insulting the descendants of German barbarians that destroyed Roman empire & Civilization in 415 AD. The European Union of 2003 based at Brussels represented the ideals of Civilized Pagan Roman Empire based in Rome, not the barbarian Christian Holy Roman Empire based in German lands. The key is the Stefano Stefani's comment that Germany is a country with arrogant certainties. German are blondes with hyper-nationalist pride.

 

(5) EU Represents Eternal Roman Civilization

Five. Prime Minister Berlusconi's brilliant retort against German haggling him in EU meeting, is a masterpiece of Diplomacy, which in Electronic age must convey the essence in 30 seconds. Donald Rumsfeld's characterization of Germany and France as Old Europe, before Iraq War, succinctly summarized the US foreign policy towards Germany and France. German Minister's comment during last General Election comparing President Bush to Hitler succinctly summarized the worldview of Germans about United States. These comments are diplomatic masterpieces, not mistakes. The purpose of Mr. Berlusconi and Mr. Stefani had been to declare that the Eternal Rome, representing Pre-Christian Hindu Civilization of God Jupiter (Indra) should not get lessons from descendants of German Barbarians, whose leader Alaric destroyed Roman Civilization and Roman Empire. The Holy Roman Empire located in present day Germany was the Empire of Barbarians blessed by Pope, who had conspired with the German barbarian invaders for the destruction of Roman Empire & Civilization. Italian Prime Minister Berlusconi declared by his comment that the European Union, after the acceptance of the Constitution of Europe would not be the 21st century version of the barbarian Christian's "Holy Roman Empire" based on Germany, but the 21st Century version of the "Pre-Christian secular Pagan Roman Empire and Roman Civilization that emanated from Eternal Rome. India should support the creation of European Union as a Super State modeled on the lines of Pagan Pre-Christian Roman Empire and Roman Civilization, not on the lines of Pope-dominated Barbarian Germany led Christian Holy Roman Empire. Roman Empire represented the forces of Civilization, led by Eternal Rome. The Christian Holy Roman Empire represented barbarianism and Medieval Dark Age, and was dominated by Pope and Church of Rome. Patriotic Berlusconi indirectly asserted that under his Presidency the European Union and the Draft Constitution of Europe would look upon Civilized pre-Christian Roman Empire and Roman Civilization as the ideal, and European Union should not look towards Christian Holy Roman Empire as the ideal for New Europe. In 415 AD with the connivance of Pope, the German barbarian leader Alaric conquered Rome and destroyed the Roman Empire. Mr. Berlusconi wants Great Rome should project the Civilization and religion of God Jupiter/Zeus, Goddess Isis as the embodiment of Civilized Europe not the Civilization that produced Inquisitions, Dark Age and Medievalism in Europe. Mr. Berlusconi is absolutely right in promoting the contribution of Rome, Roman Empire and Roman Civilization to Civilization of Europe. The greatness of Europe lies in relishing the greatness of pre-Christian Rome and ancient Roman Civilization.

 

(6) 21st Century is the Century of the Color-line

Six. The 21st Century would be the Century of the Color line. The 20th Century was the century of great ideological struggles: struggles against Colonialism, Communism and Fascism, and struggles against Segregation, Apartheid, and Casteism. One should give the 21st Century its first encounter with unapologetic pagan protest and non-white protest from idolaters, Pagans, Hindu and Buddhist peoples of black, brown and yellow races. The Clash of Races is an impassioned reaction against non-violent pagan, Hindu and Buddhist ideology of accommodation and humility towards monotheist iconoclasts, determined to impose their predator fundamentalist Occidental Christian and Islamic beliefs over oriental races in Oriental Civilizations. The intolerant Christian and Muslim fundamentalist terrorists are always responsible for the acts of religious and cultural and political terrorism on the tolerant Oriental societies that encourage and tolerate religious, cultural and ethnic diversity.

 

However, it is wrong to see the foreign iconoclast’s terrorism in the Hindu and Buddhist worlds as the source of the clash of races problems, when it no longer is. Are Hindus and Buddhists like Plato’s cave dwellers, staring robotically at a wall marked predatory iconoclast intolerant barbarian terrorism, when in fact their true problem is to understand the reality of the modern world just outside the cave, that it is OK for great powers to conquer and dominate lesser powers, and it is OK for powerful Civilizations to impose by sword the religion and culture of the dominant civilization over less powerful religions, nations, societies and states. Hindus and Buddhists, India and China must not define what is appropriate response to aggression in terms of Hindu and Buddhist ethics, but in terms of the real politics of the modern world order. India and China are two super powers in the top four Super power Club that includes also United States and Russia, and it entitles them to use force to impose their national will on smaller nations and propagate Hinduism and Buddhism over other religions and ethnic groups.

 

(7) Role of Indian & Chinese Civilization

Seven. The new 21st-century international problem and racial problem might be called the problem of emergence- the shock that formerly non-assertive India and China experienced when they first emerged as Super Powers after the collapse of the Soviet Union and especially after president Bush’s invasion of Iraq in April 2003. India ($2.2 trillion) and China ($4.1 trillion) are the world’s 4th and 2nd largest economies, and 3rd and 2nd largest armies in the world, and 2nd and 1st largest population in the world. India and China have not exercised the superpower role in the past, and in freedom and new status as world power, their economic underdevelopment looks precisely like the inferiority their former colonial rulers had always accused them of, because it no longer has the excuse of expression. India and China have in their minds have given United States more power than it has or would ever likely to have, to justify their non-exercise of their great power in the world and to justify their failure to export and propagate Hinduism and Buddhism in other Civilizations. When India and China were oppressed, they tended to believe in the power of the Colonial oppressors, and even when China emerged as economic power in 1990s, it wanted its economic life prosperous and did not care to promote its culture, civilization and Buddhism abroad. India’s policy of Non-Alignment won freedom for the Third World Nations, but it ill prepared the Third World Nations and newly independent great powers for any great power role.

 

India and China defined their roles in the 21st Century through the eyes of the Western world and they measured their national destinies by the opinion of the West towards India and China. India and China suffer from the problem of “Double Consciousness” i.e. the sense of looking at one’s self through the eyes of others, of measuring one’s soul by the tape of the world that looks on in amused contempt and pity. The value of the concept of double Consciousness is more in the framing of the idea than in the idea itself. It would be wrong on the part of India and China to argue that Christian colonial powers were responsible for their inability to exercise the great power role in the world of 2003. It is wrong to say that India and China cannot hope for success as world powers unless encouraged by the initiatives of white powers, namely, United States, Russia, France, Germany and Britain. India and China cannot shirk their responsibilities for their lesser world role, as the former functionaries and bureaucrats of the colonial powers in India and China, continue to promote policy formulations that perfectly reinforces the relationship of dominance and subordination at the heart of the oppression of India and China as world powers and world civilizations. India and China can no longer blame colonial powers for their declined role in the world, and burden of the India and China problem shifted to the shoulders of the brown and yellow civilizations. Neither India nor China needs any US Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and they should not let others carry the burden of one’s lift. India and China have been oppressed for long and are not always eager for the world power status. The question arises: Whether India and China would achieve super power status in alliance with United States or in competition with the United States? The Civilizations of India and China, and the religions of Hinduism and Buddhism should not shirk racial and religious militancy to face the challenges of intolerant predator fundamentalist religions and civilizations. If Hindus and Buddhists, Indians and Chinese continue to tolerate the injustices and the terrorism perpetrated by intolerant predator fundamentalist Catholics and Wahhabi terrorists, they alone are to blame for letting them get away with the crime.

 

(8) Agricultural Subsidies as Clash of Races

Eight. The agricultural subsidies to Western and American Cotton commodity producers and farmers a potent weapon in the Clash of civilization. The Agricultural subsidies that industrialized countries give to their agricultural farmers and commodity producers caused poverty in Africa and Asia. First, the agricultural subsidies that American, European and Japanese farmers give to their farmers to subsidize their cost of production so that they are able to sell below cost in the world markets, forces the commodity producers to sell their commodities below cost, thus making agriculture non-remunerative in the Third World. The agricultural subsidies that American cotton farmers get from US government allowed the large cotton producers to dump their cotton in the world markets, forcing the export prices of raw cotton from Mali below cost of production of Cotton. Second, The industrialized powers pour five times more money into agricultural subsidies at home than they do into development aid. Third, subsidies to American cotton growers cause losses of hundreds of millions of dollars to African farmers far exceeding the aid that the United States gives the impoverished Africa continent. The subsidies are killing us all. The Mali cotton growers are doing their job, but the more they work, the less they receive. The best way to stop poverty in Africa is to stop these Agricultural subsidies in the West.

 

Fourth, the agricultural subsidies that United States, European Union, Canada, Australia and Japan give to their farmers to subsidize their exports at lower then their cost price promotes the clash of races by impoverishing the third world farmers. The agricultural subsidies to the American cotton farmers allows America cotton farmers export at far below the cost of production, forcing the third world farmers sell their cotton at below remunerative prices.

 

Fifth, African leaders say agriculture subsidies in the United States and Europe undermine local farmers. The subsidies that America and European Union give to subsidize their farmers don't just hurt Africans, they're far worse and starving Africa’s people. Resentment runs high in Mali, sub-Saharan Africa's largest cotton producer, over agricultural subsidies in the West. A combination of declining profits and drought have caused annual production to drop from half a million tons to just over 200,000 tons in the last two years. Many Malian farmers have been selling off their food staples to pay basic expenses because of the falling cotton prices caused by agricultural subsidies to American cotton farmers Mali’s colon farmers sold their our cotton at a loss in 2003. President Bush during his five-nation African tour in Nigeria has heard directly from African leaders about their concerns against agricultural subsidies to Cotton farmers in USA. Absolutely, the subject of American agricultural subsidies came up in Botswana, and it came up in South Africa and it came up in Senegal. It will come up in every country we come to. "If you in the West continue to subsidize your cotton producers, we here in Mali will continue to harvest to heavy costs. We have no protection at all." Cotton accounts for half of Mali's exports, supporting more than 3 million of the country's 11 million people. They're just peasant farmers, with small cotton field. Mali’s cotton is very clean and high quality cotton very competitive if the big producers in the rich countries were not selling cheap cotton because they are subsidized. Plummeting world cotton prices and a poor rainy season last year have combined to make this a particularly difficult year in southern Mali, where electricity, telephone lines, water wells and paved roads are scarce. The country of Mali is one of the world's poorest. Mali’s finance minister, Bassary Toure said it is hypocrisy for developed countries to subsidize their farmers. The industrialized powers pour five times more money into agricultural subsidies at home than they do into development aid. Industrialized nations tell Africans that they have to play by the rules of the free market then industrialized nations break the rules by subsidizing their cotton and commodity farmers in industrialized nations. World Bank said the impact of U.S. and European subsidies on world cotton prices is substantial. We're talking about a crop being grown by some of the poorest farmers. The impact of American subsidy to American cotton farmers on the Mali cotton producers in terms of poverty is severe. Subsidies to American cotton growers cause losses of hundreds of millions of dollars to African farmers far exceeding the aid that the United States gives the impoverished continent. The American subsidies to American cotton farmers are killing Mali’s cotton farmers. The Mali’s cotton farmers are doing their job, but the more they work, the less they receive. The best way to stop poverty is to stop American agricultural subsidies to American farmers. Bush said removing subsidies is not solely America's responsibility, as America has proposed a very strong reduction in agricultural subsidies. However, in order to make that come to be, there needs to be reciprocation from Europe and Japan in order to make the policy effective to end the agricultural subsidies in the industrialized world.

 

(9) Clash of Fertility in Japan

Nine. The Japanese population in 1999 (127 million) might dwindle to 89 million in 2050 and 60 million in 2100 AD. After 2050, if the present trend continues the population would decline by 800,000 every year. The falling birth rate and decline of population in Japan exemplifies the demographic basis of the clash of Civilizations. India and China rising as civilizations because they have a robust population growth, with the blessing of the almighty Goddess. Japanese native religion is very similar to native Hindu religion. Japanese are closer to Indians as a race. Japanese and Indians should inter marry to produce a joint Indo-Japanese race. Millions of Indians should inter marry Japanese. Japan would decline like ancient Greece and ancient Rome and lose its international position and the size of its economy would shrink precipitously, if it didn’t open its borders to import millions of immigrants from India or other Buddhist nations. Societies have always risen and faded, and Japan will likely disappear and something else will take its place. Greece and Rome disappeared too. Japan is at the leading edge of a phenomenon that is beginning to strike many advanced countries: rapidly aging populations and dwindling fertility. The size of Japan's work force peaked in 1998 and has since entered a decline that experts expect to accelerate. By 2050, demographers say, Japan will have 30 percent fewer people, and one million 100-year-olds. By then, 800,000 more people will die each year than are born. By 2100 the century's end, the United Nations estimates, the present population of Japan of 120 million will be cut in half to 60 million. Better integration of women into the workplace may help in the short term, but experts say the only hope for stabilizing the population is large-scale immigration, sustained over many years. Failing that, the consequences could include not only a scarcity of workers and falling demand, but also a collapse of the pension system as the tax base shrinks and the elderly population booms. It had been a custom in Japan that the elder son used to leave the old parents high up on the hill to die so that the older generation may not use the resources necessary for the younger generation to procreate and prosper. Perhaps Japan should transfer the 75-year and above population to specially built cities in Africa or South America so that the younger peoples in Japan have sufficient lands to procreate and multiply. India should offer to house elderly Japanese in specially built Japanese cities in India, having modern healthcare facilities. Resettlement of elderly Japanese in specially built retirement communities in India would allow older Japanese enjoy better quality of life at lower cost in India and still enjoy the same high quality Japanese goods and medical care.

 

(10) Fertility & Decline of Greece Rome Egypt

Ten. The decline of the ancient Civilizations of Egypt, Greece, and Rome had been result of the precipitous decline of their populations. Unless Buddhist Japan and allow unlimited open immigration from Hindu India to revitalize the Japanese genes the Civilization of Japan might decline in the 22nd Century. India can supply 17 million immigrants to Japan, who can marry Japanese boys and girls and learn Japanese language and accept Japanese religion and customs. To stave off such a disaster, Japan would need 17 million new immigrants by 2050, according to a recent United Nations report. Other estimates have said Japan would need 400,000 new immigrants each year. But Japan is the most tenaciously insular of all the world's top industrial countries, and deeply conservative notions about ethnic purity make it hard for even the experts here to envision large-scale immigration. Seventeen million immigrants, as the United Nations forecasts, would represent 18 percent of the population in a country where immigrants now amount to only one percent. Even that modest figure consists mostly of second- and third-generation Koreans and Chinese whose ancestors were brought to Japan when it maintained colonies on the Asian mainland. Even long-term immigrants face frequent discrimination and are not accepted as "real" Japanese. "The figures of required immigrants in Japan the demographers talk about unimaginable for Japan. "In a quarter-century from 1975-2000, Japan has absorbed one million immigrants. Societies have always risen and faded, and Japan will likely disappear and something else will take its place. Greece and Rome disappeared too." The doctrine of nativism dominates the ruling elite of Japan. Japan’s refusal to import immigrants is the result of the social limitations of Japan, which is very insular society. Japan cannot absorb newcomers is free of the nativism that is common among members of the conservative political leadership. It grows out of a realistic appraisal of his country's social limitations, including those of its workplace culture and educational system. English-language skills in Japan, for example, rank along with North Korea's among the worst in Asia, making it difficult to attract international talent to its universities. Because of those issues and the society's insularity, Japan can probably absorb no more than 200,000 newcomers over the next decade. The Japanese government appears to agree and has planned to encourage only a kind of "high end" immigration that would be limited to those with specialized knowledge or skills. Japan wants to retain the insularity of Japanese society and import foreign immigrants with specialized skills. India should offer Japan special old age communities for Japanese retired persons to be built with Japanese money in Andaman & Nicobar Islands, where Japanese amenities would be provided and it would ease up the residential space in Japan and also develop Islands. Goddess of Fertility has played important role in the clash of civilizations. Smaller insular nations, namely, Phoenicians, Babylon, ancient Egypt, Kush, Indus Valley Civilization, and Greece that rose to the pinnacle of power and glory only to fall, when the Goddess Mother sealed the wombs of their women and their fertility declined. The Clash of Civilization is also the clash of the fertility of the ancient civilizations and the invading barbarians. Hindu Indian and Buddhist Chinese Civilization have survived intact from time immemorial because of their continental size and they roughly represented 25% of the world population throughout history. The size of nation’s population counts in the global Clash of Civilizations. Rise and fall of nations and civilizations in the final analysis depends on the discretion of the Almighty Goddess that controls the fertility of the women’s wombs.

 

(11) Differing World View in 2050

Eleven. Christian, Muslim, Hindu, and Buddhist represent four distinct worldviews and frequently they look at the same reality with diametrically opposite perspectives. First, Diplomats need a new theory of international politics, which would allow them to look at the world from the perspective of other civilizations. Diplomats need a new theory to separate the religious factors from the geopolitical factors influencing the foreign policy of other great powers. Second, the world's nations must determine the architecture of international security in the proper way, on the basis of the principles of democracy and equality and taking into account each other's interests. Washington threatening to replace international law with "the law of the fist." There has been a dangerous willingness on the part of the United States to ignore opposition around the world in dealing with international problems. Third, the Hindu India, Buddhist China, Orthodox Russia and Catholic France would have to develop strategic ties with one another in the Concert of World to hold Protestant America, theocratic Papacy and theocratic Wahhabi Arabia in check. The tolerant and inclusive societies of Hindu India, Buddhist China and Japan, Orthodox Russia would have to undertake joint measures against predatory civilizations and intolerant religious cults to assert tolerant multi-ethnic diverse civilizations right of preemptive strikes against predatory intolerant religious cults and theocratic priest-ruler states and terrorist fundamentalist militant religious organizations.

 

(12) Geopolitics of the World in 2050 AD

Twelve. The British “Economist” weekly magazine, did a survey of the “New Geopolitics, the Road to 2050,” in July 31,1999 issue. The future world shall comprise solely of seven or eight lumbering- cultural monsters. People are moved to action in the world by connections of blood, faith, instinct, color and race. In the coming century, big powers will compete, clash and coalesce with each other in various permutations and combinations. The post-modern system, will takeover, and the descendants of the European people who invented nation-state will themselves have invented a new multilingual political entity that covers most of non-Orthodox Europe. In which case that global state-hood tally will come down again, with a bump. India, China, Europe and America would definitely among the seven or eight lumbering-cultural monster civilizations that would survive the road to 2050. What other four or six countries that would survive as independent sovereign nations in the new age of colonial empires in 2050 AD in the world? People of the world shall be moved to action in the world by connections of blood, faith, instinct, color and race. In the coming century, big powers will compete, clash and coalesce with each other in various permutations and combinations. The Clash of Civilizations is real and would determine which of the 8 or 10 entities would remain the basic units of the International system in 2050. Rest of the smaller countries or the world would have to merge in to one of these 8 or 10 monster supra national confederations before 2050. The top three super powers of the world in 2003 are: United States, China and India, and these three countries would also be super powers in 2050 and beyond.

 

14(12) America’s Role in the Clash

(1) Clash of Civilization is US Covert Operations

One. United States has consistently deployed Clash of Civilization as Covert Operations to promote the racial, religious and national interests of the United States from its inception in 1775. The CIA realized that by engineering the military coups it could keep the military rulers under its thumb to serve the interests of the United States. The White House realized that the under-privileged Muslim clergy would serve the national interests of the American Big Oil and work as fifth columnists in their countries, in exchange for their increased share in the political process. The CIA had recruited the Sicilian Mafia to undermine Benito Mussolini and used Kuomintang Heroin Cartel of Asian Golden Triangle to finance its anti-Communism operations in the before, during and after the Vietnam War. United States and the CIA consistently employed Catholic and Wahhabi clergy, Wahhabi intolerance and Drug Cartels to promote American policies through CIA’s ties.

 

First, from the birth of the United States to the Civil War the principal purpose of the American Clash of Civilization was to exterminate the Native American Indians and to promote the Slavery, which was banned in Canada and Britain. Second, the United States and Papacy undertook Covert Operations against Britain and engineered the secession of Catholic Ireland in 1919 by promoting the Two-Nation Theory to undermine the principal challenger to the American colonialism. People of Irish descent represent 35% population of the United States.

 

Third, the United States promoted the principle of Wahhabi priest-ruler and Wahhabi Mecca Caliphate to engineer the secession of Arab Saudi Arabia and Arab Iraq and Arab Kuwait from Ottoman Empire during first quarter of the 20th Century. Fourth, the American colonialism and British Empire partitioned India in 1947 to create the artificial state of Pakistan on the false doctrine of Two-nation theory to create a geographical wedge between India and the oil-rich Iran, as Indian Empire before 1947 controlled 100% of the Iranian oil and 49% of the Iraqi oil. Artificial state of Pakistan was created to foil Indian Empire’s future conquest of Iran and Iraq.

 

Fifth, United States and the NATO sought alliances Alliance with the Albanian drug traffickers to partition Yugoslavia and carve out Kosovo from multi-ethnic Yugoslavia as Kosovo lies on the possible route of Azerbaijan-Adriatic oil/gas pipeline to transport Azerbaijan gas and oil to the Adriatic oil terminals. Sixth, United States supported Wahhabi Mujahideens in Afghanistan in 1980s to bring down the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. Seventh, United States and the CIA continue to support Chechnya terrorists in Russia as Grozzny and Chechnya lie on the possible route to transport the Azerbaijan oil and gas northward through Russian oil pipeline networks.

 

Eighth, President Bush establish American oil colony over Afghanistan by camouflaging it by America’s War on Islamic terrorism. Ninth, the recent Congressional Report on 9/11 outlines the role Saudi Arabia played in the 9/11 terrorist attacks. President Bush invaded Afghanistan to provide safe passage to Osama bin Laden and to protect Al Qaeda terrorists from sure deaths at hands of the victorious Northern Alliance soldiers. Tenth, United States, European Union and Papacy have consistently used the Clash of Civilizations as covert operations to mobilize militant Muslim terrorism to promote covert operations and ethnic Islamic separatism in multi-ethnic multi-religious secular India, Russia and China. Eleventh, the 20th Century Beast of the clash of Civilization is the loyal Lap Dog of the White House and United States has historically cultivated its 3-heads of Priest-rulers, Intolerance and drugs.

 

Twelfth, the 21st Century Beast of the Clash of Civilization the Oil-headed Beast is also the loyal Lap Dog of the White House. However, the Oil-Headed Beast would bite of the two heads of the 3-headed Beast of the 20th Century, namely the heads of Wahhabi Priest-rulers and Wahhabi & Catholic Intolerance, for the simple fact that Wahhabi terrorists attacked New York and Pentagon on 9/11. Thirteenth, however because of the 9/11 Hindu India and Protestant United States became the closes Civilization allies of the 21st Century and their national interests coincided in the fast growing American oil colonial empires. 

 

(2) Beast of Clash of Civilizations Is US Lap Dog

Two. United States nurtured and financed the principal of Wahhabi priest-rulers, Catholic priest-rulers, Wahhabi religious intolerance, Catholic religious intolerance, Wahhabi Heroin cartel, and Catholic Cocaine cartel to undertake covert operations against multi-ethnic multi-religion secular Civilizations and to promote religious ethnic separatism and predatory intolerance to create chaos in Civilization States. The CIA controls the 3-headed Beast of the Clash of Civilizations, and the Beast has consistently promoted the national interests of the White House and the Pentagon. The Beast of the Clash of Civilization in 20th Century was nurtured and financed by the CIA to undertake Covert Operations for the United States. The dreaded Beast of the Clash of Civilization, is also the Lap Dog of the White House as American colonialism nurtured, financed and legitimized all the three heads of the Beast, namely the head of priest-ruler, the head of Intolerance and the head of Drug trade. America engineered the Clash of Civilization at the start of the 20th Century, as the foundation of the Neo-Colonialism that United States decided would supplant the demise of the European Colonial Empires after the Second World War. United States was a new entrant into the race of the Colonial Empires. American oil colonialism financed, nurtured and propagated the Wahhabi priest-rulers of Mecca, militant Wahhabi fundamentalist Intolerance, and Muslim heroin cartels to cement closer ties with Muslim clergy, militant Muslim fundamentalism and Muslim Heroin/Opium cartels to induce Islamic oil-producing nations come voluntarily under the control and influence of the United States.

 

First, United States and Imperial Russia created Empires in 19th Century primarily by the subjugation of the geographically contiguous territories in the North America and Siberia respectively. Neither United States nor Russia established overseas colonies in the 19th Century. Both United States and Russia in the 19th Century expanded to encroach upon contiguous land mass to make them part of the expanding State of the USA and Russia, and the occupied territories became the part of the homeland and were not treated as colonies per se.

 

Second, in the 20th Century, United States worked to establish Neo-Colonialism where the US would support the pretenders to priest-rulers, so that in exchange for their support to the rebellion against their Empire, the United States would recognize them as the rulers of seceded territories and the priest-ruler would grant American colonialism the monopoly rights over the mineral rights over all oil and gas resources in their lands.

 

Third, the United States promoted the concept of the Wahhabi priest-rulers in the Arabian Peninsula in 1910s, when it was the part of the Ottoman Islamic Caliphate, at war against the Allied Powers in the First World War. Holy Koran demands that the entire Islamic Ummah should be under the rule of a single Muslim Caliph. United States propagated the idea of Clergy of Wahhabi Mecca as the new Caliph of Islam, which derived its legitimacy on the grounds of propagation of the true form of Islam. British spy Colonel Lawrence of Arabia sold the dream of the Wahhabi priest-ruler to the Ottoman governor of Mecca. The Wahhabi clergy of Mecca & Medina enjoyed no special privilege, wealth and power in the Ottoman Caliphate. Under the Ottoman Caliphate the Wahhabi Bedouin nomad earned livelihood as desert dacoits and by looting the Muslim pilgrims to Mecca and Medina throughout the 2nd Millennium.

 

Fourth, the British Empire and United States supported the rebellion of the Wahhabi Bedouin nomad tribes against the Ottomans to expedite the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire and recognized Abdul Aziz Al Saud as the King of House of Al Saud Dynasty in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, where Wahhabi clergy would control the religious and social affairs of Saudi Arabia, Mecca and Medina and Americans would control and manage the oil resources of Saudi Arabia. Britain installed a puppet King in Iraq and controlled the Iraqi oil. Britain also controlled 100% of the Iranian oil in 1947. Britain and United States were fathers of the Wahhabi priest-ruler movement in Saudi Arabia and Iraq in 20th Century. The Wahhabi fundamentalism and militant Islamism had been financed, nurtured, propagated with the full backing of the United States to mobilize Muslim ulema, Maulanas and clergy to support Christian American Oil colonialism and to betray Ottoman Islamic empire. America supported the fundamentalist Muslim clergy to oppose the Islamic Empire and cast its lot with the Christian Empire, in exchange for the religious control over Mecca & Medina and the imposition of Shariah Law over Arabia. The alliance of the Christian Protestant United States with Sunni Wahhabi Clergy continued to this date.

 

Fifth, the 20th Century Beast of Clash of Civilization had first head of the Priest-King, the second head of the religious intolerance, and the third head of the drug cartels. United States nurtured the Wahhabi Priest-King-head of the Beast as well as the Wahhabi Intolerance-head of the Beast. United States also nurtured and profited by the third head of the Beast, the global drug trade in heroin and Cocaine. The CIA had nurtured the Asian Golden Triangle’s Heroin & Opium trade from 1945 to 1990, when it allowed the 5th Nationalist Kuomintang Army stationed in Yunnan Province to move to Karen province of Burma after the Communist take-over of China. United States supported the Muslim Heroin-Opium cartel of Afghanistan and Pakistan to provide financial support to pro-US Mujahideens waging wars against Soviet troops in Afghanistan.

 

Sixth, throughout the 20th Century the 3-heads of Beast of Clash of civilizations, namely, Wahhabi Priest-Ruler, Wahhabi Intolerance and Wahhabi Heroin Cartel, were controlled and nurtured by the United States to promote its national interests to consolidate its control over Arab oil and gas resources. While the former colonial powers lost their support-base and power-base in their former colonies after the demise of colonial empires, the America’s alliance with the Muslim Clergy bore fruits and these former colonies opted to have closer ties with the United States rather than Britain, France and India, the former colonial empires.

 

Seventh, the unprecedented terrorist attacks of 9/11 2001 disturbed the applecart of cozy American ties with Wahhabi Clergy, Wahhabi Intolerance and Wahhabi Opium Cartel. President Bush invaded Afghanistan and Iraq under the camouflage of War on Terror, primarily to establish direct American colonial rule over Iraq, which has world’s second largest reserves of oil and gas resources. After the establishment of direct American oil colony over Iraq, the White House found that it would be cheaper for the United States to control the Arabian oil/gas reserves by direct colonial control over Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE. The Oil-head Beast of civilization in the 21st Century would maul and damage the 3-head Best of the 20th Century’s Clash of Civilizations and bite off the two heads of the Beast and the Old 3-headed Beast would survive with only one head the head of drug cartels. American Oil-Beast will bite off the Priest-Rule head as well as the Religious Intolerance-head of the Beast of the 20th Century. The ferocious Oil-Beast of the 21st Century and the Drug-Beast of the 20th Century would continue to be the Lap Dogs of the White House in the 21st Century. Clash of Races is the America’s instrument of policy.

 

Eighth, during 18th Century and 19th Century the Clash of Civilization in United States represented the barbarian forces that opposed the principles that Britain and Canada represented, namely, the abolition of Slavery. United States continued to practice the Apartheid System as late as 1965, when Democratic President Lynden B. Johnson signed 1964 Bill of Rights. America unleashed White Clash of Civilizations against Blacks in the United States to create the White Protestant-Catholic United States after the Civil War. The purpose of the President Abraham Lincoln’s War had been to stop the importation of the black slaves, which had threatened to make United States the black-majority nation in North America, just as Haiti had emerged as the black-majority black-ruled first independent sovereign state in the Caribbean and the New World. President Lincoln waged war on the Confederate South to stop the importation of the black slaves into the United States, and the net result of the victory of anti-slavery Republican forces had been the complete end of the immigration of black Africans. The Republican victory ended the non-white immigration to the United States and preserved the United States for the white Christians of Europe. The Civil War and the subsequent end of the black and non-white immigration to the Untied States represented the WASPs Clash of Civilization against black races and non-white races.

 

Ninth, during 18th Century, 19th Century until 1905, the Clash of Civilization in the United States meant the White men’s right to commit genocide over the brown Native Americans, commonly known as the American Indians. The 13-colonies of the United States seceded from Britain to wage wars on the tens of millions of Native Indians that Britain had agreed would be protected and had set the borderline limiting the eastward frontiers of the American colonies. The Clash of Civilization in the first 100-year of the United States represented the unmitigated massacre of the Native American Indians in North America, that resulted in the expansion of the frontiers of the United States from Atlantic coast to the Pacific coast.

 

Tenth, in the 20th Century the United States employed the Clash of Civilization to launch covert operations to undermine the three principal multi-ethnic multi-religion secular Empires of the 20th Century, namely, British Empire, Ottoman Empire and Indian Empire. United States aligned with the Papacy to engineer the secession of the Catholic-majority Ireland from Great Britain to undermine the population base of the homeland of the maritime Pax Americana. The secession of the English-speaking Anglo-Saxon Catholic Ireland in 1919 from Britain was the first time that the Two-Nation Theory, Religion as the Basis of State, and the Smaller State Theory was successfully implemented. The Clash of Civilization is the American & Papal conspiracy to uphold the principle that Religion can be the basis of partition of the linguistically and ethnically similar States. The principles and the covert operations tactics that United States and the Papacy deployed for the secession of Ireland were duplicated in 1947 Partition of India Empire and the secession of Muslim Pakistan by covert operations launched by USA, Papacy and British M-6 spy agency. The Two Nation Theory was also used for the covert operations of Papacy, Germany and the United States for the invasions and partition of the multi-ethnic secular Yugoslavia to engineer the secession of Catholic Slovenia and Catholic Croatia. The American policy of ethnic separatism caused the secession of Muslim Bangladesh from Muslim Pakistan. The American policy of ethnic separatism would result in the secession of Muslim Baluchistan from Pakistan so that non-Punjabi Baluchistan might federate with Afghanistan and oil-rich Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, which would allow American Big Oil directly export Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan oil via Turkmenistan-Gwadar oil/gas pipeline from sea terminals at Gwadar. The American policy of ethnic separatism and Clash of ethnicity camouflaged the American oil interests in Afghanistan, Baluchistan and Turkmenistan. United States historically promoted the Two-Nation Theory to undermine Indian Empire’s historical legacy in the Persian Gulf region and Indian Mughal Empire’s legacy in the oil-rich Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.

 

(3) Core Policy of the United States

Three. The continued support to the Wahhabi Saudi Arabia in the 21st Century would undermine the core principles of the US foreign policy, and harm the national interests of the United States. After the Americna colonial occupation of Iraq, United States would no longer need the support of the Wahhabi monarchy in the Saudi Arabia to control the Arab oil and gas resources.

 

One. The four core principles of the United States foreign policy are as follows. One. Preserve US sovereignty and freedom of action by marginalizing the United Nations. Preserve US influence in the Third World by marginalizing the Non Aligned Movement. Preserve US influence in the Europe by marginalizing the leadership of France and Germany in the European Union. Preserve US influence in the world oil markets by marginalizing the nationalist and radical leadership in the OPEC. Two. Reserve US military interventions abroad for reasons of US national security, not altruism. Three. Avoid peacekeeping operations that compromise the US military’s war-fighting proficiencies. Four. The US should not get involved in the “nation building” in the Third World and US should beware of the political hubris inherent in project of nation building.

 

Two. President Bush had an great experience when, United States failed to secure the votes of the non-permanent members of the UN Security Council representing Non Aligned Nations. US failed to coerce the votes of Cameroon, Guinea, Angola, Chile and Pakistan. US realized to its dismay that its super power status failed to sway and undermine the Non Aligned Movement. United States realized that France and Germany turned out to be the nemesis of the United States in the United Nations. France and Germany secured alliance with Russia and China to hold United States in check, especially on the issue of Iraq War. United States invaded secular Iraq and destroyed the secular structure and imposed the pro-Wahhabi elements in power in Iraq. The American occupation of Iraq would result in the Saudi domination of OPEC. United States invaded secular Iraq to promote Saudi Arabia as the Caliph of Islam and to empower anti-secularist forces in Iraq. United States overthrew the government of Shah of Iran to empower anti-secularist ultra-fundamentalist regime of Ayatollahs in Iran. In 1979, secular Iran and secular Iraq were two principal challengers of fundamentalist Wahhabi Saudi Arabia for the leadership of the Islamic world and for the position of Caliph of Islam. Shah of Iran as well as Saddam Hussein denied Saudi King’s pretensions for the position of Caliph of Islam. After the downfall of Iran and Iraq only Pakistan would challenge Saudi Arabia’s aspirations to establish the Mecca Caliphate, as Pakistan wants to become the New Caliph of Islam and establish Islamabad Mughal Caliphate. Bush foreign policy conservatism has become colored by triumphalism and crusading zeal. George W. Bush is the most conservative person to serve as president of the United States since Calvin Coolidge. Bush administration didn’t promote the religious agenda of the fundamentalist Christian religious right conservatism. However, Christian Bush administration directly promoted the agenda of the Wahhabi Islamic religious right fundamentalism, not because he believed in the superiority of Islam over Christianity, but because the propagation of Wahhabi fundamentalism in Pakistan, Iraq and other Islamic countries promoted America’s oil interests in the Middle East. For securing America’s oil interests in the Arabian Gulf, President Bush acted like Mujahideen and promoted Mecca Caliphate, Saudi Arabia as new Caliph of Islam, and advanced Wahhabi Militant fundamentalism in Iraq and throughout the Islamic world. The White House has historically acted as the Public Relations company extolling the virtues of Wahhabi Saudi Arabia and how much United States owe to the Wahhabi fundamentalists for securing America’s energy requirements.

 

(4) White Vs Black Clash in Americas

Four. What is commonly called the European colonization of the Americas from the 15th to the 19th centuries was not strictly a European affair, far from it. It was a Joint European-African affair. Throughout 19th Century the principal focus of the Whites in the Clash of Civilizations had been to keep Blacks under the control of the whites, as blacks were in majority in the United States.

 

First, some 5.5 million of the first 6.5 million people who crossed the Atlantic Ocean and settled in the Americas (the New World) were African. Only 1 million were Europeans. The Blacks outnumbered whites 5 to 1 among the first 6.5 immigrants to the Americas (North & sough America & Caribbean) in the New World. The sugar colony of Haiti was the first colony to gain independence in the New World, and State of Haiti had more foreign and gold reserves than the United States in 1800.

 

Second, the purpose of the President Abraham Lincoln in the Civil war had been to stop the immigration of Blacks in to the United States, which threatened to make United States the Black-ruled and Black-majority State, had the black revolution that succeeded in the prosperous colony of Haiti found support among black slaves of the United States. 

 

Third, throughout the 18th Century, 19th Century the Whites in the United States were very concerned that the black slaves in the United States might revolt and join forces with the Native Americans to expel the Whites from the United states, just as they did in Haiti. The black-ruled independent Haiti had been bete noire for White-ruled United States. President Bill Clinton sent troops to impose the rule of Catholic Priest Rev. Aristide to militarily undermine the independence of Voodoo religion in Haiti.

 

Fourth, the Republicans who invaded and conquered the pro-Slavery Confederates of the South, not to give freedom to the Black slaves, rather to eliminate the threat of black takeover of the United States, in the event the Haiti Revolution spread throughout United States. The Republicans and Democratic continued to manipulate the election process to deny the blacks their right to vote and hold political power.

 

Fifth, the white-looking descendants of the black slaves of mixed white and black parentage held very high posts in the first few decades of the United States history. President George Washington had a black wife and all his children were of mixed ancestry. Many of the top leaders of the United States had been people of mixed white and black ancestry, though their skin color looked like whites. The white Anglo Saxons of United States were mortally scared that one day the people of mixed white and black ancestry might take over United States, as had happened in Mexico.

 

(5) White Vs Native Americans Clash in USA

Five. The principal focus of the United States in the 18th and 19th Century in the Clash of civilizations had been to massacre the Native Americans in the North America, the original inhabitants of the United States. The WASPs that dominated the 13-colonies of the United States in 1770 waged Clash of Civilization on Blacks and Native Americans. The White colonialists seceded from the British Empire, because Britain had accepted the rights of the Native Indian regimes for the lands and prohibited the westward expansion of the United States. The foundation of the United States based on the Clash of Civilization against the Native Americans that occupied the entire lands of the present day United States west of the 13-colonies of the United States. The WASPs of the United States consistently waged wars for genocide of the Native Americans from the day of its inception in the 1770 Declaration of Independence to as late as 1905. The State of California placed newspaper advertisement that State would pay $5 in 1905, for any head of an Indian. United States officially advocated the genocide and massacre of Native Americans as late as 1905.

 

United States consistently supported the terror in Nicaragua to encourage the deaths of the Guatemalan Native Indians as the Central America had advance Aztec and Maya civilization, which was far more advanced than the contemporary Catholic West European Civilization, which had just emerged from the Dark Age.

 

(6) Blacks supported Republicans Post Civil War

Six. The Democratic Party lost control over the Southern States after the Republican victory in the Civil War. The Democratic Party came to be associated with the pro-segregation State’s rights. The Republican victory in the Civil War made blacks the solid supporters of the Republican Party and from the Civil war in 1840’s to 1964, the day Democratic President Lynden B. Johnson signed the Bill of Rights the Southern Blacks remained Republican vote bank. After the Civil War the Democrats used the election process and the Canvassing Board’s control of the election process to systematically deny the rights of the Blacks that were supposedly liberated after the abolition of the slavery after the Civil War.

 

(7) 1964 Bill of Rights and End of Apartheid

Seven. Before Democratic President Lynden B. Johnson into law the 1964 Bill of Rights the United States had Apartheid System, as Blacks had separate public toilets and separate back rows for blacks in buses. The Republicans got controls over the conservative Southern States after the Democratic President signed into law the Bill of Rights. After the 1964 Bill of Rights the Southern Blacks switched alliance to the Democratic Party and continued to do so even in the 21st Century. After the 1964 Bill of Rights the Southern Whites solidly gathered around the Republican Party. After 1964, the pro-segregation whites used the euphemism of State’s rights to promote the agenda of the pro-segregation whites. 

 

(8) Jewish Vs Blacks Clash in Democratic Party

Eight. In large states with sizeable number of black voters, the blacks became politically powerful because of the black vote banks, especially in the large Democratic States of New York. However, in 1990s the Jews came to dominate the campaign machinery of the Democratic Party as well as Republican Party in the New York State. Jewish election campaign donors helped Jews takeover the inner-party machinery in Republic as well as Democratic Party in the New York State. During two-term presidency of President Bill Clinton the Jewish political operatives successfully marginalized the blacks from the inner party organization and the leadership of the Republican and Democratic Party. After the 1964 Bill of Rights, the Jewish leadership and Secretary of State Dr. Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski and Madeleine Albright developed closer political ties of the Jews with the pro-segregation whites arguing that Jews would be able to promote White’s interests more effectively. Since Jews could attack any criticism of Jews as a form of anti-Semitism the Jewish Orthodoxy became a useful tools for promoting the interests of the pro-segregation whites. The financial clout of the Jews in the Wall Street made Jews politicians succeed in raising large campaign war chest. The financial power of the Jews and the closer ties of Jews with the pro-segregation whites resulted in unprecedented entry into corridors of power for Jewish politicians. The electoral victories of numerous Jewish politicians such as Mayor Bloomberg of New York and nomination by Al Gore for Senator Lieberman as Vice president running mate resulted in the acceptance of Jews as part of the white ruling elite in the United States, to the detriment of the political aspirations and fortunes of Black politicians in the United States especially for the federal offices.

 

(9) USA in Papal Catholic Eschatology

Ninth. Would American Christian Empire in 21st Century meet the fate of Roman Empire of 5th Century? Pope John Paul II during Regan and Clinton Administrations sought to bring United States into the framework of Catholic apocalyptic eschatology teleology, to declare that United States is the Third Rome, the last of the world monarchies, and end would mark the inception of the Catholic Kingdom of God ruled by priests in the 3rd Christian Millennium. Pope John Paul II incited the dream of Christian American Empire in the minds of President Ronald Reagan and President Bill Clinton to wet their ecclesiastical greed, to use America’s military power for Christianization of the world. The Protestant majority and the constitutional wall that separates State and Church in the United States, makes America the last obstacle in the realization of the dream of Papal Kingdom of God on earth in the 21st Century. Papacy engineered the demise of secular atheist Soviet Union, which had separation of State and Church. The disintegration of the United States would allow Papacy to carve out a Catholic super power in North America by combining Catholic-majority areas of Canada, United States and Mexico. It is likely that Papacy has secured nuclear weapons technology during the fiasco at Los Alamos weapons laboratory during Clinton Administration.

 

One. Catholic Papacy conspired to destroy Roman Empire to fulfill its apocalyptic eschatology as the end of the last of the world monarchies so that Catholic Empire of Kingdom of God ruled by Catholic-priests could come about. “Far more effective in the minds of the barbarian peoples of the West was the idea of the Imperium Christianum or Christian Empire, which took shape after the conversion of Constantine the Great and the reconciliation between Christianity and the Roman Empire. Not only did the Christian Church become a state church, including in its liturgy prayers for the empire and the emperor, but it also brought the Roman Empire into the framework of Christian eschatology, as the last of the world monarchies whose end would mark the inception of the kingdom of God.” Papacy conspired to bring about the end of the Roman Empire, right after Christianity became the official religion of Rome, hoping to recreate the new Papal empire out of the corpse of the Roman empire. Succession of Popes conspired with foreign German barbarian invaders to help the foreign invaders conquer Roman Empire, in exchange for the Catholic Church to rule Rome or Italy. Papacy gave kiss of death to liberal Roman Empire by misusing the Roman freedom of religion. Papacy after becoming the Roman State Church became fifth columnists and betrayed Roman Empire and conspired with German barbarian invaders, who conquered and destroyed Roman Empire. Pope helped create the barbarian German empire to keep Northern Italy under colonial occupation so that Pope could create Papal empire in Rome.

 

Two. Catholic Popes incited the imperial ambitions of Charlemagne in 800 and Habsburg Emperor in 1521, to secure the use of their military power for establishing the rule of Catholic Church throughout their dominions. Arian Christianity was dominant in Charlemagne’s empire and Protestantism was the dominant religion in the German lands of Habsburg Empire. Pope John Paul II incited the dream of Christian American Empire in the minds of President Ronald Reagan and President Bill Clinton to wet their ecclesiastical greed, to use America’s military power for Christianization of the world. Catholic President John F. Kennedy invaded Vietnam to impose the political rule of the minority Christians and to undermine Buddhism in Indo-China.

 

Three. Pope Leo on 25 December 800 deceptively performed coronation of Charlemagne as “Augustus and Emperor” during the ceremony Pope was to consecrate Charlemagne’s son as king. In 750 Catholic Roman See became the first metropolitan Church of Charlemagne’s dominion. Later on Pope Innocent III argued that Pope Leo III had transferred the Caesar’s Throne of the Empire from the Greeks to the Germans in 800 his successors could transfer it elsewhere if they so wished. Pope Gregory VII asserted that only the Pope might use the imperial insignia; Pope might lawfully depose emperor, but Pope should himself be judged by none. Pope secured the full military support of the Habsburg Holy Roman Empire in Counter Reformation Wars, when Emperor Charles V, opening the Diet of Worms in 1521 declared that the “empire from of old had not many masters but one, and it is our (Habsburg) intention to be that one. 

 

Four. Pope John Paul II eulogized United States as Christian power during Reagan and Clinton Administration, and might withdraw its support to President George W. Bush during 2004 presidential elections, if President Bush wavered in its Crusades for the Christianization of the world, to protect the oil interests of American Big Oil. Papacy could mobilize its vote banks among Catholic Irish, East Europeans and Hispanic Americans to bring down the presidency of President George W. Bush in 2004, if he continued to favor pro-right conservative Protestants.

 

Five. Catholic Popes have historically given the kiss of death to the leading Christian empires and weakened the secular authorities to strengthen the secular, temporal powers of the Pope. Pope conspired with Alaric the barbarian in AD 415 conquest of Rome. Pope conspired with Ottoman Suleiman during the conquest of Byzantine Empire and Constantinople. The Pope Pius XII conspired with foreign invaders against Benito Mussolini, the deuce of Italy during Second World War. Bishop of Poland and Pope John Paul II conspired with USA to bring down the Communist government of Poland. Pope John Paul II opposed President George W. Bush’s war on Islamic terrorism in Afghanistan and failed to vehemently condemn the 9/11 terrorist attacks on United States.

 

Six. President Bush’s invasion of Iraq transformed the religious interests of American foreign policy to oil interest based American policy. Protestant WASP interests and Oil interests dominate the American policy. America would pursue the policy of Clash of Oil to the detriment of Clash of Religion spearheaded by Vatican and Mecca. USBigOil no longer needed the continued support of Wahhabi clergy for the control over Arab oil after the American conquest of Iraq. President Bush’s agenda of oil colonialism does not have any religious baggage, except to consolidate WASP control over Muslim oil resources. Protestant United States would retaliate against Papacy if papacy tried to bring United States into the framework of Catholic apocalyptic eschatology. WASP’s USA might even consider the abolition of the Papacy if it ever became clear that Catholics conspired to bring American Empire into the framework of Christian eschatology. Oil is the pagan god that would burn the Catholic apocalyptic end of time eschatology teleology. The 21st Century heralds the Clash of Oil and rebirth of the Colonial Empires.

 

14(13) Native Americans in Clash

(1) Goddess Isis - God Ossir Zeus Jupiter

Tens of millions worship Goddess Isis, God Ossir, God Zeus and God Jupiter even today. These ancient gods and goddess are alive and ancient religion of ancient Egypt, Greece, Rome and Persia has survived and prospered in foreign lands and it is inevitable that the ancient religion of Pharaoh’s would stage a come back in Egypt, Libya and Syria and expel Islam form their lands. If Jews could return to Holy Land after the Diaspora of 2000 years long, then African pagan Nubians the believers of Goddess Isis, God Ossir and Apostolic Gnostic Christians can also reclaim the lands of Syria, Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Jordan, Lebanon, Tunisia and Morocco for their religions, following the path shown by the establishment of State of Israel in 1948. Establishment of the State of Israel gave hope to the conquered civilizations of Incas, Mayas, Aztecs, Native Americans, Australian Aborigines, Amerindians, and believers of goddess Isis, Hera, Shekhmet, Hathor, Athena and believers of god Zeus, Upiter, Ossir, Ahura Mazda, Viraoccha that some day their religion and civilization would regain their ancient lands and their ancient civilizations and ancient religions would someday flourish, propser and expand.

 

If Jews, with a total worldwide population of 15 million could establish the State of Israel after the gap of 2,000 years then every once of the ancient civilization and religion has a chance to regain their ancient lands, where they would resurrect their ancient civilization. The success of Jews to reestablish the Jewish State of Israel presents greatest threat to the survival of Catholic religion in South America and survival of Islam in Egypt, Syria, Libya, Jordan, Persis and Turkey. The underlying idea of Israel that even after 2,000 years of Diaspora the defeated and displaced people bound by a common religion can recreate a lost language and establish a new state based on the ancient religion presents greatest threat to predatory Islam and Catholicism that expanded by sword and colonialism.

 

Many ancient religions and ancient civilizations would follow the lead of Jewish State of Israel and reestablish their ancient religion and ancient civilization in their ancient lands. Hindu India must never allow the destruction of the Jewish State of Israel. Hindu India should help reestablish Pharaoh’s State in Egypt, Inca’s State in Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia, Maya’s State in Mexico, Aztec’s State in Guatemala and El Salvadore, Aborigines’ State in Australia, Zoroastrian State in Persia, Hindu State in Malaysia and Indonesia, Zeus’s State in Greece, Jupiter’s State in Rome and Shamana’s State in Siberia. It is the manifest destiny of India, China and Japan to help the ancient religions and ancient civilizations reestablish their ancient way of life and culture in their ancient lands. India, China and Japan should come to the defense of paganism, pagans and tribal religions in the Clash of Civilizations.

 

(1) Specter of Black-Indian Revolt in America

First. The United States’ role in the Clash of Civilizations in 18th and 19th Century, centered on genocide of Native Americans in North America. United States fought the Civil War to end the importation of blacks into United States as slaves, fearing that the continued importation of the Africans into United States might turn the tables against whites in North America if the blacks revolted and joined forces with the Native American tribes just across the borders. Had the Black Revolution of Haiti found support in the United States and resulted in the rebellion of the black slaves in the United States then blacks would have joined forces with Native American Tribes and could have expelled whites from the United States. President Abraham Lincoln invaded the Confederates in the Civil War, as he feared that Black slaves in the South might revolt and join the war on the side of American Indian tribes, when Whites embarked upon the war on Indians. Blacks were in majority in the Untied States when 13 colonies signed the Declaration of Independence. Throughout the New World, North America, South America and the Caribbean, from the 15th to the 19th centuries, some 5.5 million black Africans were among the first 6.5 million people who crossed the Atlantic Ocean and settled in the Americas, and only 1 million were white Europeans among these first 6.5 million. The blacks outnumbered whites by 5 to 1. There were 90 million Native Indian American in 1500 when Columbus landed in the New World.

 

(2) King George III’s Proclamation of 1763

Second. England, though a Anglo Saxon nation like United States believed in the rights of the Indians, colonies and blacks. Anglo Saxon Englishmen had been at opposite side of the battle lines in the Clash of Civilizations from 1770 to 1900. Britain and Canada opposed United States imperialistic and genocidal policies towards American Indians and blacks. Britain’s King George III issued the Proclamation of 1763 that formalized the concept of Indian land titles for the first time in the history of European colonization in the New World. The Proclamation of 1763 prohibited the issuance of patents to any lands claimed by a tribe unless the Indian tribe had first been extinguished by purchase or treaty. The Proclamation of 1763 reserved for the use of the American Indian tribes “all the Lands and Territories lying to the Westward of the sources of the Rivers which fall into the Sea from the West and the Northeast.” Land west of Appalachians might not be purchased or entered upon by private persons, but purchase might be made in the name of the King or one of the colonies at a council meeting of the Indians. This policy continued up to the termination of British rule and was adopted by the United States.

 

(3) British North America Act of 1867

Third. When French dominion in Capitulated in 1760, the English announced, “the Savages or Indian Allies of his most Christian Majesty, shall be maintained in the lands they inhabit, if they choose to remain there.” Thereafter, the Proclamation of 1763 applied in Canada and was embodied in the practices of the Canadian Dominion government. The British North America Act of 1867, which created modern Canada, provided that the Parliament of Canada should have exclusive legislative authority with respect to ‘Indians and lands reserved for the Indians.

 

(4) Northwest Ordinance 1787

Fourth. Both the articles of Confederation and the federal Constitution reserved either to the president or to Congress sole authority in Indian affairs, including authority to extinguish Indian tribe by Treaty. The first full declaration of US policy was embodied in the Northwest Ordinance 1787: “The utmost good faith shall always be observed toward the Indians, their lands and property shall never be taken from them without their consent; and in their property, rights and liberty, they shall never be invaded or disturbed, unless in just and lawful wars authorized by Congress; but laws founded in justice and humanity shall from time to time be made, for preventing wrongs being done to them, and for preserving peace and friendship with them. This doctrine was embodied in the act of August 7, 1789, as one of the first declaration of the US Congress under the Constitution.

 

(5) Indian Removal Act of 1830

Fifth. The first major departure from the policy of respecting Indian rights came with the Indian Removal Act of 1830. For the first time the United States resorted to coercion, particularly in the cases of Cherokee and Seminole tribes as a means of securing coercion. In the decade following, almost the entire population of perhaps 100,000 Indians was moved westward. For three decades, beginning in the 1850s, raids and sporadic pitched fighting took place up and down the western Plains.

 

(6) Act of March 3, 1871

Sixth. The Act of March 3, 1871 declared that “hereafter no Indian nation or the tribe would be recognized as an independent power with whom the United States may contract by treaty. The Dawes General Allotment Act of 1887, the total of 118 Indians reservations were allotted. The Indians lost 86 million acres land or 62 percent of the total 138 million acres in Indian ownership prior to 1887. Indian population had been dwindling through the decades after mid-19th century. The California Indians alone dropped from 100,000 in 1853, to 30,000 in 1864, and to 19,000 in 1906.

 

(7) Conquest of Arab Oil Fields

Seventh. United States revolted against Britain, because King George III’s Proclamation of 1763 prohibited the occupation of Indian lands west of Appalachians. United States had coveted the British oil-rich colonies in the Arabian Gulf. President Bush’s invasion of Iraq is the 21st Century version of the late 18th Century and early 19th century conquest of the Indian lands in the North America, which had been declared as Indian lands by the Proclamation of 1763. The oil-producing lands of the Middle East would come under the military occupation of the United States and become part of the United States in due course in the 21st Century, just as the 86 million acres Indian lands became the white-owned lands in the Untied States by the Dawes General Allotment Act of 1887. The principal issue worth examining in the Clash of Civilizations is: Would Arab race in the 21st Century meet the fate of Native American Indians of 18th and 19th Century?

 

(8) America is in Expansion Mode

Eighth. As late as the beginning of 20th Century in 1905, the State of California offered $5 for every head of the Indian. United States completed the annihilation of the Native Americans by 1900. The black immigration to the Untied States ended after the Civil War. United States dropped Atom Bomb over Nagasaki and Hiroshima in 1945 to herald the American Age after the Second World War, which was only tempered by the Soviet opposition to the United States during the Cold War. The demise of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War and fall of the Communism ushered in 1990 the age of one superpower system, the unipolar world with United States as the sole upper power. President Bush’s war on Iraq signaled the assertive United States waging new type of Clash of Civilization for the conquest of the oil and gas reserves of Arabian Gulf and Caspian Basin. The 21st Century is similar to the 18th and 19th Century, according to Dr. Henry J. Kissinger, (Diplomacy).

 

(9) America’s Clash with Britain

Ninth. British Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson unilaterally declared oil-rich colonies east of Suez independent after 1968, due to the influence of the United State and the United States moved right in and by 1990, the United Sates had become the dominant player in the Arabian Gulf. United States moved into the Indian lands that the King George III’s Proclamation of 1767 protected as exclusive Indian lands. The birth of United States took place as a protest against the pro-Indian tribe and anti-slavery policies of the British Empire. The birth of the OPEC and United States oil colonialism in the Arabian Gulf is the direct protest against the abdication of the British colonial interests in Kuwait, UAE, Oman & Muscat, Brunei. United States didn’t have colonies after the Second World War, when the European colonial empires emerged intact after the Allied Victory. United States conspired to undermine the French colonial rule and British colonial rule as United States hoped to reestablish American colonial empire out of the ashes of the British and French colonial empires some time in future. United States wants to create American colonial Empire in selected oil-rich territories of the former Ottoman Empire, British Empire and French Empire in the Middle East. United States led the Clash of Civilization in the 21st Century by its total support to Saudi Wahhabi fundamentalism, hoping that Wahhabi clergy would be satisfied with their control over the religious affairs and voluntarily accept American monopoly over the oil and gas resources of the OPEC nations. Just as United States went all out to acquire total control over the lands of the Indians in 18th & 19th century, in the 21st Century the United States determined to takeover the oil and gas fields of the Middle East and Caspian basin. In 21st Century the British Prime Minister Tony Blair decided to lend Britain’s total support to the American conquest of Iraq, and in 2003, Britain and Untied States are on the same side of the battle lines in the Clash of Civilization, the total reversal of British position from 1770 to 1900, when Britain had been on the opposite side of the battle lines to United States in the Global Clash of Civilizations.

 

14(14) Britain’s Role in the Clash

(1) Britain’s Role in Clash of Civilizations

While United States in 1900s supported Saudi Wahhabi fundamentalism Britain promoted Arab Nationalism to mobilized educated Arab leaders oppose the Ottoman Empire. Britain promoted Arab League after the First World War to promote Arab nationalism to mobilize Jordan and Egypt oppose the Ottoman Caliphate.

 

First, British Secret Services hired South African Indian Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi to lead the Islamic Khilafat Movement in India to support Islamic separatism in India so that Muslim could develop Arab Nationalism. British Empire hired India to ethnically divide Hindus and to mobilize the Muslims. The purpose of the Khilafat Movement was to undermine the political independence of Aryan Kurds, who were promised independence after the breakup of the Ottoman Empire. M.K. Gandhi fell into the trap and instead of demanding independence of India as British Empire had promised for India’s support to the Allied Powers in the First World, where India contributed 1,500,000 soldiers the Gandhi-led Khilafat Movement imposed the rule of the Arab Muslims over Aryan Kurds.

 

Second, the Arab nationalism created by British Empire to weaken Ottoman Empire, turned out to be the nemesis of the Muslim priest-ruler concept promoted by the American empire as the successor of the Ottoman Caliphate. America supported the cause of the theocratic fundamentalist Wahhabi Muslim ulema in the Arab world, which violently clashed with the political interests of the secular Arab nationalistic leaders and parties that British Empire promoted in Arab League. The interests of pro-Islamic theocracy American Empire and the interests of the pro-Arab Nationalism Indian Empire and British Empire in the Middle East throughout the 20th Century.

 

Third, the United States supported the military coup leaders, theocracies and monarchies in the Middle East. United States engineered the military coup in Iran and brought back Mohammed Riza Pahlavi as the King of Iran, who owed loyalty to United States not Britain. United States undermined the British oil interests in Iran and the Suez Canal in the 1950s. In 1979, President Carter overthrew the liberal regime of Shah of Iran and imposed the theocratic rule of Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran, to cast America’s final vote in favor of Islamic theocracies in the Middle East and there has been no turning back after than.

 

Fourth, The CIA bribed British Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson and Britain voluntarily withdrew from all oil-producing colonies East of Suez by 1968.  Britain bribed by Untied States gave unilateral independence to Trucial States (UAE, Bahrain, Qatar), Muscat & Oman, Yemen, in 1971. Britain under influence of the CIA gave independence to Kuwait in 1963, and to Brunei in 1984. Britain turned out to be the loyal Anglo Lap Dog of the White House when Britain unilaterally abandoned British colonial possessions paving way for the American oil colonialism to replace British colonialism with American colonialism. Britain’s role in the 21st Clash of Civilization would be limited as the loyal Anglo Lap Dog of the White House.

 

14(15) Russia’s Role in Clash

(1) Russia’s Role in Clash of Civilizations

Russian Empire in the 17th, 18th, 19th and 20th Century expanded in typical European Christian expansionism, and since expanded landward and it sought to directly rule the colonial possessions as part of the homeland.

 

First, the ideological fervor of the Soviet Union delayed disintegration of the Soviet-Russian Empire, and it continued to survive on the oxygen of the Communist ideology and revolutionary fervor. The Soviet Colonial empire disintegrated when white Russians realized that only by secession of the Russian Federation from the Soviet Union, could Russian Slavs continue to control and lead the Russian Federation, in a country where due to the declining population of white Slav Russians, the non-Russians could have taken control over the Soviet Union. The Soviet Empire disintegrated because like the English of the British Empire the Russians realized that they no longer had the youthful population to continue the domination of the vast Soviet Empire.

 

Second, during 20th Century, the interests of American 3-Headed beast of the Clash conflicted with the interests of the Soviet Bear and it resulted in the defeat of the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, when the CIA openly supported the Muslim clergy-rule, Muslim militant fundamentalism and Muslim Heroin traffickers to wage all out war on Russian troops in Afghanistan in the name of Islam, which incited Muslims of Central Asia revolt against the continued Russian occupation of Muslim Central Asian Republics. The Muslim theocracy, Muslim fundamentalism and Muslim drug cartels defeated secular socialistic Soviet forces and in the process ended the Cold War. The White Western Christian Civilization’s alliance with the Muslim theocracy and fundamentalism and organized crime allowed the Western Christians defeat the Orthodox Christians and brought the Communist Second World into the fold of the US-led First World, 25-member European Union and enlarged NATO. Pentagon and the CIA’s long-standing alliance with Islamic theocracy, fundamentalism and crime hit the lottery when the Cold War ended. United States felt indebted towards Wahhabi theocracy and decided to promote King of Saudi Arabia as the new Caliph of Islam and Mecca Caliphate.

 

Third, the United States led by the oil-Beast supported the militant Islamic secessionist movements in Chechnya and Grozzny as the it strategically lie on the oil pipeline route to transport Azerbaijan oil and gas northward through Russian oil pipeline networks.

 

Fourth, during 21st Century, Russia, France and Germany would take a common stand on the issue of the Clash of Civilizations. The Soviet Bear competed with American Eagle to undermine the Western interests to protect the freedom and the sovereignty of the Non Aligned Nations during the Cold War and the Soviet might supported the Non Aligned Third World in the Clash of Civilization during the Cold War. However, after the demise of the Soviet Union, demise of the Communism and the End of the Cold War, the White Orthodox Christian European Russian Bear might join the fellow white Europeans in the post-Cold War Clash of Civilizations. It is possible that Russia might revert to the traditional Tsarist imperialistic expansion of Russian Empire in the 21st Century. The militant Islamic terrorist attacks on Russia might make Russia anti-Islam in the Clash of Civilization. The anti-Islamic Russia might be tempted to reassert Russian control over Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan the former Soviet Republics in the new Clash of Civilization, as expression of the Christian expansionism over Islamic territories. Russia has rejoined the camp of European land powers Germany and France against maritime United States, to regain Russia’s colonial influence over Islamic oil producers in the Caspian oil basin.

 

Fifth, Russian Orthodox Church is more anti-Hindu than Protestant Churches. Russian Orthodox Church, Armenian Orthodox Church, Georgian Orthodox Church and Ukraine Orthodox church do not recognize Hinduism as valid religion, even when Russian Orthodox Church recognized Buddhism, Judaism and Islam as legitimate religion. The Orthodox Church realized that the Classical Greeks worshipped God Zeus as the supreme god, who was no other than Vedic Hindu god Indra, the King of gods in India. God Zeus, God Jupiter and God Indra worshipped in India even today. If the Russian Orthodox Church could have its way in President Putin’s Russia, then Russia would be on the opposite side of Hindu India in the global Clash of Civilizations. Though Soviet Union joined India in protecting the rights and independence of the Non Aligned Third World during the Cold War, India should be very apprehensive of the Orthodox Russian Church’s role in the Clash of civilization, which might force imperial Russia to take anti-India foreign posture. In the clash of Civilizations, Hindu India could trust Protestant United States more than it could trust Orthodox Russia, whenever Russia implemented its foreign policy to promote the religious interests of Russian Orthodoxy. It would be wrong for Hindus to support Russian Orthodoxy because of the Great Schism and growing threat Papacy posed to the Russian Orthdoxy. In spite of Hindu apprehensions towards Papacy, Hindu India should prefer to join the side of Vatican in its ongoing war against Russian Orthodox Church. If Hindus were to choose between Roman Catholic Church and Russian Orthodox Church, Hindu Indians should support Catholics. However, Hindu Indians should support Greek Orthodox Church in its conflict with Roman Catholic Church. Russian orthodoxy Church harbors greater animosities towards Hinduism than expressed by Roman Catholic Church towards Hinduism.

 

Sixth, the secession of the Islamic Arayan Republics fro the Soviet Union and the growing Islamic terrorist attacks on Russians in Chechnya and Grozzny, would promote greater India-Russia cooperation to meet the challenge of Islamic terrorism, which targets India as well as Russia. Russian Orthodox might be forced by the incidence of Islamic terrorist attacks on Russians to tone down its opposition to Hinduism.

 

Seventh, after the demise of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War and the fall of the Communism in the eastern bloc, the Russian Slav Civilization firmly joined the European Christian Civilization as the junior partner of the Western Christendom, as it had been in 16th, 17th, 18th and 19the and early 20th Centuries. Russia would not support the pagan world or the Non Aligned Third World in the global Clash of Civilizations in the 21st Century. President Putin’s imperial Russia would define its Civilization role as enhancing the national interests of the White Christian Europe. Orthodox Christianity’s historic aversion to paganism dating back to the Buddhist Mongol conquest of the Russia and Asia and Eastern Europe would imperil Russia’s support to the Non Aligned Third World in the Clash of Civilizations.

 

14(16) China’s Role in Clash

(1) China’s Role in Clash of Civilization

Communist China’s Beast of the Clash is the Atheist dogma that Religion is the opiate of the masses. China is vehemently opposed to the dogma of the Priest-ruler and Wahhabi religious intolerance. Hindu India and Communist China would jointly oppose the Papal and Wahhabi claims of the priest-rulers. India and China are opposed to the religious intolerance, religious fundamentalism and predator religious cults. India and China opposed the claims of the Pope to demand the allegiance of the Catholics in the foreign lands towards the foreign Potentate Pope.

 

First, Chinese beast is dead against the two heads of the 3-headed American Beast, the heads of the priest-rule and religious intolerance and religious fundamentalism. Buddhist priest-rule is the anathema to Communist China, Communist Vietnam, Communist North Korea and Mongolia. The Chinese Communist Party is mortally scared of the Buddhist religious Fundamentalism as the Buddhist Falun Gong religious Movement enjoyed more than 100 million active members in China, far more than the membership of the Communist Party. Buddhism is likely to replace Communism as the next reigning doctrine of China.

 

Second, China is apprehensive of Papacy as Bishop of Poland, Pope John Paul II, and President Ronald Reagan had cemented ties between Church of Poland and the CIA that succeeded in bringing down the Communist government of Poland. Communist Party of China realizes that Chinese Catholics could be the fifth columnists of China. China does not recognize the leadership of Pope over Chinese Catholic Church in discipline of the priests and control over Church property. China’s Catholic Church controlled by nation wide organization nominated by the Chinese government, which nominated Chinese Catholic Bishops, to the great chagrin of Pope John Paul II. Hindu India and Communist China have similar national interests in curbing the growing influence of Papacy over Indian and Chinese society respectively.

 

Third, United States supported Communist Mao tse Tung to Chiang kai Sheik, when United States General forbade Nationalist Army to overrun the Communist stronghold in Manchuria during the Civil War. The US Army encouraged the Nationalist Kuomintang military leader in Yunnan Province to switch alliance to the Communist forces and surrender to the Communists. United States formulated its policies towards China influenced by the religious interests of the Christian missionaries in China. United States reasoned that Communist rule over China would undermine Buddhism more than the rule of the Christian Chiang Kai Sheik over China.

 

Fourth, the Judeo-Marxist Communist leaders of China have more affinity with Judeo-Christians than with the Buddhists of China. The Western diplomats felt that they could converse more freely with the Judeo-Marxists of China than with the Buddhists of China. Jewish Dr. Henry J. Kissinger cemented ties with Mao tse Tung by emphasizing to his hosts that Catholic President John F. Kennedy invaded Vietnam not to undermine Communism but more to destroy Buddhism in South Vietnam. American military rule in South Vietnam imposed the dictatorial rule of the Vietnamese Christians, even when Christians represented only 10 percent of the population in South Vietnam. 

 

Fifth, Judeo-Communist Mao tse Tung and Judeo Henry J. Kissinger cemented the growing alliance of Bolshevik Judaism and Judeo-Christianity when United States and China imposed the rule of Stalinist Christian Pol Pot over Cambodia. China and United States purposely allowed Pol Pot murder 2,000,000 Buddhists in Cambodia and kept the news secret to execute the Christian iconoclast monotheist agenda in Cambodia. The United States and Communist China’s strategic alliance, right after the defeat of Vietnam cemented by the blood of two million dead Buddhists in Cambodia.

 

Sixth, Communist Party of China could readily come to terms with the Capitalism and allowed the flowering of foreign Monopoly Capitalism in China that allowed Foreign Direct Investments (FDIs) establish industries 100% owned by Trans National Companies (TNCs). There is no reason that the new leadership of China would come to terms with Buddhism and allow religious freedom in China. Political control of the Communist Party in China can coexist with the religion freedom of Buddhism in China. As and when China becomes Buddhist the Buddhist China and Hindu India would be closest civilization friends in the world. 

 

Seventh, the Taoism is 100% similar to Hinduism. Chinese Buddhism known as Mahayana is 90% Hinduism and its scriptures written in Sanskrit not Pali and Mahayana Hinduism closer to Hinduism than Hinayana Buddhism of Sri Lanka, Burma and Thailand. China’s culture and religion closer to Hinduism than is Burma’s Buddhism. Eighth, the Sino-Indian détente would translate into civilization’s alliance of Indian and Chinese Civilization and grow into a supra national alliances of Oriental Civilization before 2050. Indo-China friendship would translate into Asian Common Market of India, China and Japan.

 

Eighth, it is China’s historical destiny to lead the Buddhist world in Asia. In spite of anti Buddhist policies of the Communist Party of China, the Christians failed to convert more than 3% of the population of Communist China, while 97% of China remained Buddhist. Buddhism is safe and survived in China in spite of atheist Communism. Buddhism has reasserted itself in Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan and Singapore, and Buddhism is alive and flourishing among overseas Chinese community 20 million strong especially in Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia.

 

Ninth, Organization of Buddhist States (OBS) would mobilize the Buddhist countries of Asia and china shall play a very important role in the OBS. The OBS would include: China, India, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Mongolia, Taiwan, Nepal, Bhutan, Burma, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia. India, China and Japan would jointly lead the Buddhist world. The alliance of the Oriental Civilization shall be the alliance of Hindu and Buddhist civilization, would compete headlong with the alliance of iconoclast monotheist civilizations of Islam, Christianity and Judaism, the principal civilizations of the Occidental Civilizations. Shiite Aryan Iran would join the Oriental bloc led by China and India.

 

Tenth, The Buddhist Overseas Chinese Community and Hindu Overseas Indian Community in Malaysia and Singapore have similar Civilization interests. Indians represent 7 percent of Malaysian population and Chinese represent 26% of Malaysia’s population of 23 million, and the balance 58% represent Muslim Malayan Bhumiputra. Overseas Indians and overseas Chinese have a common interest to acquire political power in Malaysia, Indonesia and Philippines. Indians would support Buddhist Chinese in Muslim-majority Southeast Asian countries, namely, Malaysia and Indonesia.

 

Eleventh, neither the Giant Hindu Elephant India nor the Giant Buddhist-Taoist-Communist Dragon China has any option but to have civilization-wide intercourse with each other as giant elephant and dragon can only mate with other giants and can’t be satisfied by mating with smaller nations representing size-wise dogs, cats and rats. The billion plus India has no option but to interract and merge and collude with the billion plus China, because of the sheer weight of its population.

 

Twelth, the political suppression historically failed to destroy the essence or change the basic character of the populous Civilizations. The succession of foreign invasions and foreign rule failed to destroy the Buddhist character of Chinese Civilization and Hindu character of Indian Civilization. The anti-Buddhist atheist Communist rule in China would go down in history as one of the passing phase of Chinese history. Communism would fall in China in first quarter of the 21st Century, due to the onslaught of the Capitalist forces and the rampant corruption in the top leadership of the Chinese Communist Party and the military, which rumoured to have siphoned away more than $4 trillion of Chinese assets into their private accounts either in China or in foreign accounts. Chinese Communism would collapse sooner than expected, because the new leadership of China headed by President Hu Jintao would not tolerate the loot of $4 trillion assets by the outgoing ruling Party and Military elite in China. The lure of the private property and capitalism would force Communist China grant total religious freedom in China. Communist China would become Buddhist China some time in the first quarter of the 21st Century, sooner the better, as Buddhist China would better lead the world in the 21st Century of Asia. Hindu Indian Civilization and Chinese Buddhist Civilization would lead the world as two of the top four Super Powers in the 21st Century of Asia. Hindu Civilization would be on the same side of the battle lines with the Buddhist Civilization in the Clash of Civilization in the 21st Century.

 

14(17) Iran’s Role in Clash

(1) Shiite Iran in Clash of Civilization

First, Aryan Hindu Civilization and the Aryan Shiite Sufi Civilization would be on the same side of the battle lines in the 21st Century Clash of Civilization, influenced by the Sunni Wahhabi menace and America’s open support to the concept of Wahhabi Meccan Caliphate as the leader of the Islamic world. The elevation of the barbarian Saudi Wahhabi nomad Bedouin to the Semite Wahhabi Meccan Calipahte is in the national and civilization interest neither of Hindu India nor of Shiite Iran. Historically Iran had been a part of the Indian Civilization. During Shah of Iran before 1979, Iran and India fought on the same side of the battle lines in the Clash of Civilization.

 

Second, Ayatollahs of Iran and Hindu leadership of India are realists and they realized that after the American colonilazation of Iran, the Aryan Shiites and Aryan Hindus must mend fences and raise the large wall in the West of Iran to stop the Semite invasions of Iran at its borders with Iraq. Ayatollah’s Iran and India were on the opposite side of the Clash of civilization from 1979 to 2002. However, after President Bush’s conquest of Iraq, the fundamentalist mullah-run Iran would rejoin the Indian Camp in the Clash of Civilization. The Ayatollah Khomenini’s regime installed by president Jimmy Carter in Iran to herald the new age of priest-rulers in the Islamic world, which replaced the monarchies in the Islamic world. United States worked toward overthrowing the monarchies of Ottomans, Libya, Egypt and Iran and replaced it in Iran with priest-ruler in Iran. The priest-rule of Ayatollah Khomeini was the first instance of the revolutionary overthrowing of the imperial monarchy to replace it with militant Islamic fundamentalism. The extreme religious intolerance got its first taste of power in Ayatollah’s Iran in 1979. It was the Iranian Ayatollah’s success in replacing the Iranian monarchy to impose fundamentalist Shariah law over modern liberal Iran society by threat of sword that unleashed the predator Islamic intolerance in the world. The priest-ruler experience of Ayatollah Khomeini gave birth to the dreams of theocratic Wahhabi Caliphate.

 

Third, Iran is the borderline state and separates the Oriental world from the Occidental world. Persian Prophet Zoroaster was the father of the monotheist religions. Christianity, Islam and Judaism borrowed heavily from Zoroastrianism, Maggism and Mazdaikism the principal religions of Iran. Iran is an Aryan country and Shiite nation engaged in mortal combat with Wahhabi Saudi Arabia for the leadership role in the Islamic world. The idea that Iran could be isolated is a non-starter. Iran has 16 neighbors, the largest number for any country with the exception of Russia. Iran is located between the Persian Gulf and the Caspian Basin that together contains some 70 percent of the world’s known oil reserves and almost 60 percent of world’s natural gas. On each side only one country separates Iran from the three continents of Europe, Asia and Africa. Iran is one of the world’s 20 largest and most populous countries, with a population of 63 million, surface area of 1.6 million sq. km, the NP ($325 billion), population density of 39 people per sq. km. Iran or Indonesia should become the Caliph of Islam and either Persian or Bhasa Indonesia should become the language of the Arab world.

 

Fourth, rather than Semite Wahhabi Saudi Arabia, the Aryan Shiite Iran should become the Caliph of Islam. Iran has better credentials than Saudi Arabia to be the new Caliph of Islam. The Iran’s (GNP $325 billion and population 63 million) easily outstrips the Saudi Arabia’s (GNP $129 billion and population 21 million) The Saudi Arabia not qualified to be the leader of Islamic world. The GNP of Saudi Arabia is smaller than the GNPs of Indonesia ($505 billion), Pakistan ($237 billion) and Bangladesh ($188 billion). It is plain stupid for Saudi Arabia to try to become the Caliph of Islam. Aryan Shiite Iran is the principal challenger to the pretensions of the Saudi Wahhabi King for the leadership of the Islamic world. United States arranged the assassination of Anwar Sadat to eliminate Egypt as the contender to the leadership of the Islamic world. United States imposed the rule of military dictators in Turkey to eliminate Turkey’s pretensions to the leadership of the Islamic world. Britain partitioned Indian in 1947 to eliminate Indian Empire’s claims to the leadership of the Islamic world. Iran along with Turkey and Egypt has had a leadership role in the Islamic world for centuries. With Turkey now looking to Europe and Egypt unable to forge a synthesis of its Islamic heritage and its modernizing ambitions, Iran is left as the only major country where Islam could still develop in both positive and negative ways. President Jimmy Carter engineered the downfall of Shah of Iran to undermine Iran’s competition to Saudi Arabia. During last quarter during the rule of Mullahs, the ayatollah’s Iranian experience has been a model for Shiite Muslims and a warning to many more. That situation is likely to continue as Iran enters a new democratic phase in its post-Ayatollah political development. The present system of Ayatollah’s is an anomaly and will have to change, and Iran would rejoin its place among civilized modern nations, as it had been during Shah of Iran’s regime. The hard-line mullahs understand the language of realpolitik and that, if assured that the West is not trying to overthrow them, will play the realpolitik game with America. President Bush threatening Iran to force Shiite Aryan Iran accept the leadership of Semite Saudi Arabia as the new Caliph of Islam and new leader of the Islamic world.

 

Fifth, during the 60s and 70s, imperial Iran under the rule of Shah of Iran Mohammed Riza Pahlavi opposed the concept of the priest-rulers, religious intolerance and trafficker-rulers and thus conflicted with the American 3-headed Beast of the Clash of Civilization. Shah Mohammed Riza Pahlavi, though a strong military ally of the Untied States, sided with India in the clash of Civilizations. American Beast with three heads of priest-ruler, religious intolerance and Trafficker-ruler conspired to overthrow the regime of liberal secular Shah to replace it with ultra-religious intolerant regime of Ayatollah Khomeini.

 

Sixth, Aryan Iran should develop strategic ties with the Protestant Anglo Saxon United States, to argue that Aryan Shiite Iran would serve the oil interests of United States better than Wahhabi Saudi Arabia. If Shiites are able to forge geopolitical alliance with Americans in Iraq then Protestant, Shiite and Hindu alliance could become a reality in Clash of Civilizations. The Muslim Arabs in the Middle East are militarily weaker than the Shiite Arabs and Shiite Iranians. The Shiite-majority provinces of Saudi Arabia and UAE, Kuwait and Iraq could demand secession to carve out the Arab Shiite state in the Arabian Gulf, which would challenge Wahhabi Sunni Saudi Arabia for the leadership role in the Middle East. Shiite take-over of Mecca and Medina would be in the national interest of India and the United States. It is very likely that Shiites would join Hindus and Protestants in the Clash of Civilizations against Sunni Islamic world.

 

Seventh, the oil-riches of the Caspian Basin made Iran geopolitical more important than Saudi Arabia in the 21st Cen tury. The oil and gas resources of Caspian basin, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan transformed the role of Iran and Shiite Iran realized that Iran’s national interests coincide with the national interests of Hindu India. Iran would fight the Clash of Civilization on the same side of the battle lines as Hindu India to jointly consolidate Aryan influence over the Aryan oil producers, namely, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. In 21st Century the Caspian oil would force fundamentalist priest-ruler Shiite Iran to join fellow Aryan Hindu India in the Clash of Civilization. The Semite domination of the Caspian oil-producing nations is not in Indian and Iranian national interests. American occupation of Iran is not in India’s national interest.

 

14(18) Secular Turkey in Clash

Secularism to Destroy Religion

First, the secularism has been a Semite weapon developed by prostitute philosopher Karl Marx to destroy the religious basis of Russian Orthodoxy, Sunni Turkey, Hindu India and Buddhist China. The United States and Christian world deployed the intrument of secularism as a weapon to destroy the Islamic patrimony of the Ottoman Empire, Hindu legacy of Indian Empire and Buddhist legacy of China. British Empire planted Mahatma Gandhi in India to create separatism between Hindu India and Muslim India, by developing the Hindu basis of the Indian Empire, in contrast to the Islamic basis of the Mughal Empire. The West created the Turki basis of the modern Turkey that abandoned the mutli-ethnic concept of Turkey and embarked upon a policy of the massacre of the ethnic minorities, especially Armenians and Kurds. United States supported secular Mao tse tung over Christian Chiang Kai sheik, believing that Judeo-Communist Bolshevik Mao tse tung would undermine Buddhism in China more than the Nationalist government of Chiang kai Sheik. The Vatican and William Kaiser of Germany during First World War helped the return of Vladimir Lenin to Russia to destroy Russian Orthodoxy and pro-Britain House of Romanov by imposing the inconoclast secular rule of the atheist Communist over Orthodox Russia. The secularism had been the favourite weapon of the Western colonial powers to destroy the Orthodox Russia, Islamic Ottoman Caliphate, Hindu Indian Empire and Buddhist China.

 

Second, the United States and the Western colonial powers employed the doctrines of Wahhabi fundamentalism, Islamic ethnic separatism, and Islam as the basis of the state to partition the multi-ethnic states of Ottoman Caliphate and Indian Empire. The concept of Mullah-rulers and Mullah-elite in the Islamic society was the Zionist plot to undermine the Islamic multi-ethnic states. The West used secularism to undermine the Caliphate in Ottoman Turkey and simultaneously used Islamic fundamentalism to carve out Wahhabi priest-ruled kingdoms and sheikhdoms in Arabian Peninsula. United States and Britain supported the Wahhabi fundamentalism and Islamic separatism to undermine the claims of Ottoman Caliphate and Indian Empire over the oil-rich Arabian Gulf to promote the secession of Arab countries from Ottoman Empire and the secession of Pakistan from Indian Empire respectively.

 

Third. The United States promoted the military dictatorships in Turkey to undermine the Islamic patrimony of Turkey. Pro-US military regimes of turkey imposed secularism to undermine Islamic heritage of Turkey. While United States used military dictatorships in Turkey to impose secularism, it used military dictatorships in Pakistan to impose Islamic fundamentalism during rule of Gen. Zia Ul Haq and Gen. Pervez Musharraf. United States used the military dictatorships in South Korea, Myanmar, South Vietnam and Cambodia to crush Buddhism. The United States used military dictatorship in Greece to undermine the Orthodoxy heritage of Greece. The United States used the military dictatorships in Guatemala to undermine the Aztec Indian majority. United States has historically misused the pro-US military coups and military regimes to undermine Islam in Turkey, to undermine secularism in Pakistan, to undermine Buddhism in South Korea, South Vietnam, Myanmar/ Burma, Cambodia and Laos. The new Islamic government of Turkey led by Prime Minister Erdogan realized to their dismay that United States imposed secularism in Turkey through pro-US military coup leader led military regimes, but secular Turkey didn’t endear Turkey to the United States, who preferred Semite Wahhabi Saudi Arabia as the future Caliph of Islam. Turkey realized that Untied States militarily crushed secular society of Iraq to impose the rule of theocratic Shiites and replaced the secular Arab Sunni elite with theocratic Wahhabi elite in post-Saddam Iraq.

 

Fourth, though Britain successfully promoted Arab League and Arab nationalism in Egypt, Syria, Libya and Algeria to gain independence from their colonial rulers, and it resulted in the independence of Syria, Libya, Algeria, and Egypt. However, United States reversed its policy and supported the Islamic fundamentalists in these liberal modern Islamic nations and supported militant covert operations to bring down the secular regimes in Egypt and Algeria.

 

Fifth, Turkey’s future lies as a secular multi-ethnic state. Turkey would join India in the Clash of Civilization and oppose atheist socialistic secularism and oppose Wahhabi fundamentalism as common menace to the mankind. Turkey would reassert its Ottoman heritage in the Arabian Peninsula and India would assert its pre-1947 heritage in the Arabian Gulf, which throughout 18th, 19th and early 20th Centuries had been an Indian Lake. It would be in the national interest of India, if Turkey regained its colonial rule over Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Syria. It would be in the national interest of Turkey, if India regained its influence over Iraq, Kuwait, UAE, Yemen and Oman and Muscat it exercised before 1947 as Indian Empire. It would be in the national interest of Turkey, if India rather than Pakistan exercised influence over oil-rich Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. The civilization interests of Aryan Turkey and Aryan India coincide in Arabian Peninsula and Caspian Central Asia.

 

Sixth. Ottoman Turkey and Mughal Indian Empire founded by the same Turkic-speaking Aryan ethnic tribes of Central Asia. The Suleiman the magnificent, who founded Ottoman Caliphate and the Emperor Babur, who founded Mughal dynasty in India, belonged to the same Turkic-speaking Seljuk-Turks Aryan tribes of Muslim Central Asia that descended from the Mongol Empire. Ottoman Caliphate was an Aryan Caliphate. Aryan Turkey and Aryan India would fight the Clash of civilizations on the same side of the battle lines during 21st Century.

Seventh. The Christian West used secularism as a diplomatic ploy to undermine Muslim Turkey, Hindu Indian, Buddhist China, Buddhist Japan and Buddhist Myanmar. It is high time that India, Turkey and Japan give up secular policies and adopt Hindu, Islamic and Buddhist policies respectively.

 

Seventh. Kemal Pasha Ataturk was a British Spy hired by the West to permanently destroy the imperial legacy of the multi-ethnic Aryan Ottoman Caliphate. Kemal Pasha was a traitor and promoted the foreign interests of the Christian American and British Empire to the detriment of Muslim Turkey. Turkey’s military leaders were implants of the Christian colonial empires, who agreed to undermine the imperial legacy of the Ottoman Turkey to placate their Christian masters, in exchange for the Allied Powers consent to impose dictatorial rule over Turkey. Turkey’s secular rulers found to their dismay that being secular and democratic didn’t endear them to the European Union and the United States, who continued to eulogize the virtues of the barbarian Semite Wahhabi Saudi totalitarian fundamentalism. It was a Christian plot to impose anti-Islam secularism into the political system of Turkey after its defeat at hands of the Allied Powers at the end of the First World War in 1919, to destroy the political legacy of multi-ethnic Islamic Caliphate. It was a Christian plot to impose anti-Hindu secularism into the political system of independent Hindu India in 1947, after the partition of Indian Empire after the Second World War, to destroy the political legacy of multi-ethnic Indian Empire and Mughal Empire. It was a Christian plot to impose atheist anti-Buddhism secularism in Communist China, to destroy the Buddhist Civilization in China. It was a German-Vatican plot to impose atheist anti-Orthodoxy secularist communism in Orthodox Russia to destroy Orthodoxy in Russia in 1917, when William Kaiser nurtured and financed Vladimir Lenin during his return to Russia from exile. Christian Lee Kwan Yee was the British agent groomed for the secession of Singapore from the Malaysian colony, so that the Muslim Malayans could control political power in Malaysia. Kemal Pasha Ataturk was a British spy implanted into power by the Allied Powers to expedite the secession of Saudi Arabia and Iraq. While Christian colonial empires promoted secularism as an instrument of diplomacy to destroy the Islamic legacy of Ottoman Empire and Indian Empire, so that secession of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan could be accomplished respectively. Even in 2003, the secular democratic institutions in Turkey and India endeared neither Turkey nor India to the United States and the European Union, which continued to prefer Wahhabi fundamentalist regimes of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan to secular governments of Turkey and India respectively. Christian powers imposed secular politics in Turkey and India to engineer the rise of the Wahhabi Saudi Arabia and Muslim Pakistan respectively.

 

Eighth. After the American conquest of Iraq, the Civilization interests of Turkey and Iran the two principal claimants to the leadership of the Islamic world as the Caliph coincided with those of Hindu India in the clash of civilizations in 21st Century. The Aryan Turkey, Aryan Iran and Aryan India have common national interests in scuttling the pretensions of the priest-rulers of Semite Wahhabi Saudi Arabia for the leadership role of the Islamic world in the form of the Semite Mecca Caliphate led by Semite Bedouin nomad tribes of Arabian Peninsula, who exercised no important role and influence in the Islamic Empires of Baghdad Caliphate and Ottoman Caliphate, after the seat of Islam shifted from Damascus to Baghdad under Abbasid dynasty in the 8th Century. 

 

Ninth. The Semite Wahhabi fundamentalism had been a Christian and Zionist plot to bring the oil-rich Arabian Peninsula under the control of Semite Wahhabi Bedouin nomad tribes and Semite Israeli Jews, to regain for the Semite race the power and influence they lost for more than a Millennium. Just as Semite Jews exercised political power for a brief period before the beginning of the Christian era in the Holy Land, the Semite Arab Bedouin tribes had their period of glory during first 150 years of the Christian era, during Mecca Caliphate and Damascus Caliphate. Semite Jews had no role in the Holy Land during last 2000 years, and Semite Arab Bedouin nomad tribes had no significant role in the Islamic world during last 1300 years. British colonialism promoted Semite Zionist Israel and American colonialism promoted Semite Wahhabi Saudi Arabia to restore the Arabian Peninsula and the Holy Land under the control of Semite races. United States, Britain and Papacy found common cause in promoting Semite Jewish fundamentalism and Semite Wahhabi fundamentalism to create the artificial states of Israel and Saudi Arabia on the basis of religious and ethnic separatism and religious intolerance. The Jewish State of Israel, Wahhabi Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Islamic State of Pakistan represented the successful attempts of the Christian colonial powers to carve out new artificial states out of the multi-ethnic Civilization States to bring the oil and gas resources of the Arabian Gulf under the control of American and British imperialism.

 

Tenth. The restoration of the Ottoman Caliphate and the Turkey’s conquest of the oil-producing Arabian Peninsula would be in the national interest of India and restore Aryan domination of the Middle East and undermine Semite Wahhabi fundamentalism and predatory religious intolerance. Turkey should join Iran and India to restore Aryan rule over Semite Arabian Peninsula. The Wahhabi Saudi Arabia is the womb of evil that nurtured and financed the Islamic militants in Kashmir and Hindu India would be fully justified in advocating the restoration of the Ottoman rule over Arabian Peninsula under secular Ankara Caliphate as a long-term solution of the menace of Wahhabi terrorism. Civilized Turkey should regain its control over oil-rich Arabian Peninsula. Christian colonial empires, United States and Britain promoted the predatory religious intolerance of Wahhabi cult to undermine the multi-ethnic multi-national civilized Ottoman Islamic Empire in the 20th Century. Britain promoted Two-Nations Theory and Small Nation Theory to carve out the artificial state of Islamic Pakistan on the basis of religious separatism to deny Hindu India control over and direct access to the oil resources of Iran and Iraq. Britain engineered the secession of Singapore from Malaysia and Brunei from Malaysia, to deny Chinese people the control over oil resources of Malaysia and Brunei. In united Malaysia Chinese people could have gained political control over united Malaysia if they joined forces with Indians. To guarantee the Muslim Malayan control over Malaysian Oil Britain carved out the artificial state of Singapore. To guarantee the Semite Wahhabi Bedouin control over the oil resources of Saudi Arabia, Britain engineered the revolt led Wahhabi Clergy of Mecca and Bedouin tribes against Ottomans. The Christian oil interests aligned with militant Islam and Islamic separatism to secure control over the oil-resources of the Muslim nations.

 

Eleventh. Turkey would abandon secularism and assert its leadership of the Islamic world after Euroepan Union rejected its plea to join the Christian Euroepan Union as the first Muslim member. The Islamic government of Turkey led by Erdogan would restore Islamic Ottoman imperial policies as the basis of the foreign policy and diplomacy of modern democratic Turkey. Islamization of secular Turkey would go a long way in combating the menace of Islamic terrorism financed and nurtured by Wahhabi Saudi Arabia and UAE. Islamization of secular Turkey would be in the national interest of India.

 

14(19) Japan’s clash of Fertility

First. In Japan, a shortage of young adults willing to marry and start families has had devastating economic consequences. The aging population and shrinking population of adult youths caused the world’s first Low-birth-rate recession in Japan. Second. Marriage rates have dropped in Japan and a new social type emerged, which Japanese call the Parasaito Shinguru or “Parasite single.” The stereotypical parasaito shinguru is a young career woman living rent-free with her parents. Those sympathetic to such young women say they avoid marriage because under Japanese custom, they would be expected to care for husband’s aging parents as well their own. The Japanese education raises the cost of parenthood. Tellingly only 9 percent of Japanese mothers say they find pleasure in rearing children. In 2001, Japan’s Youth Research Institute asked schoolgirls around the world to consider the statement “Everyone must get married.” The staggering 88 percent of Japanese girls disagreed. Japan’s fertility rate is among the world’s lowest, just 1.4 children per woman. 

 

Third. From 1980 to 2000, the number of Japanese between the ages of 25 and 44 declined by 7 percent. Even as Japan’s supply of young adults was shrinking, from 1980 to 2000 the number of people ages 45 to 64 was swelling by a massive 42 percent. So it happened that a rapidly growing middle-age population and a shrinking supply of youth combined to cause what Yamada Masahiro of the Tokyo Gakugei University has called the world’s first ‘low-birth-rate recession.”

 

14(20) Clash of Job Outsourcing

India is Super Power in Outsourcing

The projected gap of 14 million skilled workers by 2020 in USA can only be filled by India. Even if India and other nations import some 3.3 million US service jobs during next 15 years by 2018, still there would be 10 million skilled jobs waiting to be filled in USA. The demands for high tech IT jobs would always grow than lessen in the decade through 2010 and India would emerge as the IT Super Power. In the age of globalization the India would provide the high tech IT jobs and also the agricultural workers. The agricultural sector contributed only 2% towards the GNP of USA, while the service sector contributed 72% of the GNP. India is the only country that could produce the large numbers of the large numbers of high tech personnel that would be required, once the baby boomers retire.  

 

First. The last time there was a labor shortage as deep as the one that looms in USA today was 600 years ago in England when peasants revolted. Beginning in 1348, the Black Death wiped out 30 to 50 percent of Europe. In England the plague produced such a sever labor shortage that grain rotted in fields during the 1349 harvest. Peasant farmhands who made up the vast majority of the surviving labor force demanded pay hikes to compensate for the extra work demanded of them. Landowners responded by ramming wage controls through Parliament. Eventually, the overworked laborers launched the peasant’s Revolt of 1381, one of the greatest working-class rebellions of the Middle Ages. Although the revolt was quickly repressed, the persistent labor shortage wound up driving many landlords out of direct cultivation. Instead landlords outsourced production by breaking their estates into parcels that they rented out to ambitious peasants. These yeomen entrepreneurs gave rise to new gentry during the Renaissance. In the same vein, skilled American workers who currently fear downward mobility may emerge as a privileged elite in the 21st Century, when the job shortage hits US economy in its first upturn.

 

Second. Forrester Research estimates that India and other nations will import some 3.3 million US service jobs during the next 15 years before 2018. The long-term tragedy of off-shoring isn’t that it is snatching away skilled American jobs, on the contrary outsourcing can’t possibly snatch enough of them. India’s IT industry produces about $14 billion a year, compared to US IT sector of $813 billion. Indian Subcontinent’s 150,000 tech workers represent less than 2 percent of America’s domestic IT labor force.

 

Third. The static educational level of workforce in USA, coupled with the retirement of the baby boomers, means that there wouldn’t be enough skilled workers to meet continuously rising demand over the next 20 years. The projected gap in skilled workers in USA by 2020 is 14 million. Within 7 years by 2010, 30 million American workforce will be older than 55. Unlike any other time in US history, new generation in USA will be lesser educated than its predecessor. Up to this point, each generation to join the US workforce has been larger and better educated than its predecessor. This time however, neither will be true. As the American boomers retire, the workforce will stop growing. The United States has always been able to count on an expanding labor force in history. But as the boomers are replaced by smaller generation, the number of workers between the prime working ages of 25 and 54 will stagnate. Form 1980 to 2000 the number of all American workers grew at 54% and from 2000 to 2020 it would grow only 3%. From 1980-2000, the share of the American workforce that had attended college grew from just over 40% in 1980 to almost 60% of total work force in 2000 and this figure would barely bulge in next 20 years, even assuming that there will be about 1 million legal and illegal immigrants a year. The average workers education will flat line at 60% with college degrees, and grow only 7% in next 20 years.

 

Fourth. Over the course of this decade through 2010, the biggest increase in employee demand will occur in the technology and medical fields. The 10 fastest growing occupations in 2000-2010 period are: (1st) Software engineer, applications (100%), (2nd) Support Specialist (93%), (3rd) System software engineers (90%), (4th) Network and systems administrators (80%), (5th) Network systems and data communications analyst (70%), (6th) Desk top publishing (60%), (7th) Database administrator (60%), (8th) personal and home care aide (60%), (9th) systems analyst (60%), and (10th) medical assistant (50%). The average growth in demand for all occupations is 15.2% in the 2000-2010 period. India’s dominance in the technology sector is assured and the IT technology and software jobs would remain in demand. Indian IT sector would grow and catch a large share of the $813 billion US IT market. It is stupid to argue that data base administrators will become obsolete as printing typesetters. Whenever new technology eliminates less sophisticated jobs, it tends to create higher-level job positions elsewhere. That’s how the progress works.

 

14(21) Clash in History

(1) Priests Vs Kings

One. Catholic Vatican Papacy and Wahhabi Mecca attempted to establish theocracy, government led by the priests in the Christian and Muslim world respectively. Throughout history priests have played political role and competed with secular kings for political power. Throughout history mystics have challenged the avarice of the priests and asserted their right to directly approach the divine without the intermediacy of priests. Priests have historically challenged the rights of thinkers, scholars, philosophers and mystics to redefine scriptures and religious customs as it hurts their incomes. Authoritarian religions became a business of god for priests. Authoritarian religions became the vehicle for priests to acquire political power. In the ancient world God was a woman and the almighty Goddess the creator ruled the religions of the ancient world. The ancient world was the agricultural society and it favored religions of Goddess as Goddess symbolized the womb and the Creator. Opponents of the dictatorships of the priests would be alongside Hindus on the same side of battle lines in the clash of civilization.

 

(2) Goddess Vs God

Two. Christian women would worship Goddess to bring down the Papal patriarchy. Jewish women would worship the Goddess Shekhmet to end the Jewish patriarchy. Muslim women would worship Goddess Al Lat the presiding deity of Mecca before the Islamic conquest to end the persecution of Muslim women by Wahhabi zealots. Patriarchal Occidental religions suppress woman because its priests fear that freedom of women would resurrect the worship of Goddess and Goddess might some day replace God as the leading deity. Judaism, Christianity and Islam suppressed women in their societies because of their fear that the freedom of women would give rise to the worship of Goddess in Judaism, Christianity and Islam respectively. It is inevitable that Goddess would near future reign supreme in Occidental religions. In the ancient world only female could be the priest and the high priestess married a younger male King, who was ritually sacrificed after some time to maintain the dominance of the woman in the society. Over the period of time, in Babylon the male eunuchs became assistant priests in the temple. With the rise of powerful male kings the male priests became the High Priest and women priestesses became assistant priests and gradually became temple prostitutes.

 

Ancient India was Dravidian maritime agricultural civilization, and it worshipped Goddess and it prospered along the maritime coastline. The Aryan Vedic religion was patriarchal religion and it was pastoral nomad civilization based on the self-sufficient economy of cow and sheep. Dravidian Hinduism worshipped Goddess Kali and God Shiva and it symbolized monotheism in the form of union of Linga (Penis) and Yoni (womb). Hinduism became matriarchy cum patriarchy religion. The Goddess staged a come back and relegated the male Vedic gods into background in India. Ancient China and ancient Japan practiced matriarchal religion of goddess. There was a phase and worship of gods became more prevalent than worship of Goddess. Howsoever the Goddess staged a come back in China and the male god Aswalokeswara became feminine.

 

Ancient Egypt, Babylon and Phonecians worshipped Goddess. Goddess Isis, Astarte, Athena, Innanna, and Hera had historically been more popular in Middle East and Europe. The Judaism, Islam and Christianity represent religion with God as man. The Catholic conception of the Immaculate Conception of Mary might develop into the concept of Goddess Mary. It is possible that some day Christians would worship Goddess Mary more than God. Worshippers of goddess in Islam, Christianity, Judaism would be on the same side of battle lines with Hindus in the clash of civilizations.

 

(3) Mysticism Vs Priests

Three. The mystics of Islam, Christianity and Judaism would unite to force reformation of Islam, Christianity and Judaism in the 21st Century. The mystics of all religions, Christian mystics and Sufi mystic Muslims would unite to foil the attempts of the Vatican and Mecca to impose the dictatorship of the priests in the Christian and Islamic world. The mystics have traditionally challenged the monopoly claimed by priests over the spiritual secrets. Priests want to keep the knowledge of god secret so that priests cold make more money by their knowledge of scriptures. Mystics have distributed the knowledge of god free to the people and historically been more popular than the priests. Christian Mystics have historically opposed the greed of Papacy and Gnostic Christianity declared heresy by Church of Rome. Mystic Jews the Pharisees and followers of Kabbalah have historically opposed the pretension of the Rabbi Jews. The Sufi Mystics have historically challenged the avarice and greed of Mullahs and ulema. Mystics are opposed to the concept of the dictatorship of the priests. Christian mystics, Kabbalah Jews, Shiite Sufi mystics would fight the clash of civilization alongside Hindus on the same side of the battle lines.

 

(4) Philosopher as Religious Reformer

Four. Religion is the field of philosophy. The scholars and philosophers have a moral duty to reinterpret religious scriptures in terms of comparative study of religions and lead the reformation of religion, including reformation of Christianity, Judaism, Islam and Oriental religions. Philosophers like G.W.F. Hegel should lead the reformation of Christianity. Religion is reservoir of the knowledge of the mankind and all religions contain truths. It is the job of philosophers and scholars to reinterpret religion and religious scriptures in the light of the comparative study of religions to make religion more relevant to the 21st Century. The dictatorship of the philosophers is preferred to the dictatorship of the priests. While the dictatorship of the priests would force new Dark Age on the world the dictatorship of the philosophers would reform world religions and catapult human race to higher evolution path. The Semite doctrine of the dictatorship of priests and the Semite doctrine of the dictatorship of the proletariat in reality sought to establish the dictatorship of the dacoits so that the Semite looters could loot the property of the civilizations. Protestant philosophers specially of Enlightenment school and idealism school of philosophy would be alongside Hindus on the same side of battle lines in clash of civilizations.

 

(5) Religious Shariah law or Western law

Five. Vatican and Mecca conspired to impose barbarian Shariah law over civilized Muslim nations that had adopted civilized Western law primarily to create the legal structure to establish the dictatorship of the priests in the Islamic world as the Shariah law gave Ulema and Mullah considerable judicial and administrative powers. The Kemalists, modernists and opponents of the imposition of the Shariah law would on the same side of the battle lines as Hindus in the clash of civilization.

 

(6) Pro-Choice or Pro-Life

Six. Catholics opposed the pro-Choice and pro-Abortion movements as part of their concerted efforts to force American women into bondage and servitude to men. Papacy financed large-scale Pro-Life political movements in United States to influence election process by to mobilize Catholic vote banks and Catholic campaign contribution machinery to catapult a Catholic into the Oval Office. The Counter Reformation War and the God Vs Goddess war reflected in the political clash of pro-life and pro-choice movements in United States. The 2000 Presidential election in the US appeared to the onlookers as primarily the election between Pope and American women and secondarily the contest between Bush and Al Gore. WASPs wisely forewarned Catholic Church that political issues should not be discussed from the pulpit lest they lost the tax-exempt status. Pro-choice Christians would be on the same side of the battle lines alongside Hindus in clash of civilization.

 

(7) Hillary Clinton as Presidential Candidate

Seven. The democratic presidential nomination of Hillary Clinton would bring to fore the question of status of woman in the Christian world. Hillary Clinton in the Oval Office would enhance the role and status of woman in the Christian world and put pressure on Christian religious leaders to anoint woman as priests in Christian Church. It was a Vatican conspiracy that the Bill guaranteeing equal rights to women passed by Senate and Congress failed to get majority of states’ ratification and it collapsed. Looking from the perspective of Hindus the political and religious status of white Christian women in USA not much better than the status of Arab women, if one takes into consideration the differences in American and Arab culture and civilization. The white Christian forces that believe in the equality of woman and man would alongside Hindus be on the same side of the battle lines in the clash of civilizations.

 

(8) Secret Religious Societies

Eighth. Secret religious societies are menace to the Civilization as secret societies hide under the name of religion and conduct subversive activities to destabilize the secular governments. The Jesuits have been very active in India and China and they indulge in politics to promote papal agenda. The secret religious societies should be banned. Osama Bin Laden organized Al Qaeda terrorist organization on the lines of the Christian secret societies notably Jesuits and Masonic Lodge. Secret Societies, whether Jesuits, Masonic Lodge, Shiite secret societies, Alqaeda, or Mafia represents great dangers to the society. The secret societies that operate under the cover of organized religious charity and Church presents great danger as this cover keeps them out of the watch of law enforcement agencies. Jesuits directly played important part in the genocide of 2,000,000 Buddhists in Cambodia under Khmer Rouge and Pol Pot government. Communist China and India should ban Jesuits. Christian secret religious societies became menace to the civilization, after president Ronald Reagan and Pope John Paul II allowed the CIA to use the resources of the Roman Catholic Church in Poland to bring down Communist government in Poland. The ability of secret Vatican-sponsored secret societies to bring down communism in the Eastern Bloc has wetted their appetite to bring down more non-Catholic governments in the world. The political forces should pool their social resources to eradicate the menace of such secret religious organizations as undertake political covert operations to promote the interests of authoritarian religions. Opponent of the secret religious societies would be alongside Hindus on the same side of the battle lines in clash of civilization.

 

(9) Military Coup as form of Colonial Invasion

Ninth. United States historically promoted military coups throughout the Third World as an instrument of foreign policy. The CIA-sponsored military coups allowed the White House to directly influence the policies in the Third World. The Soviet Union undertook direct military invasion of Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Afghanistan to impose pro-Soviet puppet regimes. The CIA-sponsored military coups periodically installed the puppet military regimes in Pakistan, Bangladesh, South Korea, Indonesia, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Colombia. The military dictators in Pakistan General Zia Ul Haq and General Pervez Musharraf, General Suharto of Indonesia, General Pinochet of Chile had been puppets of the United States and they acquired power with the direct support of the CIA. Foreign sponsored military coups present greatest menace to the civilized world. India should sign defense pact with Non Aligned Third World countries to provide insurance against military coups. Democratically elected governments in the Non Aligned nations would join India on the same side of the clash of civilizations. Military coup is a form of colonial terrorism.

 

(10) Menace of Semite Ideologies

Tenth. Semite Karl Marx’s argument that economic forces determine history provides the key to understand the underlying purpose of all diverse religions, ideologies and philosophies that Jews gave to the world. The underlying purpose of the Jews as a race had been to develop doctrine to justify the loot of other’s property by Jews. The religion of Judaism, Judeo-Christianity and Judeo-Islam became opium of the masses under the influence of Jews and Jews used them to loot the property of others in name of religion. The religion of Marxism Communism is the opium of masses to loot the property of the nations to serve the greed of the dictatorship of the proletariat dacoits. The Wahhabi cult is the opium of the masses to serve the greed of the dictatorship of priest dacoits. The ideology of Neo-Conservatism is the opium of the white masses to serve the greed of Oil barons. The proselytizing Evangelical sect is the opium of the masses to serve the greed of the Christian missionaries. Wahhabi Islamic militancy is the opium of the masses to serve the political greed of drug mafia. America’s war on terrorism is the opium of masses to serve the greed of Oil Barons.

 

Torah justified the rape and loot of gentile lands and property by Jews in the name of will of God. The principle purpose of Semite Christians that engineered to make Christianity the State Church of Roman Empire had been to loot the property of pagans throughout the Roman Empire. The principal purpose of the alliance of Damascus Jews with Prophet Muhammad and Caliph Abu Bakr had been to lend money to Arab Bedouin raiding parties to loot the property of pagan Egyptians, Syrians, Libyans and Persians.

 

The principle purpose of the Karl Marx’s doctrine of the abolition of private property and dictatorship of the proletariat had been to allow Russian Jews loot the private and state property of Russia. The principle purpose underlying the demise of Communism in Soviet Union was to allow Russian Jews and Jew controlled Russian Mafia to loot the State property in the Soviet Union and Russia. The principal purpose of the Semite doctrine of Wahhabi Islamic fundamentalism and dictatorship of the priests is to loot the oil-wealth and the private property of the Arab world by Semite looters and Semite colonialists. Jews is a nomad race of hunters and shepherds and historically failed to become builders and even non-Jewish artisans and craftsmen built the Temple of Jerusalem.

 

Jews have historically come up with new doctrines, ideologies and religions with a common purpose to justify the loot of private property of civilizations by Jews. Hellenic Jews led the Christian bands that looted the pagan Hindu temples of ancient Greece, Rome, Egypt, Asia Minor and Syria in 5th Century. Damascus Jews joined the Bedouin raiding parties to loot the property of pagan Hindu and Christian property in Egypt, Syria, Libya and Persia. Russian Jews joined the Bolsheviks to loot the private property and Romanov property in post-Revolution Soviet Union. Russian Jews joined the Russian mafia to loot the Soviet-Russian property during Perestroika and post-Communist era in Russia. Semite Israelis and Semite Arab seeks to loot the wealth of the oil-rich nations by promoting the terrorist doctrine of dictatorship of the Wahhabi proletariats in Middle East and Arab world. Jews conceived iconoclast patriarchal religion to justify the loot of property of goddess worshippers of Jordan Valley. Patriarchal iconoclast Judaism, Judeo-Catholicism, Judeo Bedouin Wahhabi Islam, Judeo-Marxism, Judeo dictatorship of proletariats and Judeo dictatorship of priests are Jewish doctrines, ideologies and religions serving the common purpose to justify the loot of the property of the civilizations by Jews.

 

Jews conspired the religious ideology of Semite Wahhabi Islamic fundamentalism as the political plot to loot the property of the oil-rich Arab world. To loot property of Arabia, Egypt, Syria and Libya, the Hellenic urban Jews joined forces with Catholic Christians in 5th Century, Damascus Jews joined forces with Semite Muslim Bedouin in 7th Century, and Jews joined forces with American and British in early 1910s and 1940s. In 2000 Jews joined forces with Semite clergy of Mecca and American Big Oil to establish direct American oil colonies in OPEC Arab countries. In 2003 the Jews would work with Semite Mecca clergy to establish the dictatorship of the priests in Saudi Arabia to loot the property of the Saudi royal property and royal properties in oil-rich Arab sheikhdoms.

 

The purpose of all Semite doctrines, namely, Judaism, Judeo-Christianity, Bedouin Judeo-Islam, Mecca's Judeo-Wahhabi fundamentalism had been to justify the loot of the private property by Jews. The clash of civilization in the 21st Century is the result of the greed of iconoclast monotheist religions to loot the property of pagan civilizations. Karl Marx was a prostitute-philosopher hired by the Vatican to produce the shit philosophy to undermine the Reformation of Christianity by Hegelian philosophy, to bury religious crusades of Hegelian idealist spiritualism under the garbage of Marxist materialism. Jews of the world repainted the shit-Marxism in the golden colors and framed in diamond studded frames and perfumed with the best ideological improvisations, as Jews realized that Marxism could allow Russian Jews loot the property of Russia and Eastern Europe. By eulogizing the shit philosophy of Karl Marx, the Jews succeeded in looting the property of Russia, China, Eastern Europe, Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos in the name of Judeo-Marxism. The clash of civilization is the invasion of the barbarian terrorist forces representing shit-philosophies and false-religions on the civilized world. The forces opposed to Marxism, intolerance, exclusion, predatory religious fundamentalism and suppression of women would join Hindu India on the same side of the clash of civilizations.

 

(11) Looting Pagan Lands Minerals Commodities

Eleventh. The White Christian Europeans looted the lands of pagan Native Americans, Incas, Mayas, Aztecs and Aborigines in North America, South America and Australia. The Semite Arabs looted the lands of pagans in Egypt and North Africa. The underlying purpose of the spread of Christianity by Papacy in the New World had been to loot the lands of the original inhabitants of the Americas and Australia. The underlying purpose of the spread of Islam in North Africa and Africa south of Sahara had been to justify the loot of black African lands by Arabs. The underlying purpose of the Arab slave traders for supplying black slaves to America had been to loot the lands and property of the pagan Africans. The underlying purpose of the imposition of Shariah had been to force pagans convert to Islam and Christianity. Pagans represent more than 50% of the population in Congo, Madagascar, Mauritius and many African countries south of Sahara. Sovereign independent pagan states should be carved out of the Africa countries so that pagan people have pagans-led governments in pagan countries in black Africa. The pagans of the world and Hindus would join the clash of civilizations on the same side of the battle lines. Pagan states should be created on the basis of religion in black Africa, where colonial frontiers have continued in the post-colonial age. The natioinal frontiers in black Africa should be redrawn on the lines o ethnicity, tribes and religion. Pagan-majority states should be carved out in Africa south of Sahara.

 

(12) Redistribution of the Empty Continents

Twelfth. The principle conflict of the 21st Century is the problem of overpopulation of Asia and empty continents of Australia and South America. Australia and New Zealand does not belong to the White race. Eastern Siberia does not belong to white race. The rich farmlands of Africa, including South Africa, Zimbabwe does not belong to white race. The white race must allow overpopulated Asian unrestricted immigration to the empty continents of Australia and South America. Canada should open its doors to emigration from India and China. White race illegally occupied the continents of North America, South America and Australia. The Native Americans, Incas, Mayas, Aztecs and Australian Aborigines should get back their continent that were militarily taken by white invaders. Overpopulated India and China emerged as super powers in 21st Century, and each boast population of billion plus. The question of land and question of the empty continents illegally occupied by white invaders would fuel the clash of civilization in the 21st Century. It would be fair if white Anglo Saxons vacated Australia and white Slavs vacated Siberia to allow unlimited migration from Asia to these empty lands. White farmers in Zimbabwe and South Africa should hand over their farmlands to blacks. The question of empty lands in Australia, New Zealand, and South America would determine the world politics in the New Century and define the Clash of Civilizations. More than 500 million Indians, 500 million Chinese and 50 million Bangladeshis and Pakistanis would immigrate to Australia, Africa and South America in the 21st Century. Overpopulation of Asia would result in the mass emigration to the New World and Australia just as in the post-Columbus age white Europeans emigrated from Europe to Americas and Australia.

 

(13) Goddess sealed wombs of white women

Thirteenth. The history is the clash of the goddess worshippers and worshippers of gods. The patriarchal religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam looted the lands of the idolaters, pagans and goddess worshippers in Middle East, Africa, North America, South America and Australia. The patriarchal religions, Judaism, Zoroastrianism and Christianity destroyed the temples of the Goddess by sword. The Almighty Goddess retaliated by sealing the wombs of women of white Catholics, white Orthodox Christians and white Jews. Catholic France, Italy, Spain and Portugal suffered devastating decline in birth rate. Orthodox Russia, Ukraine and other Slav nations also suffer from very low birth rate. The non-white Mestizos, the people of mixed Inca, Maya and Aztec ancestry vastly outnumber white Christians of unmixed European ancestry throughout Hispanic America. Brown Mestizos overwhelmingly outnumber whites in Mexico, Central America, Venezuela, Peru, Ecuador, and Bolivia. The decline of the birth rate per woman and the consequent decline of the population of white European Christians ended the age of white Europeans in 21st Century. The robust economy of United States expedited the decline of European population due to increased immigration of young Europeans to United States. The population increase in United States by immigration of Anglo Saxons resulted in the precipitous decline of the population in Anglo Saxon Canada, Australia, Ireland and Britain. The Almighty Goddess ensured the defeat of the patriarchal monotheist Judaism and Christianity by sealing the womb of white European Christian women, to rightly punish them for the genocide of Native Americans, Incas, Mayas, Aztecs and indigenous peoples in North America, South America and Australia. Goddess will bless the followers of the religions of goddess, matriarchal religions and pagan religions in the 21st Century Clash of civilizations. With the blessing of the Almighty Goddess, the Creator, the people of the Goddess would reclaim the lands and the continents they lost to the iconoclast invaders of the patriarchal monotheist civilizations during last two Millennium. The clash of civilization is the clash of matriarchal civilizations that believe God is a woman with the patriarchal civilizations that believe that God is a man and cannot be a woman. Hindu civilization and Buddhist civilization, Indian and Chinese civilizations are matriarchal civilizations and believe God is a woman and god can be both a man and a woman. India and China would be on the same side of the battle lines in the global clash of civilizations.

 

(14) Rise of Fundamentalism in USA

Fourteenth. Wahhabi Osama bin Laden and Pope John Paul II advocate the ultra-conservatism and anti-women fundamentalism because it sells and promotes increased laity participation in the mosques and Church. Authoritarian religious churches advocate simple-minded fundamentalism to promote their religious brand, religious product differentiation to increase its competitive advantages in the inter-faith competition. The religious intolerance and fundamentalism - Catholic, Judaic, Wahhabi- present great threat to secular, liberal, tolerant, inclusive and diverse civilizations in the 21st Century, including United States. The fundamentalism is in ascent in the US and the Islamic world. United States became the frontline for the global clash of civilizations and the predatory intolerance focused on bringing down the constitutional wall separating the State and the Church in the United States, as a prelude to establish the dictatorship of the priests in the Christian and Islamic world in the 21st century.

 

First. The fundamentalism is in ascent in the Catholic Church and in Wahhabi Mosque. American Catholic market place became the magnet for the ultra-conservative policies of Pope John Paul II, and Catholic brand simple-minded religious fundamentalism is driving the expansionism of Catholicism in the United States. The United States is the only western country in which the role of religion and religious fundamentalism is increasing. The simple-minded fundamentalism is the brand of religion that is driving the growth of religion in USA, even when it barely exists in Europe. Second. The US is the most competitive of religious marketplaces. The competition stimulates innovation and growth among churches. Catholicism is a global brand and it competes with domestic Non denominational religious products. Methodism is a franchise operation that has global reach. Catholicism dominates the Southern Europe but Protestantism is strong in North Europe. Third. The US has never had a dominant church since the Pilgrim Fathers. The separation of Church and state in the US constitution was a conscious refusal to give any religious denomination regulatory advantage. Catholic Church in US was greatly helped by immigration of Catholic Polish, German immigrants. Fourth. The Southern Baptist is to religion what Wal-Mart is to retailing, and both have a simple formula: low prices for scriptural truths, and both have flat organizations and are focused on their customers. Catholic Church is like a monopoly, directed towards the needs of the priests than laity, and unconstrained by democratic or market forces devotes energy for fundamentalist doctrinal niceties, to produce the opium of the masses. Fifth. The Vatican reforms of the 1960s did not arrest the declining observance of the 1960s in USA. Catholic religious right conservatives argue that the reforms of the 1960s by the 1965 Catholic Synod reduced the differentiation of the Catholic religious doctrine and diminished its competitive advantage. Conservatives argue that laity needs discipline from their priests and Church, as from their auditors. The religious marketplace favors not what laity ought to want, but what they do want.

 

Sixth. The Vatican Mecca Axis jointly promoted wider acceptance of the rule of the priests and religious fundamentalism in the Christian and Islamic world respectively. Papacy leading the assault to break the wall that separates the Church and the States, hoping that end of the secular United States would result in the apocalyptic inception of the Pope-rule Kingdom of God in USA. Seventh. Catholic fundamentalism gained access in the US by simple-minded fundamentalism like anti-abortion pro-life movements. The Alabama Judge Ray Moore’s insistence for the Ten Commandment monument in the Federal court Building, is just another attempt to bring down the wall that separates the State and the Church. The Papal fundamentalism presents a very serious threat to the American civilization that values the separation of the State and the Church. Eighth. The forces of intolerance, exclusion and authoritarian religions, Catholicism and Evangelicals joined forces to implement the agenda of Pope John Paul II to break the wall separating the State and Church in the United States. The Clash of Civilization is severe and threatening the separation of church and the state in the US constitution, by judicial reinterpretation of the laws by conservative Judges. Ninth. The fall of the US secularism would cause more chaos in the world than the fall of the Western Roman Empire. The clash of civilization is very real and targeted secular WASPs United States, whose end would bring about the Pope-ruled kingdom of god in North America.

 

Tenth. The WASP’s United States shall be the principal theater of the Clash of Civilizations between the forces of tolerance, inclusion, diversity and rationalist religions against the coalition of forces representing predatory intolerance, exclusion, bigotry, fundamentalism, suppression of women and religious authoritarianism. Hindu India, Protestant United States, white Christian women and supporters of the wall that separates the State and Church would be on the same side of the battle lines in the global clash of civilizations throughout the 21st Century. President George W. Bush does not belong to the camp of Papal fundamentalism that seeks to establish the dictatorship of the Christian priests in the United States. Eleventh. It is high time that philosophy of G.W.F. Hegel should guide the Christians seeking the Reformation of Christianity and Church. The laity philosophers, thinkers and scholars of India and the United States should lead the masses to ensure that the forces of tolerance, inclusion, separation of the State and Church inflict decisive defeat on the forces of predatory religious intolerance, exclusion and suppression of women. The fall of the secularism in the United States would cause more destruction and chaos in the world than caused by the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 5th century. Christian religious right conservative conspiracy waged war to undermine the wall separating the Church and the State by supporting Alabama Chief Justice Ray Moore’s demand that the Monument for Tenth Commandment should remain in the rotunda of the Court. The secular WASP’s United States as we know might cease to exist, whenever the constitutional wall separating the State and the Church falls. 

 

(16) Matriarchal Vs Patriarchal Inheritances

Sixteenth. Patrirachal Chrisitanity, Islam and Judaism took over the property of the matriarchal civilizations of Goddess worshippers, who inherited through female line. Patriarchal religions and civilizations took over the property of the matriarchal civilizations by intermarrying with the women of the matriarchal civilizations. Matriarchal nations inherited through female line, and the marriage of the men of the patriarchal clan with the women of the matriarchal clan, resulted in the matriarchal inheritances passing from matriarchal mothers to their half-patriarchal sons. Arabs from Egypt migrating to Nubian Sudan in 15th century, began intermarrying with the Nubians and introduced Arabic Muslim culture to the Nubian Christian inhabitants. The Arabs, who inherited from the male line, soon acquired control over property from Nubians, who inherited through female line, the Arab-Nubian intermarriages resulted in the Nubian inheritances passing from Nubian mothers to their half-Arab sons. The clash of civilization in the final analysis is the clash of matriarchy and patriarchy. The clash of civilization is between forces that believe that God can only be a man, and those that believe that god is a woman as well as a man. The clash of civilization is the clash of patriarchy of god only as a male and Goddess. All ancient religions and ancient civilizations believe in the concept of Goddess and also were idolaters and believed in the concept of Soul which condemened as animism by Christians, and believed that God pervades the entire creation, the concept condemned as heresy of pantheism by Christians. The icnonoclasts Vs idolaters and intolerants Vs tolerants represent two warring sides of the clash of civilization. 

 

 

 

© 2006 Copyrights All Rights Reserved Author: KALKI GAUR

Kalki Gaur Books are as follows:

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RACES” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DIPLOMACY OF CIVILIZATIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “MANIFESTO OF NEOCONSERVATISM” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “HINDU HOLY GITA – MOKSA VIA RELIGIOUS WARS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “DA VINCI CODE AS CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GLOBAL CLASH OF RELIGIONS” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “GNOSTIC BIBLE” (2006)

Kalki Gaur, “POPULIST MANIFESTO” (2006)

The complete text of 5,000 pages of Books by Kalki Gaur available for free download at following Kalki Blogs for academic and non-commercial usage.

http://360.yahoo.com/gaurkalki   ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/clashofreligions  ; 

http://360.yahoo.com/diplomacyofcivilizations  ; 

http://clearblogs.com/kalkigaur/  ; 

http://kalkigaur.blogstream.com/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkigaur/blog/  ;

http://my.opera.com/kalkitv/blog/  ;

http://indiatalking.com/blog/kalkigaur/  ;

http://diplomacyofcivilizations.blog.com/  ; 

http://kalki.newsvine.com/

http://kalkimail.googlepages.com/

http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/

© 2006 Kalki Gaur Copyrights All Rights Reserved, Email: kalkimail@gmail.com